Abstract
The Sillakudi Formation is a sandstone-dominated succession bounded by unconformities. It represents the oldest unit of the Ariyalur Group deposited during the Campanian under fully established passive margin depositional conditions. The present study is an attempt to interpret the depositional palaeoenvironment of Sillakudi Formation based on its trace fossil content, supported by sedimentological evidences. Detailed sedimentological and ichnological observations were undertaken in multiple traverses and spot locations across the Sillakudi Formation. The Sillakudi Formation is subdivided into four facies associations, each represented by a distinct ichnology and environment of deposition. Unit 1 comprises conglomerates grading upwards into pebbly sandstones almost devoid of trace fossils except a few
Introduction
The Cauvery Basin is a pericratonic rift basin situated in the southernmost part of the East Continental Margin of India (Gaina et al., 2007; Lal et al., 2009; Powell et al., 1988; Sinha et al., 2015). The depositional history of the basin is dominated by two phases—syn-rift followed by post-rift phase. The Uttatur and Trichinopoly Groups (Aptian to Santonian) represent the early post-rift phase during which the passive margin had begun to develop. During the deposition of the overlying Ariyalur Group (Campanian to Maastrichtian), passive margin depositional conditions were fully established. The Sillakudi Formation is Campanian in age and represents the oldest unit of the Ariyalur Group (Banerji, 1972; Sundaram et al., 2001; Tewari et al., 1996). It is a sandstone-dominated succession reported to have been deposited in inner shelf settings (Nagendra et al., 2011; Tewari et al., 1996). Its boundaries with the underlying Trichinopoly Group and overlying Kallankurichchi Formation are unconformable. Nagendra et al. (2011) briefly mentioned deepening followed by a relative sea level fall leading to inner shelf conditions towards the end of the Sillakudi Formation.
Trace fossils have been known to improve the interpretation of sedimentary facies (e.g., Buatois & Mángano, 2011). They have proved to be excellent environmental indicators in formations constituting the Cretaceous succession of the Cauvery Basin (Nagendra et al., 2010; Paranjape et al., 2014, 2015, 2016; Muthuvairavasamy et al., 2021). Chiplonkar and Ghare (1977) and Ghare (1985) studied borings on the invertebrate fossils from the Ariyalur Group. However, these studies are not specific to the Sillakudi Formation.
The present study attempts to decipher the changes in the depositional environment of the Sillakudi Formation by integrating ichnological and sedimentological evidence.
Traverses and Methodology
The Sillakudi Formation, though having a wide area of exposure, due to low dips and overlying soil/alluvium, the exposures are patchy. The traverse between Varagur and Pudur exposes a relatively continuous succession and ichnological and sedimentological observations have been compiled with data added from other locales, their stratigraphic positions being approximated with the help of the regional strike (Figure 1A). The Varagur–Pudur traverse is considered a reference for the litholog shown in Figure 1B.
(A) Location map of Sillakudi Formation, Ariaylur Group along with the locations studied. (B) Litholog of the Varagur-Pudur traverse representing the Sillakudi Formation along with Units identified and interpretation.
Facies description and bed-by-bed logging were done based on lithological characteristics, such as composition, sedimentary structures, bed/unit thicknesses, bed/unit contacts, bed/unit geometry, textures (i.e., grain size, sorting and roundness), trends of grain size variation, body and trace fossil content, bioturbation index (BI), etc. While studying the trace fossils, their orientation, primary identification, ethological character, abundance in a lithounit/facies, diversity, etc., were taken into account. The BI was determined in the field as per the scheme suggested by Taylor and Goldring (1993). A short description of the trace fossils encountered is given in Table 1.
Description and occurrence of trace fossils within the Sillakudi Formation, Ariyalur Group.
Depositional Units
The Sillakudi Formation can be subdivided into four litho-units. The sedimentological characters, ichnology and environmental interpretations of these units are discussed in this section.
Unit I: Conglomerates Grading into Pebbly Sandstones
(a) Contact (yellow line) between the Trichinopoly Groups (below) and the Sillakudi Formation (above); (b) Ill-sorted conglomerates (Unit I); (c) Fossils associated with conglomerate and pebbly sandstones (Unit I); (d) Gritty sandstones (Unit I); (e) Planolites isp. from sandstones (Unit I); (f) Medium and coarse sandstone alternations (Unit II) (diameter of coin 2.4 cm).
The fossil content (Plate 1c) includes bivalves, gastropods, fossil wood, echinoids, ammonites, echinoid spines, etc., their abundance decreasing upwards.
Unit II: Alternations of Medium and Coarse Sandstones
(a) Large cross-bedding in sandstones (Unit II); (b) Clayey medium-grained sandstones (Unit II); (c) Ophiomorpha nodosa (bar scale = 1cm) and (d) Thalassinoides isp. from sandstones of Unit II (bar scale = 10cm); (e) ripple cross-laminations in sandstones of Unit II; (f) pebbly to very coarse-grained massive sandstones (Unit IIIA); and (g) massive sandstones with pebbles floating displaying paired opening of Arenicolites (Unit IIIA).
In the upper part of the unit (17–25 m in lithology) alternations of arenites and muddy wackes continue but these have sharp planar bases in comparison to the commonly wavy bases in the lower part. These alternations are less fossiliferous, with smaller size inoceramids and common broken fragments of larger inoceramids, as compared to the earlier unit and with the occasional presence of fossil wood.
In the upper part of the unit, the depositional environment may not have varied much, but the presence of sharp-based sandstones could possibly indicate deposition above the storm wave base.
Unit III: A. Pebbly Sandstones
Precise environmental interpretation for the ripple-laminated sandstones is difficult. As they are closely associated with the debris flow deposits, these beds could be identified as products of turbidity currents. However, suspension sedimentation, later reworked by bottom currents is also possible. Intense bioturbation indicates a pause/slack in sedimentation giving ample time for organisms to rework these sediments. This association is interpreted to represent debris flow with turbidites deposited on slopes or products of hyperpycnal plumes on the delta front.
Unit III: B. Calcareous Sandstones and Claystones
(a) Arenicolites isp. appearing as slits on the eroded rock surface (Unit IIIA); (b) Skolithos isp. in the sandstones of Unit IIIA; (c) claystones alternating with medium-grained calcareous sandstones (Unit IIIB); (d) Scolicia vertebralis ; (e) Scolicia prisca ; (f) Phycodes isp.; and (g) Trichichnus isp. from the calcareous sandstones of Unit IIIB (diameter of coin 2.4 cm).
The sandy claystones indicate deposition through suspension settling on the slope or basin floor.
The alternations of these two facies indicate deposition in slope-fan fringes or prodelta.
Unit IV: Cross-Bedded Sandstones
(a) Palaeophycus tubularis ; (b) Planolites beverleyensis , from the calcareous sandstones of Unit IIIB; (c) Thalassinoides isp. from the sandstones of Unit IV; (d) cross-bedded calcareous sandstones containing fossil fragments of bivalves and gastropods from Unit IV; and (e) topmost part of Unit IV showing ripple cross-lamination (diameter of coin 2.4 cm).
Conclusion
Unit I comprising of conglomerates fining up-section into gritty sandstones is interpreted to have been deposited in foreshore to shoreface settings. The linear extent of this unit all along the contact indicates deposition along strandlines rather than in offshore areas. The paucity of trace fossils except a few
A shallowing of the environment is seen in Unit IV where pebbly to gritty cross-bedded sandstones exhibit networks of
On the basis of these observations, a rapid deepening of the basin is noticeable from the base of Unit I till the lower half of unit II, with the onlap of a basinal facies onto a comparatively shallower one. These two units show an upward decrease in grain size and a retrogradational stacking pattern. The upper half of Unit II is interpreted as an aggrading sequence. The transition from a distalfacies to deltaic and shoreface in Units III and IV is indicative of a subsequent regression and a shallowing trend.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Our sincere thanks are due to the Agharkar Research Institute for housing the type specimens. The authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi (SRF to A.R.P) for their financial support. The authors thank Prof. Franz Fürsich and Prof. Bhawani Singh Desai for their constructive reviews.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
