Within the Polish labor market, immigration—along with flexibility, globalization, and mobility—has increased in importance. Because of the many cultural and historical similarities to Poland, as well as geographical proximity, Ukrainians play a very important role. They mostly take on the unattractive (from the point of view of the local worker) work-world positions: ones that are low paying, temporary, and offer insecure and uncertain lengths of employment. Using two in-depth case studies on Ukrainian migrant workers employed in diverse Polish industries, we answer the question of whether Ukrainian citizens working in Poland (economic migrants) are precarious workers in light of Vosko’s and Duell’s concepts of precariat.
AlbertiGabriella. 2014. Mobility strategies, “mobility differentials” and “transnational exit”: The experiences of precarious migrants in London’s hospitality jobs. Work, Employment and Society28 (6): 865–81.
2.
AlbertiGabriellaHolgateJaneTapiaMaite. 2013. Organising migrants as workers or as migrant workers? Intersectionality, trade unions and precarious work. International Journal of Human Resource Management24 (22): 4132–48.
AndersonBridget. 2010. Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society24 (2): 300–17.
5.
AxelssonLinnMalmbergBoZhangQian. 2017. On waiting, work-time and imagined futures: Theorising temporal precariousness among Chinese chefs in Sweden’s restaurant industry. Geoforum78: 169–78.
6.
BabanFeyziIlcanSuzanRygielKim. 2017. Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43 (1): 41–57.
7.
BerntsenLisa. 2015. Precarious posted worlds: Posted migrant workers in the Dutch construction and meat processing industries. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations31 (4): 371–90.
8.
BerntsenLisaLillieNathan. 2016. Hyper-mobile migrant workers and Dutch Trade Union representation strategies at the Eemshaven construction sites. Economic and Industrial Democracy37 (1): 171–87.
9.
BoeseMartinaCampbellIainRobertsWinsomeThamJoo-Cheong. 2013. Temporary migrant nurses in Australia: Sites and sources of precariousness. The Economic and Labour Relations Review24 (3): 316–39.
10.
BosmansKimHardonkStefanCuyperNele DeLouckxFredVanroelenChristophe. 2016. Expert Views on the Manifestations of Precarious Employment in Flanders. Interface Demography Working Paper 3. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Accessed at: http://interfacedemography.be/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/IDWP2016-3.pdf
11.
BrabantZoéRaynaultMarie-France. 2012a. Health situation of migrants with precarious status: Review of the literature and implications for the Canadian context—Part A. Social Work in Public Health27 (4): 330–44.
12.
BrabantZoéRaynaultMarie-France. 2012b. Health of migrants with precarious status: Results of an exploratory study in Montreal—Part B. Social Work in Public Health27 (5): 469–81.
13.
BurrowsScott. 2013. Precarious work, neo-liberalism and young people’s experiences of employment in the Illawarra region. The Economic and Labour Relations Review24 (3): 380–96.
14.
CampbellIainPriceRobin. 2016. Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review27 (3): 314–32.
15.
Casas-CortésMaribel. 2014. A genealogy of precarity: A toolbox for rearticulating fragmented social realities in and out of the workplace. Rethinking Marxism26 (2): 206–26.
16.
Central Statistical Office. 2018. Informacja o Rozmiarach i Kierunkach Emigracji z Polski w Latach 2004–2017. Warsaw: GUS.
17.
CharmazKathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
18.
DuellNicola. 2004. Defining and Assessing Precarious Employment in Europe: A Review of Main Studies and Surveys. Charleston: Economix.
19.
EberleMeghan L.HollidayIan. 2011. Precarity and political immobilisation: Migrants from Burma in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia41 (3): 371–92.
20.
FedyukOlenaKindlerMarta. 2016. Ukrainian Migration to the European Union. New York: Springer.
21.
FeliksiakMichał. 2017. Attitude to Receiving Refugees. Ithaca, NY: Public Opinion Research Centre.
22.
FordeChrisMacKenzieRobert. 2009. Employers’ use of low-skilled migrant workers. International Journal of Manpower30 (5): 437–52.
23.
FudgeJudy. 2011. The Precarious Migrant Status and Precarious Employment: The Paradox of International Rights for Migrant Workers. Working Paper No. 11-15. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia Metropolis British Columbia. Accessed at: http://mbc.metropolis.net/assets/uploads/files/wp/2011/WP11-15.pdf
24.
FuschPatriciaNessLawrence. 2015. Are we there yet? Saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report20 (9): 1409–16.
25.
GoldringLuinBerinsteinCarolinaBernhardJudith K. 2009. Institutionalizing precarious migratory status in Canada. Citizenship Studies13 (3): 239–65.
26.
GoldringLuinLandoltPatricia. 2011. Caught in the work-citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalizations8 (3): 325–41.
27.
Grabowska-LusińskaIzabelaDrbohlavDusanHarsAgnes, eds. 2011. Immigration Puzzles: Comparative Analysis of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland Before and After Joining the EU. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
28.
Grzymała-KazłowskaAleksandra. 2013. Migration and socio-demographic processes in Central and Eastern Europe: Characteristics, specificity and internal differences. Central and Eastern European Migration Review2: 5–11.
29.
HakimCatherine. 1991. Grateful slaves and self-made women: Fact and fantasy in women’s work orientations. European Sociological Review7 (2): 101–21.
30.
JordanLucy P.DeVerteuilGeoffreyKandtJensManleyDavidWuQiaobing. 2017. On the edge: Changing geographies of the global city precariat in London and Hong Kong. Urban Geography38 (10): 1459–78.
31.
JørgensenMartin Bak. 2016. Precariat—what it is and isn’t—towards an understanding of what itdoes. Critical Sociology42 (7–8): 959–74.
32.
KallebergArne L.HewisonKevin. 2013. Precarious work and the challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist57 (3): 271–88.
33.
Kałuża-KopiasDorota. 2014. Demograficzne skutki międzynarodowych migracji w wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Polski. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach167: 32–42.
34.
KarlssonTobias. 2015. Dimensions of precarity: A contradictory case of non-standard employment. Lund Papers in Economic History137: 1–14.
35.
KimDaisy Y.2017. Resisting migrant precarity: A critique of human rights advocacy for marriage migrants in South Korea. Critical Asian Studies49 (1): 1–17.
36.
LeeDonnaHamptonMarkJeyacheyaJulia. 2015. The political economy of precarious work in the tourism industry in small island developing states. Review of International Political Economy22 (1): 194–223.
37.
LewisHannahDwyerPeterHodkinsonStuartWaiteLouise. 2015. Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labour in the global north. Progress in Human Geography39 (5): 580–600.
McDowellLindaBatnitzkyAdinaDyerSarah. 2009. Precarious work and economic migration: Emerging immigrant divisions of labour in greater London’s service sector. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33 (1): 3–25.
40.
MertonRobert C.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
41.
MolodikovaIneYudinaTania. 2016. Migration strategies of Ukrainian migrants: EU or Russia. Contemporary Problems of Social Work: Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University2 (3): 62–71.
42.
MunckRonaldo. 2013. The precariat: A view from the south. Third World Quarterly34 (5): 747–62.
43.
NeilsonBrettRossiterNed. 2008. Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society25 (7–8): 51–72.
44.
OfreneoRene E.2013. Precarious Philippines. American Behavioral Scientist57 (4): 420–43.
45.
OwczarekDominikChełstowskaAgata. 2016. Amazon Po Polsku Warunki Pracy i Stosunki z Pracownikami [Amazon in Poland: Work Conditions and Relations with Employees]. Raport. Warsaw: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
46.
PiperNicolaRosewarneStuartWithersMatt. 2017. Migrant precarity in Asia: “Networks of labour activism” for a rights-based governance of migration. Development and Change48 (5): 1089–110.
47.
PoławskiPaweł. 2012. Generacja prekariuszy na Polskim rynku pracy [Generation of the precariat on the Polish labor market]. Polityka Społeczna [Social Policy] 462 (9): 16–22.
48.
PotterMichaelHamiltonJennifer. 2014. Picking on vulnerable migrants: Precarity and the mushroom industry in Northern Ireland. Work28 (3): 390–406.
49.
PyeOliverDaudRamlahHarmonoYuyunSukarsaTatat. 2012. Precarious lives: Transnational biographies of migrant oil palm workers. Asia Pacific Viewpoint53 (3): 330–42.
50.
RefslundBjarke. 2018. When strong unions meet precarious migrants: Building trustful relations to unionise labour migrants in a high union-density setting. Economic and Industrial Democracy3: 1–22.
51.
RodgersGerryRodgersJanine. 1989. Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
52.
SardarMadhumanti. 2012. The precariat a bit less precarious in Mumbai. New Labor Forum33 (1): 76–84.
53.
SavageMikeDevineFionaCunninghamNiallTaylorMarkLiYaojunHjellbrekkeJohsRouxBrigitte LeFriedmanSamMilesAndrew. 2013. A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey experiment. Sociology47 (2): 219–50.
54.
SchierupCarl-UlrikMunckRonaldoLikic-BrboricBrankaNeergaardAnders. 2015. Migration, Precarity, and Global Governance: Challenges and Opportunities for Labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
ŞensesNazlı. 2016. Rethinking migration in the context of precarity: The case of Turkey. Critical Sociology42 (7–8): 975–87.
ShinKwang-Yeong. 2013. Economic crisis, neoliberal reforms, and the rise of precarious work in South Korea. American Behavioral Scientist57 (3): 335–53.
58.
SmitRiaRugunananPragna. 2014. From precarious lives to precarious work: The dilemma facing refugees in Gauteng, South Africa. South African Review of Sociology45 (2): 4–26.
59.
StandingGuy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
60.
StraussKendraMcGrathSiobhán. 2017. Temporary migration, precarious employment and unfree labour relations: Exploring the “continuum of exploitation” in Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Geoforum78: 199–208.
61.
SzymaniakMarek. 2018. Urobieni. Reportaże o pracy. Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne.
62.
TompaEmileScott-MarshallHeatherDolinschiRomanTrevithickScottBhattacharyyaSudipa. 2007. Precarious employment experiences and their health consequences: Towards a theoretical framework. Work (Reading, Mass.)28 (3): 209–24.
63.
AbelValenzuelaJr.. 2011. Non-regular employment in the United States: A profile. JILPT Report10: 87–115.
64.
Van OortMadison. 2015. Making the neoliberal precariat: Two faces of job searching in Minneapolis. Ethnography16 (1): 74–94.
65.
VelayuthamSelvaraj. 2013. Precarious experiences of Indians in Australia on 457 temporary work visas. The Economic and Labour Relations Review24 (3): 340–61.
66.
VillegasPaloma E.2014. “I can’t even buy a bed because I don’t know if I’ll have to leave tomorrow”: Temporal orientations among Mexican precarious status migrants in Toronto. Citizenship Studies18 (3–4): 277–91.
67.
VoskoLeah. F.2010. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
VoskoLeahZukewichNancyCranfordCynthia. 2003. Precarious jobs: A new typology of employment. Perspectives on Labour and Income15 (4): 16–26.
69.
WaldingerRogerLichterMichael I. 2003. How the Other Half Works: Immigration and the Social Organization of Labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70.
WrightErik. 2016. Is the precariat a class?Global Labour Journal7 (2): 123–35.
