Macrocultural dynamics of hegemonic masculinity complicate microeconomic negotiations. In this article, I examine hegemonic masculinity as an explanatory framework to understand how gendered work in households differs along income and race dimensions. I use Panel Study of Income Dynamics data to demonstrate how men of different race and income groups respond to their female partner out-earning them, an economic threat to masculinity. Results indicate that upper-income couples with White men have a strong aversion to the situation in which a woman out-earns her male partner. Middle-income White men follow suit, but lower-income White men, and Black men in most income groups, do not. I discuss how these findings relate directly to power, patriarchy, and the hegemonic nature of hegemonic masculinity.
AtkinsonMaxine. P.GreensteinTheodore N.LangMolly M.2005. For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family67 (5): 1137–48.
2.
BertrandMarianneKamenicaEmirPanJessica. 2015. Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics130 (2): 571–614.
3.
BhattacharyaHaimanti. 2015. Spousal violence and women’s employment in India. Feminist Economics21 (2): 30–52.
BittmanMichaelEnglandPaulaSayerLiannaFolbreNancyMathesonGeorge. 2003. When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology109 (1): 186–214.
6.
BowlegLisa. 2008. When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles59 (5–6): 312–25.
7.
Caridad BuenoCruzHendersonErrol A.2017. Bargaining or backlash? Evidence on intimate partner violence from the Dominican Republic. Feminist Economics23 (4): 90–116.
8.
CarriganTimConnellBobLeeJohn. 1985. Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society14 (5): 551–604.
9.
CharlesKerwin K.LuohMing-Ching. 2010. Male incarceration, the marriage market, and female outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics92 (3): 614–27.
10.
CohenDavid S.2010. Keeping men and women down: Sex segregation, anti-Essentialism, and masculinity. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender33: 509.
11.
CohenDavid S.2015. Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology41: 1–20.
12.
ConnellRaewyn W.1987. Gender and Power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
13.
ConnellRaewyn W.2005. Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.
FolbreNancy. 1994. Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.
16.
GarlickSteve. 2017. The Nature of Masculinity: Critical Theory, New Materialisms, and Technologies of Embodiment. Vancouver: UBC Press.
17.
HartmannHeidi I.1979. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. Capital & Class3 (2): 1–33.
18.
HimmelweitSusan. 2003. An evolutionary approach to feminist economics. In Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, eds. DrucillaBarkerKuiperEdith, 247–65. London: Routledge.
19.
hooksbell. 1995. Killing Rage: Ending Racism. New York: Henry Holt, LLC.
KeaneMichael P.WolpinKenneth I.2010. The role of labor and marriage markets, preference heterogeneity, and the welfare system in the life cycle decisions of black, Hispanic, and white women. International Economic Review51 (3): 851–92.
22.
KimmelMichael. 2006. Manhood in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
LaslettBarbaraBrennerJoanna. 1989. Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology15 (1): 381–404.
24.
LundbergShellyPollakRobert A.2014. Cohabitation and the uneven retreat from marriage in the United States, 1950-2010. In Human Capital in History: The American Record, eds. BoustanLeah PlattFrydmanCarolaMargoRobert A., 241–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
MartellMichael E.RoncolatoLeanne. 2016. The homosexual lifestyle: Time use in same-sex households. Journal of Demographic Economics82 (4): 365–98.
26.
MartellMichael E.RoncolatoLeanne. 2020. Share of household earnings and time use of women in same-sex and different-sex households. Eastern Economic Journal46 (3): 414–37.
27.
MaynardSteven. 1989. Rough work and rugged men: The social construction of masculinity in working-class history. Labour/Le Travail23: 159–69.
28.
MorganDavid. 2005. Class and masculinity. In Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, eds. KimmelMichaelHearnJeffConnellRaewyn W., 165–77. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
ReeserTodd W.2011. Masculinities in Theory: An Introduction. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
31.
RodgersDaniel. T.2014. The Work Ethic in Industrial America 1850–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
RoedigerDavid. 1999. The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. London: Verso.
33.
RoysterDeirdre. A.2007. What happens to potential discouraged? Masculinity norms and the contrasting institutional and labor market experiences of less affluent black and white men. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science609 (1): 153–80.
34.
SchneiderDaniel. 2012. Gender deviance and household work: The role of occupation. American Journal of Sociology117 (4): 1029–72.
35.
ScottNicholas A.SiltanenJanet. 2017. Intersectionality and quantitative methods: Assessing regression from a feminist perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology20 (4): 373–85.
36.
Sevilla-SanzAlmudenaGimenez-NadalJose IgnacioFernándezChristina. 2010. Gender roles and the division of unpaid work in Spanish households. Feminist Economics16 (4): 137–84.
37.
SimisterJohn. 2013. Is men’s share of housework reduced by gender deviance neutralization? Evidence from seven countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies44 (3): 311–25.
StaplesRobert. 1978. Masculinity and race: The dual dilemma of Black men. Journal of Social Issues34 (1): 169–83.
40.
SyrdaJoanna. 2020. Spousal relative income and male psychological distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin46 (6): 976–92.
41.
TienCharles. 2017. The racial gap in voting among women: White women, racial resentment, and support for Trump. New Political Science39 (4): 651–69.
42.
ThébaudSarah. 2010. Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender & Society24 (3): 330–54.
