This study describes how industrial symbiosis is reposed in studies dealing with the Brazilian context. This study was based on a systematic literature review in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, relying on the Prisma method and a research protocol. The results embrace quantitative and qualitative aspects such as the number of publications, the territorial scope of the studies, authors and keywords networks. The sample was also segregated into three categories, theoretical works, opportunities and formed networks, reporting the presence of industrial symbiosis in Brazil in the extant literature. The main contribution of this research is to aggregate the studies already published in the international literature, demonstrate how the IS is reported and how they can be expanded in territories or business cases not yet portrayed.
AlmeidaJMGde GohrCFSantosLC (2020) Assessing collaborative capabilities for sustainability in interorganizational networks. Sustainability12: 9763.
2.
AngeloACMendonçaFSalomonP, et al. (2019) Conceptual circular business model based on industrial symbiosis of a microalgae cultivation and a cement plant. In:4th international conference on energy and environment – Bringing together engineering and economics (ICEE), Guimarães, 16–17 May.
3.
AntoniouNAZorpasAA (2019) Quality protocol and procedure development to define end-of-waste criteria for tire pyrolysis oil in the framework of circular economy strategy. Waste Management95: 161–170.
4.
BaahCOpoku-AgyemanDAcquahISK, et al. (2021a) Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption27: 100–114.
5.
BaahCOpoku-AgyemanDAcquahISK, et al. (2021b) Understanding the influence of environmental production practices on firm performance: A proactive versus reactive approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management32: 266–289.
6.
BacudioLRBenjaminMFDEusebioRCP, et al. (2016) Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL. Sustainable Production and Consumption7: 57–65.
7.
BansalPMckNightB (2009) Looking forward, pushing back and peering sideways: Analyzing the sustainability of industrial symbiosis. Journal Supply Chain Management45: 26–37.
8.
BatistaAMLSchardosinFZBierCA, et al. (2020) A technological alternative for solid waste utilization with a emphasis on closed production cycles in circular economy. In: 2020 international conference on technology and entrepreneurship – virtual, ICTE-V. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTE-V50708.2020.9114371
9.
BeersDBossilkovACorderG, et al. (2008) Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry: The cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology11: 55–72.
10.
BoixMMontastrucLAzzaro-PantelC, et al. (2015) Optimization methods applied to the design of eco-industrial parks: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production87: 303–317.
11.
BoonsFChertowMParkJ, et al. (2017) Industrial symbiosis dynamics and the problem of equivalence: Proposal for a comparative framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology21: 938–952.
Brazil (2016) Law 13263 of March 23, 2016. Changes Law No. 13.033, of September 24, 2014, to provide for the percentages of biodiesel addition to diesel oil sold in the national territory., 2016. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13263.htm
14.
ButturiMALolliFSellittoMA, et al. (2019) Renewable energy in eco-industrial parks and urban-industrial symbiosis: A literature review and a conceptual synthesis. Applied Energy255: 113825.
15.
CamposTRTFonsecaMVAMoraisRMN (2014) Reverse logistics: A route that only makes sense when adopting a systemic vision. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment180: 41–52.
16.
CaoXWenZZhaoX, et al. (2020) Quantitative assessment of energy conservation and emission reduction effects of nationwide industrial symbiosis in China. Science of the Total Environment717: 137114.
17.
CegliaDAbreuMCSde Da Silva FilhoJCL (2017) Critical elements for eco-retrofitting a conventional industrial park: Social barriers to be overcome. Journal of Environmental Management187: 375–383.
18.
ChenXFujitaTOhnishiS, et al. (2012) The impact of scale, recycling boundary, and type of waste on symbiosis and recycling. Journal of Industrial & Ecology16: 129–141.
19.
ChertowMParkJ (2016) Scholarship and practice in industrial symbiosis: 1989–2014. In: CliftRDruckmanA (eds) Taking stock of industrial ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 87–116.
20.
ChertowMR (2000) Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment25: 313–337.
21.
ChertowMR (2007) ‘Uncovering’ industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology11: 11–30.
CutovoiITM (2015) Understanding the low occurrence of Symbiosis Industrial in Brazil. Independent Journal of Management & Production6: 813–826.
25.
De AbreuMCSCegliaD (2018) On the implementation of a circular economy: The role of institutional capacity-building through industrial symbiosis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling138: 99–109.
26.
De PaulaEVDe AbreuMCS (2019) Pressures from the context and institutional capacity building to develop industrial symbiosis networks. Gestão & Produção26: e3831. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3831-19
27.
De Souza PiresMJ (2020) TD 2607 – O Grau de Heterogeneidade da Estrutura Agrícola da Região Centro-Oeste Segundo os Censos Agropecuários 1995, 2006 e 2017 [D 2607 – The degree of heterogeneity of the agricultural structure of the center-West Region according to the 1995, 2006 and 2017 agricultural censuses]. Texto para Discussão1–58. https://doi.org/10.38116/td2607
28.
DomenechTDaviesM (2011) Structure and morphology of industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Kalundborg. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences10: 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.011
Elabras VeigaLBMagriniA (2009) Eco-industrial park development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A tool for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production17: 653–661.
31.
Feiferytė-SkirienėAStasiškienėŽ (2021) Seeking circularity: Circular urban metabolism in the context of industrial symbiosis. Sustainability13: 9094.
32.
FerrerGCorteziaSNeumannJM (2012) Green city: Environmental and social responsibility in an industrial cluster. Journal of Industrial Ecology16: 142–152.
33.
FichtnerWTietze-StockingerIFrankM, et al. (2005) Barriers of interorganisational environmental management: Two case studies on industrial symbiosis. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal2: 73.
34.
FreitasLARUMagriniA (2017) Waste management in industrial construction: Investigating contributions from industrial ecology. Sustainability (Switzerland)9: 6–8.
35.
FreitasSMACde SousaLNDinizP, et al. (2018) Steel slag and iron ore tailings to produce solid brick. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy20: 1087–1095.
36.
GiannettiBFBonillaSHAlmeidaCMVB (2004) Developing eco-technologies: A possibility to minimize environmental impact in Southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production12: 361–368.
37.
HieteMLudwigJSchultmannF (2012) Intercompany energy integration. Journal of Industrial Ecology16: 689–698.
38.
HuangLZhenLYinL (2020) Waste material recycling and exchanging decisions for industrial symbiosis network optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production276: 124073.
39.
HustedBWde Sousa-FilhoJM (2019) Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research102: 220–227.
IslamK (2016) Industrial symbiosis: A review on uncovering approaches, opportunities, barriers and policies. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences2: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-488x.000009
42.
Jato-EspinoDRuiz-PuenteC (2020) Fostering circular economy through the analysis of existing open access industrial symbiosis databases. Sustainability12: 952.
43.
Jato-EspinoDRuiz-PuenteC (2021) Bringing facilitated industrial symbiosis and game theory together to strengthen waste exchange in industrial parks. Science of the Total Environment771: 145400.
44.
JensenPDBassonLHellawellEE, et al. (2011) Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from the United Kingdom’s National Industrial Symbiosis Programme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling55: 703–712.
45.
KarayılanSYılmazÖUysalÇ, et al. (2021) Prospective evaluation of circular economy practices within plastic packaging value chain through optimization of life cycle impacts and circularity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling173: 105691.
46.
KenyonRL (1965) Academic-industrial symbiosis in research. Chemical and Engineering News43: 7.
47.
KravchenkoGAPasqualettoAFerreiraE, et al. (2016) Aplicação de princípios da ecologia industrial nas empresas moveleiras de Goiás. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental21: 283–294.
48.
Kumar MittalVSingh SangwanK (2013) Assessment of hierarchy and inter-relationships of barriers to environmentally conscious manufacturing adoption. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development10: 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjstsd-04-2013-0020
49.
LawalMWan AlwiSRMananZA, et al. (2021) Industrial symbiosis tools – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production280: 124327.
50.
LiederMRashidA (2016) Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production115: 36–51.
51.
LimaJde RutkowskiEWCarvalhoCC, et al. (2010) Sustainable logistics platform in a regional Brazilian airport. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning5: 163–174.
52.
LoiziaPNeofytouNZorpasAA (2019) The concept of circular economy strategy in food waste management for the optimization of energy production through anaerobic digestion. Environmental Science and Pollution Research26: 14766–14773.
53.
LoiziaPVoukkaliIZorpasAA, et al. (2021) Measuring the level of environmental performance in insular areas, through key performed indicators, in the framework of waste strategy development. Science of the Total Environment753: 141974. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720355030
MachadoRRConceiçãoSVLeiteHG, et al. (2015) Evaluation of forest growth and carbon stock in forestry projects by system dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production96: 520–530.
56.
MahmoodZKouserRAliW, et al. (2018) Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability10: 207.
57.
MahmoodZKouserRMasudMAK (2019) An emerging economy perspective on corporate sustainability reporting – Main actors’ views on the current state of affairs in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility4: 8.
58.
MarinelliSButturiMARiminiB, et al. (2021) Estimating the circularity performance of an emerging industrial symbiosis network: The case of recycled plastic fibers in reinforced concrete. Sustainability13: 10257.
59.
MarraAMazzocchittiMSarraA (2018) Knowledge sharing and scientific cooperation in the design of research-based policies: The case of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production194: 800–812.
60.
MartinMHarrisS (2018) Prospecting the sustainability implications of an emerging industrial symbiosis network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling138: 246–256.
61.
MathewsJATanHMooreMJB, et al. (2011) A conceptual lignocellulosic ‘feed+fuel’ biorefinery and its application to the linked biofuel and cattle raising industries in Brazil. Energy Policy39: 4932–4938.
62.
MattilaTJPakarinenSSokkaL (2010) Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis – A comparison of process-, hybrid and input−output life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology44: 4309–4314.
63.
MauthoorS (2017) Uncovering industrial symbiosis potentials in a small island developing state: The case study of Mauritius. Journal of Cleaner Production147: 506–513.
MurrayASkeneKHaynesK (2017) The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics140: 369–380.
67.
NevesAGodinaRAzevedoSG, et al. (2019) The potential of industrial symbiosis: Case analysis and main drivers and barriers to its implementation. Sustainability11: 7095.
68.
NevesAGodinaRAzevedoSG, et al. (2020) A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production247: 119113.
69.
OliveiraFRde FrançaSLBRangelLAD (2018) Challenges and opportunities in a circular economy for a local productive arrangement of furniture in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling135: 202–209.
70.
OmettoARRamosPARLombardiG (2007) The benefits of a Brazilian agro-industrial symbiosis system and the strategies to make it happen. Journal of Cleaner Production15: 1253–1258.
71.
OngJMahmoodNZMusaSN (2021) Challenges to promoting eco-industry parks in Malaysia: A case study of Rawang Integrated Industrial Park. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management23: 1258–1269.
72.
OrmazabalMPrieto-SandovalVPuga-LealR, et al. (2018) Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production185: 157–167.
73.
PaquinRHoward-GrenvilleJ (2012) The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology16: 83–93.
74.
ParkJDuque-HernándezJDíaz-PosadaN (2018) Facilitating business collaborations for industrial symbiosis: The pilot experience of the sustainable industrial network program in Colombia. Sustainability10: 3637.
75.
PatalaSSalmiABockenN (2020) Intermediation dilemmas in facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production261: 121093.
76.
PereiraEV (2019) Resíduos Sólidos (Solid Waste). Editora Senac São Paulo.
77.
Pérez-FortesMSchönebergerJCBoulamantiA, et al. (2016) Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Applied Energy161: 718–732.
78.
PohlmannCRScavardaAJAlvesMB, et al. (2020) The role of the focal company in sustainable development goals: A Brazilian food poultry supply chain case study. Journal of Cleaner Production245: 118798.
RodinVMoserS (2021) The perfect match? 100 reasons why energy cooperation is not realized in industrial parks. Energy Research & Social Science74: 101964.
83.
SakrDBaasLEl-HaggarS, et al. (2011) Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: Global trends and Egyptian context. Journal of Cleaner Production19: 1158–1169.
84.
Sant’AnaMAKGadioliMCBBabiskMP, et al. (2019) Use of waste of ornamental stone in ceramic mass incorporation in Brazil. In: IkhmayiesSLiJVieiraC, et al. (eds) Green materials engineering (pp. 283–291). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
85.
SantosAJdos da Costa CunhaGCruzDRS, et al. (2019) Iron mining wastes collected from Mariana disaster: Reuse and application as catalyst in a heterogeneous electro-Fenton process. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry848: 113330.
86.
SantosVENMagriniA (2018) Biorefining and industrial symbiosis: A proposal for regional development in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production177: 19–33.
87.
SaraceniAVResendeLMde Andrade JúniorPP, et al. (2017) Pilot testing model to uncover industrial symbiosis in Brazilian industrial clusters. Environmental Science and Pollution Research24: 11618–11629.
88.
SchlüterLMortensenLKørnøvL (2020) Industrial symbiosis emergence and network development through reproduction. Journal of Cleaner Production252: 119631.
89.
SellittoMMurakamiF (2020) Destination of the waste generated by a steelmaking plant: A case study in Latin America. Aestimum77: 127–144.
90.
SellittoMAHermannFF (2016) Prioritization of green practices in GSCM: Case study with companies of the peach industry. Gestão & Produção23: 871–886.
91.
SellittoMAHermannFF (2019) Influence of green practices on organizational competitiveness: A study of the electrical and electronics industry. Engineering Management Journal31: 98–112.
92.
SellittoMAMurakamiFK (2018) Industrial symbiosis: A case study involving a steelmaking, a cement manufacturing, and a zinc smelting plant. Chemical Engineering Transactions70: 211–216.
93.
SellittoMAMurakamiFKButturiMA, et al. (2021) Barriers, drivers, and relationships in industrial symbiosis of a network of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption26: 443–454.
94.
ShiL (2017) Industrial ecology education at Tsinghua University. Journal of Industrial Ecology21: 423–429.
95.
ShiLYuB (2014) Eco-industrial parks from strategic niches to development mainstream: The cases of China. Sustainability6: 6325–6331.
96.
SilvaFAda SimioniFJHoffDN (2020) Diagnosis of circular economy in the forest sector in southern Brazil. Science of the Total Environment706: 135973.
97.
SilvaFCShibaoFYKruglianskasI, et al. (2019) Circular economy: Analysis of the implementation of practices in the Brazilian network. Revista de Gestão26: 39–60.
98.
Sousa Jabbour deABLDe Souza AzevedoFArantesAF, et al. (2013) Esverdeando a cadeia de suprimentos: Algumas evidências de empresas localizadas no Brasil. Gestao e Producao20: 953–962.
99.
SouzaDdePMendonçaFM, et al. (2012) Environmental and socioeconomic analysis of producing biodiesel from used cooking oil in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Industrial Ecology16: 655–664.
100.
SouzaFBigarelli Ferreira Florencio deMValélia SaraceniA, et al. (2020) Temporal comparative analysis of industrial symbiosis in a business network: Opportunities of circular economy. Sustainability12: 1832.
101.
SterrTOttT (2004) The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development – Reflections, practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production12: 947–965.
102.
SuBHeshmatiAGengY, et al. (2013) A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production42: 215–227.
103.
TrevisanMNascimentoLFMadrugaLR, et al. (2016) Ecologia Industrial, Simbiose Industrial e Ecoparque Industrial: Conhecer para aplicar. Sistemas & Gestão11: 204–215.
104.
TsengM-LBuiT-D (2017) Identifying eco-innovation in industrial symbiosis under linguistic preferences: A novel hierarchical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production140: 1376–1389.
105.
TurkenNGedaA (2020) Supply chain implications of industrial symbiosis: A review and avenues for future research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling161: 104974.
106.
VahidzadehRBertanzaGSbaffoniS, et al. (2021) Regional industrial symbiosis: A review based on social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production280: 124054.
107.
ValentineSV (2016) Kalundborg Symbiosis: Fostering progressive innovation in environmental networks. Journal of Cleaner Production118: 65–77.
108.
Von AgnerTCStadlerCMarçalRFM, et al. (2005) Solid residues utilization orientated by industrial ecology principals: A case study. In: ECOS 2005 – Proceedings of the 18th international conference on efficiency, cost, optimization, simulation, and environmental impact of energy systems, Trondheim, Norway, 20–22 June 2005, pp. 125–131. Tapir Academic Press.
109.
VoukkaliILoiziaPPedreñoJN, et al. (2021) Urban strategies evaluation for waste management in coastal areas in the framework of area metabolism. Waste Management & Research39: 448–465.
110.
WahrlichJSimioniFJ (2019) Industrial symbiosis in the forestry sector: A case study in southern Brazil. Journal of Industrial Ecology23: 1470–1482.
111.
WangSLuCGaoY, et al. (2019) Life cycle assessment of reduction of environmental impacts via industrial symbiosis in an energy-intensive industrial park in China. Journal of Cleaner Production241: 118358.
112.
WenZMengX (2015) Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: A case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China’s Suzhou New District. Journal of Cleaner Production90: 211–219.
113.
ZhangQZhaoXLuH, et al. (2017) Waste energy recovery and energy efficiency improvement in China’s iron and steel industry. Applied Energy191: 502–520.
114.
ZheLYongGHung-SuckP, et al. (2016) An emergy-based hybrid method for assessing industrial symbiosis of an industrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production114: 132–140.
115.
ZhuJRuthM (2014) The development of regional collaboration for resource efficiency: A network perspective on industrial symbiosis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems44: 37–46.
116.
ZorpasALasaridiKAbeliotisC, et al. (2014) Waste prevention campaign regarding the waste framework directive. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin23: 2876–2883.
