Radical social movements can exacerbate tensions in local settings while drawing attention to how movement goals align with political party agendas. Short-term movement influence on voting outcomes can endure when orientations toward the movement disrupt social ties, embedding individuals within new discussion networks that reinforce new partisan loyalties. To demonstrate this dynamic, we employ longitudinal data to show that increases in Republican voting, across several different time intervals, were most pronounced in southern counties where the Ku Klux Klan had been active in the 1960s. In an individual-level analysis of voting intent, we show that decades after the Klan declined, racial attitudes map onto party voting among southern voters, but only in counties where the Klan had been active.
AbramowitzAlan I.SaundersKyle L.1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics60(3):634–52.
2.
AldrichJohn H.2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AllisonPaul D.1994. “Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events.” Sociological Methods & Research23(2):174–99.
4.
AmentaEdwinCarenNealChiarelloElizabethSuYang. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology36:287–307.
5.
AmentaEdwinDunleavyKathleenBernsteinMary. 1994. “Stolen Thunder? Huey Long’s ‘Share Our Wealth,’ Political Mediation, and the Second New Deal.” American Sociological Review59(5):678–702.
6.
AndrewsKenneth T.2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the War on Poverty, 1965–1971.” American Sociological Review66(1):71–95.
7.
AndrewsKenneth T.2004. Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and Its Legacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Associated Press. 1962. “Klan Using Ballots Now, Says Shelton.” The Tuscaloosa News, June18, pg. 14.
9.
BaldassarriDeliaBearmanPeter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review72(5):784–811.
10.
BeckPaul Allen. 1977. “Partisan Dealignment in the Postwar South.” American Political Science Review71(2):477–96.
11.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
12.
BlackEarlBlackMerle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
13.
BlackMerle. 2004. “The Transformation of the Southern Democratic Party.” Journal of Politics66(4):1001–1017.
14.
BlalockHubert M.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: John Wiley.
15.
BonacichEdna. 1972. “A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market.” American Sociological Review37(5):547–59.
16.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2014. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America, 4th ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
17.
BraceyJohn H.Jr.HarleySharonMeierAugut. 2001. Papers of the NAACP: Branch Department Files. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
18.
BursteinPaulLintonApril. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns.” Social Forces81(2):380–408.
19.
CampbellAngusConversePhilipMillerWarrenStokesDonald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
CarterDan T.1995. The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22.
Center for the Study of the American South. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 1992. “Southern Focus Poll, Spring 1992” (http:hdl.handle.net/1902.29/D-20173).
23.
ChalmersDavid. 1987. Hooded Americanism: The History of the Ku Klux Klan, 3rd ed.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
ChalmersDavid. 2003. Backfire: How the Ku Klux Klan Helped the Civil Rights Movement. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
25.
ClayRussell. 1966. “Seawell Blasts Klan.” Raleigh News and Observer, January22.
26.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 202–261 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterD. Ernest. New York: Wiley.
27.
CrespinoJoseph. 2007. In Search of Another Country: Mississippi and the Conservative Counterrevolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
CressDaniel M.SnowDavid A.2000. “The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation, and Framing.” American Journal of Sociology105(4):1063–1104.
29.
CunninghamDavid. 2004. There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
CunninghamDavid. 2013. Klansville, U.S.A.: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights-Era Ku Klux Klan. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
CunninghamDavidPhillipsBenjamin T.2007. “Contexts for Mobilization: Spatial Settings and Klan Presence in North Carolina, 1964–1966.” American Journal of Sociology113(3):781–814.
32.
DiMaggioPaulEvansJohnBrysonBethany. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?”American Journal of Sociology102(3):690–755.
33.
FiorinaMorris P.AbramsSamuel J.PopeJeremy C.2005. Culture Wars? The Myth of Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
34.
FrankThomas. 2004. What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
35.
FredericksonKari. 2001. The Dixiecrat Revolt and the End of the Solid South, 1932–1968. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
36.
GelmanAndrew. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
GiugniMarcoMcAdamDougTillyCharles. 1999. How Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
GoldstoneJack. 1980. “The Weakness of Organization: A New Look at Gamson’s The Strategy of Social Protest.” American Journal of Sociology85(5):1017–42.
39.
GranovetterMarkSoongRoland. 1988. “Threshold Models of Diversity: Chinese Restaurants, Residential Segregation and the Spiral of Silence.” Sociological Methodology10(6):169–94.
40.
GriffinLarry J.HargisPeggy G.2008. “Still Distinctive After All These Years: Trends in Racial Attitudes In and Out of the South.” Southern Cultures14(3):117–41.
41.
HuckfeldtRobertSpragueJohn. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HunterJames Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
43.
IronsJenny. 2010. Reconstituting Whiteness: The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
44.
JackmanMary. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
JacobsDavidCarmichaelJason T.KentStephanie L.2005. “Vigilantism, Current Racial Threat, and Death Sentences.” American Sociological Review70(4):656–77.
46.
KelleyWayne. 1961. “Klan Feared in Atlanta ‘Mix’? No, Say Officials, Police Chief.” The Augusta Chronicle, June29, pg. 1A.
47.
KingRyan D.MessnerSteven F.BallerRobert. 2009. “Contemporary Hate Crimes, Law Enforcement, and the Legacy of Racial Violence.” American Sociological Review74:291–315.
48.
KuranTimur. 1995. “The Inevitability of Future Revolutionary Surprises.” American Journal of Sociology100(6):1528–51.
49.
LassiterMatthew D.2006. The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
LudersJoseph E.2010. The Civil Rights Movement and the Logic of Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
LukerKristen. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
McAdamDougKloosKarina. 2014. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Post-War America. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
McCammonHolly J.NewmanHarmony D.MuseCourtney SandersTerrellTeresa M.2007. “Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes of the U.S. Women’s Jury Movements.” American Sociological Review72(5):725–49.
55.
McMillenNeil R.1971. The Citizens’ Council: Organized Resistance to the Second Reconstruction, 1954–64. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
56.
McMillenNeil R.1990. Dark Journey: Black Mississippians in the Age of Jim Crow. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
57.
McVeighRory. 2009. The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-Wing Movements and National Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58.
McVeighRoryCunninghamDavid. 2012. “Enduring Consequences of Right-Wing Extremism: Klan Mobilization and Homicides in Southern Counties.” Social Forces91(3):843–62.
59.
MessnerSteven F.BallerRobert D.ZevenbergenMatthew P.2005. “The Legacy of Lynching and Southern Homicides.” American Sociological Review70(4):633–55.
60.
MessnerSteven F.AnselinLucHawkinsDarnell F.DeaneGlennTolnayStewart E.BallerRobert D.2000. An Atlas of the Spatial Patterning of County-Level Homicide, 1960–1990. Pittsburgh, PA: National Consortium on Violence Research (NCOVR).
61.
MyersDavid G.LammHelmut. 1976. “The Group Polarization Phenomenon.” Psychological Bulletin83(4):602–627.
62.
Noelle-NeumannElisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
OlzakSusan. 1992. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.
65.
QuillianLincoln. 2006. “New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination.” Annual Review of Sociology32:299–328.
66.
ReddingKent. 1992. “Failed Populism: Movement-Party Disjuncture in North Carolina, 1890 to 1900.” American Sociological Review57(3):340–52.
67.
ScammonRichard M.1970. America Votes 8: A Handbook of Contemporary Election Statistics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
68.
SchumanHoward. 1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
SchwartzMichael. 1976. Radical Protest and Social Structure: The Southern Farmers’ Alliance and Cotton Tenancy, 1880–1890. New York: Academic Press.
70.
SearsDavid O.LauRichard R.TylerTom R.AllenHarris M.Jr. 1980. “Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review74(3):670–84.
71.
SnowDavidRochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51(4):464–81.
72.
TolnayStewart E.2003. “The African American ‘Great Migration’ and Beyond.” Annual Review of Sociology29:209–232.
73.
TolnayStewartBeckE. M.1995. A Festival of Violence: An Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882–1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
74.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Un-American Activities. 1966. Activities of Ku Klux Klan Organizations in the United States, Parts I–V. 89th Congress, First Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
75.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Un-American Activities. 1967. The Present Day Ku Klux Klan Movement. 90th Congress, First Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
76.
WadeWyn Craig. 1987. The Fiery Cross: The Ku Klux Klan in America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
