This review demonstrates the free vibrational analysis of composites reinforced with natural, synthetic, and hybrid fibers and those manufactured through 3D printing highlighting their advantages such as recyclability, affordability, lightweight nature, and environmental friendliness. These materials are finding widespread use in numerous industries. The paper mainly explores the effects of the different fiber volume fractions, filler material inclusion ratio, nature of weaving pattern, layering arrangement, joint orientation, matrix content, joining mediators, and processing methods on vibrational analysis. The review also investigates the influence of layer patterns, thickness, infill density, raster angles, deposition speeds, infill rates, and the geometric characteristics of 3D printed components on their vibrational performance. The comparisons of natural frequency and damping ratio across different composites deliver significant insights into the vibrational behavior of various fiber-reinforced and 3D printed materials.
SayeedMMASayemASMHaiderJ, et al.Assessing mechanical properties of jute, kenaf, and pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: experiment and modelling. Polymers2023; 15(4): 830. DOI: 10.3390/polym15040830.
2.
KarthiNKumaresanKSathishS, et al.An overview: natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites, chemical treatments and application areas. Mater Today Proc2020; 27: 2828–2834. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.011.
3.
GholampourAOzbakkalogluT. A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J Mater Sci2020; 55(3): 829–892. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y.
4.
SahuPGuptaM. Sisal (Agave sisalana) fibre and its polymer-based composites: a review on current developments. J Reinforc Plast Compos2017; 36(24): 1759–1780. DOI: 10.1177/0731684417725584.
5.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRK. Mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Indian J Fibre Text Res2017; 42(1): 64–71.
6.
TserkiVZafeiropoulosNESimonF, et al.A study of the effect of acetylation and propionylation surface treatments on natural fibres. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36(8): 1110–1118. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.004.
7.
MauryaHOGuptaMKSrivastavaRK, et al.Study on the mechanical properties of epoxy composite using short sisal fibre. Mater Today Proc2015; 2(4–5): 1347–1355. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.053.
8.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRKBisariaH. Potential of jute fibre reinforced polymer composites: A review. Int. J. Fiber Text. Res2015; 5(3): 30–38.
9.
AbdelmoulehMBoufiSBelgacemM, et al.Short natural-fibre reinforced polyethylene and natural rubber composites: effect of silane coupling agents and fibres loading. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(7–8): 1627–1639.
10.
KuHWangHPattarachaiyakoopNTradaM. A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering2011; 42(4): 856–873. DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010.
11.
DittenberDBGangaRaoHVS. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43(8): 1419–1429. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019.
12.
PickeringKLEfendyMGALeTM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2016; 83: 98–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038.
13.
TahirPAhmedABSaifulAzrySOA, et al.Retting process of some bast plant fibres and its effect on fibre quality: a review. n.d.
14.
SanjayMRSiengchinSParameswaranpillaiJ, et al.A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydr Polym2019; 207: 108–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083.
15.
BezaziABelaadiABourchakM, et al.Novel extraction techniques, chemical and mechanical characterisation of Agave americana L. natural fibres. Compos Part B Eng2014; 66: 194–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.014.
16.
LiXTabilLGPanigrahiS. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ2007; 15(1): 25–33. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3.
17.
MwaikamboLYAnsellMP. Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 84(12): 2222–2234. DOI: 10.1002/app.10460.
18.
ReddyKOMaheswariCURajuluAV, et al.Thermal degradation parameters and tensile properties of borassus flabellifer fruit fiber reinforcement. J Reinforc Plast Compos2009; 28(18): 2297–2301. DOI: 10.1177/0731684408092380.
19.
AsimMJawaidMAbdanK, et al.Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and fibre-matrix bond strength of kenaf and pineapple leaf fibres. J Bionic Eng2016; 13(3): 426–435. DOI: 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3.
20.
SaravanakumarSSKumaravelANagarajanT, et al.Effect of chemical treatments on physicochemical properties of Prosopis juliflora fibers. Int J Polym Anal Charact2014; 19(5): 383–390. DOI: 10.1080/1023666X.2014.903585.
21.
RashidBLemanZJawaidM, et al.Physicochemical and thermal properties of lignocellulosic fiber from sugar palm fibers: effect of treatment. Cellulose2016; 23(5): 2905–2916. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-1005-z.
Saravana BavanDMohan KumarG. Potential use of natural fiber composite materials in India. J Reinforc Plast Compos2010; 29(24): 3600–3613. DOI: 10.1177/0731684410381151.
24.
SanjayMRArpithaGRNaikLL, et al.Applications of natural fibers and its composites: an overview. Nat Resour2016; 07(03): 108–114. DOI: 10.4236/nr.2016.73011.
25.
KudvaAGtMPaiKD. Physical, thermal, mechanical, sound absorption and vibration damping characteristics of natural fiber reinforced composites and hybrid fiber reinforced composites: a review. Cogent Eng2022; 9(1): 2107770. DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2107770. In: Jones IP (ed).
26.
ThyavihalliGYGMavinkere RangappaSParameswaranpillaiJ, et al.Natural fibers as sustainable and renewable resource for development of eco-friendly composites: a comprehensive review. Front Mater2019; 6: 226. DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2019.00226.
27.
SoniADasPKGuptaSK, et al.An overview of recent trends and future prospects of sustainable natural fiber-reinforced polymeric composites for tribological applications. Ind Crops Prod2024; 222: 119501. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119501.
28.
KarimahARidhoMRMunawarSS, et al.A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 2442–2458. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014.
29.
ElfalehIAbbassiFHabibiM, et al.A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites: an eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials. Results Eng2023; 19: 101271. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271.
30.
CalabreseLFioreVValenzaA, et al.A topological weakening and softening map as simplified tool to assess the performances recovery of hybridized natural fiber reinforced composites subjected to alternate salt-fog/dry cycle. Polym Test2023; 127: 108186. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108186.
31.
MMADhakalHNZhangZ, et al.The effect of various environmental conditions on the impact damage behaviour of natural-fibre-reinforced composites (NFRCs)—a critical review. Polymers2023; 15(5): 1229. DOI: 10.3390/polym15051229.
32.
TurjoSMKSHossainMFRanaMS, et al.Mechanical characterization and corrosive impacts of natural fiber reinforced composites: an experimental and numerical approach. Polym Test2023; 125: 108108. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108108.
33.
FerreiraSRMendes De AndradeRGKoendersE, et al.Pull-out behavior and tensile response of natural fibers under different relative humidity levels. Constr Build Mater2021; 308: 124823. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124823.
34.
PanYZhongZ. Relative humidity and temperature dependence of mechanical degradation of natural fiber composites. Sci China Phys Mech Astron2016; 59(6): 664603. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-015-0520-0.
35.
WangQChenTWangX, et al.Recent progress on moisture absorption aging of plant fiber reinforced polymer composites. Polymers2023; 15(20): 4121. DOI: 10.3390/polym15204121.
36.
NetoJSSDe QueirozHFMAguiarRAA, et al.A review on the thermal characterisation of natural and hybrid fiber composites. Polymers2021; 13(24): 4425. DOI: 10.3390/polym13244425.
LotfiALiHDaoDV, et al.Natural fiber–reinforced composites: a review on material, manufacturing, and machinability. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2021; 34(2): 238–284. DOI: 10.1177/0892705719844546.
39.
PaglicawanMAKimBSBasiliaBA, et al.Plasma-treated abaca fabric/unsaturated polyester composite fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol2014; 1(3): 241–246. DOI: 10.1007/s40684-014-0030-3.
40.
PanyasartKChaiyutNAmornsakchaiT, et al.Effect of surface treatment on the properties of pineapple leaf fibers reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Energy Proc2014; 56: 406–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.173.
41.
JaafarJSiregarJPPiahMBM, et al.Influence of selected treatment on tensile properties of short pineapple leaf fiber reinforced tapioca resin biopolymer composites. J Polym Environ2018; 26(11): 4271–4281. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-018-1296-2.
42.
HamdanMHMSiregarJPBachtiarD, et al.Effect of alkaline treatment on mechanical properties of woven ramie reinforced thermoset composite. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 257: 012044. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/257/1/012044.
43.
AhmadIMosadeghzadZDaikR, et al.The effect of alkali treatment and filler size on the properties of sawdust/UPR composites based on recycled PET wastes. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 109(6): 3651–3658. DOI: 10.1002/app.28488.
44.
RanaAKMandalAMitraBC, et al.Short jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of compatibilizer. J Appl Polym Sci1998; 69(2): 329–338. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980711)69:2<329::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-R.
45.
LiZZengKGuoZ, et al.All‐in‐One: an interwoven dual‐phase strategy for acousto‐mechanical multifunctionality in microlattice metamaterials. Adv Funct Mater2024; 35: 2420207. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202420207.
46.
LiZWangXZengK, et al.Unprecedented mechanical wave energy absorption observed in multifunctional bioinspired architected metamaterials. NPG Asia Mater2024; 16(1): 45. DOI: 10.1038/s41427-024-00565-5.
47.
WangXLiXLiZ, et al.A ribbed strategy disrupts conventional metamaterial deformation mechanisms for superior energy absorption. Virtual Phys Prototyp2024; 19(1): e2337310. DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2337310.
48.
WangXLiXLiZ, et al.Superior strength, toughness, and damage‐tolerance observed in microlattices of aperiodic unit cells. Small2024; 20(23): 2307369. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202307369.
49.
WangXLiZGuoX, et al.Superior damage tolerance observed in interpenetrating phase composites composed of aperiodic lattice structures. Extreme Mech Lett2024; 72: 102227. DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2024.102227.
50.
WangXLiZDengJ, et al.Unprecedented strength enhancement observed in interpenetrating phase composites of aperiodic lattice metamaterials. Adv Funct Mater2025; 35(1): 2406890. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202406890.
51.
TurnerBNGoldSA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp J2015; 21(3): 250–261. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017.
52.
Turner BNStrongRGold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J2014; 20(3): 192–204. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012.
53.
ĆwikłaGGrabowikCKalinowskiK, et al.The influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 227: 012033. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033.
54.
SolomonIJSevvelPGunasekaranJ. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today Proc2021; 37: 509–514. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484.
55.
MishraVNegiSKarS, et al.Recent advances in fused deposition modeling based additive manufacturing of thermoplastic composite structures: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2023; 36(7): 3094–3132. DOI: 10.1177/08927057221102857.
56.
JinYLiHHeY, et al.Quantitative analysis of surface profile in fused deposition modelling. Addit Manuf2015; 8: 142–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2015.10.001.
57.
DhilipkumarTVenkatesanRKimS-C, et al.Assessing the structural and free vibrational performance of areca/ ramie fibre composite reinforced with graphene nanofiller. Ind Crops Prod2024; 222: 119599. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119599.
58.
DhilipkumarTVenkatesanRHiremathVS, et al.Enhancing structural performance of 3D ‐printed adhesively bonded flat‐joggle‐flat polymer joints with graphene‐reinforced adhesive. Polym Compos2024; 45: 16335–16346. DOI: 10.1002/pc.29037.
59.
SalveAMacheA. Experimental study on the effects of SS304 and aluminium reinforcements on mechanical and vibration properties in jute‐epoxy composites. Polym Compos2024; 45(14): 13359–13377. DOI: 10.1002/pc.28708.
60.
DhilipkumarTRajeshMSathyaseelanP, et al.Evaluating structural strength and vibrational characteristics of silicon carbide incorporated adhesively bonded single lap joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2024; 38(16): 2959–2972. DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2024.2322812.
61.
VargheseLMohan KumarGC. The epoxy-based composites with size-fractionated waste areca sheath: an experimental investigation on the macroscopic and vibrational properties. Frat Ed Integrità Strutt2024; 19(71): 49–66. DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.71.05.
62.
KirubakaranRKaliyamoorthyRMunusamyR, et al.Mechanical and vibration behavior of surface‐modified titanium sheet interleaved with woven basalt/flax fiber metal laminates. Polym Compos2023; 44(12): 8442–8453. DOI: 10.1002/pc.27709.
63.
PalanikumarKSubbiahV. Bio caryota fiber reinforced polymer composites: mechanical properties and vibration behavior analysis. J Bionic Eng2019; 16(3): 480–491. DOI: 10.1007/s42235-019-0039-y.
64.
KudvaAGTMHegdeS, et al.Influence of chemical treatment of bamboo fibers on the vibration and acoustic characterization of carbon/bamboo fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Mater Res Express2024; 11(7): 075304. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad5cd5.
65.
ChakrabortySPadmarajNHIVTR, et al.Effect of fibre treatment and moisture content on the vibration and acoustic properties of the basalt/hemp hybrid composites. Mater Res Express2024; 11(3): 035101. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad2f7f.
66.
SuranaIPandyaDJPadmarajNH, et al.Influence of filler material on mechanical and vibration properties of basalt/epoxy composites. Mater Res Express2019; 6(8): 085342. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab279e.
67.
SenthilrajanSVenkateshwaranN. Ageing and its influence on vibration characteristics of jute/polyester composites. J Polym Environ2019; 27(10): 2144–2155. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-019-01493-0.
68.
SenthilrajanSVenkateshwaranNNareshK. Parametric study of different fiber parameters and their influence on acoustics and vibration behavior of jute fiber/polyester resin composites. J Nat Fibers2022; 19(16): 13063–13075. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2085225.
69.
MundeYSIngleRBSivaI. Vibration damping and acoustic characteristics of sisal fibre–reinforced polypropylene composite. Noise Vib Worldw2019; 50(1): 13–21. DOI: 10.1177/0957456518812784.
70.
MundeYSIngleRBSivaI. Investigation to appraise the vibration and damping characteristics of coir fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Adv Mater Process Technol2018; 4(4): 639–650. DOI: 10.1080/2374068X.2018.1488798.
71.
Senthil KumarKSivaIJeyarajP, et al.Synergy of fiber length and content on free vibration and damping behavior of natural fiber reinforced polyester composite beams. Mater Des (1980–2015)2014; 56: 379–386. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.039.
72.
SinghSPHirwaniCK. Effect of nano filler on the mechanical, thermal, and free vibration behavior of a jute polymer composite. Russ Phys J2024; 67(1): 55–61. DOI: 10.1007/s11182-024-03088-2.
73.
KalusuramanGIrullappasamySAslanM. Free vibration and damping behaviour of surface treated Luffa/USP composite beams. SSRN Electronic Journal2019; 1–9. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3654005.
74.
RahmanMZJayaramanKMaceBR. Influence of damping on the bending and twisting modes of flax fibre-reinforced polypropylene composite. Fibers Polym2018; 19(2): 375–382. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-018-7588-7.
RajeshkumarGSanjayMRSiengchinS, et al.Influence of sodium bicarbonate treatment on the free vibration characteristics of Phoenix sp. fiber loaded polyester composites. Mater Today Proc2022; 52: 2400–2403. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.414.
78.
RajeshkumarGVigneshwaranK. Exploring the effects of fiber content and length on mechanical, free vibration, electrical, and water absorption properties of Phoenix sp. fiber‐reinforced polyester composites. Polym Compos2024; 46: 2815–2825. DOI: 10.1002/pc.29142.
79.
RajeshkumarG. Mechanical, free vibration, electrical, and water absorption properties of vinyl ester composites reinforced with Phoenix sp. fibers: influence of eco‐friendly sodium bicarbonate treatment. Polym Compos2024; 46: 2781–2793. DOI: 10.1002/pc.29139.
80.
KumarGRHariharanVSaravanakumarSS. Enhancing the free vibration characteristics of epoxy polymers using sustainable Phoenix sp. Fibers and nano-clay for machine tool applications. J Nat Fibers2021; 18(4): 531–538. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2019.1636740.
81.
VigneshwaranKRajeshkumarG. Effect of matrix material on the free vibration characteristics of Phoenix sp. fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Mater Today Proc2018; 5(5): 11227–11232. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.001.
82.
JeyaguruSThiagamaniSMKSiengchinS, et al.Effect of various weaving architectures on mechanical, vibration and acoustic behavior of Kevlar-Hemp intra-ply hybrid composites. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2024; 176: 107845. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107845.
83.
IsmailASJawaidMNaveenJ. Void content, tensile, vibration and acoustic properties of kenaf/bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Materials2019; 12(13): 2094. DOI: 10.3390/ma12132094.
YanLChouwNYuanX. Improving the mechanical properties of natural fibre fabric reinforced epoxy composites by alkali treatment. J Reinforc Plast Compos2012; 31(6): 425–437. DOI: 10.1177/0731684412439494.
90.
SathishSKarthiNPrabhuL, et al.A review of natural fiber composites: extraction methods, chemical treatments and applications. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 8017–8023. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1105.
91.
YanL. Effect of alkali treatment on vibration characteristics and mechanical properties of natural fabric reinforced composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2012; 31(13): 887–896. DOI: 10.1177/0731684412449399.
92.
SahuPGuptaMK. A review on the properties of natural fibres and its bio-composites: effect of alkali treatment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2020; 234(1): 198–217. DOI:10.1177/1464420719875163.
93.
YousifBFShalwanAChinCWMingKC. Flexural properties of treated and untreated kenaf/epoxy composites. Materials & Design2012; 40: 378–385. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.017.
94.
RoutJMisraMTripathySS, et al.The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(9): 1303–1310. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00021-5.
95.
SymingtonMCDavid-WestOSBanksWMPethrickRAThomasonJL. The effect of alkalisation on the mechanical properties of natural fibres. In13th European conference on composite materials (EECM 13) 2008. 2008.
96.
EtaatiA. The study of fibre/matrix bond strength in short hemp polypropylene composites from dynamic mechanical analysis. n.d.
97.
TangXYanX. A review on the damping properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Ind Text2020; 49(6): 693–721. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718795914.
98.
ChandraRSinghSPGuptaK. Damping studies in Æber-reinforced composites ± a review. n.d.
99.
MohamedSANZainudinESSapuanSM, et al.Energy behavior assessment of rice husk fibres reinforced polymer composite. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(1): 383–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.067.
100.
XuDSchmauderS. The plastic energy dissipation in metal matrix composites during cyclic loading. Comput Mater Sci1999; 15(1): 96–100. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0256(99)00012-9.
101.
DeblieckRACVan BeekDJMRemerieK, et al.Failure mechanisms in polyolefines: the role of crazing, shear yielding and the entanglement network. Polymer2011; 52(14): 2979–2990. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.055.
102.
LandisENKravchukRLoshkovD. Experimental investigations of internal energy dissipation during fracture of fiber-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete. Front Struct Civ Eng2019; 13(1): 190–200. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-018-0487-1.
103.
BotelhoECCostaMLPardiniLC, et al.Processing and hygrothermal effects on viscoelastic behavior of glass fiber/epoxy composites. J Mater Sci2005; 40(14): 3615–3623. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-0760-2.
104.
BotelhoECRezendeMC. Evaluation by free vibration method of moisture absorption effects in polyamide/carbon fiber laminates. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2010; 23(2): 207–225. DOI: 10.1177/0892705709342614.
105.
DacolVCaetanoECorreiaJR. Comparative study of damping on pultruded GFRP and steel beams. Polymers2021; 13(13): 2201. DOI: 10.3390/polym13132201.
106.
WangYInmanDJ. Finite element analysis and experimental study on dynamic properties of a composite beam with viscoelastic damping. J Sound Vib2013; 332(23): 6177–6191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.016.
107.
TornabeneFFantuzziNBacciocchiM. Foam core composite sandwich plates and shells with variable stiffness: effect of the curvilinear fiber path on the modal response. J Sandw Struct Mater2019; 21(1): 320–365. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217693623.
108.
MalekzadehKTafazoliSKhaliliSMR. Free vibrations of thick rectangular composite plate with uniformly distributed attached mass including stiffness effect. J Compos Mater2010; 44(24): 2897–2918. DOI: 10.1177/0021998310369585.
109.
FazzolariFABoscoloMBanerjeeJR. An exact dynamic stiffness element using a higher order shear deformation theory for free vibration analysis of composite plate assemblies. Compos Struct2013; 96: 262–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.033.
110.
BennetCRajiniNJappesJW, et al.Effect of the stacking sequence on vibrational behavior of Sansevieria cylindrica/coconut sheath polyester hybrid composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2015; 34(4): 293–306. DOI: 10.1177/0731684415570683.
111.
JeyaguruSThiagamaniSMKPulikkalparambilH, et al.Mechanical, acoustic and vibration performance of intra‐ply Kevlar/PALF epoxy hybrid composites: effects of different weaving patterns. Polym Compos2022; 43(6): 3902–3914. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26665.
112.
JeyaguruSThiagamaniSMKMahmoudMH, et al.Free vibration analysis of jute/kenaf/banana hybrid biocomposites: effects of various stacking sequences. Mater Res Express2024; 11(4): 045505. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad3a3f.
113.
RajeshMPitchaimaniJ. Dynamic mechanical and free vibration behavior of natural fiber braided fabric composite: comparison with conventional and knitted fabric composites. Polym Compos2018; 39(7): 2479–2489. DOI: 10.1002/pc.24234.
114.
ShankarANPrasadMSiddiqueMJ, et al.Static deflection and free vibration behavior of sandwich plates made of hybrid flax/glass fiber composite skins and PLA core. Fibers Polym2023; 24(7): 2411–2424. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-023-00218-4.
115.
Senthil KumarKSivaIRajiniN, et al.Layering pattern effects on vibrational behavior of coconut sheath/banana fiber hybrid composites. Mater Des2016; 90: 795–803. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.051.
116.
KumarKSSivaIRajiniN, et al.Tensile, impact, and vibration properties of coconut sheath/sisal hybrid composites: effect of stacking sequence. J Reinforc Plast Compos2014; 33(19): 1802–1812. DOI: 10.1177/0731684414546782.
RajeshMPitchaimaniJ. Experimental investigation on buckling and free vibration behavior of woven natural fiber fabric composite under axial compression. Compos Struct2017; 163: 302–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.046.
119.
SahuDPMohantySC. Free vibration analysis of jute-epoxy polymer as skin layers and tea waste/epoxy as a core layer-based sandwich plate through experimental and AI approach. Mater Circ Econ2024; 6(1): 39. DOI: 10.1007/s42824-024-00132-x.
120.
KuppurajAAngamuthuM. Investigation of mechanical properties and free vibration behavior of graphene/basalt nano filler banana/sisal hybrid composite. Polym Polym Compos2022; 30: 09673911211066719. DOI: 10.1177/09673911211066719.
121.
GanesanGMuthunadarSRamasamyM. Experimental investigation on mechanical properties and free vibration characteristics of epoxy‐based glass/flax laminates. Polym Compos2022; 43(9): 6004–6012. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26899.
122.
ÖzbekÖTokurBY. Effect of cut-outs on the free vibration response of basalt/carbon hybrid composites. Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci Eng2021; 21(3): 724–734. DOI: 10.35414/akufemubid.889289.
123.
FlorenceAJainARTonyB, et al. Tailoring of mechanical, thermal and vibration behaviour of hybrid fibre with core honeycomb energy-absorbing materials reinforced polymer sandwich laminates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng2023; 0(0): 09544089231189609. DOI:10.1177/09544089231189609.
124.
SathishKumarGPrashanthKSKhatoonUT, et al.Investigation of mechanical properties, viscoelastic properties and free vibration analysis of natural fibre reinforced composite materials. Interactions2024; 245(1): 321. DOI: 10.1007/s10751-024-02155-x.
125.
BozkurtÖYErkliğABozkurtYT. Influence of basalt fiber hybridization on the vibration-damping properties of glass fiber reinforced epoxy laminates. Mater Res Express2018; 6(1): 015301. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aae2e7.
126.
KasiERamasamySKirubakaranR, et al.Tensile, dynamic mechanical, and vibration behavior of layering sequence design effect of glass intertwined natural kenaf woven polymeric laminates. J Nat Fibers2024; 21(1): 2316791. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2024.2316791.
127.
MuruganRRameshRPadmanabhanK. Investigation on vibration behaviour of cantilever type glass/carbon hybrid composite beams at higher frequency range using finite element method. Adv Mat Res2014; 984–985: 257–265. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.257.
128.
MuruganRRameshRPadmanabhanK. Investigation of the mechanical behavior and vibration characteristics of thin walled glass/carbon hybrid composite beams under a fixed-free boundary condition. Mech Adv Mat Struct2016; 23(8): 909–916. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2015.1056394.
129.
RajiniNJappesJWRajakarunakaranS, et al.Mechanical and free vibration properties of montmorillonite clay dispersed with naturally woven coconut sheath composite. J Reinforc Plast Compos2012; 31(20): 1364–1376. DOI: 10.1177/0731684412455259.
130.
SwamyLRSenthamaraikannanCRameshR. Investigation of the elastic modulus effect on free vibration characteristics of fiber reinforced polymer composite beams made of various fundamental shapes. Adv Mat Res2015; 1088: 401–406. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1088.401.
131.
SenthamaraikannanCSarathkumarSKRameshR. Experimental investigation on modal response of woven fabric carbon composite plate reinforced with particles of micro rubber blended epoxy matrix under free vibration condition. Adv Mat Res2014; 984–985: 273–279. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.273.
132.
SenthamaraikannanCRameshR. Evaluation of mechanical and vibration behavior of hybrid epoxy carbon composite beam carrying micron-sized CTBN rubber and nanosilica particles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J Mater Des Appl2019; 233(9): 1738–1752. DOI: 10.1177/1464420718784315.
133.
SenthamaraikannanCRameshR. Experimental investigation on vibration characteristics of woven carbon fabric-reinforced composite beams of various cross-sectional shapes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J Mater Des Appl2016; 230(1): 64–74. DOI: 10.1177/1464420714545368.
134.
BalajiSRajeshM. Shear properties and failure mechanisms of adhesive bonded composite joint: effect of glass particle reinforcement. Polym Compos2024; 45(11): 9977–9994. DOI: 10.1002/pc.28452.
135.
KarthikeyanNNaveenJ. Enhanced shear and vibration behaviour of co-cured CFRP joints with innovative lamination techniques. J Adhes2024; 101: 1012–1032. DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2024.2411368.
136.
RameshRBalasubramanianSSenthamaraikannanC. Study of free vibration characteristics of carbon epoxy based composite beams. Appl Mech Mater2015; 813–814: 1042–1046. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.813-814.1042.
137.
CaiFJoS-HMaY, et al.Effect of four groups of GO-CF/EP composites with ideal infiltration structure and different layering ways on damping properties. Polymers2022; 14(12): 2358. DOI: 10.3390/polym14122358.
138.
BozkurtÖYGökdemirME. Effect of basalt fiber hybridization on the vibration‐damping behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Polym Compos2018; 39(S4): E2274–E2282. DOI:10.1002/pc.24606.
139.
RajeshMVenkatesanRKesavanS, et al.Influence of 3D printed adherend design on structural performance and vibrational behaviour of adhesively bonded joints. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2024; 46(7): 402. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-024-04995-8.
140.
SenthamaraikannanCParthaaSarathyBSuryaS, et al. Study on the free vibration analysis and mechanical behaviour of 3D printed composite I shaped beams made up of short carbon fiber reinforced ABS and PLA materials. Mater Today Proc2023. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.141.
141.
KannanSRamamoorthyMSudhagarE, et al.Mechanical characterization and vibrational analysis of 3D printed PETG and PETG reinforced with short carbon fiber. AIP Conf Proc2020; 2270: 030004. DOI: 10.1063/5.0019362. Seoul, South Korea.
142.
KannanSRamamoorthyM. Mechanical characterization and experimental modal analysis of 3D Printed ABS, PC and PC-ABS materials. Mater Res Express2020; 7(1): 015341. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6a48.
143.
Vinoth BabuNVenkateshwaranNPanneer SelvanS. Tailoring the vibration characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid in fused filament fabrication process. J Reinforc Plast Compos2024; 0(0). DOI:10.1177/07316844241272992.
144.
ErgeneBAtlıhanGPinarAM. Experimental and finite element analyses on the vibration behavior of 3D-printed PET-G tapered beams with fused filament fabrication. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct2023; 19(4): 634–651. DOI: 10.1108/MMMS-11-2022-0265.
145.
BolatÇÇebiAMaraşS, et al.An experimental and numerical effort on the vibration behavior of additively manufactured recycled polyethylene terephthalate glycol components. Polym Eng Sci2024; 64: 5815. DOI: 10.1002/pen.26954.
146.
KannanSManapayaASelvarajR. Frequency and deflection responses of 3D ‐printed carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites: theoretical and experimental verification. Polym Compos2023; 44(7): 4095–4108. DOI: 10.1002/pc.27382.
147.
MaheshV. Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of additive manufactured PETG composite beams reinforced with organically modified montmorillonite nanoclay and short carbon fiber. Polym Compos2021; 42(10): 5021–5034. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26201.
148.
KallannavarVKattimaniS. Effect of temperature and porosity on free vibration characteristics of a doubly-curved skew laminated sandwich composite structures with 3D printed PLA core. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 182: 110263. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.110263.
149.
MaraşSBolatÇ. Free vibration analysis of 3D-printed ABS, PET-G and PLA curved beam: effects of opening angle, curvature radius, and part thickness. Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci Eng2025; 25(1): 206–214. DOI: 10.35414/akufemubid.1519102.
150.
EkererSCBoğaCSeyedzavvarM, et al.Optimizing parameters for additive manufacturing: a study on the vibrational performance of 3D printed cantilever beams using material extrusion. Rapid Prototyp J2025; 31(1): 218–230. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0146.
151.
ThanikasalamNRamamoorthyM. Vibrational behavior of a 3D printed biomimetic dual‐core composite sandwich beam: an experimental and numerical study. Polym Compos2024; 45(2): 1178–1194. DOI: 10.1002/pc.27844.
152.
ParpalaRCPopescuDPupazaC. Infill parameters influence over the natural frequencies of ABS specimens obtained by extrusion-based 3D printing. Rapid Prototyp J2021; 27(6): 1273–1285. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-05-2020-0110.
153.
ÖzbekÖTokur BozkurtYBozkurtÖY, et al. An experimental investigation on the free vibration analysis of PETG material processed by fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J2025; 31(6): 1310–1324. DOI:10.1108/RPJ-05-2024-0227.
154.
ChaitanyaSKReddyDKMHarshaSN. Vibration properties of 3D printed/rapid prototype parts. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technole2015; 4(6): 4602–4608.
155.
AslantasK. Vibration analysis of 3D printed PLA beam with honeycomb cell structure for renewable energy applications and sustainable solutions. Energy Applications and Sustainable Solutions2024; 43: 164–171. DOI: 10.21741/9781644903216-22.
156.
XueFRobinGBoudaoudH, et al.General methodology to investigate the effect of process parameters on the vibration properties of structures produced by additive manufacturing using fused filament fabrication. JOM2022; 74(3): 1166–1175. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-021-05051-9.
157.
KhanFSinghKCarterJ. Vibration behavior of 3D-printed graded composites: fabrication and testing. Polymers2024; 16(23): 3428. DOI: 10.3390/polym16233428.
158.
KuznetsovVSoloninAUrzhumtsevO, et al.Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process. Polymers2018; 10(3): 313. DOI: 10.3390/polym10030313.
159.
NguyenHTCrittendenKWeissL, et al.Experimental modal analysis and characterization of additively manufactured polymers. Polymers2022; 14(10): 2071. DOI: 10.3390/polym14102071.
160.
LevenhagenNPDadmunMD. Interlayer diffusion of surface segregating additives to improve the isotropy of fused deposition modeling products. Polymer2018; 152: 35–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.031.
BolRJMŠavijaB. Micromechanical models for FDM 3D-printed polymers: a review. Polymers2023; 15(23): 4497. DOI: 10.3390/polym15234497.
163.
LevenhagenNPDadmunMD. Improving interlayer adhesion in 3D printing with surface segregating additives: improving the isotropy of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene parts. ACS Appl Polym Mater2019; 1(4): 876–884. DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00051.
164.
YangXLiuZJingH, et al.Enhanced interlayer adhesion of 3D printed poly(lactide acid) with ultralow hyperbranched poly(ester imide)s. Compos Commun2024; 48: 101927. DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2024.101927.
165.
LyuYChenYLinL, et al.Architecture of covalent bonds between filament layers to enhance performance of 3D printing biodegradable polymer blends. Polym Test2022; 106: 107456. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107456.
166.
MohanNSenthilPVinodhS, et al.A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp2017; 12(1): 47–59. DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490.
167.
FangGZhangTZhongS, et al.Reinforced FDM: multi-axis filament alignment with controlled anisotropic strength. ACM Trans Graph2020; 39(6): 1–15. DOI: 10.1145/3414685.3417834.
168.
AlafaghaniAQattawiA. Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process2018; 36: 164–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025.
169.
NazirMHAl-MarzouqiAHAhmedW, et al.The potential of adopting natural fibers reinforcements for fused deposition modeling: characterization and implications. Heliyon2023; 9(4): e15023. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15023.
170.
KarthikKKolappanSRameshV, et al.3D printing with natural fiber composites: a review for advanced manufacturing applications. Interactions2024; 245(1): 231. DOI: 10.1007/s10751-024-02098-3.
171.
NerellaVNHempelSMechtcherineV. Effects of layer-interface properties on mechanical performance of concrete elements produced by extrusion-based 3D-printing. Constr Build Mater2019; 205: 586–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.235.
172.
PandaBChandra PaulSJen TanM. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Mater Lett2017; 209: 146–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123.
173.
YangRZengQPengY, et al.Anomalous matrix and interlayer pore structure of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Cem Concr Res2022; 157: 106829. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106829.
174.
DingTXiaoJZouS, et al.Hardened properties of layered 3D printed concrete with recycled sand. Cem Concr Compos2020; 113: 103724. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103724.
175.
MaGZhangJWangL, et al.Mechanical characterization of 3D printed anisotropic cementitious material by the electromechanical transducer. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27(7): 075036. DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/aac789.
176.
MaGLiZWangL, et al.Mechanical anisotropy of aligned fiber reinforced composite for extrusion-based 3D printing. Constr Build Mater2019; 202: 770–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.008.
177.
KrugerJDu PlessisAVan ZijlG. An investigation into the porosity of extrusion-based 3D printed concrete. Addit Manuf2021; 37: 101740. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101740.
178.
RamrajiKRajkumarKSabarinathanP. Mechanical and free vibration properties of skin and core designed basalt woven intertwined with flax layered polymeric laminates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci2020; 234(22): 4505–4519. DOI: 10.1177/0954406220922257.
179.
YangJChingYChuahC. Applications of lignocellulosic fibers and lignin in bioplastics: a review. Polymers2019; 11(5): 751. DOI: 10.3390/polym11050751.
180.
ChooKChingYChuahC, et al.Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-chitosan composite films reinforced with cellulose nanofiber. Materials2016; 9(8): 644. DOI: 10.3390/ma9080644.
181.
BakarNACheeCYAbdullahLC, et al.Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of grafted kenaf filled poly (vinyl chloride)/ethylene vinyl acetate composites. Mater Des (1980–2015)2015; 65: 204–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.027.
