In this introduction to this special issue, “A Decade Later,” we provide an overview of the accomplishments as well as the persistent questions surrounding RTI. We organize this discussion within 3 categories: assessment, instruction, and policy. Within each of these sections, we also highlight how the articles in the present special issue expand upon the key issues. Developed initially for the early grades (kindergarten through third grade) and primarily in the area of reading, many-although not all-of these issues speak to the expansion of RTI to address a broader set of academic content areas and the full range of grade levels.
BakerJ.ZigmondN. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?Exceptional Children, 56, 515–526.
2.
ClementM.VandenbergheR. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers’ professional development: An account from the field. School Leadership and Management, 21(1), 43–57.
3.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.GilbertJ. K.BarqueroL. A.. . . CrouchR. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–341.
4.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409.
5.
ComptonD. L.GilbertJ. K.JenkinsJ. R.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ChoE.. . . BoutonB. D. (2012). Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to Tier 3 instruction: What level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 204–216.
6.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF.UnderwoodP. S. (2007). A 2nd chance in second grade: The independent and cumulative impact of first-and second-grade reading instruction and students’ letter-word reading skill growth. Society for Scientific Study of Reading, 11(3), 199–223.
7.
DentonC. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 232–243.
8.
DentonC. A.VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201–211. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007510.1111/1540–5826.00075
9.
FrancisD. J.SantiK. L.BarrC.FletcherJ. M.VariscoA.FoormanB. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315–342.
10.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.CaffreyE. (in press). The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: Implications for RTI frameworks. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
11.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.BryantJ.HamlettC.LambertW. (2012). First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 217–231.
12.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.DavisG. C. (2008). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal study at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing: A Contemporary Journal, 21, 413–436
13.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlottC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204–219.
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1994) Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309
16.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP.SimmonsD. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to student diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
17.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–323.
18.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP.YoungC. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007210.1111/1540–5826.00072.
19.
FuchsL. S. (2003). Assessing treatment responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172–186.
20.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HollenbeckK.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (in press). Two-stage screening for math word-problem difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
21.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232–243.
22.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty: Its power and limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 257–269.
23.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.DenoS. L. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 6–26.
24.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.DenoS. L. (1984). Inaccuracy among readability formulas: Implications for the measurement of reading proficiency and selection of instructional material. Diagnostique, 9, 86–95.
25.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.PhillipsN. B.BentzJ. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518–537.
26.
GamseB. C.BloomH. S.KempleJ. J.JacobR. T. (2008). Reading First impact study: Interim report (NCEE 2008–4016). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/
27.
GerberM. (2005). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of Response to Instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 516–524.
28.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009–4045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
29.
GerstenR.DiminoJ. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 120–130. doi:10.1111/0938–8982.0001310.1111/0938–8982.00013
30.
GerstenR.DiminoJ. A. (2006). New directions in research on RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99–108.
31.
GerstenR.MorvantM.BrengelmanS. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52–66.
32.
GerstenR.VaughnS.DeshlerD.SchillerE. P. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476.
33.
GreenwoodC. R.TerryB.UtleyC. A.MontagnaD.. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of Classwide Peer Tutoring ussed at the elementary school. School Psychology review, 22(3), 497–516.
34.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ. C.HallR. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371–383.
35.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
36.
JenkinsJ. R.O’ConnorR. E. (2000). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 99–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
MarstonD.MuyskensP.LauM.CanterA. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision-making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200.
38.
NewmanF. M.KingB.YoungsP. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259–274.
39.
O’ConnorP. D.JenkinsJ. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_410.1207/s1532799xssr0302_4
40.
RenyiJ. (1998). Building learning into the teaching job. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 70–74.
41.
SchatschneiderC.WagnerR. K.CrawfordE. (2008). The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 308–315.
42.
SemmelM. I.AbernathyT. V.ButeraG.LesarS. (1991). Teacher perceptions of the regular education initiative. Exceptional Children, 58, 9–24.
43.
SimmonsD.HairrellA.EdmondsM.VaughnS.LarsenR.WillsonV.. . . ByrnsG. (2010). A comparison of multiple-strategy methods: Effects on fourth-grade students’ general and content-specific reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
44.
SpeeceD. L.CaseL. P.MolloyD. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 147–156. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007110.1111/1540–5826.00071
45.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–820.
46.
TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D.PetersonD. S.RodriguezM. C. (2005). The CIERA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 40–69.
47.
TorgesenJ. K. (2009). The response to intervention instructional model: Some outcomes from a large-scale implementation in Reading First schools. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 38–40.
48.
VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C.GilbertsonD. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.
49.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. A.. . . FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
50.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 244–256.
51.
VaughnS.FuchsL. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007010.1111/1540–5826.00070
52.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
53.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.WoodruffA. L.MurrayC. S.WanzekJ.ScammaccaN.. . . ElbaumB. (2009). Effects of professional development on improving at-risk students’ performance in reading. In GreenwoodC. R.KratochwillT. R.ClementsM. (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 115–142). New York, NY: Guilford.
54.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC. S.ScammaccaN.Linan-ThompsonS.WoodruffA. L. (2009). Response to early reading interventions: Examining higher responders and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75, 165–183.
55.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
56.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2010). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education?Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 167–175. doi:10.1177/074193251036126710.1177/0741932510361267
