This study aims to compare the low-velocity impact and post-impact properties of intra-ply hybrid carbon/E-glass/polypropylene non-crimp thermoplastic composites with non-hybrid carbon/PP and E-glass/PP non-crimp thermoplastic composites. Impact test was performed at four energy levels as 15 J, 30 J, 45 J and 60 J. Post-impact properties of hybrid thermoplastic composites were tested by compression after impact method for each energy level to understand the impact damage tolerance of intra-ply hybrid carbon/E-glass/PP non-crimp thermoplastic composites. The effect of hybridization on energy absorption of composites was not significant, while C-scan results showed that the intra-ply hybrid non-crimp thermoplastic composites had smaller impact damage areas in comparison to the non-hybrid samples. Compression and compression after impact tests results confirmed that the intra-ply hybridization increased the toughness of the composite laminates. Also, the residual compression strength/modulus increased with hybridization which indicated to damage tolerance.
HawyesVJCurtisPTSoutisC.Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Compos Part A2001;
32: 1263–1270.
2.
BaucomJNZikryMA.Low-velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems. Compos Part A2005;
36: 658–664.
3.
BilisikK.Multiaxis three dimensional (3D) woven fabric. In: VassiliadisS (ed) Advances in modern woven fabrics technology.
Zagrep:
InTech, 2011, pp.80–106.
4.
BeierUFischerFSandlerJKWet al.
Mechanical performance of carbon fibre-reinforced composites based on stitched preforms. Compos Part A2007;
38: 1655–1663.
5.
ScarponiCPerilloAMCutilloLet al.
Advanced TTT composite materials for aeronautical purposes: compression after impact (CAI) behavior. Compos Part B2007;
38: 258–264.
6.
HosurMVAdbullahMJeelaniS.Studies on the low-velocity impact response of woven hybrid composites. Compos Struct2005;
67: 253–262.
7.
DehkordiMTNosratyHShokriehMMet al.
Low velocity impact properties of intra-ply hybrid composites based on basalt and nylon woven fabrics. Mater Des2010;
31: 3835–3844.
8.
SwolfsYGorbatikhLVerpoestI.Fibre hybridisation in polymer composites: a review. Compos Part A2014;
67: 181–200.
9.
StraitLHKarasekMLAmateauMF.Effects of stacking sequence on the impact resistance of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic toughened epoxy laminates.J Compos Mater1992;
26: 1725–1740.
10.
BaghaeiBSkrifvarsMBerglinL.Characterization of thermoplastic natural fibre composites made from woven hybrid yarn prepregs with different weave pattern. Compos Part A2015;
76: 154–161.
11.
KarahanMKarahanN.Influence of weaving structure and hybridization on the tensile properties of woven carbon-epoxy composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2014;
33: 212–222.
12.
Ghasemi NejhadMNParvizi-MajidiA.Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Composites1990;
21: 155–168.
13.
WisnomMRCzélGSwolfsYet al.
Hybrid effects in thin ply carbon/glass unidirectional laminates: accurate experimental determination and prediction. Compos Part A2016;
88: 131–139.
14.
ReyesGSharmaU.Modeling and damage repair of woven thermoplastic composites subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct2010;
92: 523–531.
15.
VieilleBCasadoVMBouvetC.About the impact behavior of woven-ply carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic- and thermosetting-composites: a comparative study. Compos Struct2013;
101: 9–21.
16.
GonzálezEVMaimíPSainz de AjaJRet al.
Effects of interply hybridization on the damage resistance and tolerance of composite laminates. Compos Struct2014;
108: 319–331.
17.
RussoPLangellaAPapaIet al.
Thermoplastic polyurethane/glass fabric composite laminates: low velocity impact behavior under extreme temperature conditions. Compos Struct2017;
166: 146–152.
18.
DubaryNTaconetGBouvetCet al.
Influence of temperature on the impact behavior and damage tolerance of hybrid woven-ply thermoplastic laminates for aeronautical applications. Compos Struct2017;
168: 663–674.
19.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL.Maximising the hybrid effect in unidirectional hybrid composites. Mater Des2016;
93: 39–45.
20.
ThanomsilpCHoggPJ.Penetration impact resistance of hybrid composites based on commingled yarn fabrics. Compos Sci Technol2003;
63: 467–482.
21.
BrownKABrooksRWarriorNA.The static and high strain rate behaviour of a commingled E-glass/polypropylene woven fabric composite. Compos Sci Technol2010;
70: 272–283.
22.
JawaidMAbdul KhalilHPSAbu BakarA.Woven hybrid composites: tensile and flexural properties of oil palm woven jute fibres based epoxy composites. Mater Sci Eng A2011;
528: 5190–5195.
23.
SelverEPotluriPHoggPet al.
Impact damage tolerance of thermoset composites reinforced with hybrid commingled yarns. Compos Part B2016;
91: 522–538.
24.
PegorettiAFabbriEMigliaresiCet al.
Intraply and interply hybrid composites based on E-glass and poly(vinyl alcohol) woven fabrics: tensile and impact properties. Polym Int2004;
53: 1290–1297.
25.
Indu ShekarRSatheesh KumarMNDamodhara RaoPMet al.
Siddaramaiah, Chandrakala. Studies on the composites produced from co-weaved poly ether ether ketone and glass fiber fabric. J Compos Mater2010;
45: 741–749.
26.
ISO 5084-1996. Determination of thickness of textiles and textile products, 1996.
27.
ISO 7211-3-1984. Woven fabrics – construction – methods of analysis – part 3: determination of crimp of yarn in fabric, 1984.
28.
ISO 6348-2011. Determination of mass – vocabulary, 2011.
29.
ASTM D792-2013. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement, 2013.
30.
ASTM D3171-2015. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials, 2015.
31.
ASTM D7136/D7136M-15: standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event, 2015. Available at: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D7136.htm
32.
ASTM D7137/7137M-12: standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates.
33.
AbirMRTayTERidhaMet al.
Modelling damage growth in composites subjected to impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2017;
168: 13–25.
