Although the exact prevalence is not determined, a noticeable subset of individuals who enroll in adult education and training programs have either diagnosed or undiagnosed specific learning disabilities (SLD). Understanding SLD is important basic information for adult educators to inform program policies as well as determine effective instructional practices. This article discusses the development of definitions of SLD and current agreement on the nature of SLD relevant to working with adults. It concludes with implications for adult education programs.
AaronP.JoshiR.GoodenR.BentumK. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67–84. doi:10.1177/002221940731083810.1177/0022219407310838
2.
American Institutes for Research. (2002, July). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BijouS. W. (1942). The psychometric pattern approach as an aid to clinical assessment—A review. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 46, 354–362.
4.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CorleyM.TaymansJ. M. (2002). Adults with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. In ComingsJ.GarnerB. (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 3, pp. 44–83). Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/?id=568
6.
CronbachL. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684. doi:10.1037/h004394310.1037/h0043943
7.
Federal Register. (14, August, 2006). Additional Procedures for Identifying Children With Specific Learning Disabilities, p. 46648.
8.
FletcherJ. M. (2003, September). Learning disabilities in adults: Definition and measurement. Paper presented at the Adult Learning Disabilities Workshop/Symposium on Definition, Measurement and Reporting, Washington, DC.
9.
FletcherJ.M.LyonR.BarnesM.StuebingK.K.FrancisD.J.OlsonR.K.ShaywitzS.E.ShaywitzB.A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD.P. (Eds.). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185–250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of LD: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545–552. doi:10.1177/0022219405038006110110.1177/00222194050380061101
11.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
GoldbergH. (2002, January). Improving TANF program outcomes for families with barriers to employment. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1476
13.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
14.
GreggN. (2011). Increasing access to learning for the adult basic education learner with learning disabilities: Evidence-based accommodation research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 1, 32–48.
15.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M.PullenP. C. (2009). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. New York, NY: Pearson.
16.
HammillD. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84. doi:10.1177/00222194900230020110.1177/002221949002300201
17.
HinesJ. (2008). Making collaboration work in inclusive high school classrooms: Recommendations for principals. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 277–282. doi:10.1177/105345120831449210.1177/1053451208314492
18.
HockM. (2011). Effective literacy instruction for adults with specific learning disabilities: Implications for adult educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 1, 17–31.
19.
KavaleK. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 370–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
KavaleK.SpauldingL.BeamA. (2009). A time to define making the specific learning disability definition prescribe specific learning disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 39–48. Retrieved from the ProQuest Education Journals database. (1654032211)
21.
KirschI. S.JungeblutA.JenkinsL.KolstadA. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=93275
22.
KutnerM.GreenbertE.JinY.BoyleB.HsuY.DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007–480). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
23.
LasaterB.ElliottB. (2005). Profiles of the adult education and training target population: Information from the 2000 census. Raleigh, NC: RTI International. Retrieved from www.clasp.org/publications/tanf_ed_2pgr.pdf
24.
LeslieL.LambrosK.AaronsG.HaineR.HoughR. (2008). School-based service use by youth with ADHD in public-sector settings. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 163–177. Retrieved from the General Interest Module database. (1542906111)
25.
MellardD. (2003, September). Definitional issues in adult learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Adult Learning Disabilities Workshop/Symposium on Definition, Measurement and Reporting, Washington, DC.
26.
MellardD. F.PattersonM. B. (2008). Contrasting adult literacy learners with and without specific learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 133–144. doi:10.1177/074193250831505310.1177/0741932508315053
27.
MercerC. D.PullenP. C. (2009). Students with learning disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
ReschlyD. J.HospJ. L. (2004). State SLD identification policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 197–213.
36.
ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D. (1999). Reform trends and system design alternatives. In ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D.IIIGrimesJ. P. (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 19–48). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
37.
RyanA.PriceL. (1993). Learning disabilities in adult basic education: A survey of current practices. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10(3), 31–40.
38.
ShawS. (2009). Transition to postsecondary education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(2), 1–16.
39.
ShaywitzS. E.MorrisR.ShaywitzB. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychiatry, 59, 451–475. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.09363310.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633
40.
SideridisG. D. (2007). International approaches to learning disabilities: More alike or more different?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 210–215. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00249.x10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00249.x
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010(NCES 2011-015), Chapter 2. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/ch_2.asp
43.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Adult and Vocational Education. (2008, July). Bridges to opportunity: Federal adult education programs for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/eo13445.pdf
44.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2005, January). Guidelines for assessing the functional capacities of an individual with specific learning disabilities to determine significance of disability for order of selection purposes (Technical Assistance Circular RSA-TAC-05-01). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/rsa/tac-05-01.doc
VolkmarF. (2003). Changing perspectives on ADHD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1025–1027. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.102510.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1025