This paper investigates the question of whether and how restrictive immigration policies affect the earnings of Latinxs who are not the target of these policies—that is, Latinx citizens. Focusing on policies at the state (E-Verify) and county (287(g)) level, we investigate possible spillover on Latinx citizen earnings from 2006 through 2016. We use multiple sources of data, merging policy and census data with two national probability samples of Latinx citizens. Our results show that E-Verify and 287(g) affect earnings similarly. Laws leave wage-employed workers unaffected and instead exclusively shape the earnings of self-employed respondents. Among self-employed, policy effects depend on the type of county respondents live in. Once laws like 287(g) or E-Verify go into effect, Latinx self-employed see dramatic earnings losses when living outside of ethnic enclaves, while seeing earnings gains when living within predominantly-Latinx counties.
AllenChenoa. 2018. “Who Loses Public Health Insurance When States Pass Restrictive Omnibus Immigration-related Laws? The Moderating Role of County Latino Density.” Health & Place54:20–28.
Amuedo-DurantesCatalinaArenas-ArroyoE. 2018. “Understanding the Consequences of Heightened Interior Immigration Enforcement.” Pp. 104–140 in The Human and Economic Implications of Twenty-first Century Immigration Policy, edited by PozoSusan. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
4.
Amuedo-DurantesCatalinaBansakCynthia. 2014. “Employment Verification Mandates and the Labor Market Outcomes of Likely Unauthorized and Native Workers.” Contemporary Economic Policy32(3):671–80.
5.
Amuedo-DurantesCatalinaSusanPozo. 2019. “The Aftermath of Tougher Immigration Enforcement: E-Verify and Perceptions of Discrimination among Hispanic Citizens.” American Behavioral Scientist63(9):1299–330.
6.
ArandaElizabethMenjívarCeciliaDonatoKatharine. 2014. “The Spillover Consequences of an Enforcement-first U.S. Immigration Regime.” American Behavioral Scientist58(13):1687–95.
7.
ArmentaAmada. 2017. “Racializing Crimmigration: Structural Racism, Colorblindness, and the Institutional Production of Immigrant Criminality.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity3(1):82–95.
8.
ArmentaAmadaVegaIrene. 2017. “Latinos and the Crimmigration System.” Pp. 221–36 in Race, Ethnicity and Law (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 22). Bingley, England: Emerald Publishing Limited.
9.
AsadAsadClairMatthew. 2018. “Racialized Legal Status as a Social Determinant of Health.” Social Science & Medicine199:19–28.
10.
AsadAsadRosenEva. 2019. “Hiding within Racial Hierarchies: How Undocumented Immigrants Make Residential Decisions in an American City.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(11):1857–82.
11.
AydemirAbdurrahmanBorjasGeorge. 2011. “Attenuation Bias in Measuring the Wage Impact of Immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics29(1):69–112.
12.
AyromlooShaliseFeigenbergBenjaminLubotskyDarren. 2020. “States Taking the Reins? Employment Verification Requirements and Local Labor Market Outcomes.” No. w26676. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
13.
BohnSarahLofstromMagnusRaphaelSteven. 2014. “Did the 2007 Legal Arizona Workers Act Reduce the State’s Unauthorized Immigrant Population?” Review of Economics and Statistics96(2):258–69.
14.
BohnSarahSantillanoRobert. 2017. “Local Immigration Enforcement and Local Economies.” Industrial Relations56(2):236–62.
15.
BohnStephanieLofstromMagnus. 2012. “Employment Effects of State Legislation against the Hiring of Unauthorized Immigrant Workers.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6598. Retrieved December 24, 2021 (https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/62465/1/717893693.pdf).
16.
BorjasGeorge. 1986. “The Self-employment Experience of Immigrants.” The Journal of Human Resources21(4):485–506.
17.
BorjasGeorge. 2003. “The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4):1335–74.
18.
BorjasGeorge. 2014. Immigration Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
BosworthMaryParmarAlpaVázquezYolanda. 2018. Race, Criminal Justice, and Migration Control: Enforcing the Boundaries of Belonging. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
BrayneSarah. 2014 “Surveillance and SYstem Avoidance: Criminal Justic Contact and Institutional Attachment.” American Sociological Review79(3):367–391.
CardDavid. 2001. “Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics19(1):22–64.
23.
CardDavid. 2009. “Immigration and Inequality.” American Economic Review99(2):1–21.
24.
CastañedaHiede. 2019. Borders of Belonging: Struggle and Solidarity in Mixed-status Immigrant Families. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
CervantesAndrea. 2021. “’Looking Mexican’: Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Latina/o Immigrants and the Racialization of Illegality in the Midwest.” Social Problems68(1):100–17.
26.
ChassamboulliAndriPeriGiovanni. 2014. “The Labor Market Effects of Reducing the Number of Illegal Immigrants.” Review of Economic Dynamics18:792–821.
27.
DammAnna. 2009. “Ethnic Latinx Enclaves and Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes: Quasi-experimental Evidence.” Journal of Labor Economics27(2):281–314.
28.
DeeThomasMurphyMark. 2020. “Vanished Classmates: The Effects of Local Immigration Enforcement on School Enrollment.” American Educational Research Journal57(2):694–727.
29.
DonatoKatharineAmuedo-DorantesCatalina2020. “The Legal Landscape of US Immigration: An Introduction.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences6(3):1–16.
30.
DonatoKatharineAnnRodriguez Leslie. 2014. “Police Arrests in a Time of Uncertainty: The Impact of 287 (g) on Arrests in a New Immigrant Gateway.” American Behavioral Scientist58(13):1696–722.
EbertKimOvinkSarah M.2014. “Anti-immigrant Ordinances and Discrimination in New and Established Destinations.” American Behavioral Scientist58(13):1784–804.
33.
FelicianoCynthiaLanuzaYader. 2017. “An Immigrant Paradox? Contextual Attainment and Intergenerational Educational Mobility.” American Sociological Review82(1):211–41.
34.
FisherMonicaLewinPaul. 2018. “Push and Pull Factors and Hispanic Self-employment in the USA.” Small Business Economics51:1055–70.
35.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRodgersRenaeRugglesStevenWarrenJohn. 2020. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series Current Population Survey: Version 7.0. Data set. Minneapolis, MN: Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. doi:10.18128/D030.V7.0.
36.
GanglMarkus. 2010. “Causal Inference in Sociological Research.” Annual Review of Sociology36:21–47.
37.
GarcíaAngela. 2014. “Hidden in Plain Sight: How Unauthorised Migrants Strategically Assimilate in Restrictive Localities in California.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(12):1895–914.
GentschKerstinMasseyDouglas. 2011. “Labor Market Outcomes for Legal Mexican Immigrants under the New Regime of Immigration Enforcement.” Social Science Quarterly92(3):875–93.
40.
GoldsteinDanielAlonso-BejaranoCarolina. 2017. “E-terrify: Securitized Immigration and Biometric Surveillance in the Workplace.” Human Organization76(1):1–14.
41.
GonzálezGabrileaPatlerCaitlin. 2021. “The Educational Consequences of Parental Immigration Detention.” Sociological Perspectives64(2):301–20.
42.
GleesonShannonGrffithKati2021. “Employers as Subjects of the Immigration State: How the State Foments Employment Insecurity for Temporary Immigrant Workers.” Law and Society Inquiry46(1):92–115.
43.
GroggerJeffrey. 2011. “Speech Patterns and Racial Wage Inequality.” Journal of Human Resources46(1):1–25.
HallMatthewGreenmanEmily2015. “The Occupational Cost of Being Illegal in the United States: Legal Status, Job Hazards, and Compensating Differentials.” International Migration Review49(2):406–442.
46.
HippleStevenHammondLaurel. 2010. “Self-employment in the United States.” Monthly Labor Review133(9):17–32.
47.
HydeAllenWallaceMichael. 2020. “Immigration and Labor Market Outcomes in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Sociological Perspectives63:630–52. doi:10.1177/0731121419892614.
JonesJennifer. 2019. The Browning of the New South. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
KarolyLynnPerez-ArceFrancisco. 2016. “A Cost-benefit Framework for Analyzing the A Cost-benefit Framework for Analyzing the Economic and Fiscal Impacts of State-level Immigration Policies.” RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Retrieved December 24, 2021 (https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1397.html).
51.
LeerkesArjenBachmeierJamesLeachMark. 2013. “When the Border Is ‘Everywhere’: State-level Variation in Migration Control and Changing Settlement Patterns of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population in the United States.” International Migration Review47(4):910–43.
52.
LightIvanSabaghGeorgesBozorgmehrMehdiDer-MartirosianClaudia. 1994. “Beyond the Ethnic Enclave Economy.” Social Problems41(1):65–80.
53.
LoganRyanMeloMilenaCastañedaHeide. 2021. “Familial Vulnerability: Legal Status and Mental Health within Mixed-status Families.” Medical Anthropology40:639–52. doi:10.1080/01459740.2021.1879061.
MenjívarCecilia. 2016. “Immigrant Criminalization in Law and the Media: Effects on Latino Immigrant Workers’ Identities in Arizona.” American Behavioral Scientist60(5–6):597–616.
56.
MenjívarCecilia. 2021. “The Racialization of ‘Illegality.’”Daedalus150(2):91–105.
57.
MenjívarCeciliaAbregoLeisy. 2012. “Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central American Immigrants.” American Journal of Sociology117(5):1380–421.
58.
MenjívarCeciliaSimmonsWilliam PaulAlvordDanielValdezElizabeth Salerno. 2018. “Immigration Enforcement, the Racialization of Legal Status, and Perceptions of the Police: Latinos in Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, and Phoenix in Comparative Perspective.” Du Bois Review15(1):107–28.
59.
MonoganJames. 2019. “Studying Immigration Policy One Law at a Time.” Policy Studies Journal47(3):686–711. doi:10.1111/psj.12359.
60.
MonoganJamie. 2018. “Studying Immigrant Policy One Law at a Time.” Data set, Harvard Dataverse, V1. doi:10.7910/DVN/F8YTX2.
61.
MooreJames. 2008. “Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage: An Implications Side-bar for ‘Mom and Pop’ Employers.” Journal of Collective Negotiations32(1):19–31.
NgaiMae. 2014. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America—Updated Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
O’NeilKevin. 2013. “Immigration Enforcement by Local Police under 287(g) and Growth of Unauthorized Immigrant and Other Populations.” doi:10.2139/ssrn.2210765.
65.
OrreniusPiaZavodnyMadeline. 2015. “The Impact of E-Verify Mandates on Labor Market Outcomes: E-Verify and Labor Market Outcomes.” Southern Economic Journal81(4):947–59.
PedrazaFranciscoZhuLing. 2015. “The ‘Chilling Effect’ of America’s New Immigration Enforcement Regime.” Pathways, Spring, pp. 13–17.
68.
PedrozaJuan. 2019. “Where Immigration Enforcement Agreements Stalled: The Location of Local 287(g) Program Applications and Inquiries 2005-2012.” SocArXiv, January4. doi:10.31235/osf.io/2a8kz.
69.
PhamHuyenVanPham. 2014. “Measuring the Climate for Immigrants: A State-by-state Analysis.” Pp. 21–39 in Strange Neighbors: The Role of States in Immigration Policy, edited by HessickCarissaChinGabriel. New York: New York University Press.
70.
PortesAlejandroJensenLeif. 1987. “What’s an Ethnic Economy? The Case for Conceptual Clarity.” American Sociological Review52:768–71.
71.
PortesAlejandroShaferSteven. 2007. “Revisiting the Enclave Hypothesis: Miami Twenty-five Years Later.” Pp. 157–90 in The Sociology of Entrepreneurship: Vol. 25. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by RuefM.LounsburyM.Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
72.
PotochnickStephanieChenJen-HaoPerreiraKrista. 2016. “Local-level Immigration Enforcement and Food Insecurity Risk among Hispanic Immigrant Families with Children: National Level Evidence.” Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health19:1042–49.
73.
ProvineDoris Marie. 2016. Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
RaudenbushStephenBrykAnthony. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
RodriguezCassaundra. 2016. “Experiencing ‘Illegality’ as a Family? Immigration Enforcement, Social Policies, and Discourses Targeting Mexican Mixed-status Families.” Sociology Compass10(8):706–17.
76.
RosalesRocio. 2020. Fruteros: Street Vending, Illegality, and Ethnic Community in Los Angeles. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
77.
RubalcabaJoaquín Alfredo-Angel.2020. “Communities Under Siege: Ethnic Profiling under the Auspices of 287(g) in North Carolina.” Paper presented at the 2020 American Economic Association Conference, January 4, San Diego, CA.
78.
RugglesStevenFloodSarahGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahMeyerErinPacasJoseSobekMatthew. 2020. “IPUMS USA: Version 10.0. American Community Survey 2015-2019.” Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Minneapolis, MN. doi:10.18128/D010.V10.0.
79.
SandersJimyNeeVictor. 1992. “Problems in Resolving the Enclave Economy Debate.” American Sociological Review57:415–18.
80.
SantillanoRobertPotochnickStephanieJenkinsJade. 2020. “Do Immigration Raids Deter Head Start Enrollment?” AEA Papers and Proceedings110:419–23.
81.
SingerJudithWillettJohn. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001.
82.
EdwardTellesOrtizVilma. 2008. Generations of Exclusion. New York: De Gruyter.
83.
WaldingerRoger. 1993. “The Ethnic Enclave Debate Revisited.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17:444–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00232.x.
84.
WangChunbei. 2019. “Tightened Immigration Policies and the Self-employment Dynamics of Mexican Immigrants.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management38(4):944–77.
85.
WatsonTara. 2013. “Enforcement and Immigrant Location Choice.” Report No. w19626. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved February 13, 2021 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w19626).
86.
WatsonTara. 2014. “Inside the Refrigerator: Immigration Enforcement and Chilling Effects in Medicaid Participation.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy6(3):313–38.
XieYuGoughMargaret. 2011. “Ethnic Economies and the Earnings of Immigrants.” Demography48(4):1293–315.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
