Corporate Diversity Programs and Gender Inequality in the Oil and Gas Industry

Abstract

Since the 1980s, major U.S. corporations have embraced diversity as a management strategy to increase the number of women in top jobs. Diversity management programs include targeted recruitment, hiring, and promotions policies; mentoring programs; affinity groups; and diversity training. Few of these programs have proven effective in achieving gender diversity in the corporate world, despite their widespread popularity. To explore the reasons for this, the authors investigate the experiences of women scientists in the oil and gas industry who are targeted by these programs. In-depth interviews reveal possible reasons why these programs fail to achieve their intended goals. The authors find that these programs can paradoxically reinforce gender inequality and male dominance in the industry. The authors discuss alternative approaches for addressing gender inequality in work organizations and conclude with implications of their findings for corporate approaches to promoting diversity and for future research.

Keywords

gender inequality in the workplace diversity women scientists oil and gas industry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

(2007) “You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing'': Diversity, race equality, and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(4): 590–609.

American Association of Petroleum Geologists. (2009). Results from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) Professional Women in the Earth Sciences (PROWESS) survey. Retrieved from www.aapg.org/committees/prowess/AAPG_Jun3.final.pdf.

Bell

J. M.

Hartmann

(2007) Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of “happy talk''. American Sociological Review 72(6): 895–914.

Bielby, W. T., Krysan, M., & Herring, C. (2013, August). How Americans view workplace antidiscrimination interventions: Why we need a new conversation about race, gender, who wins, who loses, and what works. Paper presented at Ford Foundation Research Workshop, New York, NY.

Blair-Loy

(2005) Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Byron

R. A.

(2010) Discrimination, complexity, and the public/private sector question. Work and Occupations 37(4): 435–475.

Castilla

Bernard

(2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 55: 543–576.

Catalyst. (2012). Women in U.S. mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/publication/503/women-in-us-mining-quarrying-and-oil-gas-extraction.

Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2010). Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology. Social Problems, 57(3), 371–397.

10.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Collins

(2011) From affirmative action to diversity: Erasing inequality from organizational responsibility. Critical Sociology 37(5): 517–520.

12.

Dobbin

(2009) Inventing equal opportunity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Dobbin

Kalev

Kelly

(2007) Diversity management in corporate America. Contexts 6(4): 21–27.

14.

Dreher

G. F.

Cox

T. H.

(1996) Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(3): 297–308.

15.

Dupre, R. (2013, July 4). Women fill 40% of vacancies in oil, gas. Rigzone. Retrieved from http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=127452.

16.

Edelman

L. B.

Fuller

S. R.

Mara-Drita

(2001) Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1589–1641.

17.

Embrick

D. G.

(2011) The diversity ideology in the business world: A new oppression for a new age. Critical Sociology 37(5): 541–556.

18.

Epstein

C. F.

Seron

Oglensky

Saute

(1999) The part-time paradox: Time norms, professional life, family, and gender, New York, NY: Routledge.

19.

Fisher

M. S.

(2012) Wall Street women, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

20.

Forret

M. L.

Dougherty

T. W.

(2004) Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior 25: 419–437.

21.

Glass

(2004) Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations 31(3): 367–394.

22.

Glass

Sassler

Levitte

Michelmore

(2013) What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces 92(2): 723–756.

23.

Gonzales

L. M.

Keane

C. M.

(2011) Status of the Geoscience Workforce: 2011, Alexandria, VA: American Geological Institute.

24.

Harper

Reskin

(2005) Affirmative action at school and on the job. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 357–379.

25.

Hebson

Cox

(2011) The gendered implications of corporate value change. Gender, Work, and Organizations 18(2): 182–201.

26.

Hemphill

Haines

(1997) Discrimination, harassment, and the failure of diversity training: What to do now, Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

27.

Herring

Henderson

(2011) From affirmative action to diversity: Toward a critical diversity perspective. Critical Sociology 38(5): 629–643.

28.

Hirsh

Kmec

J. A.

(2009) Human resource structures: Reducing discrimination or raising rights awareness? Industrial Relations 48(3): 512–532.

29.

Hunt, J. (2010). Why do women leave science and engineering? (NBER Working Paper Series 15853). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15853.pdf.

30.

Ibarra

(1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(3): 422–447.

31.

Ibarra

Carter

N. M.

Silva

(2010, September) Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review 88(9): 80–85.

32.

Kaiser

C. R.

Major

Jurcevic

Dover

Brady

Shapiro

(2013) Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104(3): 504–519.

33.

Kalev

Kelly

Dobbin

(2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 71(4): 589–617.

34.

Kanter

R. M.

(1977) Men and women of the corporation, New York, NY: Basic Books.

35.

Kay

Wallace

(2009) Mentors as social capital: Gender, mentors, and career rewards in law practice. Sociological Inquiry 79(4): 418–452.

36.

Keane, C., & Wilson, C. (2013). Geoscience Currents #69: US female geoscience enrollment and degree rate. Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute. Retrieved from http://www.agiweb.org/workforce/Currents/Currents-069-Gender2012.pdf.

37.

Kilanski, K. (2011). Gender, graduate school, and the geosciences (Master’s thesis). Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.

38.

Kirton

Greene

(2010) What does diversity management mean for the gender equality project in the United Kingdom? Views and experiences of organizational “actors''. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science 27(3): 249–262.

39.

Kmec

O’Conner

L. T.

Schieman

(2014) Not fair: The association between working anything but full-time and perceived unfair treatment. Work and Occupations 41(1): 63–85.

40.

Light

Roscigno

V. J.

Kalev

(2011) Racial discrimination, interpretation, and legitimation at work. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 634: 39–59.

41.

Lofland

Snow

Anderson

Lofland

L. H.

(2006) Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.

42.

McGuire

(2000) Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations 27(4): 501–523.

43.

Miller

G. E.

(2004) Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers. Gender, Work, and Organization 11(1): 47–73.

44.

Mills

J. H.

(2005) Organizational change and representations of women in a North American utility company. Gender, Work, and Organization 12(3): 242–269.

45.

Moore

W. L.

(2008) Reproducing racism: White space, elite law schools and racial inequality, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

46.

Moore

W. L.

Bell

J. M.

(2011) Maneuvers of whiteness: “Diversity” as a mechanism of retrenchment in the affirmative action discourse. Critical Sociology 37(5): 597–613.

47.

Ollilainen

Calasanti

(2007) Metaphors at work: Maintaining the salience of gender in self-managing teams. Gender & Society 21(1): 5–27.

48.

Pierce

J. L.

(2012) Racing for innocence: Whiteness, gender, and the backlash against affirmative action, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

49.

Pirog, R. (2012). Financial performance of the major oil companies, 2007–2011 (Congressional Research Service). Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42364.pdf.

50.

Podmore

Spencer

(1982) Women lawyers in England: The experience of inequality. Work and Occupations 9(3): 337–360.

51.

Preston

(2004) Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers, New York, NY: Russell Sage.

52.

Pugh

(2013) What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 1(1): 42–68.

53.

Ramaswami

Dreher

G. F.

Bretz

Wiethoff

(2010) The interactive effects of gender and mentoring on career attainment: Making the case for female lawyers. Journal of Career Development 37: 692–716.

54.

Roscigno

V. J.

Williams

L. M.

Byron

R. A.

(2012) Workplace racial discrimination and middle class vulnerability. American Behavioral Scientist 56(5): 696–710.

55.

Sharp

Franzway

Mills

Gill

(2012) Flawed policy, failed politics? Challenging the sexual politics of managing diversity in engineering organizations. Gender, Work, and Organization 19(6): 555–572.

56.

Sinclair

(2000) Women within diversity: Risks and possibilities. Women in Management Review 15(5/6): 237–245.

57.

Smithson

Stokoe

E. H.

(2005) Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating “genderblind'' terms in organizations. Gender, Work, and Organization 12(2): 147–168.

58.

Stainback

Tomaskovic-Devey

(2012) Documenting discrimination: Racial and gender segregation in private-sector employment since the civil rights act, New York, NY: Russell Sage.

59.

Trilling

Fadel

(2009) 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

60.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Employed persons by detailed industry, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.pdf.

61.

Vican, S. B. (2013, August). From backlash to the business case: The role of affirmative action in corporate diversity management strategies. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting, New York, NY.

62.

Whittington

K. B.

(2011) Mothers of invention? Gender, motherhood, and the new dimensions of productivity in the science profession. Work and Occupations 38(3): 417–456.

63.

Williams

Muller

Kilanski

(2012) Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society 26: 549–573.

64.

Williams

(2001) Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what do to about it, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.