Ensuring healthy aging and extending health span is critical, particularly in aging societies. This study analyzed patterns of risk for long-term care (LTC) certification within 3 years in rapidly aging areas of Japan using the Kihon Checklist (KCL) and machine learning models. Data from adults aged 65 years or older in Iiyama City (aging rate 37.0%) were analyzed using Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector decision trees. The dependent variable was LTC certification, and independent variables included age, sex, and six KCL domains: physical strength, nutrition, oral function, isolation, memory, and mood. Three risk patterns demonstrated consistent results across training and evaluation datasets. Age was the strongest determinant of LTC certification. Among those aged 80 years or older, low cognitive function and depression were key risk factors, while younger groups showed stronger associations with physical weakness. Results suggest age-specific segmentation of populations is crucial for designing effective interventions to prevent LTC certification.
AlthuwayneeO. F.PradhanB.ParkH.-J.LeeJ. H. (2014). A novel ensemble decision tree-based chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) and multivariate logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Landslides, 11(6), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0466-0
2.
AraiH.OuchiY.TobaK.EndoT.ShimokadoK.TsubotaK.MatsuoS.MoriH.YumuraW.YokodeM.RakugiH.OhshimaS. (2015). Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 15(6), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12450
3.
AraiH.SatakeS. (2015). English translation of the Kihon checklist. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 15(4), 518–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12397
BautmansI.KnoopV.Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanJ.MaierA. B.BeardJ. R.FreibergerE.BelskyD.Aubertin-LeheudreM.MiktonC.CesariM.SumiY.DiazT.BanerjeeA.Capacity, W. H. O. W. G. o. V. (2022). WHO working definition of vitality capacity for healthy longevity monitoring. The lancet. Healthy longevity, 3(11), e789–e796. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00200-8
7.
BeardJ. R.OfficerA.de CarvalhoI. A.SadanaR.PotA. M.MichelJ. P.Lloyd-SherlockP.Epping-JordanJ. E.PeetersG. M.MahananiW. R.ThiyagarajanJ. A.ChatterjiS. (2016). The world report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet, 387(10033), 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4
8.
BiggsD.De VilleB.SuenE. (1991). A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 18(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769100000005
DoupeP.FaghmousJ.BasuS. (2019). Machine learning for health services researchers. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22(7), 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.012
13.
EsenkayaM. E.DokuzlarO.SoysalP.SmithL.JacksonS. E.IsikA. T. (2019). Validity of the Kihon checklist for evaluating frailty status in Turkish older adults. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 19(7), 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13678
14.
FerrucciL.GuralnikJ. M.SimonsickE.SaliveM. E.CortiC.LangloisJ. (1996). Progressive versus catastrophic disability: A longitudinal view of the disablement process. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 51(3), M123–M130. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/51a.3.m123
15.
FukutomiE.OkumiyaK.WadaT.SakamotoR.IshimotoY.KimuraY.ChenW.ImaiH.KasaharaY.FujisawaM.OtsukaK.MatsubayashiK. (2015). Relationships between each category of 25-item frailty risk assessment (Kihon checklist) and newly certified older adults under long-term care insurance: A 24-month follow-up study in a rural community in Japan. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 15(7), 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12360
16.
FukutomiE.OkumiyaK.WadaT.SakamotoR.IshimotoY.KimuraY.KasaharaY.ChenW.ImaiH.FujisawaM.OtukaK.MatsubayashiK. (2013). Importance of cognitive assessment as part of the “Kihon Checklist” developed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare for prediction of frailty at a 2-year follow up. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 13(3), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00959.x
17.
GillT. M.GahbauerE. A.AlloreH. G.HanL. (2006). Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(4), 418–423. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.4.418
18.
GongJ.WangY.HuangS. T.ChiuH. C. (2022). Study of Hospitalization costs in patients with cerebral ischemia based on E-CHAID algorithm. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022(1), Article 3978577. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3978577
19.
GulatiP.SharmaA.GuptaM. (2016). Theoretical study of decision tree algorithms to identify pivotal factors for performance improvement: A review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 141(14), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016909926
20.
GuptaB.RawatA.JainA.AroraA.DhamiN. (2017). Analysis of various decision tree algorithms for classification in data mining. International Journal of Computer Applications, 163(8), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017913660
21.
ItoK.KawaiH.TsurutaH.ObuchiS. (2021). Predicting incidence of long-term care insurance certification in Japan with the Kihon checklist for frailty screening tool: Analysis of local government survey data. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01968-z
22.
KamegayaT.YamaguchiH.HayashiK. (2017). Evaluation by the basic checklist and the risk of 3 years incident long-term care insurance certification. Journal of general and family medicine, 18(5), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.52
23.
KassG. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296
24.
KimK.ParkH. (2021). Machine-learning models predicting osteoarthritis associated with the lead blood level. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(32), 44079–44084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13887-6
25.
KitazawaK.TsuchiyaK.HiraoK.FurukawaT.TozatoF.IwayaT.MitsuiS. (2024). Escalation on Kihon checklist scores preceding the certification of long-term care need in the older population in Japan. A 9-year retrospective study. Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, 11, Article 23333928241247027. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241247027
26.
KojimaG.TaniguchiY.IliffeS.JivrajS.WaltersK. (2019). Transitions between frailty states among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 50, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.010
27.
KojimaS.MurotaniK.ZhouB.KothariK. U.FukushimaM.NagaiY. (2019). Assessing long-term care risk in older individuals with possible cognitive decline: A large population-based study using the Kihon checklist. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 19(7), 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13677
28.
KononenkoI. (2001). Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 23(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0933-3657(01)00077-x
29.
KontisV.BennettJ. E.MathersC. D.LiG.ForemanK.EzzatiM. (2017). Future life expectancy in 35 industrialized countries: Projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet, 389(10076), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9
KumaranM.PhamT. M.WangK.UsmanH.NorrisC. M.MacDonaldJ.OuditG. Y.SainiV.SikdarK. C. (2022). Predicting the risk factors associated with severe outcomes among COVID-19 patients: A decision tree modeling approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 838514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.838514
32.
LuoA. J.ChangW. F.XinZ. R.LingH.LiJ. J.DaiP. P.DengX. T.ZhangL.LiS. G. (2018). Diagnosis related group grouping study of senile cataract patients based on E-CHAID algorithm. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 11(2), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.02.21
33.
MatsushitaE.OkadaK.ItoY.SatakeS.ShiraishiN.HiroseT.KuzuyaM. (2017). Characteristics of physical prefrailty among Japanese healthy older adults. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 17(10), 1568–1574. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12935
MomoseA.YamaguchiS.OkadaA.Ikeda-KurakawaK.NamikiD.NannyaY.KatoH.YamauchiT.NangakuM.KadowakiT. (2021). Factors associated with long-term care certification in older adults: A cross-sectional study based on a nationally representative survey in Japan. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), Article 374. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02308-5
36.
OmaryZ.MtenziF. J. (2010). Machine learning approach to identifying the dataset threshold for the performance estimators in supervised. International Journal for Infonomics, 3(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2010.0034
37.
PayetteH.GueyeN. D.GaudreauP.MoraisJ. A.ShatensteinB.Gray-DonaldK. (2011). Trajectories of physical function decline and psychological functioning: A Quebec longitudinal study on nutrition and successful aging (NuAge). Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(suppl_1), i82–i90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq085
38.
RitchieS. J.Tucker-DrobE. M.StarrJ. M.DearyI. J. (2016). Do cognitive and physical function age in concert from age 70 to 76? Evidence from the Lothian birth cohort of 1936. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E90. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.85
39.
RodriguesM. A.FacchiniL. A.ThuméE.MaiaF. (2009). Gender and incidence of functional disability in the elderly: A systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25(suppl 3), S464–S476. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2009001500011
40.
SarsakH. I. (2019). Factors associated with change in functional Per-formance among Wheelchair Users. Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation & Disabilities, 4, Article 028. https://doi.org/10.24966/PMRD-8670/100028
41.
SatakeS.SendaK.HongY. J.MiuraH.EndoH.SakuraiT.KondoI.TobaK. (2016). Validity of the Kihon checklist for assessing frailty status. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 16(6), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12543
42.
SatakeS.ShimokataH.SendaK.KondoI.AraiH.TobaK. (2019). Predictive ability of the seven domains of the kihon checklist for incident dependency and mortality. The Journal of Frailty & Aging, 8(2), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2019.3
43.
SatakeS.ShimokataH.SendaK.KondoI.TobaK. (2017). Validity of the total Kihon checklist score for predicting the incidence of 3-year dependency and mortality in a community-dwelling older population. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(6), 552.e551–552.e556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.013
44.
Sato OsakiK.ZhangJ.KazawaK.MoriyamaM. (2020). Patterns of elderly people’s long-term care risks and determinants: A methodological study in a Japanese city. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 20(7), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13936
45.
SeccombeK.Ishii-KuntzM. (1991). Perceptions of problems associated with aging: Comparisons among four older age cohorts. The Gerontologist, 31(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/31.4.527
46.
Sentandreu-MañóT.Cezón-SerranoN.Cebrià I IranzoM. A.Tortosa-ChuliáM. A.TomásJ. M.Salom TerrádezJ. R.Balasch-BernatM. (2021). Kihon checklist to assess frailty in older adults: Some evidence on the internal consistency and validity of the Spanish version. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 21(2), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14126
47.
Sewo SampaioP. Y.SampaioR. A.YamadaM.OgitaM.AraiH. (2014). Validation and translation of the Kihon checklist (frailty index) into Brazilian Portuguese. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 14(3), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12134
48.
SutN.SimsekO. (2011). Comparison of regression tree data mining methods for prediction of mortality in head injury. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15534–15539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.006
49.
TaoA.ZhangY.QiuX.AraiH.WangQ. (2020). Simplified Chinese translation of the Kihon checklist. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 20(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13910
50.
TasU.VerhagenA. P.Bierma-ZeinstraS. M.OddingE.KoesB. W. (2007). Prognostic factors of disability in older people: A systematic review. British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 57(537), 319–323. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394736
51.
TsujiT.KondoK.KondoN.AidaJ.TakagiD. (2018). Development of A risk assessment scale predicting incident functional disability among older people: Japan gerontological evaluation study. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 18(10), 1433–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13503
52.
TsutsuiT.MuramatsuN. (2005). Care-needs certification in the long-term care insurance system of Japan. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(3), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53175.x
53.
von ElmE.AltmanD. G.EggerM.PocockS. J.GøtzscheP. C.VandenbrouckeJ. P.Initiative, STROBE. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of internal medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
54.
WatanabeR.TsujiT.IdeK.NoguchiT.YasuokaM.KamijiK.SatakeS.KondoK.KojimaM. (2022). Predictive validity of the modified kihon checklist for the incidence of functional disability among older people: A 3-year cohort study from the JAGES. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 22(8), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14439
55.
WeissS. M.IndurkhyaN. (1994). Small sample decision tree pruning. In Machine learning proceedings 1994 (pp. 335–342). Morgan Kaufmann.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
