This study includes experimental and numerical investigations on fibre-metal laminate structures containing adhesive joints under static bending loads. Experimental tests were carried out on Glare® 4B specimens manufactured in-house and containing doubler joint features. Numerical analyses were performed using Abaqus software including damage in the glass fibre reinforced polymer layers, ductile damage in the resin pockets (FM94 epoxy) and plasticity in the metal layers. A new cohesive zone model coupling friction and interfacial shear under through-thickness compressive stress has been developed to simulate delamination initiation and growth at the metal/fibre interfaces with the adhesive joint under flexural loading. This model is implemented through a user-defined VUMAT subroutine in the Abaqus/Explicit software and includes two main approaches, firstly, combining friction and interfacial shear stresses created in the interlaminar layers of the fibre-metal laminate as a result of through-thickness stresses and secondly, considering elastic-plastic damage behaviour using a new cohesive zone model based on the trapezoidal law (which provides more accurate results for the simulation of toughened epoxy matrices than the commonly used bilinear cohesive zone model). Numerical results have been validated against experimental data from 4-point bending tests and a good correlation observed with respect to both crack initiation and evolution. Delamination and shear failure were noted to be the predominant failure modes under bending stresses as expected. This is due to the higher mode-II stresses introduced during bending which cause different damage evolution behaviour to that seen for axial stresses. Finite element results revealed that both friction and shear strength parameters generated from through-thickness compression stresses have a significant effect in predicting damage in fibre-metal laminate structures under this type of loading.
VlotADGunninkJW. Fibre Metal Laminates - An Introduction. London: Kluwer Academic publishers, 2001.
2.
BerendsHvan BurgEvan RaaijEM. Contacts and contracts: cross-level network dynamics in the development of an aircraft material. Organ Sci2011; 22(4): 940–960.
3.
LiuCDuDLiH, et al.Interlaminar failure behavior of GLARE laminates under short-beam three-point-bending load. Composites B: Eng2016; 97: 361–367.
4.
XuY. Research on Bending Properties and Failure Mechanisms of GLARE Laminates, Master Thesis. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.
5.
YeJChuCCaiH, et al.A multi-scale modeling scheme for damage analysis of composite structures based on the High-Fidelity Generalized Method of Cells. Compos Struct2018; 206: 42–53.
6.
XuY. Preparation and Properties of Ti/CF/PMR Polyimide Super Hybrid Laminates, PhD Thesis. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University of Aeronautics, 2017.
7.
AghamohammadiHHosseini AbbandanakSNEslami-FarsaniR, et al.Effects of various aluminum surface treatments on the basalt fiber metal laminates interlaminar adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes2018; 84: 184–193.
8.
SchreyerHLPefferA. Fiber pullout based on a one-dimensional model of decohesion. Mech Mater2000; 32(12): 821–836.
9.
LiuC. Study on Interlaminar Shear Failure Behaviour and Mechanism of GLARE Laminates, Master Thesis. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.
10.
Cepeda-JimenezCMAlderliestenRCRuanoOA, et al.Damage tolerance assessment by bend and shear tests of two multilayer composites: glass fibre reinforced metal laminate and aluminium roll-bonded laminate. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(3–4): 343–348.
11.
YehP-CChangP-YYangJ-M, et al.Blunt notch strength of hybrid boron/glass/aluminium fiber metal laminates. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528(4–5): 2164–2173.
12.
CarrilloJGCantwellWJ. Mechanical properties of a novel fiber-metal laminate based on a polypropylene composite. Mech Mater2009; 41: 828–838.
13.
JungD-WKimH-JChoiN-S. Aluminum-GFRP hybrid square tube beam reinforced by a thin composite skin layer. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 1558–1565.
14.
HusainNAPangCLAbdullahMR, et al.Experimental analysis of bending and tensile behaviour of aluminium-based fibre metal laminates. In: 9th international conference on fracture & strength of aolids, Jeju, Korea, 9–13 June 2013. 2013.
15.
RajkumarGRKrishnaMNarasimhamurthyHN, et al.Investigation of tensile and bending behavior of aluminum based hybrid fiber metal laminates. Proced Mat Sci2014; 5: 60–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.242.
16.
JinKWangHTaoJ, et al.Mechanical analysis and progressive failure prediction for fibre metal laminates using a 3D constitutive model. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf September 2019; 124: 105490. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105490.
17.
DhaliwalGSNewazGM. Experimental and numerical investigation of flexural behavior of carbon fiber reinforced aluminum laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35(12): 945–956. DOI: 10.1177/0731684416632606.
18.
MansourinikMTaheri-BehroozF. The effect of interface debonding on flexural behaviour of composite sandwich beams. Jnl Sandwich Struct Mater2020; 22(4): 1132–1156. DOI: 10.1177/1099636218781981.
19.
FallahiHTaheri-BehroozFAsadiA. Nonlinear mechanical response of polymer matrix composites: a review. Polym Rev2020; 60(1): 42–85. DOI: 10.1080/15583724.2019.1656236.
20.
AzhdariSFakhreddini-NajafabadiSTaheri-BehroozF. An experimental and numerical investigation on low velocity impact response of GLAREs. Compos Struct2021; 271: 114123. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114123.
21.
BelliniC. Damage analysis of a GLARE laminate subjected to interlaminar shear. Proced Struct Integr2020; 25: 262–267.
22.
GornetLIjazHCartieDDR. Inelastic interface damage modeling with friction effects: application to Z-pinning reinforcement in carbon fiber epoxy matrix laminates. J Compos Mater2010; 44(No. 17): 2067–2081.
23.
MustoMAlfanoG. A fractional rate‐dependent cohesive‐zone model. Int J Numer Meth Eng2015; 103: 313–341. DOI: 10.1002/nme.4885.
24.
ZouZHameedM. Combining interface damage and friction in cohesive interface models using an energy based approach. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2018; 112: 290–298. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.017.
25.
VodiˇckaRKormaníkováEKšiˇnanF. Interfacial debonds of layered anisotropic materials using a quasi-static interface damage model with Coulomb friction. Int J Fract2018; 211: 163–182. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-018-0281-z.
26.
LiXHallettSRWisnomMR. Predicting the effect of through-thickness compressive stress on delamination using interface elements. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 218–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.005.
27.
GanKWHallettSRWisnomMR. Measurement and modelling of interlaminar shear strength enhancement under moderate through-thickness compression. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2013; 49: 18–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.02.004.
28.
BaekHParkK. Cohesive frictional-contact model for dynamic fracture simulations under compression. Int J Sol Struct2018: 14486–14599. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.016.
29.
ZouZLeeH. A cohesive zone model taking account of the effect of through-thickness compression. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2017; 98: 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.015.
30.
IbrahimGRAlbarbarA. A new approach to the cohesive zone model that includes thermal effects. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 167: 370–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.003.
31.
LiuPFGuZPPengXQ. A nonlinear cohesive/friction coupled model for shear induced delamination of adhesive composite joint. Int J Fract2016; 199: 135–156. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-016-0100-3.
32.
SerpieriRAlfanoG. Bond-slip analysis via a thermodynamically consistent interface model combining interlocking, damage and friction. Int J Numer Meth Eng2011; 85: 164–186. DOI: 10.1002/nme.2961.
33.
HameedMAIbrahimGRAlbarbarA. Effect of friction and shear strength enhancement on delamination prediction. J Compos Mater2020; 54(23): 3329–3342. DOI: 10.1177/0021998320911719.
34.
ASTM D7264/D7264M–07.standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials, Vol. 100. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM), 2007, pp. 19428–19459.
AlderliestenRC. Fatigue Crack Propagation and Delamination Growth in Glare, PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology, 2005.
38.
XiaoJRGillespieJW. A phenomenological Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for composite laminates under interlaminar shear and compression. J Compos Mater2007; 41: 1295–1309. DOI: 10.1177/0021998306067318.
39.
ZouZLeeH. A cohesive zone model taking account of the effect of through-thickness compression. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2017; 98: 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.015.
40.
Al-AzzawiAl-AzzawiASMKawashitaLFFeatherstonCA. A modified cohesive zone model for fatigue delamination in adhesive joints: numerical and experimental investigations. Compos Struct2019; 225: 111114. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111114.
41.
RooijenV. Bearing Strength Characteristics of Standard and Steel Reinforced GLARE®, PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology, 2006.
42.
TvergaardVHutchinsonJW. The Relation Between Crack Growth Resistance and Fracture Process Parameters in Elastic-Plastic Solids. J Mech Phys Sol1992; 40(No. 6): 1377–1397.
43.
LindePPleitnerJde BoerH, et al.Modelling and simulation of fibre metal laminates. In: Abaqus Users Conference. Boston, Massachusetts, 25–27 May 2004. www.simulia.com/forms/world/pdf2004/LINDE.pdf.
44.
SugimanSCrocombeAD. The static and fatigue response of metal laminate and hybrid fibre-metal laminate doublers joints under tension loading. Compos Structures2012; 94: 2937–2951.
45.
YaghoubiASLiawB. Experimental and numerical approaches on behavior of Glare 5 beams: influences of thickness and stacking sequence. In: AllemangRNiezreckiCBloughJ (eds) Topics in Modal Analysis II, Volume 6: Proceedings of the 30th IMAC. New York: Springer, pp. 7–16, 2012.
46.
NaghipourPSchulzeKHausmannJ, et al.Numerical and experimental investigation on lap shear fracture of Al/CFRP laminates. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1718–1724. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.012.
KawashitaLFKinlochAJMooreDR, et al.The influence of bond line thickness and peel arm thickness on adhesive fracture toughness of rubber toughened epoxy-aluminium alloy laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes2008; 28: 199–210.
50.
KatnamKBCrocombeADSugimanH, et al.Static and fatigue failures of adhesively bonded laminate joints in moist environments. Int J Damage Mech2011; 20: 1217–1226.
