Cognitive function is shaped by social network characteristics, but the geographic dispersion of social network ties remains understudied. We examine whether having a greater proportion of network ties residing outside of one’s local area (“network extralocality”) may benefit cognitive function among U.S. older adults.
Methods
We analyzed nationally representative data from the 2015–2016 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (N = 4,557) in multivariable regression models to examine associations between network extralocality and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores among adults aged 50 and older.
Results
A full-range difference in network extralocality was significantly associated with a .48-point higher MoCA score after adjusting for covariates. A significant interaction between age and network extralocality revealed stronger associations at older ages.
Discussion
Social tie proximity may be an overlooked dimension of social life with cognitive implications. Place-based interventions may support independent aging-in-place by facilitating opportunities to form and maintain extralocal ties.
AliT.NilssonC. J.WeuveJ.RajanK. B.LeonC. F. M. de. (2018). Effects of social network diversity on mortality, cognition and physical function in the elderly: A longitudinal analysis of the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 72(11), 990–996. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2017-210236
2.
AlwinD. F.FelmleeD. H.KreagerD. A. (2018). Together through time—social networks and the life course. In AlwinD. F.FelmleeD. H.KreagerD. A. (Eds.), Social networks and the life course: Integrating the development of human lives and social relational Networks (pp. 3–26). Springer Publishers.
3.
BhererL.EricksonK. I.Liu-AmbroseT. (2013). A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. Journal of Aging Research, 2013(1), Article 657508. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/657508
4.
BinetteJ.FaragoF. (2021). 2021 home and community preference survey: A national survey of adults age 18-Plus. AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00479.001
5.
CabreraJ. F.NajarianJ. C. (2015). How the built environment shapes spatial bridging ties and social capital. Environment and Behavior, 47(3), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513500275
CamachoD.PachecoK.MoxleyJ.ArandaM. P.ReidM. C.WethingtonE. (2024). Loneliness and global cognitive functioning in racially and ethnically diverse US midlife and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(1), Article 1344044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1344044
9.
CarstensenL. L.ReynoldsM. E. (2023). Age differences in preferences through the lens of socioemotional selectivity theory. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 24(1), Article 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100440
10.
ChoiH.SchoeniR. F.WiemersE. E.HotzV. J.SeltzerJ. A. (2019). Spatial distance between parents and adult children in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 12606(2), 822–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12606
CornwellB.LaumannE. O. (2018). Structure by death: Social Network replenishment in the wake of confidant loss. In AlwinD. F.FelmleeD. H.KreagerD. A. (Eds.), Social networks and the life course: Integrating the development of human lives and social relational networks (pp. 343–365). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_16
13.
CroweC.LiuL.BagnarolN.FriedL. (2024). Loneliness prevention and the role of the Public Health system. Perspectives in Public Health, 144(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139221106579
14.
DaleW.KotwalA. A.ShegaJ. W.SchummL. P.KernD. W.PintoJ.PudelekK. M.WaiteL. J.McClintockM. K. (2018). Cognitive function and its risk factors among older US adults living at home. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 32(3), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000241
15.
De SilvaN. A.GregoryM. A.VenkateshanS. S.VerschoorC. P.KuspinarA. (2019). Examining the association between life-space mobility and cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Aging Research, 2019(1), Article 3923574. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3923574
16.
EllwardtL.Van TilburgT. G.AartsenM. J. (2015). The mix matters: Complex personal networks relate to higher cognitive functioning in old age. Social Science and Medicine, 125, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.007
17.
EvansI. E. M.LlewellynD. J.MatthewsF. E.WoodsR. T.BrayneC.ClareL.Team, on behalf of the C.-W. Research. (2018). Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in healthy older people. PLOS ONE, 13(8), Article e0201008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201008
18.
EvansI. E. M.MartyrA.CollinsR.BrayneC.ClareL. (2019). Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 70(s1), S119–S144. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180501
19.
FeldS. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1086/227352
20.
FerraroK. F.BauldryS.Sauerteig-RolstonM. R.ThomasP. A. (2023). Dual functionality in later life. The Gerontologist, 63(7), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad031
21.
FinlayJ.EspositoM.LangaK. M.JuddS.ClarkeP. (2022). Cognability: An Ecological Theory of neighborhoods and cognitive aging. Social Science & Medicine, 309(1), Article 115220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115220
22.
FinlayJ.EspositoM.LiM.KobayashiL. C.KhanA. M.Gomez-LopezI.MelendezR.ColabianchiN.JuddS.ClarkeP. J. (2021). Can neighborhood social infrastructure modify cognitive function? A mixed-methods study of urban-dwelling aging Americans. Journal of Aging and Health, 33(9), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211008673
23.
FioccoA. J.YaffeK. (2010). Defining successful aging: The importance of including cognitive function over time. Archives of Neurology, 67(7), 876–880. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.130
24.
FischerC. S.BeresfordL. (2015). Changes in support networks in late middle age: The extension of gender and educational differences. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu057
25.
FratiglioniL.Paillard-BorgS.WinbladB. (2004). An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. The Lancet. Neurology, 3(6), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7
26.
GardnerP. J. (2011). Natural neighborhood networks—Important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.007
27.
Gómez-SoriaI.IguacelI.Aguilar-LatorreA.Peralta-MarrupeP.LatorreE.ZaldívarJ. N. C.CalatayudE. (2023). Cognitive stimulation and cognitive results in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 104(1), Article 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104807
28.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
29.
GuiauxM.van TilburgT.Broese van GroenouM. (2007). Changes in contact and support exchange in personal networks after widowhood. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00165.x
30.
HaJ.-H. J.-H.CarrD.UtzR. L.NesseR. (2006). Older adults’ perceptions of intergenerational support after widowhood: How do men and women differ?Journal of Family Issues, 27(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05277810
31.
HankK. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00351.x
32.
HertzogC.KramerA. F.WilsonR. S.LindenbergerU. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x
33.
HippJ. R.PerrinA. J. (2009). The simultaneous effect of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighborhood ties. City & Community, 8(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01267.x
34.
Holt-LunstadJ.CudjoeT. K. M.DumitriuD.EllisonN. B.KotwalA. A.PantellM. S.PerissinottoC. M.SmithM. L. (2025). The need for scientific leadership and collaboration to enhance social connection: A call to action. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1548(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15343
35.
HorakM.VanhoorenS. (2024). Somebody to lean on: Community ties, social exchange, and practical help during the COVID-19 pandemic. City & Community, 23(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841231159370
36.
HyunJ.CerinoE. S.KatzM. J.LovasiG.LiptonR. B.SliwinskiM. J. (2025). Neighborhood bonding and bridging social capital, social activity participation, and short-term cognitive variability in later life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 80(11), gbaf157. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf157
37.
IkkinkK. K.van TilburgT. (1999). Broken ties: Reciprocity and other factors affecting the termination of older adults’ relationships. Social Networks, 21(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00005-2
38.
JanssenJ. H. M.van TilburgT. G.van IngenE. J.CortenR.PeetersG. M. E. E. (2025). Social connectedness in older adults: The potential of social internet use to maintain a strong and stable personal network. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 80(4), Article gbaf014. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf014
39.
JohnsonC. A.GriffisM. R. (2014). The effect of public library use on the social capital of rural communities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000612470278
40.
KailB. L.CarrD. C. (2020). More than selection effects: Volunteering is associated with benefits in cognitive functioning. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(8), 1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa101
41.
KauppiM.VirtanenM.PenttiJ.AaltoV.KivimäkiM.VahteraJ.StenholmS. (2021). Social network ties before and after retirement: A cohort study. European Journal of Ageing, 18(4), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00604-y
42.
KawasC. H.LegdeurN.CorradaM. M. (2021). What have we learned from cognition in the oldest-old. Current Opinion in Neurology, 34(2), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000910
43.
KellyM. E.DuffH.KellyS.McHugh PowerJ. E.BrennanS.LawlorB. A.LoughreyD. G. (2017). The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0632-2
44.
KlinenbergE. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown.
45.
KotwalA. A.KimJ.WaiteL.DaleW. (2016). Social function and cognitive status: Results from a US nationally representative survey of older adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(8), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11606-016-3696-0
46.
KotwalA. A.SchummL. P.KernD. W.McClintockM. K.WaiteL. J.ShegaJ. W.Huisingh-ScheetzM. J.DaleW. (2015). Evaluation of a brief survey instrument for assessing subtle differences in cognitive function among older adults. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 29(4), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000068
47.
KuiperJ. S.ZuidersmaM.ZuidemaS. U.BurgerhofJ. G.StolkR. P.Oude VoshaarR. C.SmidtN. (2016). Social relationships and cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(4), 1169–1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJE/DYW089
48.
LaraE.CaballeroF. F.Rico-UribeL. A.OlayaB.HaroJ. M.Ayuso-MateosJ. L.MiretM. (2019). Are loneliness and social isolation associated with cognitive decline?International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(11), 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5174
49.
LeeS.CharlesS. T.AlmeidaD. M. (2021). Change is good for the brain: Activity diversity and cognitive functioning across adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(6), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa020
50.
LeeS. H.KimY. B. (2016). Which type of social activities may reduce cognitive decline in the elderly? A longitudinal population-based study. BMC Geriatrics, 16(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0343-x
51.
LiT.ZhangY. (2015). Social network types and the health of older adults: Exploring reciprocal associations. Social Science & Medicine, 130(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.007
52.
LitwinH.Shiovitz-EzraS. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq094
53.
LiuH.ZhangY.BurgardS. A.NeedhamB. L. (2019). Marital status and cognitive impairment in the United States: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Annals of Epidemiology, 38(1), 28–34.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.08.007
54.
LivingstonG.HuntleyJ.LiuK. Y.CostafredaS. G.SelbækG.AlladiS.AmesD.BanerjeeS.BurnsA.BrayneC.FoxN. C.FerriC. P.GitlinL. N.HowardR.KalesH. C.KivimäkiM.LarsonE. B.NakasujjaN.RockwoodK.MukadamN. (2024). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. Lancet (London, England), 404(10452), 572–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0
55.
LoganJ. R.SpitzeG. D. (1994). Family neighbors. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1086/230543
56.
LyuJ.BurrJ. A. (2016). Socioeconomic status across the life course and cognitive function among older adults: An examination of the latency, pathways, and accumulation hypotheses. Journal of Aging and Health, 28(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315585504
57.
MarsdenP. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095397
58.
MolesworthT.SheuL. K.CohenS.GianarosP. J.VerstynenT. D. (2015). Social network diversity and white matter microstructural integrity in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCAN/NSV001
59.
MurthyV. H. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need to address social isolation and loneliness. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C, 1974), 136(6), 653–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549211045425
60.
MyhreJ. W.MehlM. R.GliskyE. L. (2017). Cognitive benefits of online social networking for healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72(5), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw025
61.
NaudA.SueurC.ChaixB.KestensY. (2020). Combining social network and activity space data for health research: Tools and methods. Health & Place, 66(1), Article 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102454
62.
Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2023). Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation: The U.S. surgeon general’s advisory on the healing effects of social connection and community. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK595227/
63.
OttoniC. A.WintersM.Sims-GouldJ. (2022). “We see each other from a distance”: Neighbourhood social relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic matter for older adults’ social connectedness. Health & Place, 76(1), Article 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102844
PardasaniM. P. (2004). Senior centers: Focal points of community-based services for the elderly. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 28(4), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v28n04_03
66.
PengS.PerryB. (2025). A life course perspective on cognitive aging: The interplay between early and later life stimulating environments. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Article 00221465251356611. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465251356611
67.
PengS.RothA. R.PerryB. L. (2021). A latent variable approach to measuring bridging social capital and examining its association to older adults’ cognitive health. Social Neuroscience, 16(6), 684–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2021.2001368
68.
PerryB. L.McConnellW. R.PengS.RothA.ColemanM.ManchellaM.RoesslerM.FrancisH.SheeanH.ApostolovaL. (2022). Social networks and cognitive function: An evaluation of social bridging and bonding mechanisms. The Gerontologist, 62(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/GNAB112
69.
PerryB. L.RothA. R.PengS.RisacherS. L.SaykinA. J.ApostolovaL. G. (2022). Social networks and cognitive reserve: Network structure moderates the association between amygdalar volume and cognitive outcomes. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 77(8), 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab192
70.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
71.
RajanK. B.WeuveJ.BarnesL. L.McAninchE. A.WilsonR. S.EvansD. A. (2021). Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020–2060). Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 17(12), 1966–1975. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12362
72.
RothA. R.PengS.PerryB. L. (2022). Personal network bridging potential across geographic context. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 77(3), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab103
73.
SeemanT. E.LusignoloT. M.AlbertM.BerkmanL. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Health Psychology, 20(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.243
74.
SharifianN.ManlyJ. J.BrickmanA. M.ZahodneL. B. (2019). Social network characteristics and cognitive functioning in ethnically diverse older adults: The role of network size and composition. Neuropsychology, 33(7), 956–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000564
SpringA.AckertE.RocheS.ParrisD.CrowderK.Kravitz-WirtzN. (2023). Keeping kin close? Geographies of family networks by race and income, 1981–2017. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(4), 962–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12911
77.
StephanY.SutinA. R.MõttusR.LuchettiM.AschwandenD.TerraccianoA. (2025). Personality nuances and cognition: A multi-cohort and multi-method approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 183(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.01.060
SternY.Arenaza-UrquijoE. M.Bartrés-FazD.BellevilleS.CantilonM.ChetelatG.EwersM.FranzmeierN.KempermannG.KremenW. S.OkonkwoO.ScarmeasN.SoldanA.Udeh-MomohC.ValenzuelaM.VemuriP.VuoksimaaE.The Reserve, Resilience and Protective Factors PIA Empirical Definitions and Conceptual Frameworks Workgroup. (2020). Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 16(9), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219
80.
SturgeJ.KlaassensM.LagerD.WeitkampG.VegterD.MeijeringL. (2021). Using the concept of activity space to understand the social health of older adults living with memory problems and dementia at home. Social Science & Medicine, 288(1), Article 113208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2020.113208
81.
TorresS. (2018). Aging alone, gossiping together: Older adults’ talk as social glue. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(8), 1474–1482. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby154
82.
TorresS. (2020). “For a younger crowd”: Place, belonging, and exclusion among older adults facing neighborhood change. Qualitative Sociology, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-09441-z
83.
TothC.TullianiN.BissettM.LiuK. P. (2022). The relationship between cognitive function and performance in instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 85(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226211008722
84.
WaiteL. J.CagneyK.DaleW.HawkleyL.HuangE.LauderdaleD.LaumannE. O.McClintockM.O’MuircheartaighC. A. (2017). National social life, health and aging project (NSHAP): Round 3. ICPSR36873[Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36873
85.
YaffeK.FioccoA. J.LindquistK.VittinghoffE.SimonsickE. M.NewmanA. B.SatterfieldS.RosanoC.RubinS. M.AyonayonH. N.HarrisT. B.Health ABC Study. (2009). Predictors of maintaining cognitive function in older adults: The Health ABC Study. Neurology, 72(23), 2029–2035. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a92c36
86.
YeK. X.SunL.WangL.KhooA. L. Y.LimK. X.LuG.YuL.LiC.MaierA. B.FengL. (2023). The role of lifestyle factors in cognitive health and dementia in oldest-old: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 152(1), Article 105286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105286
87.
York CornwellE.GoldmanA. W. (2021). Local ties in the social networks of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(4), 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa033
88.
ZhaiB.LiuX.FuJ.ZhuX.LiJ. (2024). More cognitive gains from social activity in the oldest-old: Evidence from a 10-year longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(1), Article 1382141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382141
89.
ZhangK.BurrJ. A.MutchlerJ. E.LuJ. (2023). Online engagement, resilience, and loneliness among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 329(1), Article 116026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116026
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
