The article reconsiders how capitalist diversity is conceived of in the mainstream institutionalist “comparative capitalisms” literature. It highlights the division between centers and peripheries as a differentiation prior to national varieties, subsequently introducing the concepts of “nuclei of accumulation” and “nuclei of state implication.” It proposes to analyze (peripheral) varieties of capitalism as results of the conformation and change of these nuclei, their interrelations, and their insertion into global economic and political networks.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A.2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.
2.
AmsdenA. H.1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AmsdenA. H.2001. The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AmsdenA. H.2007. Escape from Empire: The Developing World’s Journey through Heaven and Hell. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
ArceoE.2005. El impacto de la globalización en la periferia y las nuevas y viejas formas de la dependencia en América Latina. Cuadernos del Cendes22:25–61.
6.
ArrighiG.1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of our Times. New York: Verso.
7.
ArrighiG.DrangelJ.1986. The stratification of the world-economy: An exploration of the semiperipheral zone. Review10:9–74.
8.
BaekS.-W.2005. Does China follow “the East Asian development model”?Journal of Contemporary Asia35:485–98.
9.
BeesonM.2003. The rise and fall (?) of the developmental state: The vicissitudes and implications of East Asian interventionism. In Developmental States: Relevant, Redundant or Reconfigured? ed. LowL., 29–40. New York: Nova Science.
10.
BlydeJuan S.2014. Synchronized Factories: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Era of Global Value Chains. Heidelberg: Springer.
11.
BoschiR.2011. Variedades de Capitalismo, Política e Desenvolvimento na América Latina. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
12.
BoyerR.1984. La crisis en una perspectiva histórica. In Algunas reflexiones a partir de un análisis a largo plazo del capitalismo francés, in La crisis actual y los modos de regulación del capitalism, ed. CondeR., 33–175. México: UAM-Iztapalapa.
13.
BoyerR.2005. How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and Society34:509–57.
14.
BrennerN.2003. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
BruffI.EbenauM.MayC.2015. Fault and fracture? The impact of new directions in comparative capitalisms research on the wider field. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. EbenauM.BruffI.MayC., 28–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
CardosoF. H.FalettoE.1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CastellsM.1996. La era de la información. Economía, sociedad y cultura, vol. 1. México: Siglo XXI.
19.
ChangH.-J.EvansP.2005. The role of institutions in cconomic change. In Reimagining Growth, ed. DymskiG.Da PaulaS., 99–129. London: Zed Press.
20.
ChibberV.2003. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Oxford: University of Princeton Press.
21.
ChibberV.2009. ¿Revivir el Estado desarrollista? El mito de la “burguesía nacional.”Revista Documentos y Aportes, núm. 11. Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe.
22.
CimoliM.2005. Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-BID.
23.
CoatesD.2015. Varieties of capitalism and “the great moderation.” In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. EbenauM.BruffI.MayC., 11–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
CrottyJ.LeeK. K.2002. Is financial liberalization good for developing nations?The case of South Korea in the 1990s. Review of Radical Political Economics34:327–34.
26.
CrottyJ.LeeK. K.2005. From East Asian “miracle” to neoliberal “mediocrity”: The effects of liberalization and financial opening on the post-crisis Korean economy. Global Economic Review34:415–34.
27.
DaviesD.2004. Discipline and Development: Middle Classes and Prosperity in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DesaiR.2013. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire. London: Pluto Press.
29.
DeyoF.1987. State and labor: Modes of political exclusion in East Asian development. In The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, ed. DeyoF., 182–202. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Di FilippoA.JadueS.1976. La heterogeneidad estructural: Concepto y dimensiones. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
31.
EbenauM.2012. Varieties of capitalism or dependency? A critique of the VoC approach for Latin America. Competition & Change16: 206–223.
32.
EpsteinG. A.SchlesingerT.VernengoM.2014. Banking, Monetary Policy and the Political Economy of Financial Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
Estevez-AbeM.2008. Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
EvansP.1998. Alternativas al Estado desarrollista. Lecciones de la crisis de Asia oriental. Nueva Sociedad155:142–56.
35.
FajnzylberF.1983. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México: Nueva Imagen.
36.
FalettoE.1989. La especificidad del Estado en América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL38:69–87.
37.
FernándezV. R.AlfaroM. B.2011. Ideas y políticas del desarrollo regional bajo variedades de capitalismo: Contribuciones desde la periferia. Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento120:57–99.
38.
FernándezV. R.LauxmannC.TrevignaniM.2013. Emergencia del Sur Global. Perspectivas para el desarrollo de la periferia latinoamericana. Economia e Sociedade22:611–43.
39.
FioriJ. L.2014. Historia, Estrategia e Desenvolvimento para una Geopolítica do Capitalismo. São Paulo: Editorial Boitempo.
40.
FishwickA.2014. Beyond and beneath the hierarchical market economy: Global production and working-class conflict in Argentina’s automobile industry. Capital & Class38:115–27.
41.
French-DavisR.2005. Reformas para América Latina después del Fundamentalismo Neoliberal. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
42.
FurtadoC.1979. Formação econômica da América Latin. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia Editora Nacional.
43.
GereffiG.1989. Rethinking development theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America. Sociological Forum4:505–33.
44.
GlassmanJ.2011. The geo-political economy of global production networks. Geography Compass5:154–64.
45.
GordonD.WeisskopfT.BowlesS.1987. Power, accumulation and crisis: The rise and demise of the postwar social structure of accumulation. In The Imperiled Economy, Book I: Macroeconomics from a Left Perspective, ed. CherryR. D., 43–58. New York: Union for Radical Political Economics.
46.
GowanP.1999. The Global Gamble: Washington’s Faustian Bid for World Dominance. London: Verso.
47.
HallP. A.SoskiceD.2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
HarveyDavid. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
HayC.2005. Two can play at that game . . . or can they? In Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, ed. CoatesD., 106–21. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
HendersonJ.2011. East Asian Transformation: On the Political Economy of Dynamism, Governance and Crisis. London: Routledge.
51.
JaguaribeH.1979. Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. Revista de Estudios Internacionales12:91–130.
52.
JessopB.2005. Globalization: It’s about Time Too!Vienna: Institute of Advanced Studies.
53.
JessopB.2015. Comparative capitalisms and/or variegated capitalism. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. EbenauM.BruffI.MayC., 65–82. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
JiJ.-H.2013. The fall of the developmental state and the rise of the neoliberal state in South Korea: Transformations in historical, geographical, and social relations. In Geo-Political Economies of East Asia, Re-locating East Asian Developmental States in Their Transnational and Local Contexts, ed. ParkB.-G.HsuJ.GlassmanJ.SaitoA.SidawayJ., 89–134. Seoul: Seoul National University Asia Center.
55.
JohnsonC.1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
56.
JomoK. S.2001. Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
57.
JomoK. S.2006. Growth with equity in East Asia? (DESA Working Paper No. 33). New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
58.
KayC.2007. Algunas reflexiones sobre los estudios rurales en América Latina. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales29:31–50.
59.
KielyR.1998. Neoliberalism revised? A critical account of World Bank concepts of good governance and market friendly intervention. Capital & Class64:63–88.
60.
KohliA.2004. State-Directed Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
KohliA.2009. Nationalist versus dependent capitalist development: Alternate pathways of Asia and Latin America in a globalized world. Studies in Comparative International Development44:386–410.
62.
KotzD. M.2002. Globalization and neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism14:64–79.
63.
LaneC.WoodG.2009. Diversity in capitalism and capitalist diversity. Economy and Society38:531–51.
64.
LapavitsasC.2013. The financialization of capitalism: Profiting without producing. City17:792–805.
Levy-OrlikN.2009. Protectionism and industrialization: A critical assessment of the Latin American industrialization period. Revista de Economía Politica29:436–53.
67.
Lu-LinC.GereffiG.1994. The informal economy in East Asian development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18:194–219.
68.
MariniR. M.1973. Dialéctica de la Dependencia. México: Ediciones Era.
69.
MarxK.1989. Trabajo Asalariado y Capital: Salario, Precio y Ganancia. Madrid: Vosa.
70.
MavroudeasS.2012. The Limits of Regulation: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
71.
McDonoughT.2015. Social structures of accumulation: A Marxist comparison of capitalisms? In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. EbenauM.BruffI.MayC., 118–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
72.
MedeirosC.2001. A economia política da crise e da mudança estrutural na Ásia. Economia e Sociedade17:33–54.
73.
NölkeA.BrinkT.ClaarS.MayC.2015. Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations21:538–67.
O’DonnellG.1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
76.
O’DonnellG.2011. Modernización y Autoritarismo. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
77.
PeckJ.TheodoreN.2007. Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography31:731–72.
78.
PortantieroJ. C.1989. La múltiple transformación del estado latinoamericano. Nueva Sociedad104:88–94.
79.
PortesA.HoffmanK.2003. Las Estructuras de Clase en América Latina: Composición y Cambios Durante la Época Neoliberal. Santiago de Chile: División de Desarrollo Social, CEPAL.
80.
PrebischR.1949. El Desarrollo Económico de América Latina y Algunos de sus Principales Problemas. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
81.
RosenbergerL.1997. Southeast Asia’s currency crisis: A diagnosis and prescription. Contemporary Southeast Asia19:223–51.
82.
SchmidtV.2007. Bringing the state back into the varieties of capitalism and discourse back into the explanation of change (CES Working Paper Series 152). Cambridge: Harvard Center for European Studies.
83.
SchneiderB. R.2009. Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies41:553–75.
84.
SchneiderB. R.2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
SchneiderB. R.SoskiceD.2009. Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: Coordinated, liberal and hierarchical systems. Economy and Society38:17–52.
86.
SchoppaL.2006. Race for the Exits: The Unraveling of Japan’s System of Social Protection. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
87.
SchuldtJ.AcostaA.2006. Petróleo, rentismo y subdesarrollo: ¿una maldición sin solución?Nueva Sociedad204:72–89.
88.
SkocpolT.1982. Wallerstein’s world capitalist system: A theoretical and historical critique. American Journal of Sociology82:1075–90.
89.
SotoR.2013. América Latina. Entre la financiarización y el financiamiento productivo. Problemas del Desarrollo44:57–78.
SunkelO.1970. Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, dependencia, marginación y desigualdades espaciales: Hacia un enfoque totalizante. Eure1:13–49.
92.
SweezyP.1981. Four Lectures on Marxism and Production. New York: Monthly Review Press.
93.
ThurbonE.2003. Ideational inconsistency and institutional incapacity: Why financial liberalisation in South Korea went horribly wrong. New Political Economy8:341–61.
94.
TilleyL.2015. Decolonizing the study of capitalist diversity: Epistemic disruption and the varied geographies of coloniality. In New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, ed. EbenauM.BruffI.MayC., 207–23. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
95.
VuT.2007. State formation and the origins of developmental states in South Korea and Indonesia. Studies in Comparative International Development41:27–56.
96.
WallersteinI.1974. The rise and future demise of the capitalist of the world-system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History16:387–415.
97.
WallersteinI.HopkinsT.1977. Patterns of development of the modern world-system. Review1:111–45.
98.
Woo-CumingsM.1999. Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the politics of nationalism and development. In The Developmental State, ed. Woo-CumingsM., 1–31. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
99.
YeungH. W.2000. State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: Lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. The Pacific Review13:133–62.
100.
ZysmanJ.1983. Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
