Technology acceptance models associate older age with lower intention to use digital technology although this assumption is often stereotypically-based and not sufficiently tested with older persons. This study investigated the association of ageism (rather than chronological age) with behavioral intention and actual use of technology within the theoretical framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT-2) model. 374 Dutch-speaking participants aged 50–97 completed the UTAUT-2 questionnaire, Expectations Regarding Aging, Attitudes Toward Older Adults Using Technology (ATOAUT-11) and experienced ageism scales. A path analysis found that expectations regarding aging partially mediated the association of age with negative attitudes. Mixed results were found regarding the fit of the new UTAUT-2-Ageism model. Negative ATOAUT moderated the associations of Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, and Habit with Behavioral Intention to use technology, and the explained variance increased. Further research is warranted to fully identify the potential role of ageism in technology acceptance.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
4.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). Taylor & Francis Group, 396(1), Article 7384. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
ChenK.ChanA. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
7.
ChoiE. Y.KimY.ChipaloE.LeeH. Y. (2020). Does perceived ageism Widen the digital divide? And does it vary by gender?The Gerontologist, 60(7), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa066
8.
ChuC. H.NyrupR.LeslieK.ShiJ.BianchiA.LynA.McNichollM.KhanS.RahimiS.GrenierA. (2022). Digital ageism: Challenges and opportunities in artificial intelligence for older adults. The Gerontologist, 62(7), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab167
9.
CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606266
CzajaS. J.CharnessN.FiskA. D.HertzogC.NairS. N.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
12.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
13.
DodeenH. M. (2003). Effectiveness of valid mean substitution in treating missing data in attitude assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301674
GreenhalghT.WhertonJ.PapoutsiC.LynchJ.HughesG.A'CourtC.HinderS.FahyN.ProcterR.ShawS. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), Aticle e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775
17.
HancockG. R.FrenchB. F. (2013). Power analysis in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 117–159). IAP Information Age Publishing.
18.
HaukN.HüffmeierJ.KrummS. (2018). Ready to be a silver surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 84(1), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020
19.
HeerinkM.KröseB.EversV.WielingaB. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
20.
HillR. J.FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), Article 244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853
21.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
22.
KornadtA. E.RothermundK. (2011). Contexts of aging: Assessing evaluative age stereotypes in different life domains. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(5), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr036
23.
KöttlH.AllenL. D.MannheimI.AyalonL. (2022). Associations between everyday ICT usage and (self-) ageism: A systematic literature review. The Gerontologist, Article gnac075. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac075
24.
KöttlH.GallistlV.RohnerR.AyalonL. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59(6), Article 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971
25.
LeeC.CoughlinJ. F. (2015). PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176
26.
LevyB. R.BanajiM. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 49–75). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1157.003.0006
27.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
28.
MacedoI. M. (2017). Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.013
29.
MannheimI.SchwartzE.XiW.ButtigiegS. C.McDonnell-NaughtonM.WoutersE. J. M.Van ZaalenY. (2019). Inclusion of older adults in the research and design of digital technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), Article 3718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193718
30.
MannheimI.WoutersE. J. M.van BoekelL. C.van ZaalenY. (2021). Attitudes of health care professionals toward older adults' abilities to use digital technology: Questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), Article e26232. https://doi.org/10.2196/26232
31.
MarangunićN.GranićA. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
32.
MarianoJ.MarquesS.RamosM. R.GerardoF.de VriesH. (2020). Too old for computers? The longitudinal relationship between stereotype threat and computer use by older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 568972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568972
33.
McDonoughC. C. (2016). The effect of ageism on the digital divide among older adults. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24966/ggm-8662/100008
PeekS. T. M.LuijkxK. G.VrijhoefH. J. M.NieboerM. E.AartsS.van der VoortC. S.RijnaardM. D.WoutersE. J. M. (2019). Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: A dynamical framework. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 236–313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1241-9
36.
PeekS. T. M.WoutersE. J. M.Van HoofJ.LuijkxK. G.BoeijeH. R.VrijhoefH. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
37.
PeineA.NevenL. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technology–a model and agenda. Ageing and Society, 41(12), 2845–2866. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x20000641
38.
Quan-HaaseA.WilliamsC.KicevskiM.EluezeI.WellmanB. (2018). Dividing the grey divide: Deconstructing myths about older adults’ online activities, skills, and attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218777572
SarkisianC. A.SteersW. N.HaysR. D.MangioneC. M. (2005). Development of the 12-item expectations regarding aging survey. The Gerontologist, 45(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.240
41.
SixsmithA. (2013). Technology and the challenge of aging. In SixsmithA.GutmanG. M. (Eds.), Technologies for active aging (pp. 7–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_2
42.
SwiftH. J.AbramsD.LamontR. A.DruryL. (2017). The risks of ageism model: How ageism and negative attitudes toward age can be a barrier to active aging. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12031
43.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
44.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
45.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y.XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
46.
WankaA.GallistlV. (2018). Doing age in a digitized World—a material praxeology of aging with technology. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
47.
WilliamsM. D.RanaN. P.DwivediY. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
48.
WoutersE. J. (2021). Healthcare and technology: The multi-level perspective: Theories, models, and frameworks. In HirvonenH.TammelinM.HänninenR.WoutersE. J. M. (Eds.), Digital transformations in care for older people (pp. 15–32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155317-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
