The use of community treatment orders and other forms of mandatory outpatient treatment has been controversial. The debate on the appropriateness of compulsory treatment in the community addresses a volatile mix of clinical, social policy, legal, and philosophical issues. This paper describes the major sources of contention, outlines the position of the protagonists, and where possible, attempts to answer some of the questions raised and identify common ground.
O'ReillyRLBrooksSAChaimowitzGANeilsonGECarrPEZikosE, and others. Mandatory outpatient treatment. Position Paper 2003–43. Ottawa: Canadian Psychiatric Association; 2003. Available: www.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Position_Papers/mandatory.asp.
2.
GerbasiJBBonnieRJBinderRL. Resource document on mandatory outpatient treatment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law2000;28:127–44.
3.
GrayJEShoneMALiddlePF. Canadian mental health law and policy. Toronto: Butterworths; 2000.
FulopNJ. Involuntary outpatient civil commitment: What can Britain learn from the US. experience? A civil liberties perspective. Int J Law Psychiatry1995;18:291–303.
6.
SwartzMSHidayVASwansonJWWagnerHRBorumRBurnsBJ. Measuring coercion under involuntary outpatient commitment: Initial findings of a randomized controlled trial. Res Community Ment Health1999;10:57–77.
7.
SwartzMSSwansonJWWagnerHRHannonMJBurnsBJShumwayM.Assessment of four stakeholder groups' preferences concerning outpatient commitment for persons with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry2003;160:1139–46.
8.
TorreyEFKaplanR.A national survey of the use of outpatient commitment. Psychiatr Serv1995;46:778–84.
9.
O'ReillyRLKeeganDLEliasJW. A survey of the use of community treatment orders by psychiatrists in Saskatchewan. Can J Psychiatry2000;45:79–81.
10.
PowerP.Community treatment orders: The Australian experience. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry1999;10:9–15.
11.
KeilitzI.Empirical studies of involuntary outpatient commitment: Is it working?Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep1990;14:368–79.
12.
O'ReillyRL. Does involuntary out-patient treatment work?Psychiatr Bull2001;25:371–4.
13.
RidgelySForumRPetrilaJ.The effectiveness of outpatient commitment. Santa Monica (CA): RAND; 2001.
14.
SwansonJWSwartzMSGeorgeLKBurnsBJHidayVABorumRWagnerHR. Interpreting the effectiveness of involuntary outpatient commitment: A conceptual model. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law1997;25:5–16.
15.
SteadmanHJGounisKDennisDHopperKRocheBSwartzM, and others. Assessing the New York involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program. Psychiatr Serv2001;52:330–6.
16.
O'ReillyRLBishopJ.Assessing the New York City Involuntary Outpatient Treatment Program [letter]. Psychiatr Serv2001;52:1533.
17.
SwartzMSSwansonJWHidayVAWagnerHRBurnsBJBorumR.A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psychiatr Serv2001;52:325–9.
18.
SzmuklerGHotopfM.Effectiveness of involuntary outpatient commitment. Am J Psychiatry2001;158:653–4.
19.
AllenMSmithVF. Opening Pandora's box: The practical and legal dangers of involuntary outpatient commitment. Psychiatr Serv2001;52:342–6.
20.
Van PuttenRASantiagoJMBerrenMR. Involuntary outpatient commitment in Arizona: A retrospective study. Hosp Community Psychiatry1988;39:953–8.
21.
HidayVAScheid-CookTL. Outpatient commitment for “revolving-door” patients: Compliance and treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis1991;179:83–8.
22.
MunetzMRGrandeTKleistJPetersonGA. The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment. Psychiatr Serv1996;47:1251–3.
23.
RohlandBMRohrerJERichardsCC. The long-term effect of outpatient commitment on service use. Admin Policy Ment Health2000;27:383–94.
24.
SenskyTHughesTHirschS.Compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: I. A controlled study of compulsory community treatment with extended leave under the Mental Health Act: Special characteristics of patients treated and impact of treatment. Br J Psychiatry1991;158:792–99.
25.
PrestonNJKiselySXiaoJ.Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: Epidemiological study in Western Australia. BMJ2002;324:1244–6.
26.
HidayVASwartzMSSwansonJWBorumRWagnerHR. Impact of outpatient commitment on victimization of people with severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry2002;159:1403–11.
27.
O'KeefeCPotenzaDPMueserKT. Treatment outcomes for severely mentally-ill patients on conditional discharge to community-based treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis1997;185:409–11.
28.
SwansonJWSwartzMSBorumRHidayVAWagnerHRBurnsBJ. Involuntary out-patient commitment and reduction of violent behaviour in persons with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry2000;76:324–31.
29.
SwartzMSBurnsBJGeorgeLKSwansonJHidayVABorumRWagnerHR. The ethical challenges of a randomized control trial of involuntary outpatient commitment. J Ment Health Admin1997;24:35–43.
30.
SwartzMSSwansonJWWagnerHRBurnsBJHidayVABorumR.Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism? Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry1999;156:1968–75.
CucaR.Ulysses in Minnesota: First steps toward a self-binding advance directive statute. Cornell Law Rev1993;79:1152–86.
33.
AppelbaumPS. Thinking carefully about outpatient commitment. Psychiatr Serv2001;52:347–50.
34.
Mental Health Services Act SS. 1984–85, 86, c M-13.1 as amended by 1993, c 59.
35.
GrayJEO'ReillyRL. Clinically significant differences among Canadian mental health acts. Can J Psychiatry2001;46:315–21.
36.
MonaghanJSteadmanHJ. Crime and mental disorder: An epidemiological approach. In: TonryMMorrisN, editors. Review of research. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1983. p 145–89.
37.
EverettB.Community treatment orders: Ethical practice in an era of magical thinking. Can J Community Psychiatry2001;1:5–20.
38.
SwansonJWHolzerCEGanjuVKJonoRT. Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: Evidence from Epidemiological Catchment Area surveys. Hosp Community Psychiatry1990;41:761–70.
39.
MulveyEP. Assessing the evidence of a link between mental illness and violence. Hosp Community Psychiatry1994;45:663–8.
40.
TorreyEF. Violent behavior by patients with serious mental illness. Hosp Community Psychiatry1994;45:653–62.
41.
SwansonJW. Mental disorder, substance abuse, and community violence: An epidemiological approach. In: MonaghanJSteadmanHJ, editors. Violence and mental disorders: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1994. p 101–36.
42.
O'ReillyRLChamberlaineCH. Criteria for admission to psychiatric units: Have we raised the bar too high?Can J Psychiatry2000;45:392.
43.
McCaffertyGDooleyJ.Involuntary outpatient commitment: An update. Mental and Physical Law Reporter1990;14:277–87.
44.
AmadorXFStraussDHYaleSAFlaumMMEndicottJGormanJM. Assessment of insight in psychosis. Am J Psychiatry1993;150:873–9.
45.
DawsonJRomansSGibbsARatterN.Ambivalence about community treatment orders. Int J Law Psychiatry2003;26:243–55.
46.
MunetzMRGrandeTKleistJPetersonGAVuddagiriS.What happens when effective outpatient civil commitment is terminated?New Dir Men Health Serv1997;75:49–59.
47.
SchwartzSJCostanzoCE. Compelling treatment in the community: Distorted doctrines and violated values. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Rev1987;20:1329–429.
48.
MulveyEPGellerJLRothLH. The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment. Am Psychol1987;42:571–84.
