This paper reviews recent Latin American presidential elections as a means of examining the quality of democracy in the region. Its principal hypothesis is that, notwithstanding the claims of mainstream analysis, the (re)introduction of formal democratic procedure has not represented a meaningful advance in authentic, broad-based political and economic enfranchisement of the region's working class and peasant majorities. In many cases the so-called democratic transition has merely disguised the adaption of previously authoritarian mechanisms of social control.
Alexander, M., & Corti, C. (1993). Argentina's privatization program, CFS Discussion Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
3.
Ames, B. (1995). Electoral rules, constituency pressures, and pork barrel. The Journal of Politics, 52 (2), 324-343.
4.
Barkin, D. (1990). Distorted development: Mexico in the world economy. Boulder: Westview.
5.
Barkin, D., Batt, R. L., & Dewalt, B. R. (1990). Food crops versus feed crops: global substitution of grains in production. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
6.
Barkin, D., Ortiz, I., & Rosen, F. (1997). Globalization and resistance: the remaking of Mexico. NACLA Report on the Americas, 30 (4), 14-27.
7.
Bresser Pereira, L. C. (1993). Economic reforms and economic growth: efficiency and politics in Latin America. In L. C. Bresser Pereira, J. M. Maravall, & A. Przeworski, Economic reforms in new democracies: a social democratic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Centeno, M. A., & Maxfield, S. (1992). The marriage of finance and order: changes in the Mexican political elite. Journal of Latin American Studies, 24 (2), 57-85.
9.
Chilcote, R. H. (1981). Dependency and Marxism: toward a resolution of the debate.Latin American Perspectives Series, No. 1. Boulder: Westview Press.
10.
Collins, J., & Lear, J. (1995). Chile's free market miracle: a second look. Oakland: Food First.
11.
Conger, L. (1995). Power to the plutocrats. Institutional Investor, 24, 42-49.
12.
Conroy, M. E., Murray, D. L., & Rosset, P. M. (1996). A cautionary tale: failed U.S. development policy in Central America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
13.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
Dominguez, J. (1997). Technopols: freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
15.
Dubois, P. C. (1994). Bolsa bulls run again as Mexican election promises PRI's return to power. Barron's, August 15.
16.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (1996). The economic experience of the last 15 years. Santiago: ECLA.
17.
The Economist. (1997). May 24.
18.
Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent development: the alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
19.
Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
20.
Fiederlein, S. L. (1996). The 1994 elections in Mexico: the case of Chiapas. Mexican Studies, 12 (1), 107-130.
21.
Fiori, J. L. (1995). Cardoso among the technopols. NACLA Report on the Americas, 28 (6), 17-22.
22.
Flynn, P. (1993). Collor, corruption and crisis: time for reflection. Journal of Latin American Studies, 25, 351-371.
23.
Gomez, S., & Echenique, J. (1991). La agriculutra Chilena: las dos caras de la modernizacion. Santiago: FLACSO, AGRARIA.
24.
Gorender, J. (1998). The reestablishment of bourgeois hegemony. Latin American Perspectives, 25 (1), 11-27.
25.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
Hojman, D. E. (1994). The political economy of recent conversions to market economics in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 26, 191-219.
27.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). (1997). Voter turnout from 1945-1997: a global report on political participation. Stockholm: IDEA.
28.
Jenkins, R. (1987). Transnational corporations and uneven development. New York: Methuen.
29.
Klesner, J. L. (1997). Democratic transition? The 1997 Mexican elections. Political Science & Politics, 30 (4), 703-711.
30.
Kornbluh, P. (1999). Declassifying U.S. intervention in Chile. NACLA Report on the Americas, 32 (6), 36-42.
31.
Lozano, C., & Feletti, R. (1991). La economfa del Menemismo: cambio estructural, crisis recurrentes y destino incierto. In El Menemato: radiograffa de nos ahos de gobierno de Carlos Menem. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Letra Buena.
32.
McGuire, J. W. (1997). Peronism without Perdn: unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
33.
Menem, C. (1996). Latin America Weekly Reports, Oct. 10.
34.
Moguel, J. (1994). Salinas' failed war on poverty. NACLA Report on the Americas, 28 (1), 38-41.
35.
Munck, G. I. (1994). Democratic stability and its limits: an analysis of Chile's 1993 elections. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 36 (2), 1-38.
36.
New York Times. (1994). March 24.
37.
Palloix, C. (1977). The self-expansion of capital on a world scale. Review of Radical Political Economics, 9 (2), 1-27.
38.
Peralta-Ramos, M. (1992). The political economy of Argentina: power and class since 1930. Boulder: Westview Press.
39.
Petras, J. (1991). The retreat of the intellectuals. In J. Petras & M. Morley, Latin America in the time of cholera: electoral politics, market economics, and permanent crisis. New York: Routledge.
40.
Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: globalization, U.S. intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Schoonmaker, S. (1995). High-tech development policies: new strategies and persistent structures in Brazilian informatics. The Sociological Quarterly, 36 (2), 369-395.
42.
Spooner, M. H. (1994). Soldiers in a narrow land: the Pinochet regime in Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Valdes, J. G. (1995). Pinochet's economists: the Chicago school in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Wall Street Journal. (1994). July 28.
45.
Weyland, K. (1993). The rise and fall of president Collor and its impact on Brazilian democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 35, 91) 1-37.
46.
Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson, Latin American adjustment: how much has happened. Washington, D.C.: Institute of International Economics.
