This paper presents a systematic discussion of class differences in housework and breadwinner ideology, and tests these relationships using a national sample of Canadian husbands. Analyses show that bourgeois males have a lower tendency to participate in housework than the managerial class or than working-class males whether unionized or not. Bourgeois males are also more likely to adhere to the breadwinner ideology than male managers and/or non-union workers. Other mechanisms such as the relative contribution of wife to the family income, husband's or wife's time availability, and/or husband's ideological orientations also effect housework. Housework is not, however, effected by ethnicity or immigration status. The implications of the findings for feminist theory are discussed.
Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (1986). Beyond sexless class and classless sex: Towards feminist Marxism. In M. Barrett & R. Hamilton (Eds.), The politics of diversity (pp. 208-240). London: Verso.
Barrett, M. (1980). Women's oppression today. London: Verso.
4.
Barnett, R. C., & Baruch, G. K. (1987). Determinants of father's participation in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(1), 29-40.
5.
Barrett, M., & McIntosh, M. (1982). The anti-socialfamily. London: Verso.
6.
Benson, H. (1991). The "family wage" and working women's consciousness in Britain, 1880-1914. Politics and Society, 19(1), 71-108.
7.
Berardo, D. H., Shehan, C. L., & Leslie, G. R. (1987). A residue of tradition: Jobs, careers, and spouse's time in housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 381-390.
8.
Berk, S. (1985). The genderfactory: The apportionment of work in the American household. New York: Plenum Press.
9.
Berk, R., & Berk, S. (1979). Labour and leisure at home. Beverly Hills: Sage.
10.
Bird, G. W., Bird, G. A., & Scruggs, M. (1984). Determinants of family task sharing: A study of husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(2), 345-355.
11.
Bourdais, C., Hamel, P. J., & Bernard, P. (1987). Le travail et l'ouvrage: Charge et partage des taches domestiques chez les couples Quebecois. Sociologie et Societes, XIX(1), 37-55.
12.
Brenner, J. (1989). Work relations and the formation of class consciousness. In E.O. Wright (Ed.), The debate on classes (pp. 184-190). London: Verso.
13.
Brenner, J., & Ramas, M. (1984). Rethinking women's oppression. New Left Review, 144, 33-71.
14.
Cassim, M. (1977). Class and ethnicity: The social organization of working-class East Indian immigrants in Vancouver. Unpublished MA thesis, University of British Columbia.
15.
Clement, W., & Myles, J. (1994). Relations of ruling: Class and gender in post-industrial societies. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
16.
Connelly, M. P., & MacDonald, M. (1986). Nova Scotia community. In M. Barrett & R. Hamilton (Eds.), The politics of diversity (pp. 53-80). London: Verso.
17.
Corman, J., Luxton, M., Livingstone, D. W., & Seccombe, W. (1993). Recasting steel labour: The Stelco story. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
18.
Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husband's participation in domestic labour. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81-97.
19.
Creese, G., & Beagan, B. (1999). Gender at work: Seeking solutions for women's equality. In Curtis et al. (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada (pp. 199-213). Scarborough, Canada: Prentice Hall, Allyn and Bacon Inc.
20.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inferences in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Ericksen, J., Yancey, W., & Ericksen, E. (1979). The division of family roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(2), 301-313.
22.
Farkas, G. (1976). Education, wage rate and the division of labour between husband and wife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 473-484.
23.
Fox, B. (1980). Hidden in the household: Women's domestic labour under capitalism. Toronto: The Women's Press.
24.
Fox, B. (1986). Never done: The struggle to understand domestic labour and women's oppression. In M. Barrett & R. Hamilton (Eds.), The politics of diversity (pp. 180-189). London: Verso.
25.
Fox, B. (1988). Conceptualizing "patriarchy."Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 25(2) 163-182.
26.
Fox, B., & Fox, J. (1986). Women in the labor market, 1931-1981: Exclusion and competition. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 23(1), 1-21.
27.
General Social Survey (1986). Time use, social mobility and language use. Statistics Canada.
28.
Haddad, T., & Lam, L. (1988). Canadian families-men's involvement in family work: A case study of immigrant men in Toronto. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 29(3-4), 269-281.
29.
Hamilton, R., & Barratt, M. (1986). The politics of diversity. London: Verso.
30.
Hardesty, C., & Bokemeier, J. (1989). Finding time and making do: Distribution of household labour in non-metropolitan marriages, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 253-267.
31.
Hartmann, H. I. (1979). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. Capital & Society, 8, 1-33.
32.
Hartmann, H. I. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Signs, 6(3), 366-394.
33.
Heise, D. R. (1975). Causal analysis. New York: Wiley.
34.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home (with A. Machung). New York: Viking Press.
35.
Horrell, S., & Humphries, J. (1995). Women's labor force participation and the transition to the male breadwinner family, 1790-1865. Economic History Review, XLVIII(1), 89-117.
36.
Humphries, J. (1977). The working-class family, women's liberation, and class struggle: The case of 19th century British history. Review of Radical Political Economics, 9(3), 25-41.
37.
Koopman-Boyden, P. G., & Abbott, M. (1985). Expectation for household task allocation and actual task allocation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(1), 211-219.
38.
Lawrence, F., Draughn, P., Tasker, G., & Wozniak, P. (1987). Sex differences in household labor-time: A comparison of rural and urban couples. Sex Roles, 17(9/10), 489-502.
39.
Livingstone, D. W., & Luxton, M. (1989). Gender consciousness at work: Modification of the male breadwinner norm among steelworkers and their spouses. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 26(2), 240-271.
40.
Livingstone, D. W., & Mangan, M. (1993). Class, gender and expanded class consciousness in Steeltown. In L. Kriesberg, M. Dobkowski, & I. Wallimann (Eds.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (Vol. 15, pp. 55-82). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41.
Lottes, I., & Kuriloff, P. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27(107), 675-688.
42.
Luxton, M. (1988). The gendered division of labour in the home. In Curtis et al. (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada: Patterns, problems, policies. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall.
43.
Mackie, M. (1991). Gender relations in Canada: Further exploration. Toronto: Butterworths Canada Limited.
44.
Maret, E., & Finlay, B. (1984). The distribution of household labour among women in dual earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 357-364.
45.
Marx, K. (1967). Capital (Vols. 1 and 3). New York: International Publisher.
46.
Mauldin, T., & Meeks, C. (1990). Time allocation of one- and two-parent mothers. Lifestyle, 11(1), 53-69.
47.
May, M. (1982). The historical problem of the family wage: The Ford Motor Company and the $5 day. Feminist Studies, 8(2), 399-424.
48.
McQuillan, K., & Belle, M. (1999). Who does what? Gender and division of labor in Canadian households. In Curtis et al. (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada (pp. 186-198). Scarborough, Canada: Prentice Hall, Allyn and Bacon Inc.
49.
Meiksins, P. (1989). A critique of Wright's theory of contradictory class locations. In E.O. Wright (Ed.), The debate on classes (pp. 173-183). London: Verso.
50.
Meissner, M., Humphery, E. W., Meis, S. M., & Scheu, W. J. (1975). No exit for wives: Sexual division of labour and cumulation of household demands. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 12, 424-439.
51.
Michelson, W. (1985). From sun to sun: Daily obligations and community structure in the lives of employed women and their families. Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld Publishers.
52.
Michelson, W. (1988). The daily routines of employed spouses as a public affairs agenda. In L. Tepperman & J. Curtis (Eds.), Readings in sociology: An introduction (pp. 400-409). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
53.
Model, S. (1982). Housework by husbands: Determinants and implications. In J. Aldous (Ed.), Two paychecks: Life in dual earnerfamilies (pp. 193-206). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
54.
Molyneux, M. (1979). Beyond the domestic labour debate. New Left Review, 116, 3-27.
55.
Morris, L. (1990). The workings of the household. London: Polity.
56.
Nakhaie, M. R. (1996). The reproduction of class relations by gender in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 21(4), 523-558.
57.
Poulantzas, N. (1975). Classes in contemporary capitalism. London: New Left Books.
58.
Robinson, J. (1977). How Americans use time. New York: Praeger.
59.
Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. State College: University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
60.
Rose, S. (1992). Limited livelihoods: Gender and class in 19th century England. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
61.
Rosenthal, C. J. (1983). Aging, ethnicity and the family: Beyond the modernization theories. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 15(3), 1-16.
62.
Ross, C. (1987). The division of labour at home. Social Forces, 65, 816-833.
63.
Schor, B. J. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
64.
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
65.
Seccombe, W. (1986a). Reflections on the domestic labour debate and prospects for Marxist-feminist synthesis. In M. Barrett & R. Hamilton (Eds.), The politics of diversity (pp. 190-207). London: Verso.
66.
Seccombe, W. (1986). Patriarchy stabilized: The construction of the male breadwinner wage norm in 19th century Britain. Social History, 2(1), 53-76.
67.
Spitze, G. D. (1986). Division of home responsibilities. Social Forces, 64, 689-701.
68.
Stafford, R., Backman, E., & Dibona, P., (1976). The division of labour among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39(1), 43-57.
69.
Stasiulis, D. K. (1990). Theorizing connections: Gender, race, ethnicity, and class. In P. S. Li (Ed.), Race and ethnic relations in Canada (pp. 269-305). Toronto: Oxford.
70.
Vanek, J. (1980). Household work, wage work and sexual equality. In S. F. Berk (Ed.), Women and household labour (pp. 275-295). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71.
Wagner, M. (1993). Are men's jobs becoming women's jobs? Substitution and segmentation in the U.S. labor force. Review of Radical Political Economics, 25(2), 75-84.
72.
Walker, K. E., & Woods, M. E. (1976). Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: Center for the Family of the American Home Economic Association.
73.
Wright, E. O. (1976). Class boundaries in advanced capitalist societies. New Left Review, 98, 3-41.
74.
Wright, E. O. (1978). Class, crisis and the state. London: Verso Edition.
75.
Wright, E. O. (1985). Classes. London: Verso.
76.
Wright, E.O. (1989). The debate on classes. London: Verso.
77.
Wright, E. O., Costello, C., Hachen, D., & Sprague, J. (1982). The American class structure. The American Sociological Review, 47(6), 709-726.
78.
Wright, E. O., Shire, K., Hwang, S., Dolan, M., & Baxter, J. (1992). The non-effects of class on the gender division of labour in the home: A comparative study of Sweden and the United States. Gender & Society, 6(2), 252-282.
79.
White, J. (1980). Women and unions. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
80.
Young, I. (1981). Beyond the unhappy marriage: A critique of the dual systems theory. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution (pp. 43-69). Boston, MA: South End Press.
