This study examines the effects of functional income distribution and fiscal policy on growth in Turkey. A post-Kaleckian open economy model is used to analyze the Turkish economy by integrating fiscal policy tools into the econometric model, such as tax burdens on labor and capital and government expenditure for 1988–2017. The novelty of our study is that it considers the private profit motive and rollback of government activities by including public-private partnership investments in the model. Our findings suggest that government ideologies in providing services through different channels do not cause alteration in the domestic demand regime; it stays wage-led in all scenarios we applied. Yet, the overall regime turns out to be profit-led since net export is sensitive to labor costs.
AllainOlivier. 2014. Tackling the instability of growth: A Kaleckian-Harrodian model with an autonomous expenditure component. Cambridge Journal of Economics39 (5): 1351–71.
2.
ArestisPhilipSawyerMalcolm. 2003. The case for fiscal policy. In The Means to Prosperity: Fiscal Policy Reconsidered, eds. Per GunnarBerglundVernengoMatias, 19–38. London: Routledge.
3.
AyhanBerkayÜstünerYılmaz. 2023. Turkey’s public-private partnership experience: A political economy perspective. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies23 (1): 115–38.
4.
BaiJushanPerronPierre. 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics6: 72–78.
5.
BhaduriAmit. 2020. Reforming capitalist democracies: Which way?Review of Political Economy32 (4): 538–47.
6.
BhaduriAmitMarglinStephen. 1990. Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics14 (4): 375–93.
7.
BleckerRobert, A.1989. International competition, income distribution and economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics13 (3): 395–412.
8.
BleckerRobert, A.1999. Kaleckian macro models for open economies. In Foundations of International Economics: Post-Keynesian Perspectives, eds. JohanDeprezHarveyJohn T., 116–49. London: Routledge.
9.
BleckerRobert, A.2002. Distribution, demand, and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro models. In The Economics of Demand-Led Growth: Challenging the Supply-Side Vision of the Long Run, ed. MarkSetterfield, 129–52. Northampton, UK: Elgar.
10.
BleckerRobert, A.2016. Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: The long and the short of it. Review of Keynesian Economics4 (4): 373–90.
11.
BoratavKorkut. 2019. Türkiye Iktisat Tarihi 1908–2015. Ankara, Turkey: İmge Kitabevi.
BoratavKorkutYeldanErinç. 2006. Turkey, 1980–2000: Financial liberalization, macroeconomic (in)stability, and patterns of distribution. In External Liberalization in Asia, Post-Socialist Europe, and Brazil, ed. LanceTaylor, 417–55. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
BoratavKorkutYeldanErinçHaşim KöseAhmet. 2000. Globalization, distribution, and social policy: Turkey, 1980–1998. In External Liberalization, Economic Performance and Social Policy, ed. LanceTaylor, 317–64. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
CengizDoruk. 2018. Total effect of privatization: Evidence from Turkey. Review of Radical Political Economics50 (4): 1–9.
16.
CömertHasanYeldanErinç. 2019. A tale of three crises made in Turkey: 1994, 2001, and 2008–09. In The Political Economy of Financial Transformation in Turkey, eds. GalipYalmanMaroisThomasRıza GüngenAli, 88–107. New York: Routledge.
17.
CommendatorePasqualePanicoCarloPintoAntonio. 2011. The influence of different forms of government spending on distribution and growth. Metroeconomica62 (1): 1–23.
18.
DuttAmitava Krishna. 1984. Stagnation, income distribution, and monopoly power. Cambridge Journal of Economics8 (1): 25–40.
19.
DuttAmitava Krishna. 1987. Alternative closures again: A comment on “growth, distribution, and inflation.”Cambridge Journal of Economics11 (1): 75–82.
20.
DuttAmitava Krishna. 2010. Post-Keynesian economics and the role of aggregate demand in less developed countries. In The Oxford handbook of post-Keynesian economics, volume 1: Theory and origins, eds. GeoffreyHarcourtKrieslerPeter, 568–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
DuttAmitava Krishna. 2013. Government spending, aggregate demand, and economic growth. Review of Keynesian Economics1 (1): 105–19.
22.
GhoshJayati. 2016. Michał Kalecki. In Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development, eds. Erik S.ReinertGhoshJayatiKattelRainer, 475–84. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
HeinEckhard. 2014. Distribution and Growth after Keynes: A Post Keynesian Guide. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
25.
HeinEckhard. 2018. Autonomous government expenditure growth, deficits, debt, and distribution in a neo-Kaleckian growth model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics41 (2): 316–38.
26.
HeinEckhardVogelLena. 2008. Distribution and growth reconsidered: Empirical results for six OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics32 (3): 1–33.
27.
KaleckiMichał. 1944. Three ways to full employment. In The Economics of Full Employment: Six Studies in Applied Economics, (prepared at the Oxford University Institute of Statistics) 39–58. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
28.
KapellerJakopLandesmanMichael A.MohrFranz X.SchützBernhard. 2018. Government policies and financial crises: Mitigation, postponement, or prevention?Cambridge Journal of Economics42 (2): 309–30.
29.
KoMin-Chang. 2019. Fiscal policy, government debt, and economic growth in the Kaleckian model of growth and distribution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics42 (2): 215–31.
30.
KurtOzan Ekin. 2020. Functional income distribution, capacity utilization, capital accumulation, and productivity growth in Turkey: A post-Kaleckian analysis. Metroeconomica71 (4): 734–66.
31.
LavoieMarc. 2022. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
32.
LavoieMarcStockhammerEngelbert, eds. 2013. Wage-led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
LeiglandJames. 2018. Public-private partnerships in developing countries: The emerging evidence-based critique. World Bank Research Observer33 (1): 103–34.
34.
LernerAbba P.1943. Functional finance and the federal debt. Social Research10: 38–51.
35.
McDanielCara. 2007. Average Tax Rates on Consumption, Investment, Labor, and Capital in the OECD 1950–2003. Unpublished manuscript. Tempe: Arizona State University.
36.
MottTracySlatteryEdward. 1994. Tax incidence and macroeconomic effects in a Kaleckian model when profits finance affects investment and prices may respond to taxes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics16 (3): 391–410.
37.
NarayanParesh Kumar. 2005. The savings and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics37 (17): 1979–1990.
38.
ObstThomasOnaranÖzlemNikolaidiMaria. 2020. The effects of income distribution and fiscal policy on aggregate demand, investment, and the budget balance: The case of Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics44 (6): 1221–43.
39.
OnaranÖzlemGalanisGiorgos. 2014. Income distribution and growth: A global model. Environment and Planning A46: 2489–513.
40.
OnaranÖzlemObstThomas. 2016. Wage-led growth in the EU15 member states: The effects of income distribution on growth, investment, trade balance, and inflation. Cambridge Journal of Economics40 (6): 1–35.
41.
ÖnişZiya. 1991. The evaluation of privatization in Turkey: The institutional context of public-enterprise reform. International Journal of Middle East Studies23 (2): 163–76.
42.
PalleyThomas. 2013. Cambridge and neo-Kaleckian growth and distribution theory: Comparison with an application to fiscal policy. Review of Keynesian Economics1 (1): 79–104.
PesaranHashem M.ShinYongcheolSmithRichard. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics16 (3): 289–326.
RibeiroRafael SMLimaGilberto Tadeu. 2018. Government expenditure ceiling and public debt dynamics in a demand-led macromodel. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics42 (3): 363–89.
47.
RowthornRobert. 1981. Demand, real wages, and economic growth. Thames Papers in Political Economy18: 3–54.
48.
SeguinoStephanie. 2012. Macroeconomics, human development, and distribution. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities13 (1): 59–81.
49.
StockhammerEngelbertOnaranÖzlemEdererStefan. 2009. Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the euro era. Cambridge Journal of Economics33 (1): 139–59.
50.
TavaniDanielZamparelliLuca. 2017. Government spending composition, aggregate demand, growth, and distribution. Review of Keynesian Economics5 (2): 239–58.
51.
TaymazErolVoyvodaEbru. 2017. Yapısal dönüşüm, sanayileşme ve sanayi politikaları: Küresel eğilimlerden Türkiye ekonomisine kısa bir gezinti. In Geçmişten Geleceğe Türkiye Ekonomisi, eds. HakanMıhçıYeldanErinç, 11–44. İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık.
52.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2012. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed.Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage.
YeldanErinçÜnüvarBurcu. 2016. An assessment of the Turkish economy in the AKP era. Research and Policy on Turkey1 (1): 11–28.
55.
YouJong-llKrishna DuttAmitava. 1996. Government debt, income distribution, and growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics20 (3): 335–51.
56.
YücememişBaşak TanınmışOkan ErolKazım. 2017. Average effective tax rates of Turkey in EU accession process. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuasi67: 24–42.
57.
ZivotEricAndrewsDonald W. K.1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shoch, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics10: 251–70.
