Effect of Moulding Temperature on Flexure,Impact Strength and Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CF/PEI Composite

Abstract

The effects of processing conditions on the mechanical properties of a CF/PEI woven fabric composite have been investigated. A compression moulding procedure using a hot press was applied to simulate the effects of various processing conditions. The mechanical properties of the CF/PEI composite were characterised by flexure, impact strength and interlaminar fracture tests in relation to the consolidation quality. Consolidation quality was studied through void content and density measurement. The results indicated that the consolidation quality of the composites was highly dependent on the processing temperature. The flexure properties. Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness for crack initiation and Mode II interlaminar fracture growth resistance correlated directly with consolidation quality. However, the Charpy impact strength and Mode I interlaminar fracture growth resistance both increased as the void content was increased because of a “multiple-crack” failure mechanism.

Keywords

thermoplastic composite CF/PEI consolidation interlaminar fracture impact strength flexure property

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sandgren

1991. “Applications for Thermoplastic Composites in Automotive Markets,” Proceedings of 46th Annual Conference, Composites Institute, The Society of the Plastic Industry, Inc., February 18–21, paper 17-A.

2. Offringa

Zimmermann

. 1992. “Thermoplastic ICE Protection Plates for the Dornier 328,” Advanced Materials and Structures from Research to Application,” Brandt

Hornfeld

Neitzel

, eds., Switzerland: SAMPE European Chapter.

3. Sharp

R. S. Holmes

Woodall

. 1995. “Material Selection/Fabrication Issues for Thermoplastic Fibre Placement,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 8:2–14.

4. Moore

D. R.

Seferis

J. C.

, et al. 1991. “Intrinsic Characterisation of Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. I: Toughness Characterisation of Carbon Fibre/Polyetherether Ketone Laminates,” Pure and Applied Chemistry. 24:1610–1625.

5. Cattanach

J. B.

Guff

Cogswell

F. N.

. 1985. “The Processing of Thermoplastics Containing High Loadings of Long and Continuous Reinforcing Fibres,” Journal of Polymer Engineering, Proceedings of the Ist Meeting of the Polymer Processing Society. Akron, OH: 6(1–4):345–362.

6. Grove

S. M.

Short

. 1986. “Fabrication Processes for Continuous Fibre-Reinforced Thermoplastics,” High Tech-The May into the Nineties.” Brunsch

Gölden

H. D.

Herkert

C. M.

, eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

7. Connor

M. S.

Toll

J.-A. E. Manson

Gibson

A. G.

. 1995. “A Model for the Consolidation of Aligned Thermoplastic Powder Impregnated Composites,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 8:138–162.

8. Hou

Mai

Y. W.

. “Production of Aileron Rib with Advanced Thermoplastic Composite.” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Composites Engineering (ICCE/2), New Orleans, August 21–24, 1995.

9. Fines

R. E.

Bartolomucci

J. P.

. “Polyether-Imides (PEI),” Engineering Materials Handbooks, Volume 2, Engineering Plastics, Epel

J. N.

, et al., eds., Published by ASM International.

10.

10. Carlsson

L. A.

, ed. 1991. “Thermoplastic Composite Materials,” Composite Materials Series, Vol. 7, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

11.

Davies

1990. “Interlaminar Fracture Testing of Composites,” Protocol of a Joint Round Robin Test Series between EGF/ASTM/JIS, European Group of Fracture Task Group on Polymers and Composites. Switzerland: Les Diablereth.

12.

12. Hashemi

Kinloch

A. J.

Williams

J. G.

. 1989. “Corrections Needed in Double Cantilever Beam Tests for Assessing the Interlaminar Failure of Fibre Composites,” J. Mater, Sci, Leiters, 8:125–129.

13.

Williams

J. G.

1989. “End Corrections for Orthotopic DCB Specimens,” Composites Sci, Tech., 35:357–376.

14.

14. Hashemi

Kinloch

A. J.

Williams

J. G.

. 1990. “The Effects of Geometry, Rate and Temperature on the Mode I, Mode II and Mixed-Mode I/II Interlaminar Fracture of Carbon-Fibre/Poly (Ether-Ether Ketone) Composites,” Journal of Composite Materials, 24:918–956.

15.

15. Davies

Benzeggagh

M. L.

. 1989. “Interlaminar Mode-I Fracture Testing,” in Application of Fracture Mechanics to Composite Materials, Friedrich

, ed., R. B. Pipes, series ed., Elsevier Science Publication, pp. 81–112.

16.

16. Jar

P. Y. B.

Mulone

Davies

Kausch

H. H.

. 1993. “A Study of the Effect of Forming Temperature on the Mechanical Behaviour of Carbon-Fibre/PEEK Composites,” Composites Science and Technology, 46:7–19.

17.

17. Wang

Y. J.

Zhao

D. M.

. 1995. “Characterization of Interlaminar Fracture Behaviour of Woven Fabric Reinforced Polymeric Composites.” Composites, 26(2):115–124.

18.

18. Ye

Friedrich

. 1993. “Interlaminar Fracture of Commingled-Fabric-Based GF/PET Composites,” Composites, 24(7):557–564.

19.

19. Friedrich

Carlsson

L. A.

Gillespie

J. W.

Jr. Karger-Kocsis

. 1991. “Fracture of Thermoplastic Composites,” in Thermoplastic Composite Materials, Composite Materials Series Vol. 7, Carlsson

L. A.

, ed., Elsevier.

20.

20. Sela

Ishai

. 1989. “Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Toughening of Laminated Composite Materials: A Review,” Composites, 20(5):423–435.