Effect of Design Variables On Participation in Residential Curbside Recycling Programs

Abstract

This research examines how each of the design variables associated with the design of residential curbside recycling programs affects the participation rate, as well as the effect of interactions between the variables. The evaluation of each design variable includes a literature review and an analysis of the results of six published surveys of curbside recycling programs. The results of this research show that there is no single ideal design for residential curbside recycling programs, but that a variety of combinations of design variables have proven to be successful. This suggests that when designing a recycling program, the costs, needs and goals of the community should be significant factors while taking into consideration the effect of some design variable options on participation. Based on these results, four residential curbside recycling programs were designed: two to maximize participation rates without significant regard to cost; and the other two with the goal of achieving a balance between participation rate and program cost. © 1997 ISWA

Keywords

Waste recycling curbside recycling residential recycling programs recycling program design recycling participation rates.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andress, C. (1990) Innovative funding for recycling programs. BioCycle, August 1990, 50-53.

Everett, J.W. & Peirce, J.J. (1993) Curbside recycling in the U.S.A.: convenience and mandatory participation. Waste Management & Research, 11, 49-61.

Folz, D.H. (1991) Recycling program design management and participation: a national survey of municipal experience. Public Administration Review, 51, 222-231.

Folz, D.H. & Hazlett, J.M. (1991) Public participation and recycling performance: explaining program success. Public Administration Review, 51, 526-532.

Glenn, J. (1988) Junior, take out the recyclables. BioCycle, May/June, 26-31.

Glenn, J. (1990) The state of garbage in America. BioCycle, April, 34-41.

Glenn, J. (1990) Curbside recycling reaches 40 million. BioCycle, July, 30-37.

Harder, G. & Knox, L. (1992) Implementing variable trash collection rates. BioCycle, April, 66-69.

Noehammer, H.C. (1994) Residential Curbside Recycling Programs: Design and Development. Master of Applied Science thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada.

10.

Peters, A. & Grogan, P. (1988) Community recycling: what is working best?, BioCycle, May/ June, 32-36.

11.

Platt, B. , Doherty, C. , Broughton. A.C. & Morris, D. (1991) Beyond 40 Percent: Record-Setting Recycling and Composting Programs. Washington, DC, U.S.A. Island Press.

12.

Platt, B. , Friedman, N. , Grodinsky, C. & Suozzo, M. (1992) In-Depth Studies of Recycling and Composting Programs. Designs, Costs, Results, Washington, DC, U.S.A. Island Press.

13.

Sinclair, R.G. (1987) Solid Waste Reduction through Recycling: An Examination of Program Design, Master of Arts thesis, Department of Geography, University of Ottawa.

14.

Winfield, M. , Coffey, G. , Ford, G. , Macdonald, D. & Vopni, P. (1992) Looking Back and Looking Ahead. Municipal Solid Waste Management in Ontario, Toronto: Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy.