Assessed Numeracy Skills and Skill Use of Adults With Learning Disabilities in PIAAC

Abstract

Adults with learning disabilities (LD) face educational and employment challenges and may also have other disabilities and health conditions. Little is known about these adults’ numeracy skills and how they use numeracy at work or home. The article’s objective was to investigate numeracy skills and skill use for U.S. adults with LD. The author conducted descriptive and regression analyses of the data from the 2012/2014/2017 U.S. Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Findings are presented on assessed numeracy skills and skill use, relationships of use and skills, and skill use among seven groups of adults with LD. Compared with the general population, adults with LD have lower mean numeracy scores. Skill use at home adds to the variance explained in numeracy skills, which suggests that using numeracy skills matters in gaining skills. Knowing the relationships of assessed numeracy skills with skill use helps educators implement strategies to support adult program completion. Implications of findings are discussed for adult educators and policymakers.

Keywords

numeracy skills learning disabilities PIAAC skill use adult basic skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Budd

Fichten

Jorgensen

Havel

Flanagan

(2016). Postsecondary students with specific learning disabilities and with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder should not be considered as a unified group for research or practice. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1255

Capsada-Munsech

(2020). Overeducation, skills and social background: The influence of parental education on overeducation in Spain. Compare, 50(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1579085

Coben

Alkema

(2017). The case for measuring adults’ numeracy practices. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 6(1), 20–32. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/11426/COABE%202017%20The%20Case%20for%20Measuring%20Adults%27%20Numeracy%20Practices.pdf?sequence=19&isAllowed=y

Coben

Miller-Reilly

Satherley

Earle

(2016). Making the most of PIAAC: Preliminary investigation of adults’ numeracy practices through secondary analysis of the PIAAC dataset. Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 11(2), 27–40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1123375.pdf

Cortiella

Horowitz

S. H.

(2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-State-of-LD.pdf

Cummins

P. A.

Yamashita

Arbogast

(2018). An examination of PIAAC data for unemployed adults aged 45–74. https://piaac.squarespace.com/s/Cummins-Yamashita-Arbogast_2018.pdf

Curry

(2017). Using the PIAAC numeracy framework to guide instruction: An introduction for adult educators. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/58891aa81b631b5929d4c05f/1485380267014/Numeracy_Guide_Curry_2017.pdf

Feinberg

Frijters

Johnson-Lawrence

Greenberg

Nightingale

Moodie

(2016). Examining associations between health information seeking behavior and adult education status in the U.S.: An analysis of the 2012 PIAAC data. PLOS ONE, 11(2), Article e0148751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148751

Gal

Grotlüschen

Tout

Kaiser

(2020). Numeracy, adult education, and “vulnerable” learners: A critical review of a neglected field. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 52, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9

10.

Ginsburg

(2017). What’s an adult numeracy teacher to teach? Negotiating the complexity of adult numeracy instruction. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 6(1), 57–61. https://coabe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2017SpringCOABEJournal.pdf

11.

Grotlüschen

Mallows

Reder

Sabatini

(2016, April). Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 131). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0v44bnmnx-en

12.

Hogan

Thornton

Diaz-Hoffmann

Mohadjer

Krenzke

VanDeKerckhove

(2016). Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) 2012 and 2014: U.S. main study and national supplement technical report (NCES 2016-036). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016036.pdf

13.

Hollinger

Larwin

(2019). Numeracy and adults’ learning readiness and commitment: Results from a large national random sample of participants. Inter-national Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 437–451. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1245087.pdf

14.

Housel

D. A.

(2020). When co-occurring factors impact adult learners: Suggestions for instruction, preservice training, and professional development. Adult Learning, 31(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159519849910

15.

Jonas

(2018, July). Numeracy practices and numeracy skills among adults (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 177). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f19fc9f-en

16.

Madaus

Shaw

(2011). College as a realistic option for students with learning disabilities. Council for Learning Disabilities. https://council-for-learning-disabilities.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/College_OptionforSLD.pdf

17.

National Research Council. (2012). Improving adult literacy: Options for practice and research. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17226/13242

18.

Patterson

M. B.

(2014). Post-GED-credential college prospects for adults with special needs. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 22(3), 22–35. https://coabe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/COABEJournalFall2014.pdf

19.

Patterson

M. B.

(2019). Adults with low skills and learning disabilities. In Perin

(Ed.), Wiley handbook of adult literacy (pp. 336–360). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261407.ch16

20.

Patterson

M. B.

(2020). PIAAC numeracy skills and home use among adult English learners. Adult Literacy Education, 2(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.35847/MPatterson.2.1.22

21.

Patterson

M. B.

Paulson

(2016). Adult transitions to learning in the USA: What do PIAAC results tell us? Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 5(1), 5–27. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098806

22.

Payne

N. A.

(2010). Adults who have learning disabilities: Transition from GED to postsecondary activities [Doctoral dissertation]. Capella University.

23.

Prins

Monnat

(2015). Examining associations between self-rated health and proficiency in literacy and numeracy among immigrants and U.S.-born adults: Evidence from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). PLOS ONE, 10(7), Article e0130257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130257

24.

Rampey

B. D.

Finnegan

Goodman

Mohadjer

Krenzke

Hogan

Provasnik

(2016). Skills of U.S. unemployed, young, and older adults in sharper focus: Results from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) 2012/2014: First look (NCES 2016-039rev). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016039.pdf

25.

Reder

Gauly

Lechner

(2020). Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency. International Review of Education, 66(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09830-5

26.

Sellers

Byrne

(2015). Numeracy into action: Putting numeracy research into practice. Irish Journal of Adult and Community Education, 112–120. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077740.pdf

27.

Smith

M. C.

Rose

A. D.

Smith

T. J.

Ross-Gordon

J. M.

(2015). Adults’ readiness to learn and skill acquisition and use: An analysis of PIAAC. In Adult education research conference. https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=aerc

28.

Takemoto

(2016). Supporting successful reentry for people with disabilities: A brief guide to issues and resources. U.S Department of Education. https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/reentry-for-people-with-disabilities-resources.pdf

29.

Takemoto

(2017). Supporting successful reentry for people with disabilities: Disability specific supports [Revised ed.]. U.S Department of Education. https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/reentry-for-people-with-disabilities-resources.pdf

30.

Willcutt

Petrill

Boada

DeFries

Olson

Pennington

(2013). Comorbidity between reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(6), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413477476

31.

Yamashita

Bardo

A. R.

Liu

(2018). Numeracy skills, health information-seeking, and preventative health behaviors among middle and older aged adults in the U.S. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/5b50a5b80e2e72f3e4d63ae5/1532011961211/Yamashita_Bardo_Liu_Health_Report2018_Final.pdf

32.

Yamashita

Kunkel

S. R.

(2015). An international comparison of the association among literacy, education, and health across the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Italy, Norway, and Bermuda: Implications for health disparities. Journal of Health Communication, 20(4), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.977469