To explore a contradiction between evidence suggesting community treatment order (CTO) ineffectiveness and clinical experience.
Conclusions:
The literature pertaining to CTOs actually provides an evidence base for both positions. The headline that three randomised controlled trials and subsequent meta-analyses fail to demonstrate significant differences between groups reflects selection bias. A case may still be made for CTOs.
KressK.An argument for assisted outpatient treatment for persons with serious mental illness illustrated with reference to a proposed statute for Iowa. Iowa Law Rev2000; 85: 1269–1386.
2.
ChurchillROwenGSinghSet al. International experiences of using community treatment orders. London (GB): Institute of Psychiatry, 2007.
3.
PellegrinoED. Emerging ethical issues in palliative care. J Am Med Assoc1998; 279: 1521–1522.
4.
SteadmanHJGounisKDennisDet al. Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot programme. Psych Serv2001; 52: 330–336.
5.
SwartzMSSwansonJWHidayVAet al. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psych Serv2001; 52: 325–329.
6.
BurnsTRugkasaJMolodynskiAet al. Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2013; 381: 1627–1633.
7.
MaughanDMolodynskiARugkasaJet al. A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2014; 49: 651–663.
8.
RugkasaJ.Effectiveness of community treatment orders. Can J Psychiatry2016; 61: 15–24.
9.
DawsonJ.Doubts about the clinical effectiveness of community treatment orders. Can J Psychiatry2016; 61: 4–6.
10.
KiselySHallK.An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled evidence for the effectiveness of community treatment orders. Can J Psychiatry2014; 59: 561–564.
11.
HuenRDaveSRowlandsP.Little evidence for community treatment orders. Br J Psychiatry Bull2016; 40: 115–118.
12.
Ministry of Health. The Mental Health Act and human rights, a discussion document. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2016.
13.
CohenPCohenJ.The clinician’s illusion. Arch Gen Psychiatry1984; 41: 1178–1182.
14.
CurtisD.OCTET does not demonstrate a lack of effectiveness for community treatment orders. Psychiatr Bull2014; 38: 36–39.
15.
TaylorMMacphersonMMacleodCet al. Community treatment orders and reduced time in hospital: a nationwide study, 2007–2012. Br J Psychiatry Bull2016; 40: 124–126.
16.
KiselyS.Canadian studies on the effectiveness of community treatment orders. Can J Psychiatry2016; 61: 7–14.
17.
ZanniGRStavisPF.The effectiveness and ethical justification of psychiatric outpatient commitment. Am J Bioeth2007; 7: 31–41.
18.
BurgessPBindmanJLeeseMet al. Do community treatment orders for mental illness reduce readmission to hospital?Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2006; 41: 574–579.
19.
SegalSPBurgessPM.Effect of conditional release from hospitalisation on mortality risk. Psych Serv2006; 57: 1607–1613.
20.
GibbsADawsonJAnsleyCet al. How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders. JMH2005; 14: 357–368.
21.
PolandJ.Bias and schizophrenia. In: CaplanPCosgroveL (eds) Bias in psychiatric diagnosis. Lanham: Jason Aronson, 2004, pp. 159.
22.
ApplelbaumPS.Thinking carefully about outpatient commitment. Psych Serv2001; 52: 347–350.
23.
ShadMUMuddasaniSPrasadKet al. Insight and prefrontal cortex in first-episode schizophrenia. NeuroImage2004; 1315–1320.
24.
CattsSVO’TooleBI.The treatment of schizophrenia. Aust NZ J Psychiatry2016; 50: 1128–1138.
25.
JohnsonS.Can we reverse the rising tide of compulsory admissions?Lancet2013; 381: 1603–1604.
26.
O’ReillyR.Why are community treatment orders controversial?Can J Psychiatry2004; 49: 579–584.
27.
MillJS.On liberty. London: Oxford University Press, 1859.
28.
LittleJD.Intervention and social breakdown in the elderly. Aust NZ J Psychiatry1996; 30: 681–684.
