A central element of the neoliberal phase of capitalism is the flexibilization of labor and the consequent prevalence of precarious work. Here, we discuss flexibilization, develop a definition and measure of precarious work using the Contingent Work Supplement to the Current Population Survey, and examine the gender composition of precarious work in the United States. We find that gender and racial hierarchies persist in precarious jobs over the 1995–2017 period. Women—and women with children in particular—are over-represented in precarious jobs compared to men. Our findings call for a consideration of the impact of the changing nature of work on different groups of workers, and a renewed role for policy to ensure equitable terms of social reproduction.
AlbeldaRandy. 1985. Nice work if you can get it: Segmentation of black and white women workers in the post-World War II period. The Review of Radical Political Economics17 (3): 72–85.
2.
AlbeldaRandy.TillyChris. 1994. Toward a broader vision: Race, gender, and labor market segmentation in the social structure of accumulation framework. InSocial Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis, eds. McDonoughTerrence.ReichMichael.KotzDavid., 212–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AppelbaumEileen. 2003. Transformation of Work and Employment in the United States: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons. School of Management and Labor Relations & Center for Women and Work. New Brunswick: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Accessed at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.118.8763&rep=rep1&type=pdf
4.
BernhardtAnnette.MilkmanRuth.TheodoreNik.HeckathornDouglas.AuerMirabai.DeFilippisJames.GonzalezAna Luz.NarroVictor.PerelshteynJason.PolsonDiana.SpillerMichael. 2009. Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers: Violations of Employment and Labor Laws in America’s Cities. Chicago: University of Illinois: Report of Center for Urban Economic Development. Accessed at: https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/BrokenLawsReport2009.pdf
5.
BrownWendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
6.
CarréFrancoise.HeintzJames. 2009. The United States: Different sources of precariousness in a mosaic of employment arrangements. InGender and the Contours of Precarious Employment, eds. VoskoLeah.MacDonaldMartha.CampbellIain., 43–59. London and New York: Routledge.
7.
CohanySharon. 1996. Workers in alternative employment arrangements. Monthly Labor Review (US Bureau of Labor Statistics)119 (10): 31–45.
8.
DiNataleMarisa. 2001. Characteristics of and preference for alternative work arrangements, 1999. Monthly Labor Review (US Bureau of Labor Statistics) 124: 28–49.
FineBen.Saad-FilhoAlfredo. 2017. Thirteen things you need to know about neoliberalism. Critical Sociology43 (4-5): 685–706.
11.
FolbreNancy. 2012. The political economy of human capital. Review of Radical Political Economics44 (3): 281–92.
12.
FraserNancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: Feminism, Capitalism, and the Cunning of History. New York: Verso.
13.
GautiéJérôme.SchmittJohn., eds. 2009. Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
GoldinClaudia. 2014. A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review104 (4): 1091–119.
15.
GordonDavid.EdwardsRichard.ReichMichael. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HardtMichael.NegriAntonio. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17.
HartmannHeidi.CallaghanPolly. 1991. Contingent Work: A Chart Book on Part-Time and Temporary Employment. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
18.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
HippieSteven. 2001. Contingent work in the late-1990s. Monthly Labor Review(US Bureau of Labor Statistics) March: 3–27.
20.
International Labor Office. 2010. Global Wage Report 2010/11: Wage Policies in Times of Crisis. Geneva: International Labour Office.
21.
KallebergArne L. 2009. Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74 (1): 1–22.
22.
KallebergArne L. 2018. Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies. Medford, MA and Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
23.
KatzLawrence.KruegerAlan. 2016. The Rise of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. NBER Working paper no 22667. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w22667
24.
LambertSusan J.HenlyJulie R.KimJaesung. 2019. Precarious work schedules as a source of economic insecurity and institutional distrust. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences5(4): 218–57.
Oxfam. 2003. Women and Precarious Work: A Framework for Policy Recommendations. Ontario: Oxfam Canada. Accessed at: http://www.oxfam.ca
28.
PolivkaAnne. 1996. Contingent and alternative work arrangements, defined. Monthly Labor Review (US Bureau of Labor Statistics) October: 3–9.
29.
RosenbergSam. 2010. Labor in contemporary Social structure of accumulation. InContemporary Capitalism and Its Crises: Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century, eds. McDonoughTerrence.ReichMichael.KotzDavid., 195–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
RuberyJill. 2015. Change at work: Feminisation, flexibilisation, fragmentation and financialisation. Employee Relations37(6): 633–44.
31.
RosenbergSam.LapidusJune. 1999. Contingent and non-standard work in the United States: Towards a more poorly compensated, insecure workforce. InGlobal Trends in Flexible Labour. Critical Perspectives on Work and Organisations, eds. FelsteadAlan.JewsonNick., 62–83. London: Palgrave.
StandingGuy. 1999. Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development27(3): 583–602.
34.
StandingGuy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
35.
StoneKatherine V. W. 2006. Flexibilization, globalization, and privatization: Three challenges to labour rights in our time. Osgoode Hall Law Journal44 (1): 77–104.
VoskoLeah. 2002. Rethinking Feminization: Gendered Precariousness in the Canadian Labour Market and the Crisis in Social Reproduction. 18th Annual Robarts Lecture, York University. Toronto: York University.
39.
VoskoLeah. 2010. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
WeilDavid. 2011. Enforcing labour standards in Fissured workplaces: The US experience. The Economic and Labour Relations Review22(2): 33–54.
41.
WilliamsJoan. 2001. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
