How does diversity of social ties influence creativity? Moving beyond the information argument, we theorize creative self-efficacy as a motivational explanation for the relationship between diversity of social ties and creativity. We further posit tie strength as a boundary condition for this mechanism. We collected social ties data from 309 employees and creativity data from 98 direct supervisors. Results showed that diversity of social ties had a direct positive relationship with creative self-efficacy and an indirect positive relationship with employee creativity via creative self-efficacy. These direct and indirect relationships were fortified when tie strength was reinforced. We contribute to and advance theory development by identifying and testing creative self-efficacy as a motivational mechanism for diversity of social ties. We show the importance of diversity of social ties and tie strength and their synergistic role in the motivational process linking social ties to creativity.
AimeFVan DyneL (2010) Bringing social structure to both sides of an issue: How proximal and distal ties interact with minority and majority positions to affect influence in workgroups. In: MartinRHewstoneM (eds) Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences. New York: Psychological Press, 312–340.
2.
AlaviMLeidnerDE (2001) Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly25(1): 107–136.
3.
AmabileTM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.
AmabileTMBarsadeSGMuellerJSStawBM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly50(3): 367–403.
5.
AndersonMH (2008) Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers’ information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior29(1): 51–78.
6.
AndersonNPotočnikKZhouJ (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management40(5): 1297–1333.
7.
AralSVan AlstyneM (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. American Journal of Sociology117(1): 90–171.
8.
BaasMDe DreuCKNijstadBA (2008) A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone activation or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin134(6): 779–806.
9.
BaerM (2010) The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology95(3): 592–601.
10.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
BanduraA (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
12.
BanduraA (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology52(1): 1–26.
13.
BlauPM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
14.
BrislinRW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW (eds) Field Methods in Cross-cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 137–164.
15.
BundersonJSSutcliffeKM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology88(3): 552–560.
16.
BurtRS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology110(2): 349–399.
17.
ChuaRYMorrisMWMorS (2012) Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes118(2): 116–131.
18.
CollinsCJClarkKD (2003) Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal46(6): 740–751.
19.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In: SternbergRJ (ed.) Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 313–338.
20.
De StobbeleirKEAshfordSJBuyensD (2011) Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal54(4): 811–831.
21.
DeciEL (1980) The Psychology of Self-Determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
22.
DeciELRyanRM (1985) The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality19(2): 109–134.
23.
DeciELRyanRM (2012) Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In: RyanRM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85–107.
24.
EdmondsonACWinslowABBohmerRMPisanoGP (2003) Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Science34(2): 197–224.
25.
FangRLandisBZhangZ, et al. (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science26(4): 1243–1260.
26.
FeistGJ (1998) A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review2(4): 290–309.
27.
GeorgeJMZhouJ (2001) When openness to experience and consciousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 513–524.
28.
GilsonLLShalleyCE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management30(4): 453–470.
29.
GistMEMitchellTR (1992) Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review17(2): 183–211.
30.
GongYHuangJCFarhJL (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 765–778.
31.
GongYCheungSYWangMHuangJC (2012) Unfolding the proactive process for creativity integration of the employee proactivity information exchange and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management38(5): 1611–1633.
32.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
33.
GranovetterMS (1982) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In: MarsdenPVLinN (eds) Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 105–130.
34.
GrosserTJVenkataramaniVLabiancaGJ (2017) An alter-centric perspective on employee innovation: The importance of alters’ creative self-efficacy and network structure. Journal of Applied Psychology102(9): 1360–1374.
35.
HansenMT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly44(1): 82–111.
36.
HargadonABBechkyBA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science17(4): 484–500.
37.
HirstGVan KnippenbergDZhouJ, et al. (2015) Heard it through the grapevine: Indirect networks and employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology100(2): 567–574.
38.
IsenAM (2000) Some perspectives on positive affect and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry11(3): 184–187.
39.
LeungAKYChiuCY (2010) Multicultural experiences, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology41(5): 723–741.
40.
LiYLiNGuoJ, et al. (2018) A network view of advice-giving and individual creativity in teams: A brokerage-driven, socially perpetuated phenomenon. Academy of Management Journal61(6): 2210–2229.
41.
LiuDJiangKShalleyCE, et al. (2016) Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes137: 236–263.
42.
MaRHuangYCShenkarO (2011) Social networks and opportunity recognition: A cultural comparison between Taiwan and the United States. Strategic Management Journal32(11): 1183–1205.
43.
MadduxWWGalinskyAD (2009) Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1047–1061.
44.
MadduxWWAdamHGalinskyAD (2010) When in Rome . . . Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(6): 731–741.
45.
MadjarNOldhamGRPrattMG (2002) There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal45(4): 757–767.
46.
MorrisonEW (2002) Newcomers’ relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1149–1160.
NonakaI (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science5(1): 14–37.
49.
NonakaIToyamaRKonnoN (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning33(1): 5–34.
50.
Perry-SmithJE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 85–106.
51.
Perry-SmithJE (2014) Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: An experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology99(5): 831–846.
52.
Perry-SmithJEShalleyCE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review28(1): 89–106.
53.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
54.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15(3): 209–233.
55.
ReagansRMcEvilyB (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly48(2): 240–267.
56.
RodanSGalunicC (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal25(6): 541–562.
57.
RoganMMorsML (2014) A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science25(6): 1860–1877.
58.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
59.
ShinSJZhouJ (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal46(6): 703–714.
60.
ShinSJKimTYLeeJYBianL (2012) Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 197–212.
61.
SinghHKryscynskiDLiXGopalR (2015) Pipes pools and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal37(8): 1649–1666.
62.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
63.
SosaME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science22(1): 1–21.
64.
TierneyPFarmerSM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1137–1148.
65.
TierneyPFarmerSM (2004) The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management30(3): 413–432.
66.
TierneyPFarmerSM (2011) Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology96(2): 277–293.
67.
TierneyPFarmerSMGraenGB (1999) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology52(3): 591–620.
68.
VenkataramaniVRichterAWClarkeR (2014) Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology99(5): 966–975.
69.
WardA (2013) Spurious correlations and causal inferences. Erkenntnis78(3): 699–712.
70.
WegenerB (1991) Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment. American Sociological Review56(1): 60–71.
71.
ZhouJGeorgeJM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 682–696.
72.
ZhouJShinSJBrassDJChoiJZhangZ-X (2009) Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology94(6): 1544–1552.
