Cascade use indicators for selected biopolymers: Are we aiming for the right solutions in the design for recycling of bio-based polymers?

Abstract

When surveying the trends and criteria for the design for recycling (DfR) of bio-based polymers, priorities appear to lie in energy recovery at the end of the product life of durable products, such as bio-based thermosets. Non-durable products made of thermoplastic polymers exhibit good properties for material recycling. The latter commonly enjoy growing material recycling quotas in countries that enforce a landfill ban. Quantitative and qualitative indicators are needed for characterizing progress in the development towards more recycling friendly bio-based polymers. This would enable the deficits in recycling bio-based plastics to be tracked and improved. The aim of this paper is to analyse the trends in the DfR of bio-based polymers and the constraints posed by the recycling infrastructure on plastic polymers from a systems perspective. This analysis produces recommendations on how life cycle assessment indicators can be introduced into the dialogue between designers and recyclers in order to promote DfR principles to enhance the cascading use of bio-based polymers within the bioeconomy, and to meet circular economy goals.

Keywords

Design for recyclability bio-based polymers system analysis cascade use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Platform

Feenstra

(2014) Additive manufacturing: SASAM standardisation roadmap. SASAM, Support Action for Standardisation in Additive Manufacturing, AM-Platform.

Association of German Municipal Utilities (2013) Verband Kommunaler Unternehmen (VKU): Informationspapier des VKU zu Biologisch Abbaubaren Kunststoffen. Berlin. Available at: http://www.vku.de (accessed 2 May 2016).

Bart

JCJ

(2006). Additives in Polymers Industrial Analysis and Applications. Reprinted with corrections. Chichester: Wiley.

Beyerer

Puente León

Längle

. (eds) Identification of bio-plastics by NIR-SWIR-Hyperspectral-Imaging, 18th–19th March 2015. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing. Available at: https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000044906/3457512 (accessed 12 January 2016).

BGK (2014) Kompostierung von Biokunststoffen ist ein Irrweg. Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V. Available at: http://www.kompost.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dateien/Themen_Positionen/5.4.1_Position-BAW_2014_final.pdf (accessed 12 December 2015).

BIO Intelligence Service (2011) Study on coherence of waste legislation FINAL REPORT. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/Coherence_waste_legislation.pdf (accessed 21 February 2015).

bioplastics magazine (2015) Citrate plasticizers offer biobased plasticizer solution for polymers. Available at: http://www.bioplasticsmagazine.com/en/news/meldungen/20150325.php (accessed 5 April 2015).

Carus

Dammer

Köppen

. (2014) Environmental innovation policy – Greater resource efficiency and climate protection through the sustainable material use of biomass. nova-Institut, IFEU- Institut, Universität zu Köln, Öko-Institut, Available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/texte_03_2014_druckfassung_uba_stofflich_abschlussbericht_kurz_englisch.pdf (accessed 24 February 2015).

Dean

(2013) Final report summary - PLA-FOAM. Available at: http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/61345_en.html (accessed 20 January 2015).

10.

Detzel

Kauertz

Derreza-Greeven

(2013) Study of the environmental impacts of packagings made of biodegradable plastics. 52/2012. Dessau-Roßlau, Germany: Federal Environment Agency of Germany. Available at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/4446.pdf (accessed 5 April 2015).

11.

Dwek

Zwolinski

(2015) How can we predict the evolution of recycling chains? Matériaux & Techniques 103: 102.

12.

EC Health and Consumers Directorate-General (2014) Union guidelines on regulation (EU) no 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/foodcontact/docs/10-2011_plastic_guidance_en.pdf (accessed 12 March 2015).

13.

Essel

Breitmayer

Carus

. (2014) Discussion paper: Defining cascading use of biomass. nova-Institute GmbH, Wuppertal Institute, IZES GmbH; Cologne-Brussels. Available at: https://biomassekaskaden.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/14-03-14_Cascading_use_Discussionpaper.pdf (accessed 13 December 2014).

14.

European Bioplastics e.V., Institute for Bioplastics and Biocomposites and nova-Institute (2015) European-Bioplastics: Market drivers and development. Available at: http://www.european-bioplastics.org/market/market-drivers/ (accessed 20 May 2016).

15.

European Commission (2015) Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the circular economy. Communication COM 614 final, European Commission. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (accessed 12 January 2016).

16.

Gebler

Schoot Uiterkamp

AJM

Visser

(2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74: 158–167.

17.

Giudice

La Rosa

Risitano

(2006). Product Design for the Environment a Life Cycle Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis.

18.

Groot

Borén

(2010) Life cycle assessment of the manufacture of lactide and PLA biopolymers from sugarcane in Thailand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15: 970–984.

19.

Hamad

Kaseem

Deri

(2013) Recycling of waste from polymer materials: an overview of the recent works, polymer degradation and stability. Polymer Degradation and Stability 98: 2801–2812.

20.

Hollstein

Wohlebe

(2015) In: proceedings of optical characterization of materials (OCM 2015-) (eds Beyerer, Puente León and Längle).

21.

Huber

(2000) Towards industrial ecology. sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning (Special issue) 2(4): 269–285.

22.

Huber

(2003) Das Konzept der ökologischen Konsistenz als Beitrag zu einer nachhaltigen Technikgestaltung. In: Grunwald

(ed.) Technikgestaltung zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg.

23.

Hunt

Zhang

Anzalone

. (2015) Polymer recycling codes for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printers. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 97: 24–30.

24.

IfBB (2014) Global biopolymer production capacity sorted by region. IfBB - Institut für Biokunststoffe und Bioverbundwerkstoffe, Hannover. Available at: http://ifbb.wp.hs-hannover.de/downloads/index.php?site=Statistics&nav=5-1-0-0-0 (accessed 12 January 2015).

25.

Imre

Pukánszky

(2013) Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends. European Polymer Journal 49: 1215–1233.

26.

La Mantia

(1998) The role of additives in the recycling of polymers. Macromolecular Symposia 135: 157–165.

27.

La Mantia

(2002) Handbook of Plastics Recycling. Shawbury, Shrewsbury: Rapra Technology Limited.

28.

Lopez

Artetxe

Amutio

. (2010) Recycling poly-(methyl methacrylate) by pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 49: 1089–1094.

29.

Madival

Auras

Singh

. (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 1183–1194.

30.

Maier

Jonathan

(2007) Identifying affordances. In: Bocquet

J-C

(ed.) International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’07), 28–31 August 2007, Paris, France, pp. 28–31. The Design Society.

31.

Maritim proArte Hotel Berlin, 22/23 November 2011, Berlin. Available at: https://www.maritim.com/en/hotels/germany/proarte-hotel-berlin/hotel-overview (accessed 16 December 2014).

32.

McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), Manyika

Chui

. (2013) Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/dotcom/Insights%20and%20pubs/MGI/Research/Technology%20and%20Innovation/Disruptive%20technologies/MGI_Disruptive_technologies_Full_report_May2013.ashx (accessed 17 February 2015).

33.

Mortier

(2014) “Open-Bio WP6 managed end-of-life options at the combined advisory workshop.” In: Cologne 2014, Combined Advisory Workshop, ProjectOpen-Bio: Opening bio-based markets via standards, labelling and procurement and OWS Netherlands. Available at: http://www.bio-based.eu/advisory-workshop/programme (accessed 17 January 2015).

34.

NNFCC and Williams

(2011) Feedstock sustainability & bioplastics how other bio-markets influence the bioplastics chain. In: 6th European bioplastics conference. Available at: http://www.nnfcc.co.uk/publications/nnfcc-presentation-feedstock-sustainability-and-bioplastics/at_download/file.

35.

PlasticsEurope (2015) “Plastics - the facts 2015: An analysis of European latest plastics production, demand and waste data.” PlasticsEurope-Association of Plastic Manufacturers. Available at: http://www.plasticseurope.org/documents/document/20151216062843-plastics_the_facts_2015_final_30pages_14122015.pdf (accessed at 12 January 2016).

36.

Riverra

Van der Meulen

(2014) Gartner’s 2014 hype cycle for emerging technologies maps the journey to digital business. Gartner, Stamford-USA. Available at: http://www.plasticsrecycling.org/ (accessed 3 March 2015).

37.

Selke

Auras

Anh Nguyen

. (2015) Evaluation of biodegradation-promoting additives for plastics. Environmental Science & Technology 49: 3769–3777.

38.

Sendel

Allison-Hope

Morris

(2015) 3-D printing sustainability opportunities and challenges. New York: BSR. Available at: http://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR-Report-3D-Printing-Sustainability-Opportunities-Challenges-2015.pdf (accessed 20 March 2016).

39.

Sirkin

ten Houten

(1994) The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design. resources. Conservation and Recycling the Cascade Chain 10: 213–276.

40.

Synbra (2015) BioFoam® by Synbra Group. Available at: http://www.biofoam.nl/index.php (accessed 1 May 2015).

41.

Tabone

Cregg

Beckman

. (2010) Sustainability metrics: Life cycle assessment and green design in polymers. Environmental Science & Technology 44: 8264–8269.

42.

Van Daal

(2015) BIOMIMICRY: 3D printed soft seat. Design portfolio. Available at: http://lilianvandaal.com/?portfolio=3d-printed-softseating (accessed 20 July 2015).

43.

van Wijk

and IOS Press (2015) 3D Printing with biomaterials: Towards a sustainable and circular economy. Available at: http://ebooks.iospress.nl/isbn/978-1-61499-486-2 (accessed 24 March 2015).

44.

VDI (2002) German Engineering Standard VDI 2243’Designing Technical Products for ease of recycling: Fundamentals and rules for design’. Available at: https://www.vdi.de/richtlinie/vdi_2243-recyclingorientierte_produktentwicklung_/ (accessed 26 February 2016).

45.

Villanueva

Eder

(2014) End-of-waste criteria for waste plastic for conversion technical proposals: Final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Available at: http://dx.publications.europa.eu/10.2791/13033 (accessed 12 April 2015).

46.

Vincotte (2015) Homepage: OK biodegradable, environmental certification: New since March: OK biodegradable MARINE. Recognising OK environment logos OK biodegradable. Available at: http://www.okcompost.be/en/recognising-ok-environment-logos/ok-biodegradable/ (accessed 15 April 2015).

47.

Wagner

Heidrich

Baumann

. (2012) Ermittlung des Beitrages der Abfallwirtschaft zur Steigerung der Ressourcenproduktivität sowie des Anteils des Recyclings an der Wertschöpfung unter Darstellung der Verwertungs- und Beseitigungspfade des Ressourcenrelevanten Abfallaufkommens. Dessau-Rosslau: Available at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/4275.pdf (accessed 4 May 2016).

48.

Weil

Levchik

(2016) Flame Retardants for Plastics and Textiles: Practical Applications. 2nd ed. Munich; Cincinnati: Hanser Publishers.