The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that mainstream liberal economics is intrinsically contradictory to the democratic ideal. The first stage of this demonstration concerns the deconstruction of the naturalization process of economics, in other words the process through which putative economic laws became equivalent to natural laws, which transformed economic decisions into technical issues supposedly free from democratic debate. The second stage concerns the ways in which the market has managed to legitimize its hegemony in society and the reasons why this contributes to the erosion of democracy.
AlperovitzG.2004. America beyond capitalism: Reclaiming our wealth, our liberty, and our democracy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2.
ArcherR.1995. Economic democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BarthesR.1972. Mythologies. Translated by LaversA.New York: Hill and Wang.
4.
BeaudM.1997. Le basculement du monde. Paris: La Découverte.
5.
BrancoM.2000. O Homem Económico contra a Economia Humana: Fundamentos não utilitaristas para uma nova economia. EpistemeII (3-4), Setembro 1999 and Fevereiro 2000, 2ª série: 179-201.
6.
BrancoM.HenriquesP.2010. The political economy of the human right to water. Review of Radical Political Economics42(2): 142-55.
BruneF.1997. Un marché à l’etat de nature. Le Monde Diplomatique, Mai.
9.
BurnsT.2000. The future of parliamentary democracy: Transition and challenge in European governance. Green Paper prepared for the Conference of the Speakers of EU Parliaments (Rome, September 22-24, 2000), Rome and Uppsala.
10.
CassenB.1997. Pour sauver la société. Le Monde Diplomatique, Juin.
11.
ChangJ. L. Y.1992. The doctrine of light-heavy and Kuan-Chong economic policies. In Perspectives on the history of economic thought, vol. VII: Perspectives on the administrative tradition: From antiquity to the twentieth century, ed. LowryT.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
12.
CollinD.1997. La fin du travail et la mondialisation. Paris: L’Harmattan.
13.
CorniaG. A.JollyR.StewartF.1987. Adjustment with a human face, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
DahlR.1997. Procedural democracy. In Contemporary political philosophy, ed. GoodinR.PettitP., 109-27. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
DahlR.2000. Democracia. Translated by BragaTeresaLisboa: Temas e Debates. Originally published as On democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).
16.
DebreuG.1984. La supériorité du libéralisme est mathématiquement démontrée. Le Figaro Magazine, March10.
17.
de FrajaG.2006. The origin of utility. CEPR Discussion Papers Series n° 5859. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP5859.asp
18.
de TocquevilleA.1986 [1840]. De la démocratie en Amérique. Paris: Robert Laffon, Bouquins.
19.
DenisH.1993. História do pensamento económico. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
20.
DriverC.ThompsonG.2002. Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance6 (2): 111-30.
21.
DupuyJ. P.1994. Intervention au débat à quoi sert la science economique. Lettre de l’AFSE, Juillet.
22.
EllermanD.2007. On the role of capital in “capitalist” and in labor-managed firms. Review of Radical Political Economics39 (1): 5-26.
23.
FerryL.1992. Le nouvel ordre ecologique: L’arbre, l’animal et l’homme. Paris: Grasset.
24.
FitoussiJ. P.2004. La démocratie et le marché. Paris: Grasset.
25.
GeorgeG.1999. Le commerce avant les libertés. Le Monde Diplomatique, Novembre.
26.
GonçalvesM. E.1996. Ciência e política em Portugal: O caso da Doença das Vacas Loucas. In Ciência e democracia, ed. GonçalvesM. E., 121-39. Lisbon: Bertrand Editora.
27.
Groupe de Lisbonne. 1995. Limites à la compétitivité. Paris: La Découverte.
28.
HaworthA.1994. Anti-libertarianism: Markets, philosophy and myth. London: Routledge.
29.
HayC.2004. The normalizing role of rationalist assumptions in the institutional embedding of neoliberalism. Economy and Society33 (4): 500-27.
30.
HeldD.1997. Democracy: From city-states to a cosmopolitan order. In Contemporary political philosophy, ed. GoodinR.PettitP., 78-101. Oxford: Blackwell.
HirschmanA. O.1991. The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
33.
KortenD. C.1996. The mythic victory of market capitalism. In The case against the global economy, ed. ManderJ.GoldsmithE., 183-92. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
34.
KrugmanP.1996. Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
KrugmanP.2009. The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. New York: Norton.
36.
LacosteY., ed. 1993. Dictionnaire de géopolitique. Paris: Flammarion.
37.
LucasR.1994. Ética política, económica e a compreensão do desenvolvimento económico. In Aspectos sociais e eticos da economia, ed. SilvaM., 85-95. Lisboa: Comissão Nacional Justiça e Paz.
38.
MaréchalJ. P.2006. Économie, éthique et politique. In La démocratie au péril de l’economie, ed. HumbertM.CailléA., 93-123. Rennes: Presse Universitaires de Rennes.
39.
MazoE.2005. What causes democracy?CDDRL Working Papers, Stanford Institute on International Studies, n° 38.
40.
MomaniB.2004. American politicization of the International Monetary Fund. Review of International Political Economy11 (5): 880-904.
41.
MorrisD.1996. Free trade, the great destroyer. In The case against the global economy, ed. ManderJ.GoldsmithE., 218-28. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
42.
NorgaardR.1994. Development betrayed: The end of progress and co-evolutionary revisioning of the future. London: Routledge.
43.
PetrellaR.1997. Vers une société de welfare mondial, les limites du capitalisme de marché. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Social Europe, Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, May.
44.
PolanyiK.1983. La grande transformation, aux origines politiques et économiques de notre temps. Paris: Gallimard. Originally published as The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1944).
