Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-first Century has focused attention on the dramatic rise in economic inequality that has occurred in the United States and Europe over the past four decades. This paper argues that his account of the mechanisms that determine the distribution of income and wealth in a capitalist economy is unconvincing, for it rests on a tautology and on a spurious hypothesis about how the savings rate, the growth rate, and the capital/income ratio are connected.
AtkinsonA. B.2008. The changing distribution of earnings in OECD countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BarnettA.BattenS.ChiuA.FranklinJ.Sebastiá-BarrielM.2014. The UK productivity puzzle. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin54 (2): 114-128.
3.
BernardoJ. L.MartínezF. L.StockhammerE.2014. A Post-Keynesian response to Piketty’s “fundamental contradiction of capitalism.” Post-Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper No. 1411.
FreemanR. B.1999. The new inequality: Creating solutions for poor America. Boston: Beacon Press.
6.
MarxK.1894. Capital, Vol. III. New York: International Publishers [1967].
7.
MilanovicB.2014. The return of “patrimonial capitalism”: A review of Thomas Piketty’sCapital in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Literature52: 519-534.
8.
PikettyT.2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
ShaikhA.1974. Laws of production and laws of algebra: The Humbug production function. Review of Economics and Statistics56: 115-120.
10.
TchernevaP. R.2014. Reorienting fiscal policy: A bottom-up approach. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics37: 43-66.
11.
WolffE. N.1995. Top heavy: A study of increasing inequality of wealth in America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
