Drawing upon data from more than 5,000 dyads, the authors examine how the strength of employees’ intraorganizational ties and the social resources of their network members affect influence-conferring support, task support, and social support. The authors hypothesize that the effects of tie strength and social resources will vary with type of network support and theorize how three mechanisms—trust, risk, and redundancy—explain the differential effects of tie strength and social resources on intraorganizational support. Their findings highlight the variable effects of tie strength and social resources and illustrate the unique ways in which strong ties operate within work organizations.
AralS.AlstyneM. V. (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. American Journal of Sociology117: 90–171.
3.
BeggsJ. J.HurlbertJ. S. (1997) The social context of men’s and women’s job search ties: Membership in voluntary organizations, social resources, and job search outcomes. Sociological Perspectives40: 601–623.
4.
BianY. (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review62: 366–385.
5.
BrassD. (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal28: 327–343.
6.
BridgesW. P.VillemezW. J. (1986) Informal hiring and income in the labor market. American Sociological Review51: 574–582.
7.
BrownD. W.KonradA. M. (2001) Job-seeking in a turbulent economy: Social networks and the importance of cross-industry ties to an industry change. Human Relations54: 1015–1044.
8.
BurtR. S. (1992) Structural holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
ChanC. S. (2009) Invigorating the content of social embeddedness: An ethnography of life insurance transactions in China. American Journal of Sociology115: 712–754.
10.
DucharmeL. J.MartinJ. K. (2000) Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: A test of the buffering hypothesis. Work and Occupations27: 223–243.
11.
FernandezR. M.WeinbergN. (1997) Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review62: 883–902.
12.
FischerC. S. (1982) To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
FosterP. C. (2013) Mobile project networks: Regional dynamics in the U.S. film and television industry. Work and Occupations40: 398–430.
14.
FriedkinN. E. (1980) A test of structural features of Granovetter’s strength of weak ties theory. Social Networks2: 411–422.
15.
FriedkinN. E. (1982) Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks3: 273–285.
16.
GranovetterM. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology91: 481–510.
17.
GranovetterM. (1974) Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
GranovetterM. (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1: 201–233.
19.
GreenG. P.TiggesL. M.DiazD. (1999) Racial and ethnic differences in job-search strategies in Atlanta, Boston, and Los Angeles. Social Science Quarterly80: 263–278.
20.
HalldénK. (2015) Taking training to task: Sex of the immediate supervisor and men’s and women’s time in initial on-the-job training. Work and Occupations42: 73–102.
21.
HansenM. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 82–111.
22.
HurlbertJ. S. (1991) Social networks, social circles, and job satisfaction. Work and Occupations18: 415–430.
23.
IbarraH. (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 422–447.
24.
IbarraH. (1995) Race, opportunity, and diversity in social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal38: 673–703.
25.
JackS. L. (2005) The role, use, and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Management Studies42: 1233–1259.
26.
KallebergA. L. (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74: 1–22.
27.
KanterR. M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation, New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
KautonenT.ZolinR.KuckertzA.ViljamaaA. (2010) Ties that blind? How strong ties affect small business owner-managers’ perceived trustworthiness of their advisors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development22: 189–209.
29.
KimP. H.LongestK. C.AldrichH. E. (2013) Can you lend me a hand? Task-role alignment of social support for aspiring business owners. Work and Occupations40: 213–249.
30.
KrackhardtD. (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In: NohriaN.EcclesR. G. (eds) Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239.
31.
KramerR. M. (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology50: 569–598.
32.
KundaG. (1992) Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33.
LarsonA. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 76–104.
34.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science50: 1477–1490.
35.
LevinD. Z.WalterJ.MurnighanJ. K. (2011) Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science22: 923–939.
36.
LinN.DuminM. (1986) Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks8: 365–385.
37.
LinN.EnselW. M.VaughnJ. C. (1981) Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review46: 393–405.
38.
LinN.VaughnJ. C.EnselW. M. (1981) Social resources and occupational status attainment. Social Forces59: 1163–1181.
39.
LivelyK. J. (2000) Reciprocal emotion management: Working together to maintain stratification in private law firms. Work and Occupations27: 32–63.
40.
MarinA. (2012) Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters. Social Networks34: 181–192.
41.
MarsdenP. V.CampbellK. E. (1984) Measuring tie strength. Social Forces63: 482–501.
42.
MarsdenP. V.CampbellK. E. (2012) Reflections on conceptualizing and measuring tie strength. Social Forces91: 17–23.
43.
MarsdenP. V.GormanE. H. (2001) Social networks, job changes, and recruitment. In: BergI.KallebergA. L. (eds) Sourcebook of labor markets: Evolving structures and processes, New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 467–502.
44.
MarsdenP. V.HurlbertJ. S. (1988) Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Social Forces66: 1038–1059.
45.
MatthewsR.PendakurR.YoungN. (2009) Social capital, labour markets, and job-finding in urban and rural regions: Comparing paths to employment in prosperous cities and stressed rural communities in Canada. The Sociological Review57: 306–330.
46.
McFadyenA. M.SemadeniM.CannellaA. A.Jr. (2009) Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science20: 552–564.
47.
McGuireG. M. (2000) Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations27: 500–523.
48.
McGuireG. M. (2007) Intimacy at work: A typology of the social support that workers provide to their network members. Work and Occupations34: 125–147.
49.
NewmanK. S. (1999) No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
50.
ParkK.WilsonM. G.LeeM. S. (2004) Effects of social support at work on depression and organizational productivity. American Journal of Health Behavior28: 444–455.
51.
PodolnyJ. M.BaronJ. N. (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review62: 673–693.
52.
RawlingsC. M.McFarlandD. A. (2011) Influence flows in the academy. Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers. Social Science Research40: 1001–1017.
53.
ReagansR. (2011) Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science22: 835–849.
54.
SloanM. M. (2012) Unfair treatment in the workplace and worker well-being: The role of coworker support in a service work environment. Work and Occupations39: 3–34.
55.
SmithS. S. (2005) ‘Don’t put my name on it’: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. American Journal of Sociology111: 1–57.
56.
SolonG.HaiderS. J.WooldbridgeJ. (2015) What are we weighting for. Journal of Human Resources50: 301–316.
57.
SosaM. E. (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science22: 1–21.
58.
VölkerB.FlapH. (1999) Getting ahead in the GDR: Social capital and status attainment under communism. Acta Sociologica42: 17–34.
59.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990) Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology96: 558–588.
60.
WilliamsC. L.MullerC.KilanskiK. (2012) Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender and Society26: 549–573.
61.
WinshipC.RadbillR. (1994) Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research23: 230–257.
62.
YakubovichV. (2005) Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review70: 408–421.
