The current study tests the accuracy of the public's knowledge of recidivism risk over time, using arrest records as a benchmark. It asks a large public sample about the likelihood of first-time arrestees being arrested again compared to the probability of the general population being arrested for a first offense. The results show that respondents highly overestimate first-time arrestees’ likelihood to recidivate, and this overestimation becomes more pronounced over time. These results have significant policy ramifications across various domains where individuals exercise critical decision-making authority affecting justice-involved people. These include access to criminal record information, judicial sentencing, parole determinations, employment opportunities, and housing allocation. Disseminating accurate information regarding the declining risk of recidivism to the general population and key stakeholders is paramount in formulating and implementing criminal justice reforms.
Atkin-PlunkC. A. (2020). Should all violent offenders be treated equally? Perceptions of punishment and rehabilitation for violent offenders with varying attributes. Victims & Offenders, 15(2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1711277
4.
BaglivioM. T.JackowskiK.GreenwaldM. A.HowellJ. C. (2014). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. A statewide analysis of prevalence and prediction of subsequent recidivism using risk and protective factors. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12064
5.
BakerT.MetcalfeC. F.BerenblumT.AvivG.GertzM. (2015). Examining public preferences for the allocation of resources to rehabilitative versus punitive crime policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(5), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414521462
6.
BarnesJ. C. (2013). Analyzing the origins of life-course-persistent offending: A consideration of environmental and genetic influences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812458907
7.
BaumerT. (1978). Research on fear of crime in the United States. Victimology, 3(3/4), 254–264.
8.
BeckA. J.ShipleyB. E. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ Number: 116261.
9.
BiemerP. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058
10.
BlumsteinA.NakamuraK. (2009). Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 47(2), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00155.x
11.
BlumsteinA.NakamuraK. (2012). Extension of current estimates of redemption times: Robustness testing, out-of-state arrests, and racial differences. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 2009-IJ-CX-0008. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
12.
BurtonA. L.Burton, Jr.V. S.CullenF. T.CullenF. T.ButlerL. C.ThieloA. J. (2020a). Beyond the New Jim Crow: Public support for removing and regulating collateral consequences. Federal Probation Journal, 84(3), 19–33. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/84_3_3.pdf
13.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.BurtonV. S.GrahamA.ButlerL. C.ThieloA. J. (2020b). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
14.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.CullenF. T.BurtonV. S.ThieloA. J. (2021). Beyond the eternal criminal record: Public support for expungement. Criminology and Public Policy, 20(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12531
BushwayS. D.NieuwbeertaP.BloklandA. (2011). The predictive value of criminal background checks: Do age and criminal history affect time to redemption?Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 49(1), 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00217.x
17.
BushwayS. D.PickettJ. T. (2024). Direct incentives may increase employment of people with criminal records. Criminology & Public Policy, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12681
18.
ButlerL. C.CullenF. T.BurtonA. L. (2020). Redemption at a turning point: Public support for rehabilitation ceremonies. Federal Probation, 84(1), 38–47.
19.
CerdaJ. A.StenstromD. M.CurtisM. (2019). Effect of public safety realignment variables on the perceived employability of former offenders: Public perception of the role of type of custody and program participation. Psychology Crime and Law, 25(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1526935
20.
ChandlerJ.RosenzweigC.MossA. J.RobinsonJ.LitmanL. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7
21.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 42(2), 359–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17459125.2004.tb00523.x
22.
ChiuC. Y.DweckC. S.TongJ. Y. Y.FuJ. H. Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.923
23.
ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
24.
ClearT. R.RoseD. R.RyderJ. A. (2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047003003
25.
CourtrightK. E.MackeyD. A.PackardS. H. (2005). Empathy among college students and criminal justice majors: Identifying predispositional traits and the role of education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051125042000333514
26.
CullenF. T.ClarkG. A.CullenJ. B.MathersR. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012003003
27.
DenneyA. S.TewksburyR.JonesR. S. (2014). Beyond basic needs: Social support and structure for successful offender reentry. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 2(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.d95029f6
28.
DenverM. (2020). Criminal records, positive credentials, and recidivism: Incorporating evidence of rehabilitation into criminal background check employment decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 66(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719833358
29.
DenverM.EwaldA. (2018). Credentialing decisions and criminal records: A narrative approach. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 56(4), 715–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12190
30.
DenverM.PickettJ. T.BushwayS. D. (2017). The language of stigmatization and the mark of violence: Experimental evidence on the social construction and use of criminal record stigma. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 55(3), 664–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12145
31.
DeWittS. E.BushwayS. D.SiwachG.KurlychekM. C. (2017). Redeemed compared to whom? Comparing the distributional properties of arrest risk across populations of provisional employees with and without a criminal record. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(3), 963–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12309
32.
DeWittS. E.DenverM. (2020). Criminal records, positive employment credentials, and race. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(3), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427819886111
33.
EnnsP. K. (2016). Incarceration nation: How the United States became the most punitive democracy in the world. Cambridge University Press.
34.
FeingoldZ. R. (2021). The stigma of incarceration experience: A systematic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(4), 550–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000319
35.
GarlandB. E.WodahlE. J.CotaL. D. (2016a). Measuring public support for prisoner reentry options. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(12), 1406–1424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15578438
36.
GarlandB.WodahlE.SaxonC. (2016b). What influences public support of transitional housing facilities for offenders during reentry?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414564866
37.
GarlandB. E.WodahlE. J.SchuhmannR. (2013). Value conflict and public opinion toward prisoner reentry initiatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411424
38.
GigerenzerG.HoffrageU. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
39.
HalperinE.RussellA. G.TrzesniewskiK. H.GrossJ. J.DweckC. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333(6050), 1767–1769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925
40.
HannanK. R.CullenF. T.GrahamA.JonsonC. L.PickettJ. T.HanerM.SloanM. M. (2023). Public support for second look sentencing: Is there a shawshank redemption effect?Criminology & Public Policy, 22(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12616
41.
HelfgottJ. (1997). Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Federal Probation, 61(2), 12–24.
42.
HirschfieldP. J.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 48(1), 27–55.
KalraN.VegetabileB. G.BushwayS.BaumannG. C. (2022). How different sampling methods paint vastly different pictures of recidivism, and why it matters for policy. Santa Monica. RAND Corporation.
45.
KuehnS.VosgerauJ. (2022). Once a criminal, always a criminal: People overestimate the immorality of formerly incarcerated people. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20, 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09534-w
46.
KurlychekM. C.BrameR.BushwayS. D. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending?Criminology and Public Policy, 5(3), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00397.x
LaxJ. R.PhillipsJ. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/23075149
49.
LeasureP.AndersenS. T. (2016). The effectiveness of certificates of relief as collateral consequence relief mechanisms: An experimental study. Yale Law and Policy Review Inter Alia, 35(11), 11–22.
50.
LeeH.CullenF. T.BurtonA. L.BurtonV. S. (2022). Millennials as the future of corrections: A generational analysis of public policy opinions. Crime & Delinquency, 68(12), 2355–2392. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112872110226
51.
LehmannP. S.PickettJ. T.DenverM. (2020). Public opinion on criminal records and employment: A test of competing theoretical models. Crime and Delinquency, 66(6-7), 995–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719875699
52.
LevensonJ. S.BrannonY. N.FortneyT.BakerJ. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
53.
LoftinC.McDowallD. (2010). The use of official records to measure crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9120-8
54.
MarunaS.KingA. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal?: Redeemability and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1
55.
McPhersonM. (1978). Realities and perceptions of crime at the neighbourhood level. Victimology, 3(3–4), 319–328.
56.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C. (2014). Prisoner reentry in the era of mass incarceration. Sage Publications.
57.
MossS. A.LeeE.BermanA.RungD. (2019). When do people value rehabilitation and restorative justice over the punishment of offenders?Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1539688
58.
MurphyD.FuleihanB.RichardsS.JonesR. (2011). The electronic “scarlet letter”: Criminal backgrounding and a perpetual spoiled identity. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.560548
NaginD. S.PiqueroA. R.ScottE. S.SteinbergL. (2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(4), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00406.x
61.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
62.
PettitB.GutierrezC. (2018). Mass incarceration and racial inequality. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 77(3–4), 1153–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12241
63.
PeytchevA.PeytchevaE. (2017). Reduction of measurement error due to survey length: Evaluation of the split questionnaire design approach. Survey Research Methods, 11(4), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i4.7145
PiqueroA. R.BlumsteinA.BrameR.HaapanenR.MulveyE.NaginD. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401161005
66.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
67.
QuelletteH. M.ApplegateB. K.VukM. (2017). The public’s stance on prisoner reentry: Policy support and personal acceptance. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/doi10.1007/s12103-016-9382-2
68.
RadeC. B.DesmaraisS. L.MitchellR. E. (2016). A meta-analysis of public attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816655
69.
RamirezM. D. (2013). Americans’ changing views on crime and punishment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(4), 1006–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft040
70.
ReedJ.ReedR. (1973). Status, images, and consequence: Once a criminal. Sociology and Social Research, 57, 460–472.
71.
ReichS. E. (2017). An exception to the rule: Belief in redeemability, desistance signals, and the employer’s decision to hire a job applicant with a criminal record. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(2), 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1268235
72.
RhodesW.GaesG.LuallenJ.KlingR.RichT.ShivelyM. (2016). Following incarceration, most released offenders never return to prison. Crime & Delinquency, 62(8), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714549655
73.
RidenerR.KuehnS. (2017). College education, major, or criminology classes? An examination of what drives students’ level of punitiveness. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2016.1269325
74.
RobertsJ. V.DoobA. N. (1989). Sentencing and public opinion: Taking false shadows for true substances. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 27(3), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1785
75.
RobertsJ. V.DoobA. N. (1990). News media influences on public views of sentencing. Law and Human Behavior, 14(5), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044222
76.
RobertsJ. V.WhiteN. R. (1986). Public estimates of recidivism rates: Consequences of a criminal stereotype. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.28.3.229
77.
RybergJ.RobertsJ. V. (2014). Popular punishment on the normative significance of public opinion. Oxford University Press.
ShapiroR. Y. (2011). Public opinion and American democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 982–1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr053
81.
ShiL.LuY.PickettJ. T. (2020). The public salience of crime, 1960-2014: Age-period-cohort and time-series analyses. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 58(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12248
82.
SloasL. B.Atkin-PlunkC. A. (2019). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 1009–1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418762532
83.
TamK.ShuT.NgH. K.TongY. (2013). Belief about the immutability of moral character and punitiveness toward criminal offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
84.
ThieloA. J.CullenF. T.CohenD. M.ChouhyC. (2016). Rehabilitation in a red state: Public support for correctional reform in Texas. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(1), 137–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12182
85.
ThompsonA. J.PickettJ. T. (2020). Are relational inferences from crowdsourced and opt-in samples generalizable? Comparing criminal justice attitudes in the GSS and five online samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 907–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09436-7
VuoloM.LagesonS.UggenC. (2017). Criminal record questions in the era of “ban the box.”. In Criminology and Public Policy, 16(1), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12250
WhittleT. N. (2018). Felony collateral sanctions effects on recidivism: A literature review. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(5), 505–524.
94.
WinnickT. A.BodkinM. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled “ex-con.”. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 295–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701588081
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
