The growing awareness of socioeconomic and environmental issues and the high percentage of petroleum resources consumed and new environmental regulations have fueled efforts to develop innovative, cutting-edge, environmentally friendly materials with a wide range of applications. Due to environmental and sustainability concerns, the advancement of biocomposites has resulted in tremendous breakthroughs in green materials in this century. Their primary goal is to replace current synthetic petroleum-based composites with natural resources. Materials derived from nonrenewable petroleum-based sources are hazardous and expensive to produce; on the other hand, biocomposites derived from natural sources are biodegradable, recyclable, non-abrasive, and compostable and have properties comparable to synthetic fiber composites. Natural fibers are low-cost, lightweight, biodegradable, renewable, and environmentally friendly alternatives to synthetic fibers like glass and carbon fiber. The long-term viability of natural fiber-based composite materials has led to increased use in various production industries. However, the manufacturing process of natural fiber-based biocomposites is still plagued by some difficulties, such as poor adhesive propensity, moisture absorption, poor fire resistance, low impact strength, and low durability. This review provides a panoramic view to provide insight into different aspects of biocomposites based on natural fibers and polymers in terms of properties and applications, which will pave the way for future biocomposites research in academic and commercial contexts.
Abdul KhalilHPSBhatAHIreana YusraAF. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym2012; 87: 963–979. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078.
2.
AkampumuzaOWambuaPMAhmedA, et al.Review of the applications of biocomposites in the automotive industry. Polym Compos2017; 38(11): 2553–2569. DOI: 10.1002/pc.23847.
3.
MohantyAKMisraMHinrichsenG. Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromolecular Materials Eng2000; 276(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301).
4.
Mashouf RoudsariGMohantyAKMisraM. A statistical approach to develop biocomposites from epoxy resin, poly(furfuryl alcohol), poly(propylene carbonate), and biochar. J Appl Polym Sci2017; 134: 45307. DOI: 10.1002/app.45307.
5.
ChangBPMohantyAKMisraM. Studies on durability of sustainable biobased composites: a review. RSC Adv2020; 10(31): 17955–17999. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09554c.
6.
FormelaKZedlerLHejnaA, et al.Reactive extrusion of bio-based polymer blends and composites – current trends and future developments. Express Polym Lett2018; 12: 24–57. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.4.
7.
PauksztaDBorysiakS. The influence of processing and the polymorphism of lignocellulosic fillers on the structure and properties of composite materials-a review. Materials2013; 6: 2747–2767. DOI: 10.3390/ma6072747.
8.
JohnMThomasS. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym2008; 71: 343–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040.
9.
KoronisGSilvaAFontulM. Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos B Eng2013; 44: 120–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004.
10.
GitaN. Ramaswamy a, Terry Sellers b, Weiying Tao c, Le Grand Crook d. Kenaf nonwovens as substrates for laminations. Ind Crops Prod2003; 17: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00040-7.
11.
PlattDK. Engineering and High Performance Plastics - Market Report 2003.
12.
La RosaADReccaGSummerscalesJ, et al.Bio-based versus traditional polymer composites. A life cycle assessment perspective. J Clean Prod2014; 74: 135–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.017.
13.
BanikNDeyVSastryGRK. An overview of lignin & hemicellulose effect upon biodegradable bamboo fiber composites due to moisture. Mater Today Proc2017; 4: 3222–3232. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.208.
14.
La MantiaFPMorrealeM. Green composites: a brief review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 579–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017.
15.
SatyanarayanaKGArizagaGGCWypychF. Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers—an overview. Prog Polym Sci2009; 34: 982–1021. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002.
16.
FarukOBledzkiAKFinkH-P, et al.Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci2012; 37: 1552–1596. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003.
17.
DittenberDBGangaRaoHVS. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 1419–1429. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019.
18.
ReddyMMVivekanandhanSMisraM, et al.Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities. Prog Polym Sci2013; 38: 1653–1689. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.006.
19.
GurunathanTMohantySNayakSK. A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2015; 77: 1–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007.
20.
MohammedLAnsariMNMPuaG, et al.A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int J Polym Sci2015; 2015: 1–15. DOI: 10.1155/2015/243947.
21.
GholampourAOzbakkalogluT. A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J Mater Sci2019; 55: 829–892. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y.
22.
May-PatAValadez-GonzálezAHerrera-FrancoPJ. Effect of fiber surface treatments on the essential work of fracture of HDPE-continuous henequen fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Test2013; 32: 1114–1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.06.006.
23.
Imana ShahrinTShekhMdMamun KabirK, et al.Effects of resin treatments on the quality of cotton fabric dyed with reactive dye. Fibres Text East Eur2018; 26: 102–107. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7804.
BharathKNBasavarajappaS. Applications of biocomposite materials based on natural fibers from renewable resources: a review. Sci Eng Compos Mater2016; 23: 123–133. DOI: 10.1515/secm-2014-0088.
26.
ThakurVKThakurMKGuptaRK. Review: raw natural fiber–based polymer composites. Int J Polym Anal2014; 19: 256–271. DOI: 10.1080/1023666x.2014.880016.
27.
CampilhoRDSG. Introduction to Natural Fiber Composites. Natural Fiber Composites. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2016, p. 1.
28.
MohantyAKMisraMDrzalLT. Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites: an introduction. Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites, 15. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2005.
29.
CheungH-yHoM-pLauK-t, et al. Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Compos B Eng2009; 40: 655, doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.014.
30.
MalkapuramRKumarVYuvraj Singh NegiN. Recent development in natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2008; 28: 1169–1189. DOI: 10.1177/0731684407087759.
31.
DeepaBAbrahamECherianBM, et al.Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresour Technol2011; 102: 1988–1997. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.030.
32.
YanLKasalBHuangL. A review of recent research on the use of cellulosic fibres, their fibre fabric reinforced cementitious, geo-polymer and polymer composites in civil engineering. Compos B Eng2016; 92: 94–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.002.
33.
NaiduALRaghuveerDSumanP. Studies on characterization and mechanical behavior of banana peel reinforced epoxy composites. J Sci. Eng. Res2013; 4: 844.
34.
PopelkaANovákIAl-MaadeedMASA, et al.Effect of corona treatment on adhesion enhancement of LLDPE. Surf Coat Technol2018; 335: 118–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.12.018.
35.
MasoodiRPillaiKM. A study on moisture absorption and swelling in bio-based jute-epoxy composites. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2012; 31(5): 285–294. DOI: 10.1177/0731684411434654.
36.
SetswaloKMolaletsaNOladijoOP, et al.The influence of fiber processing and alkaline treatment on the properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. Appl Sci Eng Prog2021. DOI: 10.14416/j.asep.2021.08.005.
37.
GokCAytasS. Chapter 16 - biosorption of uranium and thorium by biopolymers. The role of colloidal systems in environmental protection. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 363–395.
38.
AksakalRMertensCSoeteM, et al.Applications of discrete synthetic macromolecules in life and materials science: recent and future trends. Adv Sci2021; 8: 2004038. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202004038.
39.
Diez-PascualAM. Synthesis and applications of biopolymer composites. Int J Mol Sci2019; 20: 2321. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092321.
40.
AverousLBoquillonN. Biocomposites based on plasticized starch: thermal and mechanical behaviours. Carbohydr Polym2004; 56: 111. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.11.015.
41.
BenyahyaSAoufCCaillolS, et al.Functionalized green tea tannins as phenolic prepolymers for bio-based epoxy resins. Ind Crops Prod2014; 53: 296. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.045.
42.
FerdosianFYuanZAndersonM, et al.Synthesis of lignin-based epoxy resins: optimization of reaction parameters using response surface methodology. RSC Adv2014; 4: 31745–31753. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra03978e.
43.
Curing and Mechanical Characterization of a Soy-Based Epoxy Resin System. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 91: 3513–3518. Doi:10.1002/app.13571.
44.
RaquezJ-MDelégliseMLacrampeM-F, et al.Thermosetting (bio) materials derived from renewable resources: a critical review. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35(4): 487–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.001.
45.
KaplanDL. Introduction to biopolymers from renewable resources. Biopolymers from renewable resources. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1998, pp. 1–29.
46.
PolymerOhio, bio-based resins: a growing opportunity for bioplastics packaging. Polym PolymerOhio2015.
47.
El MansouriNEYuanQHuangF. Characterization of alkaline lignins for use in phenol-formaldehyde and epoxy resins. BioResources. Bio Resour2011; 6(3): 2647–2662.
CzubP. A comparison of the syntheses of high molar mass epoxy resins on the basis of two groups of modified vegetable oils. Macromol Symp2009; 277: 162–170.
50.
El MansouriNEYuanQHuangF. Characterization of alkaline lignins for use in phenol-formaldehyde and epoxy resins. BioResources. BioResources2011; 6(3): 2647–2662.
51.
LiangGChandrashekharaK. Cure kinetics and rheology characterization of soy-based epoxy resin system. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 102: 3168–3180. DOI: 10.1002/app.24369.
52.
ReddyTRKimHJParkJW. Renewable biocomposite properties and their applications. In: Composites from renewable and sustainable materials. London, UK: IntechOpen, 2016, pp. 177–197. DOI: 10.5772/108445.
53.
OksmanKSkrifvarsMSelinJ-F. Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1317–1324. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-9.
54.
SarkerFPotluriPAfrojS, et al.Ultrahigh performance of nanoengineered graphene-based natural jute fiber composites. ACS Appl Mater Inter2019; 11(23): 21166–21176.
55.
PetinakisEYuLEdwardG, et al.Effect of matrix–particle interfacial adhesion on the mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/wood-flour micro-composites. J Polym Environ2009; 17: 83–94. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-009-0124-0.
56.
FarukOAinMS. Biofiber reinforced polymer composites for structural applications. Developments in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Civil Engineering, 18. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2013, pp. 18–53.
57.
ZampaloniMPourboghratFYankovichSA, et al.Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: a discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1569–1580. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.001.
58.
LuzSMDel TioJRochaGJM, et al.Cellulose and cellulignin from sugarcane bagasse reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of acetylation on mechanical and thermal properties. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 1362–1369. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.014.
59.
Hidalgo-SalazarMASalinasE. Mechanical, thermal, viscoelastic performance and product application of PP- rice husk Colombian biocomposites. Compos B Eng2019; 176: 107135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107135.
60.
PaulVKannyKRedhiGG. Formulation of a novel bio-resin from banana sap. Ind Crops Prod2013; 43: 496–505. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.064.
61.
ZhuSGuoYChenY, et al.Effects of the incorporation of nano-bamboo charcoal on the mechanical properties and thermal behavior of bamboo-plastic composites. BioResources2016; 11: 2684. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.1.2684-2697.
62.
TakagiHIchiharaY. Effect of fiber length on mechanical properties of “green” composites using a starch-based resin and short bamboo fibers. JSME INT J A-solid M2004; 47: 551–555. DOI: 10.1299/jsmea.47.551.
63.
DongYGhatauraATakagiH, et al.Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites reinforced with coir fibres: evaluation of mechanical performance and multifunctional properties. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 63: 76–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.003.
64.
GomesAMatsuoTGodaK, et al.Development and effect of alkali treatment on tensile properties of curaua fiber green composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38(8): 1811–1820. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.010.
65.
Correa AguirreJPHidalgo SalazarMÁ. Mechanical and thermal properties of biocomposites from nonwoven industrial fique fiber mats with epoxy resin and linear low density polyethylene. Results Phys2018; 8: 461. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.025.
66.
RouisonDSainMCouturierM. Resin transfer molding of hemp fiber composites: optimization of the process and mechanical properties of the materials. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(7–8): 895–906. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.040.
67.
RanganathanNOksmanKNayakSK, et al.Regenerated cellulose fibers as impact modifier in long jute fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: Effect on mechanical properties, morphology, and fiber breakage. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132(3). DOI: 10.1002/app.41301.
68.
ChandekarHChaudhariVWaigaonkarS. A review of jute fiber reinforced polymer composites. Materials today: proceedings. Mater Today Proc2020; 26: 2079–2082. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.449.
69.
AkhtarMNSulongABRadziMKF, et al.Influence of alkaline treatment and fiber loading on the physical and mechanical properties of kenaf/polypropylene composites for variety of applications. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int2016; 26(6): 657–664. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.004.
70.
BodrosEPillinIMontrelayN, et al.Could biopolymers reinforced by randomly scattered flax fibre be used in structural applications?Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(3–4): 462–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.024.
71.
OkuboKFujiiTThostensonET. Multi-scale hybrid biocomposite: processing and mechanical characterization of bamboo fiber reinforced PLA with microfibrillated cellulose. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40(4): 469–475. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.012.
72.
LiYSusan SunX. Mechanical and thermal properties of biocomposites from poly (lactic acid) and DDGS. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 121(1): 589–597. DOI: 10.1002/app.33681.
73.
TahaIZiegmannG. A comparison of mechanical properties of natural fiber filled biodegradable and polyolefin polymers. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 40(21): 1933–1946. DOI: 10.1177/0021998306061304.
74.
NagalakshmaiahMAfrinSMalladiRP, et al. Biocomposites: present trends and challenges for the future. Green composites for automotive applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 197–215.
75.
BledzkiAKJaszkiewiczAScherzerD. Mechanical properties of PLA composites with man-made cellulose and abaca fibres. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40(4): 404–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.002.
76.
MüssigJSchmehlMVon ButtlarH-B, et al.Exterior components based on renewable resources produced with SMC technology—considering a bus component as example. Ind Crops Prod2006; 24(2): 132–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.006.
77.
DjafarZRenrengIJannahM. Tensile and bending strength analysis of ramie fiber and woven ramie reinforced epoxy composite. J Nat Fibers2020; 18: 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1726242.
78.
Ferrandez-GarciaMTFerrandez-GarciaCEGarcia-OrtuñoT, et al.Experimental evaluation of a new giant reed (Arundo Donax L.) composite using citric acid as a natural binder. Agronomy2019; 9(12): 882. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9120882.
79.
XiaTHuangHWuG, et al.The characteristic changes of rice straw fibers in anaerobic digestion and its effect on rice straw-reinforced composites. Ind Crops Prod2018; 121: 73–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.004.
80.
LiuWMisraMAskelandP, et al.‘Green’composites from soy based plastic and pineapple leaf fiber: fabrication and properties evaluation. Polymer2005; 46(8): 2710–2721. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.027.
81.
RawiNFMJayaramanKBhattacharyyaD. A performance study on composites made from bamboo fabric and poly (lactic acid). J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 32(20): 1513–1525. DOI: 10.1177/0731684413498296.
82.
AwalARanaMSainM. Thermorheological and mechanical properties of cellulose reinforced PLA bio-composites. Mech Mater2015; 80: 87–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.09.009.
83.
LiXLeiBLinZ, et al.The utilization of bamboo charcoal enhances wood plastic composites with excellent mechanical and thermal properties. Mater Des2014; 53: 419–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.028.
84.
TurkuIKeskisaariAKärkiT, et al.Characterization of wood plastic composites manufactured from recycled plastic blends. Compos Struct2017; 161: 469–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.073.
85.
FangYWangQGuoC, et al.Effect of zinc borate and wood flour on thermal degradation and fire retardancy of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) composites. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis2013; 100: 230–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.12.028.
86.
PorrasAMaranonA. Development and characterization of a laminate composite material from polylactic acid (PLA) and woven bamboo fabric. Compos B Eng2012; 43(7): 2782–2788.
87.
V FinkenstadtVLLiuCKEvangelistaR, et al.Poly (lactic acid) green composites using oilseed coproducts as fillers. Ind Crops Prod2007; 26(1): 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.01.003.
88.
SaenghirunwattanaPNoomhormARungsardthongV. Mechanical properties of soy protein based “green” composites reinforced with surface modified cornhusk fiber. Ind Crops Prod2014; 60: 144–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.010.
89.
YuTJiangNLiY. Study on short ramie fiber/poly (lactic acid) composites compatibilized by maleic anhydride. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 64: 139–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.008.
90.
CourgneauCRusuDHenneuseC, et al.Characterisation of low-odour emissive polylactide/cellulose fibre biocomposites for car interior. Express Polym Lett2013; 7(9): 787–804. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.76.
91.
HoM-pLauK-tWangH, et al.Characteristics of a silk fibre reinforced biodegradable plastic. Compos B Eng2011; 42(2): 117–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.10.007.
92.
BledzkiAKJaszkiewiczA. Mechanical performance of biocomposites based on PLA and PHBV reinforced with natural fibres–A comparative study to PP. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(12): 1687–1696. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.005.
93.
FebriantoFYoshiokaMNagaiY, et al.the morphological, mechanical and physical properties of wood flour-poly lactic acid composites under various filler types. J Biol Sci2006; 6: 555–563. DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2006.555.563.
94.
CarvalhoOTAvérousLTadiniCC. Int Congr Eng Food, Athens. Greece, 2011, p. 111.
95.
LodhaPNetravaliAN. Characterization of Phytagel® modified soy protein isolate resin and unidirectional flax yarn reinforced “green” composites. Polym Compos2005; 26(5): 647–659. DOI: 10.1002/pc.20128.
96.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRK. Properties of sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Indian J Fibre Text Res2016; 41: 235.
97.
KimNKBhattacharyyaD. Development of fire resistant wool polymer composites: mechanical performance and fire simulation with design perspectives. Mater Des2016; 106: 391–403. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.005.
98.
RamnathBVKokanSJRajaRN, et al.Evaluation of mechanical properties of abaca–jute–glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Mater Des2013; 51: 357–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.102.
99.
ChattopadhyaySKKhandalRKUppaluriR, et al.Bamboo fiber reinforced polypropylene composites and their mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119(3): 1619–1626. DOI: 10.1002/app.32826.
100.
KozłowskiRWładyka‐PrzybylakM. Flammability and fire resistance of composites reinforced by natural fibers. Polym Adv Technol2008; 19(6): 446–453. DOI: 10.1002/pat.1135.
101.
MohantyAKMisraMDrzalLT. Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: An overview. Compos Inter2012; 8: 313–343.
102.
JohnMJAnandjiwalaRD. Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber‐reinforced composites. Polym Compos2008; 29(2): 187–207. DOI: 10.1002/pc.20461.
103.
WielageBLampkeTMarxG, et al.Thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric analysis of natural fibres and polypropylene. Thermochim Acta1999; 337(1–2): 169–177. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00161-6
104.
ChappleSAnandjiwalaR. Flammability of natural fiber-reinforced composites and strategies for fire retardancy: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2010; 23(6): 871–893. DOI: 10.1177/0892705709356338.
105.
JangJYJeongTKOhHJ, et al.Thermal stability and flammability of coconut fiber reinforced poly (lactic acid) composites. Compos B Eng2012; 43(5): 2434–2438. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.003.
106.
RétiCCasettaMDuquesneS, et al.Flammability properties of intumescent PLA including starch and lignin. Polym Adv Technol2008; 19(6): 628–635. DOI: 10.1002/pat.1130.
107.
WuWYangCQ. Correlation between limiting oxygen index and phosphorus/nitrogen content of cotton fabrics treated with a hydroxy‐functional organophosphorus flame‐retarding agent and dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90(7): 1885–1890. DOI: 10.1002/app.12861.
108.
RabeSSanchez-OlivaresGPérez-ChávezR, et al.Natural keratin and coconut fibres from industrial wastes in flame retarded thermoplastic starch biocomposites. Materials2019; 12(3): 344. DOI: 10.3390/ma12030344.
109.
GalloESchartelBAciernoD, et al.Tailoring the flame retardant and mechanical performances of natural fiber-reinforced biopolymer by multi-component laminate. Compos B Eng2013; 44(1): 112–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.005
110.
PujariSRamakrishnaABalaram PadalKT. Investigations on thermal conductivities of jute and banana fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Inst Eng India Ser D2016; 98: 79–83.
111.
AgrawalRSaxenaNSSreekalaMS, et al.Effect of treatment on the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of oil‐palm‐fiber‐reinforced phenolformaldehyde composites. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys2000; 38(7): 916–921.
112.
GuoRRenZBiH, et al.Electrical and thermal conductivity of polylactic acid (PLA)-based biocomposites by incorporation of nano-graphite fabricated with fused deposition modeling. Polymers2019; 11(3): 549. DOI: 10.3390/polym11030549.
113.
DuanJShaoSYa-LiL, et al.Polylactide/graphite nanosheets/MWCNTs nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. Iran Polym J2012; 21(2): 109–120. DOI: 10.1007/s13726-011-0008-8.
114.
PaulSABoudenneAIbosL, et al.Effect of fiber loading and chemical treatments on thermophysical properties of banana fiber/polypropylene commingled composite materials. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(9): 1582–1588. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.004.
115.
IdiculaMBoudenneAUmadeviL, et al.Thermophysical properties of natural fibre reinforced polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(15): 2719–2725. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.007.
116.
MangalRSaxenaNSSreekalaMS, et al.Thermal properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced composites. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 339(1–2): 281–285. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00166-1.
117.
MofokengJPLuytASTábiT, et al.Comparison of injection moulded, natural fibre-reinforced composites with PP and PLA as matrices. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2012; 25(8): 927–948. DOI: 10.1177/0892705711423291.
118.
FengDCaulfieldDFSanadiAR. Effect of compatibilizer on the structure‐property relationships of kenaf‐fiber/polypropylene composites. Polym Compos2001; 22(4): 506–517. DOI: 10.1002/pc.10555.
119.
KimH-SYangH-SKimH-J, et al.Thermal properties of agro-flour-filled biodegradable polymer bio-composites. J Therm Anal Calorim2005; 81(2): 299–306. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-005-0782-7.
120.
JosephPVJosephKThomasS, et al.The thermal and crystallisation studies of short sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos - A: Appl Sci Manuf2003; 34(3): 253–266. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00185-9.
121.
MahmudSHasanKMFJahidMA, et al.Comprehensive review on plant fiber-reinforced polymeric biocomposites. J Mater Sci2021; 56: 7231–7264. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-05774-9.
122.
SadasivuniKKSahaPAdhikariJ, et al.Recent advances in mechanical properties of biopolymer composites: a review. Polym Compos2020; 41(1): 32–59. DOI: 10.1002/pc.25356.
YousifBFEl-TayebNSM. Wear and friction characteristics of CGRP composite under wet contact condition using two different test techniques. Wear2008; 265(5–6): 856–864. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.01.016.
125.
YousifBFEl-TayebNSM. Adhesive wear performance of T-OPRP and UT-OPRP composites. Tribol Lett2008; 32(3): 199–208. DOI: 10.1007/s11249-008-9381-7.
126.
YousifBF. Replacing of glass fibres with seed oil palm fibres for tribopolymeric composites. Tribol - Mater Surf Inter2013; 2: 99–103. DOI: 10.1179/175158308x383189.
127.
ChinCWYousifBF. Potential of kenaf fibres as reinforcement for tribological applications. Wear2009; 267(9–10): 1550–1557. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.06.002.
128.
SidiaBBensalahW. Tribological and mechanical behaviors of mollusk shell‐ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene bio‐composite. Polym Compos2021; 42: 3206–3215. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26051.
129.
MohantyAKSeydibeyogluMOSahooS, et al. Matching crops for selected bioproducts. Comprehensive biotechnology. The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier, 2011, pp. 101–109.
130.
MooneyBP. The second green revolution? Production of plant-based biodegradable plastics. Biochem J2009; 418(2): 219–232. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20081769.
131.
ZwawiM. Review on natural fiber bio-composites, surface modifications and applications. Molecules2021. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26020404.
132.
AshoriA. Wood–plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries. Bioresour Technol2008; 99(11): 4661–4667, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.043.
133.
CampilhoRDSG. Recent innovations in biocomposite products. Biocomposites for high-performance applications, 275. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 275–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100793-8.00010-7.
134.
BledzkiAKJaszkiewiczAMurrM, et al. Processing techniques for natural-and wood-fibre composites. Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp. 163–192.
135.
KarusM. Increasing demand for european hemp fibres. Hemp: industrial production and uses. Bar sur Aube, France: CABI, 2013, p. 203.
HudaMSDrzalLTRayD, et al. Natural-fiber composites in the automotive sector. Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp. 221–268.
138.
ShinojSVisvanathanRPanigrahiS, et al.Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: a review. Ind Crops Prod2011; 33(1): 7–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.009.
DavoodiMMSapuanSMAhmadD, et al.Mechanical properties of hybrid kenaf/glass reinforced epoxy composite for passenger car bumper beam. Mater Des2010; 31(10): 4927–4932. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.021.
141.
ThilagavathiGPradeepEKannaianT, et al.Development of natural fiber nonwovens for application as car interiors for noise control. J Ind Text2010; 39(3): 267–278. DOI: 10.1177/1528083709347124.
142.
YuhazriMYSihombingHYahayaSH, et al.Solid fuel from empty fruit bunch fiber and waste papers Part 6: dimension stability test after exposed to ambient condition. GETview2012; 2(6): 6–11.
143.
MohantyAKVivekanandhanSPinJ-M, et al.Composites from renewable and sustainable resources: challenges and innovations. Science. J Compos Mater2018; 362(6414): 536–542. DOI: 10.1126/science.aat9072.
144.
AndresenCDemuthCLangeA, et al.Biobased automobile parts investigation. A report developed for the USDA office ofEnergy policy and new uses. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University, 2012.
ThiruchitrambalamMAthijayamaniASathiyamurthyS, et al.A review on the natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites for the development of roselle fiber-reinforced polyester composite. J Nat Fibers2010; 7(4): 307–323. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2010.529299.
147.
MannGSSinghLPKumarP, et al.Green composites: a review of processing technologies and recent applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2020; 33(8): 1145–1171. DOI: 10.1177/0892705718816354.
148.
GalegoNRozsaCSánchezR, et al.Characterization and application of poly (β-hydroxyalkanoates) family as composite biomaterials. Polym Test2000; 19(5): 485–492. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(99)00011-2.
149.
WangFXiaGLangX, et al.Influence of the graft density of hydrophobic groups on thermo-responsive nanoparticles for anti-cancer drugs delivery. Colloids Surf B2016; 148: 147–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.08.042.
150.
WangTWangFSunM, et al.Gastric environment-stable oral nanocarriers for in situ colorectal cancer therapy. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 139: 1035–1045. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.088.
151.
MouraIMRCabral FilhoPESeabraMABL, et al.Highly fluorescent positively charged ZnSe quantum dots for bioimaging. J Lumin2018; 201: 284–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.04.053.
152.
SelvarajJMaheshAAsokanV, et al.Phosphine-free, highly emissive, water-soluble Mn: ZnSe/ZnS core–shell nanorods: synthesis, characterization, and in vitro bioimaging of HEK293 and HeLa cells. ACS Appl Nano Mater2017; 1(1): 371–383. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.7b00218.
153.
UnalanIColpankanOAlbayrakAZ, et al.Biocompatibility of plasma-treated poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanofiber mats modified by silk fibroin for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016; 68: 842–850. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.054.
154.
AluigiASotgiuGTorreggianiA, et al.Methylene blue doped films of wool keratin with antimicrobial photodynamic activity. ACS Appl Mater Inter2015; 7(31): 17416–17424. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04699.
155.
BordenMEl-AminSFAttawiaM, et al.Structural and human cellular assessment of a novel microsphere-based tissue engineered scaffold for bone repair. Biomaterials2003; 24(4): 597–609, DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00374-5.
156.
MalafayaPBPedroAJPeterbauerA, et al.Chitosan particles agglomerated scaffolds for cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering approaches with adipose tissue derived stem cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med2005; 16(12): 1077–1085.
157.
MalafayaPBSantosTCvan GriensvenM, et al.Morphology, mechanical characterization and in vivo neo-vascularization of chitosan particle aggregated scaffolds architectures. Biomaterials2008; 29(29): 3914–3926. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.023.
IbusukiSFujiiYIwamotoY, et al.Tissue-engineered cartilage using an injectable and in situ gelable thermoresponsive gelatin: fabrication and in vitro performance. Tissue Eng2003; 9(2): 371–384. DOI: 10.1089/107632703764664846.
161.
SeongJ-YJunYJJeongB, et al.New thermogelling poly (organophosphazenes) with methoxypoly (ethylene glycol) and oligopeptide as side groups. Polymer2005; 46(14): 5075–5081. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.024.
162.
KouhiMPrabhakaranMPShamanianM, et al.Electrospun PHBV nanofibers containing HA and bredigite nanoparticles: fabrication, characterization and evaluation of mechanical properties and bioactivity. Compos Sci Technol2015; 121: 115–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.006.
163.
KouhiMFathiMPrabhakaranMP, et al.Enhanced proliferation and mineralization of human fetal osteoblast cells on PHBV-bredigite nanofibrous scaffolds. Mater Today Proc2018; 5(7): 15702–15709. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.181.
164.
ZhangKQianYWangH, et al.Genipin‐crosslinked silk fibroin/hydroxybutyl chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue‐engineering application. J Biomed Mater Res A2010; 95(3): 870–881, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32895.
ZhangK-HYuQ-ZMoX-M. Fabrication and intermolecular interactions of silk fibroin/hydroxybutyl chitosan blended nanofibers. Int J Mol Sci2011; 12(4): 2187–2199. DOI: 10.3390/ijms12042187.
167.
MikosAGSarakinosGLeiteSM, et al.Laminated three-dimensional biodegradable foams for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials1993; 14(5): 323–330. DOI: 10.142-9612/93/050323-06.
168.
MikosAGThorsenAJCzerwonkaLA, et al.Preparation and characterization of poly (L-lactic acid) foams. Polymer1994; 35(5): 1068–1077. DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-9.
169.
OchiKChenGUshidaT, et al.Use of isolated mature osteoblasts in abundance acts as desired-shaped bone regeneration in combination with a modified Poly-DL-Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA)-collagen sponge. J Cell Physiol2002; 194: 45–53. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10185.
170.
de Almeida NetoGRBarcelosMVRibeiroMEA, et al.Formulation and characterization of a novel PHBV nanocomposite for bone defect filling and infection treatment. Mater Sci Eng2019; 104: 110004. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110004.
171.
LaurencinCTAttawiaMAElgendyHE, et al.Tissue engineered bone-regeneration using degradable polymers: the formation of mineralized matrices. Bone1996; 19(1): S93–S99. DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00132-9.
172.
DevinJEAttawiaMALaurencinCT. Three-dimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed1996; 7(8): 661–669, DOI: 10.1163/156856296X00435.
173.
D’SouzaSFarajJAGiovagnoliS, et al.Preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation of olanzapine poly (d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. J Pharmaceutics2013; 2013: 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2013/831381.
174.
VilosCGutierrezMEscobarRA, et al.Superparamagnetic Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3 hydroxyvalerate)(PHBV) nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Electron J Biotechnol2013; 16(5): 8. DOI: 10.2225/vol16-issue5-fulltext-8.
175.
OkaCUshimaruKHoriishiN, et al.Core–shell composite particles composed of biodegradable polymer particles and magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. J Magn Magn Mater2015; 381: 278–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.01.005.
176.
ChoiSNohSHLimCO, et al.Icariin-functionalized nanodiamonds to enhance osteogenic capacity in vitro. Nanomaterials2020; 10(10): 2071. DOI: 10.3390/nano10102071.
177.
YaoDALiuHRXiaLL, et al.Preparation and characterization of icariin/PHBV drug delivery coatings on anodic oxidized titanium. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2011; 21(11): 2448–2453. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61035-2.
178.
PathaniaDKumariMGuptaVK. Fabrication of ZnS–cellulose nanocomposite for drug delivery, antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. Mater Des2015; 87: 1056–1064. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.103.
179.
GuptaDSinghDKothiyalNC, et al.Synthesis of chitosan-g-poly (acrylamide)/ZnS nanocomposite for controlled drug delivery and antimicrobial activity. Int J Biol Macromol2015; 74: 547–557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.008.
180.
SongJMaCZhangW, et al.Bandgap and structure engineering via cation exchange: from binary Ag2S to ternary AgInS2, quaternary AgZnInS alloy and AgZnInS/ZnS core/shell fluorescent nanocrystals for bioimaging. ACS Appl Mater Inter2016; 8(37): 24826–24836. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b07768.
181.
DashSKGhoshTRoyS, et al.Zinc sulfide nanoparticles selectively induce cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on leukemic cells: involvement of reactive oxygen species and tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Appl Toxicol2014; 34(11): 1130–1144. DOI: 10.1002/jat.2976.
182.
BerthetM-AAngellier-CoussyHMachadoD, et al.Exploring the potentialities of using lignocellulosic fibres derived from three food by-products as constituents of biocomposites for food packaging. Ind Crops Prod2015; 69: 110–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.028.
183.
DangJMLeongKW. Myogenic induction of aligned mesenchymal stem cell sheets by culture on thermally responsive electrospun nanofibers. Adv Mater2007; 19(19): 2775–2779. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200602159.
184.
GalegoNRozsaCSánchezR, et al.Characterization and application of poly (β-hydroxyalkanoates) family as composite biomaterials. Polym Test2000; 19(5): 485–492, DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9418(99)00011-2.
185.
BaekJ-YXingZ-CKwakG, et al.Fabrication and characterization of collagen-immobilized porous PHBV/HA nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Nanomater2012; 20121: 1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2012/171804.
186.
SunMYuXWangT, et al.Nasal adaptive chitosan-based nano-vehicles for anti-allergic drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 135: 1182–1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.188.
187.
ChenJChuBHsiaoBS. Mineralization of hydroxyapatite in electrospun nanofibrous poly (L‐lactic acid) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A2006; 79(2): 307–317. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30799.
188.
YangFWolkeJGCJansenJA. Biomimetic calcium phosphate coating on electrospun poly (ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J2008; 137(1): 154–161.
189.
WeiCHouCGuQ, et al.Efficacy of thermosensitive hydroxybutyl chitosan in prevention of post-operative abdominal adhesions in a rat model. Iran Polym J2009; 18: 355–364.
190.
PanWXiaoXLiJ, et al.The comparison of biocompatibility and osteoinductivity between multi-walled and single-walled carbon nanotube/PHBV composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med2018; 29(12): 1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6197-3.
191.
NairMBBaranwalGVijayanP, et al.Composite hydrogel of chitosan–poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) with chondroitin sulfate nanoparticles for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B2015; 136: 84–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.026.
192.
HuSBiSYanD, et al.Preparation of composite hydroxybutyl chitosan sponge and its role in promoting wound healing. Carbohydr Polym2018; 184: 154–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.033.
193.
Suárez-FrancoJLGarcía-HipólitoMSurárez-RosalesMÁ, et al.Effects of surface morphology of ceramic materials on osteoblastic cells responses. J Nanomater2013; 2013: 361249. DOI: 10.1155/2013/361249.
194.
KamińskaIFroncKSikoraB, et al.Synthesis of ZnAl 2 O 4:(Er 3+, Yb 3+) spinel-type nanocrystalline upconverting luminescent marker in hela carcinoma cells, using a combustion aerosol method route. RSC Adv2014; 4: 56596–56604. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra10976g.
195.
HuangWWangYRenL, et al.A novel PHBV/HA microsphere releasing system loaded with alendronate. Mater Sci Eng C2009; 29(7): 2221–2225. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2009.05.015.
196.
CaiYZhongZHeC, et al.Homogeneously synthesized hydroxybutyl chitosans in alkali/urea aqueous solutions as potential wound dressings. ACS Appl Bio Mater2019; 2(10): 4291–4302. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00553.
197.
DuanBWangM. Encapsulation and release of biomolecules from Ca–P/PHBV nanocomposite microspheres and three-dimensional scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. Polym Degrad Stab2010; 95(9): 1655–1664. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.05.022.
198.
WangNZhouZXiaL, et al.Fabrication and characterization of bioactive β-Ca2SiO4/PHBV composite scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C2013; 33(4): 2294–2301. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.059.
199.
XiaGLiuYTianM, et al.Nanoparticles/thermosensitive hydrogel reinforced with chitin whiskers as a wound dressing for treating chronic wounds. J Mater Chem B2017; 5(17): 3172–3185. DOI: 10.1039/C7TB00479F.
200.
do Amaral MontanheiroTLMontagnaLSPatruleaV, et al.Enhanced water uptake of PHBV scaffolds with functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. Polym Test2019; 79: 106079. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106079.
201.
DalgicADAtilaDKaratasA, et al.Diatom shell incorporated PHBV/PCL-pullulan co-electrospun scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 100: 735–746. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.046.
202.
WangYLinFXZhaoY, et al.The sustained-release behavior and in vitro and in vivo transfection of pEGFP-loaded core-shell-structured chitosan-based composite particles. Int J Nanomedicine2014; 9: 4965. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S58104.
203.
NajarRAMajeedASharmaG, et al. Biocomposites based on natural fibers: concept and biomedical applications. Biocomposites biomedical and environmental applications. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2018, p. 135.
204.
DhandayuthapaniBYoshidaYMaekawaT, et al.Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci2011; 2011: 1–19. DOI: 10.1155/2011/290602.
205.
YeXLiLLinZ, et al.Integrating 3D-printed PHBV/Calcium sulfate hemihydrate scaffold and chitosan hydrogel for enhanced osteogenic property. Carbohydr Polym2018; 202: 106–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.117.
206.
SajeshKMKiranKNairSV, et al.Sequential layer-by-layer electrospinning of nano SrCO3/PRP loaded PHBV fibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Compos B Eng2016; 99: 445–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.026.
207.
LiWDingYRaiR, et al.Preparation and characterization of PHBV microsphere/45S5 bioactive glass composite scaffolds with vancomycin releasing function. Mater Sci Eng C2014; 41: 320–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.052.
208.
AbbasipourMMirjaliliMKhajaviR, et al.Coated cotton gauze with Ag/ZnO/chitosan nanocomposite as a modern wound dressing. J Eng Fibers Fabr2014; 9(1): 155892501400900. DOI: 10.1177/155892501400900114.
BaroutiGJaffredoCGGuillaumeSM. Advances in drug delivery systems based on synthetic poly(hydroxybutyrate) (co)polymers. Progr Polym Sci2017; 73: 1–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.05.002.
212.
PolettoFSFielLADonidaB, et al.Controlling the size of poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) nanoparticles prepared by emulsification–diffusion technique using ethanol as surface agent. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2008; 324: 105–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.04.003.
213.
MonnierARomboutsCKouiderD, et al.Preparation and characterization of biodegradable polyhydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate/polyethylene glycol-based microspheres. Int J Pharm2016; 513(1–2): 49–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.066.
214.
ChenYAbdalkarimSYHYuH-Y, et al.Double stimuli-responsive cellulose nanocrystals reinforced electrospun PHBV composites membrane for intelligent drug release. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 155: 330–339. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.216.
215.
GuptaVAsehARíosCN, et al.Fabrication and characterization of silk fibroin-derived curcumin nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine2009; 4: 115–122, DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S5581.
216.
FurukawaHCordovaKEO’KeeffeM, et al.The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science2013; 341(6149): 1230444. DOI: 10.1126/science.1230444.
217.
ZhouJYangYZhangC-y. Toward biocompatible semiconductor quantum dots: from biosynthesis and bioconjugation to biomedical application. Chem Rev2015; 115(21): 11669–11717. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00049.
218.
WilzAPritchardEMLiT, et al.Silk polymer-based adenosine release: therapeutic potential for epilepsy. Biomaterials2008; 29(26): 3609–3616. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.010.
219.
EliaRNewhideDRPedevillanoPD, et al.Silk–hyaluronan-based composite hydrogels: A novel, securable vehicle for drug delivery. J Biomater Appl2013; 27(6): 749–762. DOI: 10.1177/0885328211424516.
220.
XiaLLiYZhouZ, et al.Icariin delivery porous PHBV scaffolds for promoting osteoblast expansion in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2013; 33(6): 3545–3552. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.050.
221.
QiaoYZhangWTianP, et al.Stimulation of bone growth following zinc incorporation into biomaterials. Biomaterials2014; 35(25): 6882–6897. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.101.
222.
YangHQuXLinW, et al.In vitro and in vivo studies on zinc-hydroxyapatite composites as novel biodegradable metal matrix composite for orthopedic applications. Acta Biomater2018; 71: 200–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.007.
223.
AmnaTHassanMSKhilMS, et al.Electrospun nanofibers of ZnO-TiO2 hybrid: characterization and potential as an extracellular scaffold for supporting myoblasts. Surf Interf Anal2014; 46: 72–76. DOI: 10.1002/sia.5350.
224.
ZhaoX-cXiaoG-yZhangX, et al.Ultrasonic induced rapid formation and crystal refinement of chemical conversed hopeite coating on titanium. J Phys Chem C2014; 118(4): 1910–1918. DOI: 10.1021/jp408444j.
225.
KentAHarriesBS. Nonconventional and vernacular construction materials characterisation, properties and applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
226.
MosallamASBayraktarAElmikawiM, et al.Polymer composites in construction: an overview. Symbiosis. 2015.
227.
KinnaneOReillyAGrimesJ, et al.Acoustic absorption of hemp-lime construction. Constr Build Mater2016; 122: 674–682. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.106.
228.
AkilHMOmarMFMazukiAAM, et al.Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Des2011; 32(8–9): 4107–4121. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008.
229.
DahyH. Natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites (NFRP) fabricated from lignocellulosic fibres for future sustainable architectural applications, case studies: segmented-shell construction, acoustic panels, and furniture. Sensors2019; 19(3): 738. DOI: 10.3390/s19030738.
230.
BlokRSmitsJGkaidatzisR, et al.Bio-based composite footbridge: design, production and in situ monitoring. Struct Eng Int2019; 29(3): 453–465. DOI: 10.1080/10168664.2019.1608137.
231.
DweibMAHuBShentonHW, et al.Bio-based composite roof structure: manufacturing and processing issues. Compos Struct2006; 74(4): 379–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.018.
232.
SatyanarayanaKGSukumaranKKulkarniAG, et al.Fabrication and properties of natural fibre-reinforced polyester composites. Compos Commun1986; 17: 329–333. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90750-0.
233.
KrishnamoorthyMTensingDSivarajaM, et al.Durability studies on polyethylene terephthalate (pet) fibre reinforced concrete. Int J Civ Eng2017; 8(810): 634–640.
234.
DweibMAHuBO’DonnellA, et al.All natural composite sandwich beams for structural applications. Compos Struct2004; 63(2): 147–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00143-0.
235.
BurguenoRQuagliataMJMohantyAK, et al.Load-bearing natural fiber composite cellular beams and panels. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35(6): 645–656. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.012.
236.
PapadopoulosANHagueJRB. The potential for using flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) shiv as a lignocellulosic raw material for particleboard. Ind Crops Prod2003; 17(2): 143–147. DOI: 10.1016/S0926669002000948.
237.
KhalilHAFazitaMNBhatAH, et al.Development and material properties of new hybrid plywood from oil palm biomass. Mater Des2010; 31(1): 417–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.040.
238.
AshoriANourbakhshAKaregarfardA. Properties of medium density fiberboard based on bagasse fibers. J Compos Mater2009; 43(18): 1927–1934. DOI: 10.1177/0021998309341099.
239.
MlalilaNHilongaASwaiH, et al.Antimicrobial packaging based on starch, poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly (lactic-co-glycolide) materials and application challenges. Trends Food Sci Technol2018; 74: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.01.015.
240.
SwamyRPKumarGCMVrushabhendrappaY, et al.Study of areca-reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2004; 23(13): 1373–1382. DOI: 10.1177/0731684404037049.
241.
KoideSShiJ. Microbial and quality evaluation of green peppers stored in biodegradable film packaging. Food Control2007; 18(9): 1121–1125. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.07.013.
242.
ZaitonAAssemYArafaA, et al.Synthesis of some bioactive compounds and its application as antimicrobial agents for plastic industry. Egypt J Chem2018; 61(3): 431–445. DOI: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2018.2947.1243.
243.
HashemMRefaieRZaghloulS, et al.Bioactive jute fabrics for packaging and storage of grains and legumes applications. Egypt J Chem2017; 60(4): 551–561. DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2017.859.1038.
244.
Irimia‐VladuMGłowackiEDTroshinPA, et al.Indigo‐A natural pigment for high performance ambipolar organic field effect transistors and circuits. Adv Mater2012; 24(3): 375–380. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201102619.
245.
Irimia-VladuMGłowackiEDSchwabeggerG, et al.Natural resin shellac as a substrate and a dielectric layer for organic field-effect transistors. Green Chem2013; 15(6): 1473–1476. DOI: 10.1039/c3gc40388b.
246.
SudeshKAbeHDoiY. Synthesis, structure and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates: biological polyesters. Prog Polym Sci2000; 25(10): 1503–1555. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00035-6.
247.
YoonJ-SLeeW-SJinH-J, et al.Toughening of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) with poly (cis-1, 4-isoprene). Eur Polym J1999; 35(5): 781–788. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(98)00068-8.
248.
SiracusaVRocculiPRomaniS, et al.Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Cogent Food Agric2008; 19(12): 634–643. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2015.1117749.
249.
HaugaardVKDanielsenBBertelsenG. Impact of polylactate and poly (hydroxybutyrate) on food quality. Eur Food Res Technol2003; 216(3): 233–240. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-002-0651-6.
250.
YuJChenLXL. The greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy requirement of bioplastics from cradle to gate of a biomass refinery. Environ Sci Technol2008; 42(18): 6961–6966. DOI: 10.1021/es7032235.
251.
McConvilleCTawariPWangW. Hot melt extruded and injection moulded disulfiram-loaded PLGA millirods for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme via stereotactic injection. Int J Pharm2015; 494(1): 73–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.072.
252.
HuangJMazzaraJMSchwendemanSP, et al.Self-healing of pores in PLGAs. J Controlled Release2015; 206: 20–29. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.025.
253.
ReichertCLBugnicourtEColtelliM-B, et al.Bio-based packaging: Materials, modifications, industrial applications and sustainability. Polymers2020; 12(7): 1558. DOI: 10.3390/polym12071558.
254.
Van den OeverMMolenveldKvan der ZeeM, et al. Bio-based and biodegradable plastics: facts and figures: focus on food packaging in the Netherlands. Netherlands: Wageningen Food & Biobased Research number 1722, 2017.
255.
KhakaloAFilpponenIRojasOJ. Protein-mediated interfacial adhesion in composites of cellulose nanofibrils and polylactide: enhanced toughness towards material development. Compos Sci Technol2018; 160: 145–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.013.
256.
ReisMOOlivatoJBBilckAP, et al.Biodegradable trays of thermoplastic starch/poly (lactic acid) coated with beeswax. Ind Crops Prod2018; 112: 481–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.045.
257.
SoaresFCYamashitaFMüllerCMO, et al.Thermoplastic starch/poly (lactic acid) sheets coated with cross-linked chitosan. Polym Test2013; 32(1): 94–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.005.
HanS-TZhouYRoyVAL. Towards the development of flexible non‐volatile memories. Adv Mater2013; 25(38): 5425–5449. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201301361.
260.
Irimia-VladuM. Green” electronics: biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future. Chem Soc Rev2014; 43(2): 588–610. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60235d.
261.
SugintaWKhunkaewlaPSchulteA. Electrochemical biosensor applications of polysaccharides chitin and chitosan. Chem Rev2013; 113(7): 5458–5479. DOI: 10.1021/cr300325r.
262.
OnukiYBhardwajUPapadimitrakopoulosF, et al.A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response. J Diabetes Sci Technol2008; 2(6): 1003–1015. DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200610.
263.
MoorsMAdepalliKKLuQ, et al.Resistive switching mechanisms on TaO x and SrRuO3 thin-film surfaces probed by scanning tunneling microscopy. ACS Nano2016; 10(1): 1481–1492. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07020.
264.
ZhaoXFanZXuH, et al.Reversible alternation between bipolar and unipolar resistive switching in Ag/MoS 2/Au structure for multilevel flexible memory. J Mater Chem C2018; 6(27): 7195–7200. DOI: 10.1039/C8TC01844H.
265.
JiangJBaiZLChenZH, et al.Temporary formation of highly conducting domain walls for non-destructive read-out of ferroelectric domain-wall resistance switching memories. Nat Mater2018; 1717(11): 4949–5656. DOI: 10.1038/NMAT5028.
266.
ParkYLeeJ-S. Artificial synapses with short-and long-term memory for spiking neural networks based on renewable materials. ACS Nano2017; 11(9): 8962–8969. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03347.
267.
TsengRJTsaiCMaL, et al.Digital memory device based on tobacco mosaic virus conjugated with nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol2006; 1(1): 72–77. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2006.55.
268.
Raeis-HosseiniNLeeJ-S. Controlling the resistive switching behavior in starch-based flexible biomemristors. ACS Appl Mater Inter2016; 8(11): 7326–7332. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b01559.
269.
Raeis HosseiniNLeeJ-S. Resistive switching memory based on bioinspired natural solid polymer electrolytes. ACS Nano2015; 9(1): 419–426. DOI: 10.1021/nn5055909.
270.
HosseiniNRLeeJ-S. Biocompatible and flexible chitosan‐based resistive switching memory with magnesium electrodes. Adv Funct Mater2015; 25(35): 5586–5592. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201502592.
271.
LiuTWuWLiaoK-N, et al.Fabrication of carboxymethyl cellulose and graphene oxide bio-nanocomposites for flexible nonvolatile resistive switching memory devices. Carbohydr Polym2019; 214: 213–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.040.
272.
GogurlaNMondalSPSinhaAK, et al.Transparent and flexible resistive switching memory devices with a very high ON/OFF ratio using gold nanoparticles embedded in a silk protein matrix. Nanotechnology2013; 24(34): 345202. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/34/345202.
273.
BokCHWooSJWuC, et al.Flexible bio-memristive devices based on chicken egg albumen: Au@ SiO 2 core-shell nanoparticle nanocomposites. Sci Rep2017; 7(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12209-6.
274.
ZhuJXZhouWLWangZQ, et al.Flexible, transferable and conformal egg albumen based resistive switching memory devices. RSC Adv2017; 7(51): 32114–32119. DOI: 10.1039/c7ra05237e.
275.
KimS-JHwangBLeeJ-S. Control of gold nanoparticle–protein aggregates in albumen matrix for configurable switching devices. Adv Mater Inter2018; 5(9): 1800086. DOI: 10.1002/admi.201800086.
276.
WuWHanS-TVenkateshS, et al.Biodegradable skin-inspired nonvolatile resistive switching memory based on gold nanoparticles embedded alkali lignin. Org Electron2018; 59: 382–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.051.
277.
ChangY-CLeeC-JWangL-W, et al.Highly uniform resistive switching properties of solution‐processed silver‐embedded gelatin thin film. Small2018; 14(13): 1703888. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201703888.
278.
JengH-YYangT-CYangL, et al.Non-volatile resistive memory devices based on solution-processed natural DNA biomaterial. Org Electron2018; 54: 216–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.048.
279.
YagatiAKKimS-ULeeT, et al.Recombinant azurin-CdSe/ZnS hybrid structures for nanoscale resistive random access memory device. Biosens Bioelectron2017; 90: 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.11.037.
280.
LvZWangYChenZ, et al.Phototunable biomemory based on light‐mediated charge trap. Adv Sci2018; 5(9): 1800714. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800714.
281.
YoonJMohammadniaeiMChoiHK, et al.Resistive switching biodevice composed of MoS2-DNA heterolayer on the gold electrode. Appl Surf Sci2019; 478: 134–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.229.
282.
WangLJackmanJANgWB, et al.Flexible, graphene‐coated biocomposite for highly sensitive, real‐time molecular detection. Adv Funct Mater2016; 26(47): 8623–8630. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201603550.
283.
XingYShiCZhaoJ, et al.Mesoscopic‐Functionalization of Silk Fibroin with Gold Nanoclusters Mediated by Keratin and Bioinspired Silk Synapse. Small2017; 13(40): 1702390. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201702390.
284.
JørgensenMNorrmanKGevorgyanSA, et al.Stability of polymer solar cells. Adv Mater2012; 24(5): 580–612. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104187.
285.
MeiJDiaoYAppletonAL, et al.Integrated materials design of organic semiconductors for field-effect transistors. J Am Chem Soc2013; 135(18): 6724–6746. DOI: 10.1021/ja400881n.
286.
XingXChenMGongY, et al.Building memory devices from biocomposite electronic materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater2020; 21(1): 100–121. DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2020.1725395.
287.
ChangJ-WWangC-GHuangC-Y, et al.Chicken albumen dielectrics in organic field‐effect transistors. Adv Mater2011; 23(35): 4077–4081. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201102124.
288.
MurgundeBKRabinalMK. Solution processed bilayer junction of silk fibroin and semiconductor quantum dots as multilevel memristor devices. Org Electron2017; 48: 276–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.015.
289.
ArigaKNishikawaMMoriT, et al.Self-assembly as a key player for materials nanoarchitectonics. Sci Technol Adv Mater2019; 20(1): 51–95. DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2018.1553108.
290.
MiuraAUraokaYFuyukiT, et al.Floating nanodot gate memory fabrication with biomineralized nanodot as charge storage node. J Appl Phys2008; 103: 074503. DOI: 10.1063/1.2888357.
291.
BeraSMondalSPNaskarD, et al.Flexible and transparent nanocrystal floating gate memory devices using silk protein. Org Electronics2014; 15: 1767–1772. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.04.038.
292.
SunH-SChiuY-CLeeW-Y, et al.Synthesis of oligosaccharide-based block copolymers with pendent π-conjugated oligofluorene moieties and their electrical device applications. Macromolecules2015; 48: 3907–3917. DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00651.
293.
FengPDuPWanC, et al.Proton conducting graphene oxide/chitosan composite electrolytes as gate dielectrics for new-concept devices. Sci Rep2016; 6: 34065. DOI: 10.1038/srep34065.
294.
KybertNJHanGHLernerMB, et al.Scalable arrays of chemical vapor sensors based on DNA-decorated graphene. Nano Res2013; 7: 95–103. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-013-0376-9.
295.
LinT-WHsiehP-JLinC-L, et al.Label-free detection of protein-protein interactions using a calmodulin-modified nanowire transistor. Proc Nat Acad Sci2010; 107: 1047–1052. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910243107.
296.
MansorMRMasturaMTSapuanSM, et al. The environmental impact of natural fiber composites through life cycle assessment analysis. Durability and life prediction in biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 257–285.
297.
SommerhuberPFWenkerJLRüterS, et al.Life cycle assessment of wood-plastic composites: analysing alternative materials and identifying an environmental sound end-of-life option. Resour Conserv Recycl2017; 117: 235–248.
298.
RebitzerGEkvallTFrischknechtR, et al.Life cycle assessment Part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int2004; 30(5): 701–720. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.
299.
WotzelKWirthRFlakeM. Life cycle studies on hemp fibre reinforced components and ABS for automotive parts. Die Angew Makromolekulare Chem1999; 272: 121–127.
300.
AlvesCFerrãoPMCSilvaAJ, et al.Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Clean Prod2010; 18(4): 313–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.022.
301.
LuzSMCaldeira-PiresAFerrãoPMC. Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components. Resour Conserv Recycl2010; 54(12): 1135–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.009.
302.
Le DuigouA, et al.PLLA/Flax Mat/Balsa Bio-sandwich—environmental impact and simplified life cycle analysis. Appl Compos Mater2011; 19(3–4): 363–378.
303.
JoshiSVDrzalLTMohantyAK, et al.Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?Compos Part A Appl Sc2004; 35(3): 371–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016.
304.
XuXJayaramanKMorinC, et al.Life cycle assessment of wood-fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Mater Process Technol2008; 198(1–3): 168–177.
305.
ZhangJChevaliVSWangH, et al.Current status of carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites recycling. Composites Part B: Eng2020; 193: 108053. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108053.
306.
CorreaJPMontalvo-NavarreteJMHidalgo-SalazarMA. Carbon footprint considerations for biocomposite materials for sustainable products: a review. J Clean Prod2019; 208: 785–794.
307.
ReindersMJOnwezenMCMeeusenMJG. Can bio-based attributes upgrade a brand? How partial and full use of bio-based materials affects the purchase intention of brands. J Clean Prod2017; 162: 1169–1179.
308.
ZahRHischierRLeãoAL, et al.Curauá fibers in the automobile industry – a sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod2007; 15(11–12): 1032–1040. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.036.
309.
SchmehlMMüssigJSchönfeldU, et al.Life cycle assessment on a bus body component based on hemp fiber and PTP®. J Polym Environ2008; 16(1): 51–60.
310.
WangJShiSQLiangK. Comparative life-cycle assessment of sheet molding compound reinforced by natural fiber vs. glass fiber. J Agric Sci Technol B2013; 3(7B): 493.
311.
La RosaADCozzoGLatteriA, et al.Life cycle assessment of a novel hybrid glass-hemp/thermoset composite. J Clean Prod2013; 44: 69–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.038.
312.
DengYGuoYWuP, et al.Optimal design of flax fiber reinforced polymer composite as a lightweight component for automobiles from a life cycle assessment perspective. J Ind Ecol2019; 23(4): 986–997. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12836.
313.
Corbière-NicollierTLabanBGLundquistL, et al.Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics. Resour Conserv Recycl2001; 33: 267–287.
314.
DienerJSiehlerU. Ökologischer Vergleich von NMT‐und GMT‐Bauteilen. Die Angew Makromolekulare Chem1999; 272: 1–4.
