The Politics of Prevention: Polarization in How Workplace COVID-19 Safety Practices Shaped the Well-Being of Frontline Service Sector Workers

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reshaped the labor market, especially for service sector workers. Frontline service sector workers, already coping with precarious working conditions, faced proximate risks of COVID-19 transmission on the job and navigated new workplace safety measures, including masking, social distancing, and staying home while sick, all in a polarized political environment. We examine polarization in the effects of COVID-19 workplace safety measures on workers’ feelings of safety and well-being. Specifically, we examine how support for former President Trump moderates the relationship between COVID-19 safety practices (masking, social distancing, staying home while sick) and workers’ feelings of safety and well-being. To do so, we draw on novel data collected by The Shift Project from 2,039 service sector workers at 89 large firms during the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that workplace safety measures are positively associated with workers’ self-assessments of feeling safe and with mental health, but only for Biden voters.

Keywords

precarious work COVID-19 polarization well-being

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelekan

I. O.

Asiyanbi

A. P.

(2016). Flood risk perception in flood-affected communities in lagos, Nigeria. Natural Hazards, 80(1), 445–469. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1977-2

Allcott

Boxell

Conway

Gentzkow

Thaler

Yang

(2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254

Ballew

M. T.

Leiserowitz

Roser-Renouf

Rosenthal

S. A.

Kotcher

J. E.

Marlon

J. R.

Lyon

Goldberg

M. H.

Maibach

E. W.

(2019). Climate change in the American mind: Data, tools, and trends. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61(3), 4–18. doi:10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300

Barrios

J. M.

Hochberg

. (2020). Risk Perception through the Lens of Politics in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Baum

M. A.

(2011). Red state, blue state, flu state: Media self-selection and partisan gaps in swine flu vaccinations. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), 1021–1059. doi:10.1215/03616878-1460569

Census Bureau. (2021). CPS Historical Time Series Tables: Table A-2. Retrieved November 12, 2021 https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/educational-attainment/cps-historical-time-series.html

Clinton

Cohen

Lapinski

J. S.

Trussler

(2021). Partisan Pandemic: How Partisanship and Public Health Concerns Affect Individuals’ Social Distancing During COVID-19. Science Advances, 7(2), 1–7. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd7204

Deane

Parker

., & Gramlich J. (2021). A Year of US Public Opinion on the Coronavirus Pandemic. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 6, 2021 https://www.pewresearch.org/2021/03/05/a-year-of-u-s-public-opinion-on-the-coronavirus-pandemic/

Dunlap

R. E.

McCright

A. M.

Yarosh

J. H.

(2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–23. doi:10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995

10.

Evans

J. H.

Hargittai

(2020). Who doesn’t trust fauci? The public’s belief in the expertise and shared values of scientists in the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 1–13. doi:10.1177/2378023120947337

11.

Fagan

Huang

. (2020). A look at how people around the world view climate change. Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 13, 2022 https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/18/a-look-at-how-people-around-the-world-view-climate-change/.

12.

Gadarian

S. K.

Goodman

S. W.

Pepinsky

T. B.

(2021). “Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic” edited by N. Lupu. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0249596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249596

13.

Gauchat

(2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225

14.

Gauchat

(2015). The political context of science in the United States: Public acceptance of evidence-based policy and science funding. Social Forces, 94(2), 723–746. doi:10.1093/sf/sov040

15.

Graham

Cullen

F. T.

Pickett

J. T.

Jonson

C. L.

Haner

Sloan

M. M.

(2020). Faith in trump, moral foundations, and social distancing defiance during the coronavirus pandemic. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 1–23. doi:10.1177/2378023120956815

16.

Greenwood

Perrin

Duggan

. (2016). Social Media Update 2016. : Pew Research Center.

17.

Hamel

Sparks

Brodie

. (2021). KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: February 2021. Kaiser Family Foundation.

18.

Hornsey

M. J.

Harris

E. A.

Bain

P. G.

Fielding

K. S.

(2016). Meta-Analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. doi:10.1038/nclimate2943

19.

Jones-Jang Mo

Noland

. (2022). The politicization of health and science: Role of political cues in shaping the beliefs of the vaccine-autism link. Health Communication, 37(5), 608–616. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1859723

20.

Kousser

Tranter

(2018). The influence of political leaders on climate change attitudes. Global Environmental Change, 50, 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.005

21.

Kozlowski

A. C.

(2022). How conservatives lost confidence in science: The role of ideological alignment in political polarization. Social Forces, 100(3), 1415–1443. doi:10.1093/sf/soab020

22.

Kramer

. (2020). 14% of U.S. Adults Say They Have Tested Positive for COVID-19 or Are ‘Pretty Sure’ They Have Had It. Pew Research Center . Retrieved November 4, 2021 https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/14/14-of-u-s-adults-say-they-have-tested-positive-for-covid-19-or-are-pretty-sure-they-have-had-it/

23.

Lee

J. J.

(2021). Party polarization and trust in science: What about democrats? Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7, 1–12. doi:10.1177/237802312110101

24.

New York Times. (2020). Presidential Election Results: Biden Wins. November 3.

25.

Pew Research Center. (2019). In a Politically Polarized Era, Sharp Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions. Retrieved November 4, 2021 https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/in-a-politically-polarized-era-sharp-divides-in-both-partisan-coalitions/

26.

Prochaska

J. J.

Sung

H.-Y.

Max

Shi

Ong

(2012). Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization: The K6 as a measure of moderate mental distress. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 21(2), 88–97. doi:10.1002/mpr.1349

27.

Ravenelle

A. J.

Kowalski

K. C.

Janko

(2021). The Side Hustle Safety Net: Precarious Workers and Gig Work during COVID-19. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 898–919. doi:10.1177/07311214211005489

28.

Schneider

Harknett

(2022). What’s to Like? Facebook as a Tool for Survey Data Collection. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(1), 108–140. doi:10.1177/0049124119882477

29.

Scoville

McCumber

Amironesei

Jeon

. (2021). The Politicization of Face Masks in the American Public Sphere during the COVID-19 Pandemic. preprint. SocArXiv.

30.

Semenza

J. C.

Hall

D. E.

Wilson

D. J.

Bontempo

B. D.

Sailor

D. J.

George

L. A.

(2008). Public Perception of Climate Change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 479–487. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020

31.

Shepherd

MacKendrick

Cristina Mora

(2020). Pandemic Politics: Political Worldviews and COVID-19 Beliefs and Practices in an Unsettled Time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 1–18. doi:10.1177/2378023120972575

32.

Wen

McDonnell

Goh

Šegalo

Ahmad

Cheshmehzangi

., & Xiang, Y-T. (2021). Vaccines are not yet a silver bullet: The imperative of continued communication about the importance of COVID-19 safety measures. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health 12, 100204. doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100204

33.

Suryadevara

Bonville

C. A.

Cibula

D. A.

Domachowske

J. B.

Suryadevara

A. C.

(2019). Associations between population based voting trends during the 2016 US presidential election and adolescent vaccination rates. Vaccine, 37(9), 1160–1167. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.036

34.

van der Linden

(2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012

35.

Wolfe

Harknett

Schneider

. (2021). Inequalities At Work And The Toll Of COVID-19. Health Affairs Health Policy Brief.