Effect of processing conditions on the dispersion,electrical,and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposites

Abstract

Carbon nanotube (CNT)/polypropylene nanocomposites with different levels of CNT dispersion were created by melt mixing in order to reveal the influence of nanofiller state of dispersion on the nanocomposites electrical and mechanical properties. Optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were used to analyze the microstructure of the nanocomposite. Melt mixing energy, melt viscosity, and shear stress were analyzed to understand the influence of processing conditions on the microstructure and electrical properties. CNT dispersion in the polypropylene matrix was enhanced by increasing the melt mixing time and/or rotation speed. The electrical conductivity was found to be very sensitive to the changes in the CNT level of dispersion, while the tensile strength and secant modulus did not show any significant response to the enhancement in the nanofiller state of dispersion.

Keywords

Processing conditions nanocomposite mechanical properties electrical properties carbon nanotube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alig

Pötschke

Lellinger

. Establishment, morphology and properties of carbon nanotube networks in polymer melts. Polymer 2012; 53: 4–28.

Al-Saleh

Sundararaj

. Review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/polymer composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2011; 42: 2126–2142.

Azeez

Rhee

Park

. Epoxy clay nanocomposites – processing, properties, and applications: a review. Compos Part B Eng 2013; 45: 308–320.

Cheng

H-M

. The fabrication, properties, and uses of graphene/polymer composites. Macromol Chem Phys 2012; 213: 1060–1077.

Potts

Dreyer

Bielawski

. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 2011; 52: 5–25.

Paul

Robeson

. Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer 2008; 49: 3187–3204.

Papageorgiou

Nerantzaki

Grigoriadou

. Isotactic polypropylene/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites: the effect of modification of MWCNTs on mechanical properties and melt crystallization. Macromol Chem Phys 2013; 214: 2415–2431.

Breuer

Sundararaj

. Big returns from small fibers: a review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Compos 2004; 25: 630–645.

Byrne

Gun’ko

. Recent advances in research on carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 1672–1688.

10.

Wang

Liu

X-Q

. A comparison of melt and solution mixing on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in a poly(vinylidene fluoride) matrix. Compos Part B Eng 2012; 43: 1425–1432.

11.

Bikiaris

. Microstructure and properties of polypropylene/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Materials 2010; 3: 2884–2946.

12.

Moniruzzaman

Winey

. Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 2006; 39: 5194–5205.

13.

Spitalsky

Tasis

Papagelis

. Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog Polym Sci 2010; 35: 357–401.

14.

Stan

Sandu

Fetecau

. Effect of processing parameters and strain rate on mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-filled polypropylene nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 2014; 59: 109–122.

15.

Andrews

Jacques

Minot

. Fabrication of carbon multiwall nanotube/polymer composites by shear mixing. Macromol Mater Eng 2002; 287: 395–403.

16.

Pan

Chan

. Correlation between dispersion state and electrical conductivity of MWCNTs/PP composites prepared by melt blending. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2010; 41: 419–426.

17.

Durmus

Kasgoz

Macosko

. Linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)/clay nanocomposites. Part I: Structural characterization and quantifying clay dispersion by melt rheology. Polymer 2007; 48: 4492–4502.

18.

Artzi

Narkis

Siegmann

. Review of melt-processed nanocomposites based on EVOH/organoclay. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2005; 43: 1931–1943.

19.

Al-Saleh

Sundararaj

. Electrically conductive carbon nanofiber/polyethylene composite: effect of melt mixing conditions. Polym Adv Technol 2011; 22: 246–253.

20.

Al-Saleh

Gelves

Sundararaj

. Carbon nanofiber/polyethylene nanocomposite: processing behavior, microstructure and electrical properties. Mater Des 2013; 52: 128–133.

21.

Gupta

Sydlik

Schnorr

. The effect of mixing methods on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes during the solvent-free processing of multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2013; 51: 410–420.

22.

Al-Saleh

Al-Anid

Hussain

. CNT/ABS nanocomposites by solution processing: proper dispersion and selective localization for low percolation threshold. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2013; 46: 53–59.

23.

Kasaliwal

Göldel

Pötschke

. Influences of polymer matrix melt viscosity and molecular weight on MWCNT agglomerate dispersion. Polymer 2011; 52: 1027–1036.

24.

Krause

Pötschke

Häußler

. Influence of small scale melt mixing conditions on electrical resistivity of carbon nanotube-polyamide composites. Compos Sci Technol 2009; 69: 1505–1515.

25.

Pötschke

Villmow

Krause

. Melt mixed PCL/MWCNT composites prepared at different rotation speeds: characterization of rheological, thermal, and electrical properties, molecular weight, MWCNT macrodispersion, and MWCNT length distribution. Polymer 2013; 54: 3071–3078.

26.

Wang

Z-J

Kwon

D-J

G-Y

. Mechanical and interfacial evaluation of CNT/polypropylene composites and monitoring of damage using electrical resistance measurements. Compos Sci Technol 2013; 81: 69–75.

27.

Bousmina

Ait-Kadi

Faisant

. Determination of shear rate and viscosity from batch mixer data. J Rheol 1999; 43: 415–433.

28.

Coleman

Khan

Blau

. Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Carbon 2006; 44: 1624–1652.

29.

Ogasawara

Tsuda

Takeda

. Stress–strain behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotube/PEEK composites. Compos Sci Technol 2011; 71: 73–78.