Labor mobility and flexible employment practices have been recognized as central constructs in research on creative industries. However, despite the increasing mobility of creative work, flexible employment practices have received much more attention than the geographic mobility of creative projects and workers. This article addresses this gap by studying regional network dynamics in the evolution of the film industry in Massachusetts between 2000 and 2010. The author shows that the geographic distribution and specific types of labor and nonwage spending in the Massachusetts film industry varied over time as a function of the regional project mix and policies designed to lure highly mobile projects to the region.
BanksM. (2010) Craft labor and creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy16: 305–321.
2.
BechkyB. A. (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science17: 3–21.
3.
BidwellM.BriscoeF. (2010) The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organization Science21: 1034–105.
4.
BielbyW. T.BielbyD. D. (1999) Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters. American Sociological Review64: 64–85.
5.
BlairH. (2003) Winning and losing in flexible labour markets: Operation of networks of interdependence in the UK film industry. Sociology37: 677–694.
6.
BorgattiS. P. (2002) NetDraw software for network visualization, Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
7.
CavesR. E. (2000) Creative industries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
ChristophersonS. (2006) Behind the scenes: How transnational firms are constructing a new international division of labor in media work. Geoforum37: 739–751.
9.
ChristophersonS.RightorN. (2010) The creative economy as “big business”: Evaluating state strategies to lure film makers. Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 336–352.
10.
ChristophersonS.StorperM. (1989) The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labor market: The motion picture industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review42: 331–347.
11.
CoeN. (2000) On location: American capital and the local labour market in the Vancouver film industry. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21: 79–94.
12.
CurrahA. (2007) Hollywood, the internet and the world: A geography of disruptive innovation. Industry and Innovation14: 359–384.
13.
CurridE. (2007) How art and culture happen in New York. Journal of the American Planning Association73: 454–467.
14.
Currid-HalkettE.RavidG. (2012) Stars and the connectivity of cultural industry world cities: An empirical social network analysis of human capital mobility and its implications for economic development. Environment and Planning A44: 2646–2663.
15.
Ernst & Young (2009b) Estimated impacts of the New York State film credit, New York, NY: Author.
16.
FaulknerR. R. (1983) Music on demand: Composers and careers in the Hollywood film industry, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
17.
FaulknerR. R.AndersonA. B. (1987) Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology4: 879–909.
18.
FloridaR. (2002a) The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers92: 743–755.
19.
FloridaR. (2002b) The rise of the creative class, New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
FloridaR. (2008) Who’s your city?, New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
FosterP.BorgattiS. P.JonesC. (2011) Gatekeeper search and selection strategies: Relational and network governance in a cultural market. Poetics39: 247–265.
22.
Foster, P., Manning, S., & Terkla, D. (2013). The rise of Hollywood East: Regional film offices as intermediaries in film and television production clusters. Regional Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799765.
23.
GrabherG. (2002) Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies36: 205–214.
24.
GrabherG. (2004) Architectures of project-based learning: Creating and sedimenting knowledge in project ecologies. Organization Studies25: 1491–1514.
25.
JonesC. (1996) Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry. In: ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M. (eds) The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–75.
26.
JonesC.HesterleyW. S.BorgattiS. P. (1997) A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review22: 911–945.
27.
LorenzenM. (2005) Knowledge and geography. Industry and Innovation12: 399–407.
28.
LutherW. (2010) Movie production incentives: Blockbuster support for lackluster policy, Washington, DC: Tax Foundation.
29.
ManningS. (2005) Managing project networks as dynamic organizational forms: Learning from the TV movie industry. International Journal of Project Management23: 410–414.
30.
ManningS. (2008) Embedding projects in multiple contexts: A structuration perspective. International Journal of Project Management26: 30–37.
31.
ManningS. (2010) The strategic formation of project networks: A relational practice perspective. Human Relations63: 551–573.
32.
ManningS.SydowJ. (2011) Projects, paths, and practices: Sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships. Industrial and Corporate Change20: 1369–1402.
33.
MarkusenA. (2004) Targeting occupations in regional and community economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association70: 253–268.
34.
MarkusenA.ShrockG. (2006) The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development implications. Urban Studies43: 1661–1686.
35.
MaskellP.LorenzenM. (2004) The cluster as market organization. Urban Studies41: 991–1009.
MengerP. (1999) Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology25: 541–574.
39.
Miller, S. R., & Abdulkadri, A. (2009). The economic impact of Michigan’s motion picture production industry and the Michigan motion picture production credit. East Lansing, MI: Center for Economic Analysis.
40.
PitterA. (2013) A report on the Massachusetts film industry tax incentives, Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Revenue.
41.
PoppA. V.PeachJ. (2008) The film industry in New Mexico and the provision of tax incentives, Las Cruces, NM: Arrowhead Center, Office of Policy Analysis.
SaxenianA. (1996) Beyond boundaries: Open labor markets and learning in Silicon Valley. In: ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M. (eds) The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–39.
44.
ScottA. (2004) The other Hollywood: The organizational and geographic bases of television program production. Media, Culture and Society26: 183–205.
45.
ScottA. (2005) On Hollywood: The place, the industry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
StarkeyK.BarnattC.TempestS. (2000) Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organization Science11: 299–305.
47.
StorperM. (1989) The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: External economies, the division of labour, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics13: 273–305.
48.
SydowJ.StaberU. (2002) The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies36: 223–235.
49.
TolbertP. S. (1996) Occupations, organizations, and boundaryless careers. In: ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M. (eds) The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–349.
50.
UzziB.SpiroJ. (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology111: 447–504.
51.
VogelH. (2007) Entertainment industry economics, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52.
WeinerJ. (2009a) Cost-benefit analysis of Connecticut’s film tax credit, Boston, MA: New England Public Policy Center.
WindelerA.SydowJ. (2001) Project networks and changing industry practices – collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies22: 1035–1060.
