Our divided democracy—characterized by partisan polarization and moralized opposition—presents significant challenges to sociologists who would use our discipline to create a more just society. I focus here on the strategic role of, and need for, deeper engagement across the political divide. I review current research on polarization—increasingly focused on attitudinal consolidation and partisan identity—to emphasize challenges to and opportunities for persuasion. I call for increased engagement in three strategic subfields of sociology: (1) social movements, to integrate persuasion more centrally into theories and research on collective social action; (2) social psychology, to engage the interdisciplinary field of moral cognition to develop effective strategies for persuasion; and (3) rural sociology, to understand more deeply the perspectives and moral frameworks essential to engagement across the divide.
AbramowitzAlan I.2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AbramowitzAlan I.2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
AbramsSamuel J.FiorinaMorris P.. 2012. “‘The Big Sort’ That Wasn’t: A Skeptical Reexamination.” PS: Political Science and Politics45(2):203–10.
4.
AndersonElijah. 1999. The Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton.
5.
ApplebaumAnne. 2020. The Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. New York: Doubleday.
6.
AshwoodLoka. 2018. For-profit Democracy: Why Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural Americans. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
AtwellMatthew N.BridgelandJohnLevinePeter. 2017. Civic Deserts: America’s Civic Health Challenge. Washington, DC: National Conference on Citizenship.
8.
BailChristopher A.ArgyleLisa P.BrownTaylor W.BumpassJohn P.ChenHaohanHunzakerM. B. FallinLeeJaeminMannMarcusMerhoutFriedolinVolfovskyAlexander. 2018. “Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115(37):9216–21.
9.
BaldassarriDeliaBearmanPeter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review72(5):784–811.
10.
BaldassarriDeliaGelmanAndrew. 2008. “Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology114(2):408–46.
11.
BishopBillCushingRobert G.. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.
12.
BleeKathleenMcDowellAmy. 2012. “Social Movement Audiences.” Sociological Forum27(1):1–20.
13.
CamachoMichelle M.GaytánMarie SaritaPrietoGreg. 2014. “Diversity in the Academy: On the Growing Prominence of Race and Ethnicity in the Pacific Sociological Association, 1929-2014.” The American Sociologist45:301–18.
14.
CampbellJames E.2016. Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CarothersThomasAndrewO’Donohue, eds. 2019. Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
CarrPatrick J.KefalasMaria J.. 2009. Hollowing Out the Middle: The Rural Brain Drain and What It Means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
17.
CaseAnnDeatonAngus. 2021. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
CohenGeoffrey L.2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(5):808–22.
19.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 206-261 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterD. E.. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
20.
CoxGary W.1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science34(4):903–35.
21.
CramerKatherine J.2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
DellaPostaDaniel. 2020. “Pluralistic Collapse: The ‘Oil Spill’ Model of Mass Opinion Polarization.” American Sociological Review85(3):507–36.
23.
DellaPostaDanielShiYongrenMacyMichael. 2015. “Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes?”American Journal of Sociology120(5):1473–511.
24.
de TocquevilleAlexis. [1835] 2000. Democracy in America. Edited by MayerJ. P. and Translated by LawrenceGeorge. New York: First Perennial Classics.
25.
DiMaggioPaulEvansJohnBrysonBethany. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?”American Journal of Sociology102:690–755.
26.
DittoPeter H.PizarroDavid A.TannenbaumDavid. 2009. “Motivated Moral Reasoning.” Pp. 307–38 in Moral Judgment and Decision Making, edited by BartelsD. M.BaumanC. W.SkitkaL. J.MedinD. L.. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
27.
DowneyDennis J.2006. “Mobilizing Consensus: Strategic Orientations and Rationales in Wartime Intergroup Relations.” Mobilization11(3):201–21.
28.
DowneyDennis J.RohlingerDeana A.. 2008. “Linking Strategic Choice with Macro-organizational Dynamics: Strategy and Social Movement Articulation.” Research in Social Movement, Conflicts, and Change28:3–38.
29.
EisenbergAnn M.2017. “Do Sagebrush Rebels Have a Colorable Claim? The Space Between Parochialism and Exclusion in Federal Lands Management.” Public Land and Natural Resources Law Review38:57–102.
FeinbergMatthewWillerRobb. 2013. “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes.” Psychological Science24(1):56–62.
34.
FeinbergMatthewWillerRobb. 2015. “From Gulf to Bridge: When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(12):1665–81.
35.
FernbachPhilip M.RogersToddFoxCraig R.SlomanSteven A.. 2013. “Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding.” Psychological Science24(6):939–46.
FiorinaMorris P. 1999. “Extreme Voices: A Dark Side of Civic Engagement.” Pp. 395–425 in Civic Engagement and American Democracy, edited by SkocpolT.FiorinaM.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
FiorinaMorris P.2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting & Political Stalemate. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
39.
FiorinaMorris P.AbramsSamuel J.PopeJeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.
40.
FiratRengin B.2019. “Opening the ‘Black Box’: Functions of the Frontal Lobes and Their Implications for Sociology.” Frontiers in Sociology4:3.
41.
FiratRengin B.HitlinSteven. 2012. “Morally Bonded and Bounded: A Sociological Introduction to Neurology.” Pp. 165–99 in Biosociology and Neurosociology. Vol. 29: Advances in Group Processes, edited by KalkhoffW.hyeS. R.LawlerE. J.. Somerville, MA: Emerald Publishing.
42.
FrankThomas. 2004. What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
43.
GinsburgRuth Bader. 1992. “Speaking in a Judicial Voice.” New York University Law Review67(6):1185–209.
44.
GreeneJoshua. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books.
45.
GreeneSteven. 1999. “Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach.” Political Psychology20(2):393–403.
46.
HaidtJonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review108:814–34.
47.
HaidtJonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage Books.
48.
HallJacquelyn Dowd. 2005. “The Long Civil Rights Movement and the Political Uses of the Past.” Journal of American History91(4):1233–63.
49.
HaltinnerKristenSarathchandraDilshani. 2020. “Pro-environmental Views of Climate Skeptics.” Contexts19(1):36–41.
HawkinsStephenYudkinDanielJuan-TorresMiriamDixonTim. 2018. Hidden Tribes: A Study of America’s Polarized Landscape. New York: More in Common.
52.
HettBenjamin Carter. 2018. The Death of Democracy: Hitler’s Rise to Power and the Downfall of the Weimar Republic. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
53.
HillygusSunshine D.ShieldsTodd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
HitlinStevenVaiseyStephen. 2013. “The New Sociology of Morality.” Annual Review of Sociology39:51–68.
55.
HochschildArlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
56.
HunterJames Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: BasicBooks.
57.
IyengarShantoSoodGauravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76(3):405–31.
58.
JasperJames M.2006. Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
KingCharles. 2019. Gods of the Upper Air: How a Circle of Renegade Anthropologists Reinvented Race, Sex, and Gender in the Twentieth Century. New York: Penguin Random House.
60.
KramerLarry D.2012. “Judicial Supremacy and the End of Judicial Restraint.” California Law Review100(3):621–34.
61.
KundaZiva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin108(3):480–98.
62.
LamontMichele. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
LaukaAlbanMcCoyJenniferFiratRengin. 2018. “Mass Partisan Polarization: Measuring a Relational Concept.” American Behavioral Scientist62(1):107–26.
64.
LeeTaeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
LevineRhonda. 2005. Enriching the Sociological Imagination: How Radical Sociology Changed the Discipline. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
68.
LevitskyStevenZiblattDaniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
69.
LuftAliza. 2020. “Theorizing Moral Cognition: Culture in Action, Situations, and Relationships.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World6:1–15.
70.
MansbridgeJane J.1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
MasonLilliana. 2016. “A Cross-cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly80(1):351–77.
73.
MasonLilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
McAdamDoug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
McAdamDougFielding-SinghPriyaLaryeaKrystalHillJennifer. 2022. “Predicting the Onset, Evolution, and Postgraduate Impact of College Activism.” Mobilization: An International Journal27(2):125–47.
77.
McAdamDougKloosKarina. 2014. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
78.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
79.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
80.
McCoyJenniferSomerMurat, eds. 2018. “Polarization and Democracy: A Janus-faced Relationship with Pernicious Consequences.” Special Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist62(1).
81.
McCoyJenniferSomerMurat, eds 2019. “Polarizing Polities: A Global Threat to Democracy.” Special Issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences681(1).
82.
MeierAugustBraceyJohn H.Jr.1993. “The NAACP as a Reform Movement, 1909-1965: ‘To Reach the Conscience of America.’” The Journal of Southern History59(1):3–30.
83.
MetzlJonathan M.2019. Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment Is Killing America’s Heartland. New York: Basic Books.
84.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology101(6):1628–60.
85.
MilanovicBranko. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
86.
MorrisAldon D.1993. “Birmingham Confrontation Reconsidered: An Analysis of the Dynamics and Tactics of Mobilization.” American Sociological Review58(5):621–36.
87.
MouwTedSobelMichael E.. 2001. “Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion.” American Journal of Sociology106(4):913–43.
88.
MutzDiana C.2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
89.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior32:303–30.
90.
OishiShigehiroKesebirSelinSnyderBenjamin H.. 2009. “Sociology: A Lost Connection in Social Psychology.” Personality and Social Psychology Review13(4):334–53.
91.
PariserEli. 2012. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Books.
PilgeramRyanne. 2021. Pushed Out: Contested Development and Rural Gentrification in the U.S. West. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
95.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard A.. 1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon Books.
96.
PogueJames. 2018. Chosen Country: A Rebellion in the West. New York: Henry Holt.
97.
PowellMichaelBallíCeciliaLugoBetsabeth Monica. 2020. Real Talk: Understanding Texas Latino Voters through Meaningful Conversation. San Antonio, TX: Texas Organizing Project Education Fund.
98.
PutscheLauraHormelLeontinaMihelichJohnStorrsDebbie. 2017. “‘You End Up Feeling Like the Rest of the World Is Kind of Picking on You’: Perceptions of Regulators Science’s Threats to Economic Livelihoods and Idahoans’ Collective Identity.” Science Communication39(6):687–712.
99.
ReichJennifer A.2018. Calling the Shots: Why Parents Reject Vaccines. New York: New York University Press.
100.
RidgewayCecilia. 2000. “Social Difference Codes and Social Connections: 1999 Presidential Address to the Pacific Sociological Association, April 16, 1999, Portland, Oregon.” Sociological Perspectives43(1):1–11.
101.
RoddenJonathan A.2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.
102.
RosenfeldSam. 2018. The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
103.
EddieRosenstein. 2016. The Freedom to Marry. Brooklyn, NY: Eyepop Productions.
104.
SafarpourAlaunaDruckmanJamesLazerDavidTrujilloKristin LunzShereAnjuliBaumMatthewOgnyanovaKatherinePerlisRoySantillanaMauricioUsluAtaQuintanaAlexiGreenJonQuHongPippertCaroline H.LinJennifer. 2022. “The COVID States Project #80: Americans’ Views on Violence against the Government.” OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/753cb.
105.
SarathchandraDilshaniHaltinnerKristen. 2020. “Trust/Distrust Judgments and Perceptions of Climate Science: A Research Note on Skeptics’ Rationalizations.” Public Understanding of Science29(1):53–60.
106.
SawyersTraci M.MeyerDavid S.. 1999. “Missed Opportunities: Social Movement Abeyance and Public Policy.” Social Problems46(2):187–206.
107.
SchulmanSarah. 2021. Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987-1993. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
108.
SherifMuzafer. 1954. Experimental Study of Positive and Negative Intergroup Attitudes Between Experimentally Produced Groups: Robbers Cave Study. Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma.
109.
ShermanJennifer. 2009. Those Who Work and Those Who Don’t: Poverty, Morality, and Family in Rural America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
110.
ShermanJennifer. 2018. “Not Allowed to Inherit My Kingdom: Amenity Development and Social Inequality in the Rural West.” Rural Sociology83(1):174–207.
111.
ShermanJennifer. 2021. Dividing Paradise: Rural Inequality and the Diminishing American Dream. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
112.
SilvaJennifer M.2019. We’re Still Here: Pain and Politics in the Heart of America. New York: Oxford University Press.
113.
SimpsonBrentWillerRobbFeinbergMatthew. 2018. “Does Violent Protest Backfire? Testing a Theory of Public Reactions to Activist Violence.” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World4:1–14.
114.
SkitkaLinda J.MorganG. Scott. 2014. “The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction.” Advances in Political Psychology35(1):95–110.
115.
SkitkaLinda J.MullenElizabeth. 2002. “The Dark Side of Moral Conviction.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy2(1):35–45.
116.
StaggenborgSuzanne. 1989. “Stability and Innovation in the Women’s Movement: A Comparison of Two Movement Organizations.” Social Problems36(1):75–92.
117.
SunsteinCass. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
118.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50(3):755–69.
119.
TickamyerAnn R.ShermanJenniferWarlickJennifer, eds. 2017. Rural Poverty in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
120.
Ulrich-SchadJessica D.DuncanCynthia M.. 2018. “People and Places Left Behind: Work, Culture and Politics in the Rural United States.” The Journal of Peasant Studies45(1):59–79.
121.
WaltonJohn. 1992. Western Times and Water Wars: State, Culture, and Rebellion in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
122.
WasowOmar. 2020. “Agenda Seeding: How Black Protests Moved Elites, Public Opinion and Voting.” American Political Science Review114(3):638–59.
123.
Rhys HWilliams., ed. 1997. Cutural Wars in American Politics: Critical Reviews of a Popular Myth. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
124.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1997. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Vintage.
125.
WuthnowRobert. 2018. The Left behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
