Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although volunteering has been associated with numerous social benefits for diverse older adults, there is little information on how they establish relationships within a multicultural volunteering program outside of their co-ethnic communities. This convergent mixed-method social network study adopts the bonding and bridging social capital theory to explore the structures and dynamics of social interactions within a multicultural volunteer program. Low-income Russian, Khmer, Somali, Nepali, and English-speaking older volunteers in the Senior Companions Program (SCP) in a Midwest metropolitan (N = 83) participated in the surveys and focus groups. Homophily coefficients (r) show that the SCP volunteers mostly interacted with people who identified with the same nationality (r = .86), race (r = .87), and gender (r = .50). Qualitative results suggested that volunteers strengthened their social networks through within-cultural social bonding while appreciating opportunities for cross-cultural social bridging. Compared with within-cultural social bonding, cross-cultural social bridging in multicultural volunteer programs require intentional facilitation, resources, and organizational commitment.

Keywords

diverse older adults organized volunteering social network

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayalon

Levkovich

(2019). A systematic review of research on social networks of older Adults. The Gerontologist, 59(3), e164–e176. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx218

Borgatti

S. P.

Everett

Johnson

(2013). Analyzing social networks. In Seaman

(Ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

Butler

S. S.

(2006). Evaluating the senior companion program a mixed-method approach. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 47(1–2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v47n01_05

Calabrese Barton

Tan

(2020). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of “rightful presence” for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20927363

Cao

Dabelko-Schoeny

H. I.

White

Maleku

Sheldon

(2021). I wanna help, but my hands can be a little tied: The challenges and benefits of formal volunteering among low-income diverse older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.1897723

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory-A practical guide through qualitaty analysis (vol. 148). Sage Publications Ltd.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications Ltd.

Choi

M. S.

Dabelko-Schoeny

White

(2020). Access to employment, volunteer activities, and community events and perceptions of age-friendliness: The role of social connectedness. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(9), 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464819847588

Claridge

(2018). Functions of social capital – bonding, bridging, linking (vol. 1–7). Social Capital Research.

10.

Conkova

Lindenberg

(2020). The experience of aging and perceptions of “Aging Well” among older migrants in The Netherlands. The Gerontologist, 60(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz125

11.

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L. P.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

12.

Dong

X. Q.

Chang

E.-S.

(2017). Social networks among the older Chinese population in the USA: Findings from the PINE study. Gerontology, 63(3), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455043

13.

Ertug

Brennecke

Kovács

Zou

(2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. The Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 38–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0230

14.

Fetters

M. D.

(2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage Publications.

15.

Freeman

L. C.

(1979). Centrality in social networks I: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(1), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

16.

Fukui

H. M.

Menjívar

(2015). Bound by inequality: The social capital of older Asians and Latinos in Phoenix, Arizona. Ethnography, 16(4), 416–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138114565550

17.

Gao-Miles

(2017). Beyond the ethnic enclave: Interethnicity and trans-spatiality in an Australian suburb. City and Society, 29(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12113

18.

Gonzales

Matz-Costa

Morrow-Howell

(2015). Increasing opportunities for the productive engagement of older adults: A response to population aging. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu176

19.

Gonzales

Nowell

W. B.

(2017). Social capital and unretirement: Exploring the bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social relationships. Research on Aging, 39(10), 1100–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027516664569

20.

Gonzales

Shen

Wang

Martinez

L. S.

(2016). Race and place : Exploring the intersection of inequity and volunteerism among older Black and white adults race and place : Exploring the intersection of inequity and. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 59(5), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2016.1224787

21.

Granovetter

(1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.05.022

22.

Greenfield

E. A.

Scharlach

A. E.

Davitt

J. K.

(2016). Organizational characteristics and volunteering in Age-Friendly supportive service initiatives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(5), 931–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015621620

23.

Kadushin (2012). Understanding social networks theories concepts, and findings, Oxford University Press.

24.

Kim

Schneider

Faß

Lochbaum

(2021). Personal social capital and self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults: A cross-sectional study exploring the roles of leisure-time physical activity and socioeconomic status. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10043-6

25.

Lancee

(2010). The economic returns of immigrants’ bonding and bridging social capital. Bram Lancee, 44(1), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00803.x

26.

(2018). Does multiculturalism work? language, friendship homophily, and well-being of immigrants in Canada. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997318

27.

Melamed

Munn

C. W.

Simpson

Abernathy

J. Z.

Harrell

Sweitzer

(2020). Homophily and segregation in cooperative networks. American Journal of Sociology, 125(4), 1084–1127. https://doi.org/10.1086/708142

28.

Newman

M. E.

(2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical review E, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126

29.

Rabiee

(2005). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2004399

30.

Reyes

(2022). Experiences of civic participation among older African American and Latinx immigrant adults in the context of an ageist and racist society. Research on Aging, 45(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221094288

31.

Sargent

Samanta

Yelden

(2017). A grounded theory analysis of a focus group study. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473997233

32.

Serrat

Scharf

Villar

Gómez

(2020). Fifty-five years of research into older people’s civic participation: Recent trends, future directions. In Gerontologist, 60(Issue 1), pp. E38–E51. Gerontological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz021

33.

Singer

(2015). A typology of immigrant gateways, 2014 December, (pp. 2013–2014). https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Gateways-2014-update-1.pdf

34.

Singh

Estefan

(2018). Selecting a grounded theory approach for nursing research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393618799571

35.

Syed

Nelson

S. C.

(2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648

36.

Tan

E. J.

Georges

Gabbard

S. M.

Pratt

D. J.

Nerino

Roberts

A. S.

Wrightsman

S. M.

Hyde

(2016). The 2013–2014 senior corps study: Foster grandparents and senior companions. Public Policy & Aging Report, 26(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prw016

37.

Tang

Morrow-Howell

Hong

(2009). Inclusion of diverse older populations in volunteering: The importance of institutional facilitation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008320195

38.

Torres

Serrat

(2019). Older migrants’ civic participation: A topic in need of attention. Journal of Aging Studies, 50, 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100790.

39.

Valente

T. W.

Pitts

S. R.

(2017). An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044528

40.

Withall

Thompson

J. L.

Fox

K. R.

Davis

Gray

de Koning

Lloyd

Parkhurst

Stathi

(2018). Participant and public involvement in refining a peer-volunteering active aging intervention: Project ACE (active, connected, engaged). The Gerontologist, 58(2), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw148

41.

Wright-St Clair

V. A.

Nayar

Kim

Wang

S. M.

Sodhi

S. K.

Chung

Suchdev

(2018). Late-life Asian immigrants managing wellness through contributing to socially embedded networks. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1370607

42.

Penning

(2015). Immigration and loneliness in later life. Ageing and Society, 35(1), 64–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000470

43.

Yousefi Nooraie

Sale

J. E. M.

Marin

Ross

L. E.

(2018). Social network analysis: An example of fusion between quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818804060

44.

Zhou

(2017). Contemporary Chinese diasporas. In Zhou

(Ed.), Springer nature. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.2307/40095860

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.41 MB

A Mixed-Method Social Network Analysis of Low-Income Diverse Older Volunteers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material