Abercrombie, N. 1980 Class, structure and knowledge: Problems in the sociology of knowledge. Oxford, Blackwell.
2.
Agassi, J.1979“The functions of intellectual rubbish” , Research in the Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Arts2: 209-227.
3.
Amsterdamski, S. 1975 “Between experience and metaphysics”, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XXXV, Dordrecht, Boston, Reidel. (Translated from Polish. 1st ed. 1973.)
4.
Anderson, R. 1981 “The necessity of field methods in the study of scientific research”, pp. 213-244 in: E. Mendelson and Y. Elkana (eds). Sciences and culture. Sociology of Sciences Yearbook, 5. Dordrecht, Boston, Reidel.
5.
Balandier, G. 1975 Gurvitch and phenomenological sociology. Oxford, Blackwell. (Translated from French.)
6.
Baran, P. 1957 The political economy of growth. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1973.
7.
Barber, B. 1952 Science and social order. Glencoe, ill.Free Press.
8.
Barber, B. 1968 “The sociology of science”, pp. 92-100 in: International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, vol. 14. New York, Macmillan/Glencoe, Ill., Free Press.
9.
Barber, B. 1975 “Towards a new view of the sociology of knowledge”, pp. 103-116 in: Coser (ed.). Op. cit.
10.
Barber, B. ; Hirsch, W. (eds). 1962 The sociology of science. New York, Free Press of Glencoe.
11.
Baritz, L. 1960 The servants of power. A history of the use of social science in American industry. Middletown, Conn., Wesleyan University Press.
12.
Barnes, B. (ed.). 1972 Sociology of science. Selected readings. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
13.
Barnes, B. 1974 Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14.
Barnes, B.1979“Vicissitudes of belief” , Social Studies of Science9(2): 247-263.
15.
Barnes, B. ; Dolby, R.1970“The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint”, Archives Européennes de Sociologie11(1): 3-25.
16.
Beaver, D. de 1978 “Possible relationships between the history and sociology of science”, pp. 140-161 in: Gaston (ed.). Op. cit.
17.
Ben David, J.1970“Introduction” , Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, 21 (1): 7-29.
18.
Ben David, J. 1971 The scientist's role in society. A comparative study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ., Prentice-Hall.
19.
Berger, P. ; Luckmann, T. 1966 The social construction of reality. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday.
20.
Bernal, J. 1939 The social function of science. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1967.
21.
Bernal, J. 1964 “After twenty-five years”, pp. 285-309 in: M. Goldsmith; A. Mackay (eds). The science of science. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1966.
22.
Bloor, D. 1976 Knowledge and social imagery. London, Boston, Henley, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23.
Blue, G. 1979 “Joseph Needham's contribution to the history of science and technology in China”, pp. 1-37 in: Papers presented at the First International Seminar on “Science and Technology in the Transformation of the World”. Belgrade, United Nations University.
24.
Blume, S. 1974 Toward a political sociology of science. New York, London, Macmillan.
25.
Böhme, G. 1979 “Alternatives in science — Alternative to science”, pp. 105-125 in: Novotny; Rose (eds). Op. cit.
26.
Böhme, G.et al.1973“Finalisierung der Wissenschaft” , Zeitschrift für Soziologie2 (2): 128-144.
27.
Böhme, G.et al. 1978 “Finalisierung revisited”, pp. 195-250 in G. Böhme et al., Die gesellschaftliche Orientierung des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp (Starnberger Studien, vol. 1).
28.
Bühl, W. 1974 Einführung in die Wissenchaftssoziologie. München, C.H. Beck.
29.
Cipolla, C. 1972-1976 The Fontana economic history of Europe. London, Glasgow, Collins Fontana Books (6 vols.).
30.
Clark, B. 1977 Academic power in Italy. Bureaucracy and oligarchy in a national university system. Chicago, ill., Chicago University Press.
31.
Cole, J. ; Zuckerman, H. 1975 “The emergence of a scientific specialty”, pp. 139-174 in: Coser (ed.). Op. cit.
32.
Contributions à la sociologie de la connaissance. 1967 Paris, Anthropos (Cahiers du laboratoire de sociologie de la connaissance, vol. 1).
33.
Copans, J. (ed.). 1975 Anthropologie et impérialisme. Paris, Maspéro.
34.
Coser, L. 1968 “Knowledge, sociology of”, pp. 428-435, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 8: 428-435. New York, Macmillan/Glencoe Ill., Free Press.
35.
Coser, L. (ed.). 1975 The idea of social structure. Papers in honor of R.K. Merton. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
36.
Curtis, J. ; Petras, J. (eds). 1970 The sociology of knowledge. A reader. New York, Washington, Praeger.
37.
Deppe, F. 1971 Das Bewusstsein der Arbeiter. Studien zur politischen Soziologie des Arbeiterbewusstseins. Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein.
38.
Dolby, R.1970“Sociology of knowledge in natural science” , Science Studies1 (1): 3-21.
39.
Durkheim, E. 1898 “Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives”, in: E. Durkheim, Sociologie et philosophie. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.
40.
Durkheim, E. 1912 Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1960.
41.
Edge, D.1979“Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review” , History of Science, 17 (2): 102-134.
42.
Edge, D. ; Mulkay, M. 1976 Astronomy transformed: The emergence of radio astronomy in Britain. New York, Wiley.
43.
Elkana, J.et al. (eds). 1978 Towards a metric of science: The advent of science indicators. New York, Wiley.
44.
Engels, F. 1878 “Herrn Eugen Dührings Umwältzung der Wissenschaft” (Anti-Dühring), vol. 20, pp. 1-303, 573-620, in: K. Marx; F. Engels, Werke. Berlin (GDR), Dietz Verlag, 1962.
45.
Engels, F. 1873-1886 “Dialektik der Natur”, vol. 20, pp. 305-570, in: K. Marx; F. Engels, Werke. Berlin (GDR), Dietz Verlag, 1962.
46.
Forman, P.1971“Weimar culture, causality and quantum theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment” , Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences3: 1-115.
47.
Frank, A. 1968 Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York, Monthly Review Press.
48.
Galtung, J. 1967 “After camelot”, pp. 281-312 in: I.L. Horowitz (ed.). The rise and fall of project camelot. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
49.
Gasilov, V. 1977 “Nauchnaya shkola — Fenomen i issledovatel'naya programma naukovedeniya”, [Scientific school — A phenomenon and a research programme of the science of science] pp. 119-153 in: S.R. Mikulinskyet al. (eds). Shkoly v nauke [The schools in science], Moskva, Nauka.
50.
Gaston, J. (ed.). 1978 Sociology of science. San Francisco, Washington, London, Jossey-Bass.
51.
Goćkowski, J.1980a“Sociology of science as self-knowledge of scholars” , Science of Science1 (2): 143-160.
52.
Goćkowski, J.1980b“Three types of scientific schools” , Science of Science1 (4): 349-376.
53.
Gough, K. 1969 “World revolution and the science of man”, pp. 135-144 in: T. Roszak (ed.). The dissenting academy. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
54.
Greenberg, D. 1967 The politics of American science. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1969.
55.
Gurvitch, G. 1971 The social framework of knowledge. Oxford, Blackwell. (Translated from French.)
56.
Habermas, J. 1968 Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
57.
Hagstrom, W. 1965 Scientific community. New York, Basic Books.
58.
Hahn, R. 1971 The anatomy of a scientific institution. The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1805. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.
59.
Halmos, P. (ed.). 1972 The sociology of science. Keele, University of Keele. (The Sociological Review Monograph, 18.)
60.
Hamilton, P. 1977 Knowledge and social structure. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
61.
Hindness, B. 1977 Philosophy and methodology in the social sciences. Hassocks, Harvester Press.
62.
Hirsch, J. 1970 Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt und politisches System. Organization und Grundlagen administrativer Wissenschaftsförderung in der BRD. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
63.
Hirsch, J. 1974 Staatsapparat und Reproduktion des Kapitals. Projekt Wissenschaftsplanung 2. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
64.
Hoffmann, R.-W. 1979 “Die Verwissenschaftlichung der Produktion und das Wissen der Arbeiter”, pp. 229-256 in: G. Böhme and M. von Engelhardt (ed.). Entfremdete Wissenschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
65.
Holton, G. 1973 Thematic origins of scientific thought. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
66.
Holton, G. 1978 The scientific imagination: Case studies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
67.
Hübner, K.et al. (eds). 1976 Die politische Herausforderung der Wissenschaft. Gegen eine ideologisch verplante Forschung. Hamburg, Hoffmann und Campe.
68.
Hübner P. ; Neyman E.1974“O organiczeniach empiricznej socjologii nauki” [On the limitations of the empirical sociology of science], Zagadnienia naukoznawstwa10 (1): 41-46.
69.
Hymes, D. (ed.). 1969 Reinventing anthropology. New York, Vintage Books, 1974.
70.
Jachiel, N. 1978 Soziologie und Wissenschaft. Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein. (Translated from Bulgarian.)
71.
Kaplan, N. (ed.) 1965 Science and society. Chicago, Rand McNally.
72.
Klima, R. 1974 “Scientific knowledge and social control in science: The application of a cognitive theory of behaviour to the study of scientific behaviour”, pp. 96-122 in: Whitley (ed.). Op. cit.
73.
Klima, R. ; Viehoff, L. 1977 “The sociology of science in West Germany and Austria”, pp. 145-192 in: Merton; Gaston (eds). Op. cit.
74.
Knorr, K.1979“Thinkering towards success: Prelude to a theory of scientific practice” , Theory and Society8(3): 347-376.
75.
Knorr, K.et al. 1979 “Individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units”, pp. 55-94 in: F.M. Andrews (ed.). Scientific productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press/Paris, Unesco.
76.
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981 The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, Pergamon Press.
77.
Kozlova, M. 1979 “Problemy osnovaniya nauki” [Problems of the foundations of science], pp. 13-56 in: Stepin (ed.). Op. cit.
78.
Kröber, G. : Laitko, H. (eds). 1975 Wissensschaft. Stellung, Funktion und Organisation in der entwickelten sozialistischen Gesellschaft. Berlin (GDR), Dietz Verlag.
79.
Krohn, R. 1975 “Wissensoziologie und Wissenschaftssoziologie”, pp. 79-99 in: Stehr; König (eds). Op. cit.
80.
Kuhn, T. 1968 “Science, the history”, pp. 75-83, vol. 14 of: International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (Reprinted in Kuhn, (1977): 105-126).
81.
Kuhn, T. 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press (2nd. edition).
82.
Kuhn, T.1971“The relations between history and history of sciences” , Daedalus100: 271-304. (Reprinted in: Kuhn, 1977: 127-161.)
83.
Kuhn, T. 1977 The essential tension. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press.
84.
Kuklick, H.1978“The sins of the fathers: British anthropology an African colonial administration” , Research in Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Arts1: 93-119.
85.
Latour, B. ; Woolgar, S. 1979 Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. London, Beverly Hills, Sage.
86.
Law, J. 1976 “Theories and methods in the sociology of science: An interpretative approach”, pp. 221-231 in: Lemaineet al. (eds). Op. cit.
87.
Lazarsfeld, P. 1975 “Working with Merton”, pp. 35-66 in: Coser (ed.). Op. cit.
88.
Lécuyer, B.-P.1978“Bilan et perspectives de la sociologie de la science dans les pays occidentaux” , Archives Européennes de Sociologie13: 257-336.
89.
Leis, W.1975“Ideology and science” , Social Studies of Science5 (2): 193-201.
90.
Lemaine, G.et al. (eds). 1976 Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines. The Hague, Paris, Mouton.
91.
Lenk, K. (ed.). 1967 Ideologie. Ideologiekritik und Wissenssoziologie. Neuwied, Berlin GDR, Luchterhand, 1961.
92.
Lenk, K. (ed.). 1972 Marx in der Wissenssoziologie. Studien zur Rezeption der Marxschen Ideologiekritik. Neuwied, Berlin, Luchterhand.
93.
Mackenzie, D. ; Barnes, B. 1975 “Biometriker und Mendelianer. Eine Kontrovese und Ihre Erklärung”, pp. 165-196 in: Stehr; König (eds). Op. cit.
94.
Mackenzie, D. ; Barnes, B. 1979 “Scientific judgement: The biometry — Mendelian controversy”, in: B. Barnes; S. Shapin (eds). Natural order. Historical studies of scientific culture. London, Beverly Hills, Sage.
95.
MacLeod, R. 1977 “Changing perspectives in the history of science”, pp. 149-195 in: I. Spiegel-Rösing; D. de Solla Price (eds). Science, technology and society. London, Beverly Hills, Sage.
96.
Mannheim, K. 1924 “Historicism”, pp. 84-133 in: Mannheim, 1952, op. cit.
97.
Mannheim, K. 1929 “Competition as a cultural phenomenon”, pp. 191-229 in: Mannheim, 1952, op. cit.
98.
Mannheim, K. 1931 “The sociology of knowledge”, pp. 237-280 in: Mannheim, 1936, op. cit.
99.
Mannheim, K. 1936a Ideology and Utopia (1929-1931). London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Translated from German.)
100.
Mannheim, K. 1936b “Preliminary approach to the problem”, pp. 1-48 in: Mannheim, 1936a op. cit.
101.
Mannheim, K. 1952 Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Translated from German.)
102.
Mannheim, K. 1956 “The problem of intelligentsia. An inquiry into its past and present role”, pp. 91-170 in: Mannheim, Essays in the sociology of culture. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Published posthumously.)
103.
Martins, H. 1972 “The Kuhnian `Revolution' and its implication for the sociology”, pp. 13-58 in: T.J. Nositeret al. (eds). Imagination and precision in the social sciences. London, Faber and Faber.
104.
Marusic, A. 1977 Sociologija znanja i marksizam [Sociology of knowledge and Marxism]. Zagreb, S̈kolska Knjiga.
105.
Merton, R.K. 1945 “The sociology of knowledge”, pp. 439-455 in R.K. Merton, Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, Ill., Free Press.
106.
Merton, R.K. 1968 “The Matthew effect in science”, pp. 439-459 in: Merton, 1973, op. cit.
107.
Merton, R.K. 1973 The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press.
108.
Merton, R.K. 1977 “The sociology of science, an episodic memoir”, pp. 3-141 in: Merton; Gaston (eds). Op. cit.
109.
Merton, R.K.et al. (eds). 1959 Sociology today. Problems and perspectives. New York, Basic Books.
110.
Merton, R.K. ; Gaston, J. (eds). 1977 The sociology of science in Europe. Carbondale and Edwardsville, ill.Southern Illinois University Press.
111.
Meynell, H.1977“On the limits of the sociology of knowledge” , Social Studies of Science (4): 489-500.
112.
Milić, V. 1980 “The science of science and the sociology of science in European socialist countries”, pp. 185-342 in: Mulkay and Milić, 1980, op. cit.
113.
Mills, C.W. 1940 “Methodological consequences of the sociology of knowledge”, pp. 453-468 in: Mills, Power, politics and people. New York, Oxford University Press.
114.
Millstone, E.1978“A framework for the sociology of knowledge” , Social Studies of Science8 (1): 111-125.
115.
Moscovici, S. 1966 La psychanalyse. Son image et son public. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
116.
Motroshilova, N. 1974 “Metodologicheskie problemy i urovni issledovaniya nauki i nauchnogo znaniya” [Methodological problems and levels of investigation into science and scientific knowledge] pp. 20-61 in: V.Zh. Kelle; S.R. Mikulinsky (eds). Sotsiologicheskie problemy nauki [Sociological problems of science]. Moskva, Nauka.
117.
Mulkay, M.1969“Cultural growth in science” , Social Research36 (1): 22-52.
118.
Mulkay, M.1976a“Mediating role of scientific elite” , Social Studies of Science6 (3-4): 445-470.
119.
Mulkay, M. 1976b “Methodology in the sociology of science: Some reflections on the study of radio astronomy”, pp. 207-220 in: Lemaineet al. (eds). Op. cit.
120.
Mulkay, M. 1979 Science and the sociology of knowledge. London, Boston, Sidney, Allen and Unwin.
121.
Mulkay, M. 1980 “Sociology of science in the West”, pp. 1-181 in: Mulkay; Milic. Op. cit.
122.
Mulkay, M,; Milić, V. (eds). 1980The sociology of science in East and West. Current sociology28 (3): 1-342.
123.
Namer, G.1971“La sociologie de la science et la sociologie de la connaissance” , Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie28 (51): 351-362.
124.
Needham, J. 1954-1974 Science and civilization in China. Cambridge, University Press. (5 volumes)
125.
Needham, J. 1969 The grand titration. Science and civilization in East and West. London, Allen and Unwin.
126.
Needham, J. 1970 Clerks and craftsmen in China and the West. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
127.
Nelkin, D. 1976 “Science or scripture: the politics of `equal time' ”, pp. 209-227 in: G. Holton; W. Blanpied (eds). Science and its public: the changing relationship, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, no. 33 Dordrecht, Boston, Reidel.
128.
Nelkin, D. 1977 Science textbook controversies and politics of equal time. Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.
129.
Niznik, J.1977“Fenomenologiczny nurt socjologii wiedzi” [The phenomenological current in the sociology of knowledge]Studia filozoficzne2 (135): 83-97.
130.
Nowakowska, M. 1975 “Measurable aspects of the concept of scientific career”, pp. 295-307 in: K.D. Knorret al. (eds). Determinants and controls of scientific development. Dordrecht, Boston, Reidel.
131.
Nowotny, H. ; Rose, H. (eds). 1979 Counter-movements in the sciences. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 3. Dordrecht, Boston, London, Reidel.
132.
OECD 1963 The measurement of scientific and technical activities (Frascati Manual). Paris, 1976 (3rd version).
133.
Pappworth, K. 1969 Human guinea pigs. Experimentation on man. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.
134.
Parsons, T. 1951 The social system. Glencoe, ill., The Free Press. 1952 (2nd printing).
135.
Parsons, T. 1959 “An approach to the sociology of knowledge', pp. 25-48, vol. 4. of: Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology. Louvain, International Sociological Association.
136.
Pfetch, F.1979“The `Finalization' debate: Some comments and explanations” , Social Studies of Science9 (1): 115-124.
137.
Plessner, H. 1924 “Zur Soziologie der modernen Forschung und ihrer Organization an der deutschen Universität”, pp. 407-425 in: M. Scheler (ed.). Versuche zu eine Soziologie des Wissens. München, Leipzig, Duncker und Humblot.
138.
Popper, K. 1957 The poverty of historicism. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
139.
Pyenson, L.1977“Who the guys were': Prosopography in the history of science” , History of Science15: 155-188.
140.
Pyenson, L.1982“Cultural imperialism and exact sciences: German expansion overseas, 1900-1930” , History of Science20 (1): 1-47.
141.
Rachkov, P. 1974 Naukovedenie. Problemy, struktura, elementy. [The sciences of science. problems, structure, elements]. Moskva, Izdat Moskovskogo Universiteta.
142.
Rahman, A. 1972 Anatomy of science. Delhi, National Publishing House.
143.
Rahman, A. 1973 “Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century science in India and some problems of comparative studies”, pp. 52-67 in: Teich and Young (eds). Op. cit.
144.
Rahman, A.1979“Science, technology and development in a new social order” , Science and Public Policy6 (1): 12-24.
145.
Remmling, G. 1967 Road to suspicion. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
146.
Remmling, G. (ed.). 1973 Towards the sociology of knowledge. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
147.
Restivo, S.1979“Joseph Needham and the comparative sociology of Chinese and modern science” , Research in the Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Arts2: 25-51.
148.
Roll-Hansen, N.1980“The controversy between biometricians and Mendelians: A test case for the sociology of scientific knowledge” , Social Science Information19 (3): 501-517.
149.
Rose, H. 1979 “Hyper-reflectivity — A new danger for the countermovements”, pp. 277-289 in: Nowotny and Rose (eds). Op. cit.
150.
Rose, H. ; Rose, S. 1974 “ `Don't adjust your mind, there is a fault in reality': Ideology in the neurobiological sciences”, pp. 148-171 in: Whitley (ed.). Op. cit.
151.
Scheler, M. 1926 Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft, reprinted in: M. Scheler Gesammelte Werke 8. Bern, München, Franke Verlag, 1960.
152.
Schutz, A. ; Luckmann, T. 1974 The structures of the life-world. London, Heinemann. (Translated from German.)
153.
Shapin, S.1982“History of science and its sociological reconstructions” , History of Science, 20 (49): 157-211.
154.
Shapin, S. ; Thackray, A.1974“Prosopography as a research tool in the history of science: The British scientific community, 1700-1900”, History of Science12 (1): 1-28.
155.
Shinn, T.1979“The French science faculty system, 1808-1914: Institutional change and research potential in mathematics and physical sciences” , Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences10: 271-332.
156.
Sklair, L. 1972 “The political sociology of science”, pp. 43-59 in: Halmos (ed.). Op. cit.
157.
Stark, W. 1958 The sociology of knowledge. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
158.
Stehr, N. ; König, R. (eds.). 1975 Wissenschaftssoziologie. Studien und Materialien. Special issue number 18 of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
159.
Stehr, N. ; Meja, V. (eds). 1980 Wissenssoziologie. Special issue number 22 of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
160.
Storer, N. 1966 The social system of science. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
161.
Stepan, N.1978“The interplay between socio-economic factors and medical science: Yellow fever research, Cuba and the United States” , Social Studies of Science8 (4): 397-423.
162.
Stepin, V. 1979 “Struktura i evolyutsiya teoreticheskikh znanii” pp. 179-258 in: Stepin (ed.). Op. cit.
163.
Stepin, V. (ed.). 1979 Priroda nauchnogo poznaniya [The nature of scientific cognition]. Minsk, Izdat BGU im V.I. Lenina.
164.
Szalai, A.1979“Research on research and some problems of research bureaucracy” , Scientometrics1 (3): 247-258.
165.
Teich, M. ; Young, R. (eds). 1973 Changing perspectives in the history of science. Essays in the honor of Joseph Needham. London, Heinemann.
166.
Thackray, A.1974“Natural knowledge in the cultural context: The Manchester model” , American Historical Review79 (3): 672-709.
167.
Tjaden-Steinhauer, M. 1975 Das Gesellschaftsbewusstsein der Arbeiter. Umrisse einer theoretischen Bestimmung. Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein.
168.
The sociology of knowledge 1959 Vol. 4 of Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology. Louvain, International Sociological Association.
169.
Uledov, A. 1972 Die Struktur des gesellschaftlichen Bewusstseins. Eine soziologischtheoretische Untersuchung. Berlin (GDR), VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1968. (Translated from Russian.)
170.
Unesco 1969 Manuel d'inventaire du potentiel scientifique et technique national. Etudes et documents de politique scientifique. Paris.
171.
Verhorn, C.et al.1982“Measuring the contribution of biomedical research to the production of health” , Research Policy11 (1): 3-13.
172.
Volkov, G. 1968 Sotsiologiya nauki [Sociology of science]. Moskva Politizdat.
173.
Weingart, P. 1970 Die amerikanische Wissenschaftslobby. Düsseldorf, Bertelsman Universitätsverlag.
174.
Weingart, P. 1974 “On a sociological theory of scientific change”, pp. 45-68 in: Whitley (ed.). Op. cit.
175.
Weingart, P. 1976 Wissenproduktion und soziale Struktur. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.
176.
Weingart, P. 1978 “The relation between science and technology — A sociological explanation”, in: W. Krohnet al. (eds.) The dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 2. Dordrecht, Boston, Reidel.
177.
Whitley, R. 1972 “Black-boxism and the sociology of science: A discussion of the major developments in the field”, pp. 61-92 in: Halmos (ed.). Op. cit.
178.
Whitley, R. (ed.). 1974 Social processes of scientific development. London, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
179.
Woolgar, S. 1976a “The identification and definition of scientific collectivities”, pp. 233-245 in: Lemaineet al. (eds). Op. cit.
180.
Woolgar, S.1976b“Writing an intellectual history of scientific development: The use of discovery accounts” , Social Studies of Science6 (3-4): 395-422.
181.
Worboys, M. 1976 “The emergence of tropical medicine: A study in the establishment of a scientific specialty”, pp. 75-98 in: Lemaineet al. (eds). Op. cit.
182.
Young, R.1969“Malthus and the evolutionists: The common context of biological and social theory” , Past and Present43: 109-145.
183.
Young, M. 1973 “The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth-century debate on man's place in nature”, pp. 344-438 in: Teich and Young (eds). Op. cit.
184.
Znaniecki, F. 1940 The social role of the man of knowledge. New York, Columbia University Press.