Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Coronary artery disease has remained a major health challenge despite enormous progress in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Formation of atherosclerotic plaque is a chronic process that is developmentally influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic determinants. Inflammation triggers atherosclerosis, and the fundamental element of inflammation is the immune system. The immune system involves in the atherosclerosis process by a variety of immune cells and a cocktail of mediators. It is believed that almost all main components of this system possess a profound contribution to the atherosclerosis. However, they play contradictory roles, either protective or progressive, in different stages of atherosclerosis progression. It is evident that monocytes are the first immune cells appeared in the atherosclerotic lesion. With the plaque growth, other types of the immune cells such as mast cells, and T lymphocytes are gradually involved. Each cell releases several cytokines which cause the recruitment of other immune cells to the lesion site. This is followed by affecting the expression of other cytokines as well as altering certain signaling pathways. All in all, a mix of intertwined interactions determine the final outcome in terms of mild or severe manifestations, either clinical or subclinical. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to precisely understand the kind and degree of contribution which is made by each immune component in order to stop the growing burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this review, we present a comprehensive appraisal on the role of immune cells in the atherosclerosis initiation and development.

Keywords

atherosclerosis immune system plaque inflammation

Introduction

The growing trend of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality imposes a huge financial and social toll.¹ Most of the cardiovascular-related devastating sequels are attributed to coronary artery disease (CAD). The main cause of CAD is atherosclerosis, which is developed by a complex interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic factors.² Immune system is among the intrinsic factors that contributes substantially to the formation and development of atherosclerosis inasmuch as some researchers consider atherosclerosis as an autoimmune disease.³ Atherosclerosis development is mainly determined by the balance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features. Meanwhile, other CAD risk factors like hyperlipidemia is potentially able to recruit immune cells, and orient the atherosclerosis progress in favor of enhanced plaque formation.² Indeed, individuals with metabolic syndrome and obesity are exposed to a variety of cytokines that exacerbate the condition.^4,5 Adipose tissue itself releases some cytokines including leptin, adiponectin, and resistin which augment the inflammatory reactions.⁴ Peroxidation of the lipids within adipose tissue generates molecules with both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory functions which act through binding to nuclear receptors controlling inflammation-related genes.^6,7

Atherosclerosis is probably initiated by entrapment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the intimal layer of the coronary arteries. In the interim, endothelial injury provides suitable circumstances for circulating monocytes to gain access to the subendothelial layer. Some impairments like hyperlipidemia, hypertension, blood flow disorders, and increased level of oxidative stress facilitate the occurrence of endothelial injury. Monocytes transform to macrophages after receiving some stimuli from surroundings. The newly formed macrophages engulf modified LDLs generating cells with lipid-laden foamy appearance. After several cycles of engulfing, macrophages die due to extensive uptake of lipid particles. Accumulation of dead cells establishes a necrotic core. Finally, smooth muscle cells (SMCs) cover this core, and the atherosclerotic plaque with a fibrous cap is formed⁸ (Figure 1). Notably, the aforementioned order of events are according to what happens in the humans, and there may be some differences in other species.

Figure 1.

Schematic presentation of atherosclerotic plaque formation with the involvement of major players. TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-6, Interleukin 6; IL-8, Interleukin 8; IFN-γ, Interferon gamma; MCSF, Macrophage colony-stimulating factor; LDL, Low density lipoproteins; Ox-LDL, Oxidized low-density lipoprotein; HDL, High density lipoproteins; TLR-2, Toll-like receptor 2; TLR-4. Toll-like receptor 4; CD14, Cluster of differentiation 14.

In this review, we tried to present a comprehensive appraisal on the role of immune system in the atherosclerosis process in order to seek how immune cells interact with every component of the plaque as well as with each other toward formation and development of CAD.

Contribution of the immune system to atherosclerosis: From the first step to the last

Innate and adaptive immunity play a significant role in the atherosclerosis process.⁹ Immune cells harbor pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on their surface, and scrutinize different organs for detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in order to eliminate pathogens or damaged cells, respectively.^10,11 In the early stages of atherosclerosis, modified endogenous molecules provide antigens for antigen presenting cells promoting activation of adaptive immunity.¹² LDL particles, which are modified in different ways, play the role of immune complexes,^13,14 and make up immunogenic entities. For example, epitopes of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) are one of the major DAMPs in the subendothelial space that are recognized by PRRs of the immune cells like toll-like receptors (TLR).¹⁵ Indeed, it is believed that LDL stimulates the expression of these receptors corroborating high amounts of TLR-4 in human atherosclerotic plaques.^16,17

Also, macrophages use their receptors, surface CD1 molecule and major histocompatibility-complex (MHC) molecules, to present ingested LDLs as lipid and peptide antigens, respectively. This presentation activates a member of adaptive immune system, CD4⁺ T cells.¹⁸ Encountering of naïve T cells with antigens transform them into effector (memory) T cells, in particular Th1 cells producing IFN-γ, a pro-atherogenic cytokine.¹⁸ In addition to macrophages, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6 are secreted by other immune cells like mast cells and neutrophils.¹⁹ These inflammatory mediators with possible proangiogenic characteristics²⁰ upregulate the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on endothelial cells.¹⁹ Increasing local concentration of inflammatory mediators recruit further immune cells to the region, and totally, lead to the set-up of a chronic inflammation with accumulation of dead cells.¹⁸ Immune cells also release matrix metalloproteinases that degrade extracellular matrix (ECM), and then promote reconstruction and neoangiogenesis of the ECM which results in the shift of protein content in the ECM during atherosclerosis progression.^21–23

However, expression of strong anti-inflammatory cytokines besides appearance of antibody responses by B cells have significant impacts on the counterbalancing of the atherosclerotic-related immune reactions.² For instance, interleukin 10 and TGF-β tightly control T cell responses as the absence of these two cytokines augments the progress of atherosclerosis.² Due to the profound involvement of the immune system in atherosclerosis, some studies proposed targeting immune components as a strategy to slow down the rate of plaque formation. Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-1β, decreased the rate of recurrent cardiovascular events by targeting overactive immune system without lowering serum lipid level.²⁴ However, different components of the immune system play contradictory roles in relation to atherosclerosis progression (Figures 2 and 3). Moreover, restrain of the immune system substantially decreases natural defense mechanisms against pathogenic invaders increasing the risk of fatal infections.²⁵

Figure 2.

Components of the immune system that promote atherosclerosis. NKT cells, Natural killer T cells; IL-1, Interleukin 1; IL-4, Interleukin 4; IL-10, Interleukin 10; IL-12, Interleukin 12; IL-18, Interleukin 18; IFN-γ, Interferon gamma; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Th1, T helper 1 cells; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; ILC-1, Innate lymphoid cells 1; ILC-3, Innate lymphoid cells 3.

Figure 3.

Components of the immune system that inhibit atherosclerosis. Treg, T regulatory cells; IL-10, Interleukin 10; TGF-β, Transforming growth factor beta; IgM, Immunoglobulin M; OxLDL, Oxidized low-density lipoprotein; CD103+ Dendritic cells, Cluster of differentiation 113 positive dendritic cells.

Immune cells in the atherosclerotic plaque

Almost all of the innate and adaptive immune cells are implicated in the atherosclerosis process.^26,27 Macrophages are dominant in number, and other cells such as mast cells, T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes are found in the atherosclerotic lesions.^27,28 Intriguingly, localization of these cells throughout the plaque may vary, and some of them are accumulated more in certain areas. For instance, macrophages, mast cells, and T cells are mostly seen in the shoulder regions of the atherosclerotic plaque.^29–31 Here, we discuss the functions of impactful immune cells in relation to the formation and development of atherosclerosis according to their importance in this process.

Macrophages

Circulating monocytes and consequently, macrophages are the first immune cells appeared in the atherosclerotic lesion.³² Both monocytes and macrophages are involved in different stages of the atherosclerotic process including plaque formation, progression, and rupture.²⁶ Number of circulating monocytes and number of macrophages in the plaque are closely related.³³ Interestingly, type of receptors on circulating monocytes is associated to the size of the plaque. While TLR-2 is expressed more in patients with larger plaques, CD14, TLR-4, and myeloperoxidase are dominant in patients with smaller plaques.³⁴ This difference in receptor expression may demonstrate the involvement of different types of macrophages in different stages of plaque development.³⁴ Moreover, it was shown that monocytes with osteogenic markers are highly associated with atherosclerosis.³⁵ This may explain calcium deposition in the atherosclerotic plaques and vascular calcification in the coronary arteries of such patients.³⁶ Nonetheless, there is no relation between monocytes subpopulation and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in a 3-years follow up period.³⁷ However, an association is reported between nonclassical monocytes and CAD progression. In a recent study, Slan⁺ monocytes are shown to resolve plaques due to their anti-inflammatory property. The authors concluded that this subset helps to prevent atherosclerosis progression.³⁸ There is an association between increased number of plaque macrophages and plaque development. In early stages of plaque formation, monocytes depletion results in attenuation of atherosclerosis progress though preformed plaques are not influenced by monocytes count,³⁹ showing the more complex condition in the advanced stages.²⁶

There is a direct correlation between clinical cardiovascular risk factors and the amount of infiltrated macrophages within the plaque.⁴⁰ Although symptomatic plaques are infiltrated with more macrophages in comparison to asymptomatic ones,⁴¹ marked macrophage infiltration does not necessarily translate into poor outcome. Lower risk of restenosis in 1-year follow up was reported in patients with higher content of plaque macrophages. However, this study reported the histological findings of atherosclerotic plaques obtained from carotid endarterectomy, which might be pathologically different from that of de novo atherosclerosis.⁴² Of factors that precisely predict future cardiac events are plaque neovascularization and intraplaque hemorrhage.⁴³

The sources of monocytes are hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the bone marrow. During atherosclerosis, HSPCs translocate to the spleen, and extramedullary hematopoiesis is performed to produce specific type of monocytes (lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, Ly6C^high).⁴⁴ These splenic monocytes with inflammatory properties infiltrate into the atherosclerotic lesion.⁴⁴ Hyperlipidemia and low levels of HDL accelerate HSPCs proliferation and monocytosis, totally aggravating atherosclerosis progress.⁴⁵ Hyperglycemia imposed similar effect on the monocyte count via augmenting progenitors proliferation.⁴⁶ Intriguingly, splenic migration of HSPCs and generation of monocytes in the new site are intensified after myocardial infarction (MI). This inevitably escalates atherosclerosis progress, and increases the risk of further cardiovascular events.⁴⁷ Whereas entrance of splenic monocytes to the blood stream is mediated by angiotensin II⁴⁸ and splenic B cells,⁴⁹ blocking of this entrance ameliorates the MI adverse consequences.⁴⁸

Macrophages play a delicate role in orienting plaque fate. They affect growth and rupture of the plaque through either maintaining or attenuating inflammation. This is done via secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and burying dead cells by efferocytosis process.²⁶ Based on promotion or inhibition of inflammation, macrophages are classified into M1 and M2 types, respectively.⁵⁰ Some factors determine the macrophage polarization. Anatomical site of the plaque, carotid or femoral, affects M1/M2 proportion, with the former site contains higher M1.⁵¹ M1 polarization strongly activates inflammatory pathways within the plaques.⁵² Polarization state and macrophage phenotype are also influenced by a plethora of cytokines and growth factors in the atherosclerotic lesions.⁵³ However, categorization of macrophages into M1 and M2, and relating this classification to the atherosclerosis progress is not as simple as it seems because both types are tightly involved in lesion development.⁵⁴

In the microenvironment of human plaque, lesional macrophages possess specialized functions that are not only explained by M1 and M2 phenotypes.⁵⁵ A variety of macrophage populations with diverse functions are associated to the atherosclerosis.⁵⁶ Depending on the activation stimuli received by M2 macrophages, they undergo phenotypic changes to generate several subclasses including M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d.⁵⁷ M2a is emerged after stimulation by IL-4 and IL-13, and secrete pro-fibrotic factors involved in tissue repair. M2a types are known as wound-healing macrophages.^58–62 However, M2b macrophages, which are induced by IL-1β or LPS, are known for simultaneous production of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines.⁶³ M2c macrophages are induced upon exposure to IL-10 and glucocorticoids, and together with M2b phenotypes are called regulatory macrophages.⁶⁴ The characteristics of M2d macrophages are releasing high levels of IL-10 and vascular endothelial growth factor besides low level of TNF and IL-12.^65,66

Furthermore, there are other macrophage phenotypes that are plaque specific such as Mox, Mhem, and M4.⁵⁷ CXCL4 and oxLDL induce emergence of M4 and Mox macrophages, respectively. Both of them have atherogenic properties. After intraplaque hemorrhage and hemoglobin release which especially occurs in advanced lesions, another subtype called M (Hb) or Mhem is produced.⁶⁷ It is noteworthy that each phenotypic subset has a distinctive function in the course of atherosclerosis development.

Ly6C^high monocytes contribute greatly to the generation of local macrophages.⁶⁸ Existence of proliferating macrophages is also evident in the atherosclerotic lesions.^69,70 oxLDL propels macrophage proliferation, too.^71,72 In advanced lesions, the frequency of macrophages (up to 87%) is mainly determined by local proliferation.^73,74 Contrary findings showed that the rate of proliferation is higher in the early lesions.⁷⁵ In addition to the macrophages, proliferation of monocytes could occur locally at the lesion site.⁷⁶ Maturation of the macrophages and monocytes results in acquisition of phagocytic property. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) provokes differentiation of monocytes to macrophages in the endothelial layer. Upon formation of macrophages, their scavenger receptors mediate oxLDL internalization.⁷⁷ Macropinocytosis and TLRs-mediated signals are involved in this process.⁷⁸ Ingestion of LDL particles by the macrophages results in the accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets. Meanwhile, cholesterol esters form a foamy shaped cell symbolized as the dawning of the atherosclerosis. Thereafter, fatty streaks, which are the typical histological finding of atherogenesis, emerged.⁷⁹ Recent studies revealed the possibility of lipid loading by circulating monocytes as well. They can also acquire a foamy phenotype, and infiltrate into the atherosclerotic lesion.⁸⁰ This emphasizes the high concentration of serum monocytes as a risk factor for atherosclerosis development.⁸¹ Notably, it is not clear that which comes first to the plaque site, circulating monocytes or LDL particles. Possibly, both players enter to the subendothelial layer in parallel.⁸²

Cholesterol loading and transdifferentiation to macrophage-like cells may also be performed by SMCs.⁸³ Therefore, about 50% of the foam cells are reported to have SMC origin.⁸⁴ However, function and transcriptional profile of SMCs-derived foam cells are different compared with those originated from macrophages. The former has reduced potential of phagocytosis and efferocytosis.^85–87 Interestingly, cholesterol unloading reverses the foamy phenotype to their original SMC.²⁶

Mast cells

Mast cells have been historically identified in the atherosclerotic lesions.⁸⁸ They are present in the adventitial layer of the artery, and are implicated in almost all of the steps from early to the late stages of atherosclerosis, with their counts increasing with lesion development.¹⁹ Mast cells recruit neutrophils and circulating leukocytes to the plaque site. So, they contribute to the initiation of the plaque growth and mounting of the inflammatory responses.¹⁹ This recruitment is performed following secretion of attractant chemokines like TNF-α and neutral proteases from activated mast cells. Mast cells are also involved in adhesion to the activated endothelial cells followed by transendothelial migration.¹⁹ In fact, activated mast cells stimulate endothelial cells to express adhesion molecules.^89,90 Indeed, mast cells secrete tryptase, which disrupts endothelial integrity impairing its barrier function.¹⁹ LDL particles may be emerged after tryptase-induced degradation of the endothelium.⁹¹ Chymase is the other enzyme that is secreted by the mast cells. It inhibits efflux of the cholesterol from the plaque back to the circulation, and may also decrease anti-inflammatory properties of HDL.^92,93

Histamine is another important product of the mast cells. It increases microvascular permeability particularly in the venous side of the vessels through activation of endothelial histamine H1 receptor facilitating entrance of more LDL particles into the intima. This effect intensifies the progress of atherosclerosis.^94,95 While histamine and leukotrienes of the mast cells are atherogenic,^89,96 mast cell-derived heparin is likely to limit the growth of thrombus.¹⁹ Pro-inflammatory cytokines with atherogenic characteristics such as IL-6 and IFN-γ are also secreted by the mast cells.⁹⁷ In contrary to heparin and tryptase, histamine is not a specific product of the mast cells, and is also synthesized by the endothelial cells.⁸⁹

Plaque growth is largely influenced by the proliferation of SMCs and deposition of extracellular matrix. Contribution of mast cells to the proliferation of pulmonary SMCs was carried out through secretion of mitogenic factors.⁹⁸ However, there is no data about such mast cell-derived effect on arterial SMCs.¹⁹ Secretion of growth-limiting factors by the endothelial cells is attenuated upon endothelial erosion.^99,100 This endothelial erosion that is supported by the mast cells probably provide the opportunity for the growth of subendothelial SMC.^101,102

Neutral proteases and histamine release of the mast cells cause apoptosis of the macrophages within the lesion.¹⁰³ Apoptotic area is mainly located at the center of the plaque. When mast cells are activated locally, apoptotic cells are increased leading to the growth of apoptotic core and stabilization of the plaque.¹⁹ In an opposing role, mast cells induce impairment and apoptosis of SMCs which result in weakening and rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque.¹⁰⁴ For instance, chymase degrades fibronectin leading to SMCs apoptosis. Fibronectin is a precellular component of matrix which is necessary for adhesion of SMCs and survival signaling.¹⁰⁵

Growing of the atherosclerotic plaque which is accompanied with narrowing of the lumen cause turbulence of the blood flow. Turbulence-induced stress makes endothelial cells dysfunctional, and even detach. Local mast cells may be activated on this occasion, and secret tryptase and chymase. These enzymes disintegrate the basement membrane aggravating separation of the endothelial cells.¹⁰⁰ TNF-α is released from the activated mast cells, and deteriorates survival signaling of the endothelial cells smoothing their apoptosis.⁹⁹ Also, circulating neutrophils which are recruited to the injured area through the effect of mast cell-derived IL-8 may contribute to the endothelial erosion.^106,107 Activated mast cells besides activated neutrophils drive degradation and rupture of the plaque cap, from both abluminal and luminal sides, respectively.⁸⁹

Dendritic cells

Different types of dendritic cells (DCs) are perceived as important players in all stages of the atherosclerosis process. These cells have crucial roles in lipid uptake and lipid metabolism, and are considered as important mediators in early accumulation of lesional lipid.¹⁰⁸ In vivo studies demonstrated the induction of DC maturation by cholesterol crystals, inflammatory cytokines, and necrotic cells-derived nucleic acids in the atherosclerotic plaques. There is a strong link between DC maturation and atherosclerosis as DC maturation has two effects; secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activation of T cells.^109,110 CD103⁺ DCs are known as tolerogenic DCs that induce the development of T regulatory cells (Tregs). Tregs suppress activation of endothelial cells¹¹¹ and macrophages via secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10^112,113 leading to atheroprotection. In contrast, CCL17⁺ DCs are known as suppressors of Treg development since they act on CCR4, and promote apoptosis of the Tregs.¹¹⁴ Plasmocytoid DCs (pDCs) have been detected in the shoulder regions of the atherosclerotic plaques,¹¹⁵ and they are one of the sources of IFN-α and IFN-β, which demonstrate pro-atherogenic functions.¹¹⁶ Both immature classical DCs and CD103⁺ DCs are potent efferocytes. Secondary cellular necrosis, which occurs in those apoptotic cells that were not ingested by the phagocytes, is considered as a pro-atherosclerotic process which is prevented by DC efferocytosis.¹¹⁷ Also, DC mediated efferocytosis of lipid-laden apoptotic foam cells is an important mechanism for eliminating cholesterol, oxidized lipids, and other pro-inflammatory DAMPs.^118–121

T lymphocytes

T lymphocytes, in particular Th cells (CD4⁺ T cells), infiltrate into the plaque and recognize protein antigens of oxLDLs, heat-shock proteins, and proteins of the pathogens like Chlamydia species.^122–124 After activation, Th cells release IFN-γ, which in turn activates macrophages. In particular, Th1 cells enhance antigen presentation as well as help to synthesize cytokines such as TNF and interleukin 1.¹²⁵ In advanced atherosclerotic lesion, a large number of T cells, especially Th1, are present. This subtype, which is stimulated by IL-18 and IL-12, accelerates atherosclerosis. However, there are debates regarding the role of Th2 cells in the atherosclerosis development.⁷⁷ It seems that during atherosclerosis, Th1 response rather than Th2 is emerged due to signaling of certain cytokines within the plaque.^126,127 Although it was reported that Th2 response may have antiatherosclerotic effect in some studies,¹²⁸ it imposes some unfavorable outcomes as well,² such as formation of aneurysms which is induced via Th2 pathway.¹²⁹

Cytotoxic T cells (CD8⁺ T cells),¹³⁰ Natural Killer T (NKT) cells,¹ NK cells¹³⁰ and γδ-T cells¹³¹ are among the most important types of killer cells. Coronary plaques with few SMCs and large amount of lymphocytes have thin and vulnerable fibrous cap. The killer lymphocytes induce cell apoptosis in the lesions through different approaches like cytotoxin-, FasL/TRAIL- and/or cytokine-dependent mechanisms¹³² that ultimately terminates in plaque rupture and sudden death.¹³³ Along with CD4⁺ T cells, killer lymphocytes are all implicated in the atherosclerosis process. They are copious in the unstable plaques reinforcing their role in plaque rupture as well as their involvement in the initial development of atherosclerosis.¹³²

Killer cells could also be categorized into innate or adaptive ones based on the type of activation.¹³² Nonetheless, cytotoxic potential of both types causes cell death resulting in plaque rupture. However, time and mechanism of their implication to form vulnerable plaques are poorly understood. Also, it is yet unclear whether they are atherogenic per se or their atherogenicity is derived indirectly from interaction with other cell types.¹³²

NKT cells are in fact lipid-sensing cells.¹⁸ They secret pro-atherogenic cytokines and cytotoxins.¹⁸ Unique T cell receptors (TCRs) along with common surface markers as with NK cells are expressed by NKT cells.¹⁸ iNKT cells have roles in the initiation and development of atherosclerotic lesions. The effects of NKT cells in atherosclerosis are delivered in the form of secretion of certain cytokines like IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 supplemented by cytotoxic potential of NKT cells after activation. Also, these cells affect the stability of the lesions by secretion of granzyme B and perforin, which are both involved in the formation of necrotic core.¹⁸ In contrary, natural and induced regulatory T cells are known as atheroprotective T cells because they diminish inflammatory responses or deactivate dendritic cells.¹³⁴

B lymphocytes

B cells in the lesions, although rare in quantity, show antiatherosclerotic activity possibly due to the production of cytokines and antibodies against plaque antigens as well as binding of antibodies to Fc receptors. Antibodies of splenic B cells recognize phosphorylcholine molecule in oxLDLs and apoptotic cell membranes. Therefore, they effectively inhibit atherosclerosis through excluding oxLDLs from further involvement in the atherosclerotic process.^135,136 The notion of atheroprotectivity of B cells originates from studies in which atherosclerosis is exacerbated after complete or splenic B cell deficiency.^135,137,138

Although secretion of antibodies by B cells, as a fundamental part of humoral immunity, has an atheroprotective effect, different types of B cells (B1 and B2) are not similar regarding the effect on the atherosclerosis development. B1 cells produce IgM antibodies and possess an atheroprotective function through omitting oxLDLs from the environment¹³⁹ while B2 cell secret IgG and IgE which promote atherosclerosis.⁷⁷ However, there are controversies in this regard. Low circulating IgM levels are associated with extensive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. Intriguingly, the relationship between IgG levels and atherosclerosis development could have been inverse, direct, or neutral.¹⁴⁰ Also, it was shown that severity of CAD and coronary events are increased in the case of elevated serum IgE.¹⁴¹ In addition to the humoral immune responses, B cells are also involved in atherosclerosis in the form of cellular immunity. This involvement is a complex interaction between T and B cells that include, but not limited to, regulation of T cell activation via antigen presentation, cytokine production, and co-stimulation.²⁷

Secondary lymphoid organs are involved in the atherosclerosis-related immune responses by the intermediary of B cells.²⁷ Although number of B cells in the atherosclerotic plaques are few, they are abundant in artery tertiary lymphoid organs.¹⁴² These are aggregations of B cells, T cells, and plasma cells in the adventitia layer of advanced atherosclerotic plaques with potential to mount local immune responses.²⁷

Innate lymphoid cells (ILC)

A recently discovered population of immune cells is known as innate lymphoid cells. They affect other cells via two main mechanisms: first, secretion of cytokines and other soluble factors, second, cytotoxic function. These cells stimulate type II immune response, and attenuate the atherosclerosis process.¹⁴³ Similar to other immune cells, innate lymphoid cells have several subtypes. Cytokines released from ILC-1 and ILC-3 subtypes are involved in the progression of atherosclerosis.¹⁴³

Platelets and neutrophils

Activated platelets release certain chemokines such as CCL5 that causes recruitment of neutrophils to the atherosclerotic lesions through CCR1 and CCR5.¹⁴⁴ Neutrophils secrete granule proteins like azurocidin, cathepsin G, and α-defensins. They are involved in activating macrophages and recruiting monocytes to the injured site. Totally, these movements promote formation of the foam cells.¹⁴⁴ In the conditions of chronic inflammation like atherosclerosis, destructing function of the neutrophils may divert from foreign cells toward self-cells, which might lead to the vascular injury.¹⁴⁵ However, type of vascular injury could be variable in different stages of the atherosclerosis progress. While in the early stages of atherosclerosis, neutrophils cause endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation, they provoke some events like plaque rupture and atherothrombosis at the late stages.¹⁴⁵ Defensins and cathelicidins are neutrophil peptides with prominent roles in the innate immunity. High concentrations of these two molecules are detectable in the atherosclerotic plaques. In fact, they are mediators of vascular disease. Defensins instigate the metabolism of vessel walls lipoprotein besides accumulation and modification of LDL and lipoprotein in the endothelium and extracellular matrix. Defensins are prothrombotic elements that interfere with the function of vascular SMCs, too and, inhibit angiogenesis as well. Cathelicidins enhance in vitro endothelial proliferation, induce angiogenesis, and regulate apoptosis of the endothelial cells.¹⁴⁶

Neutrophils paly a substantial role in the atherosclerosis by another mechanism, too. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are mesh-like projections with different constituents which are released after neutrophil activation. NETs extrusions are involved in a variety of pathological conditions including atherosclerosis and thrombosis.¹⁴⁷ NETs contain decondensed chromatin, histones, other nuclear and cellular proteins, cytoskeleton, proteases, and azurophilic granules. They also harbor some circulating elements like tissue factor, fibrin, and other similar proteins that are important in coagulation.¹⁴⁸ NETs induce oxidative stress and oxidize HDL. They cause dysfunction of the endothelial cells followed by apoptosis, totally give rise to the generation of anti-double-stranded-DNA autoantibodies.¹⁴⁷

NETs are found in the atherosclerotic lesions and arterial thrombi. They activate endothelial cells, antigen presenting cells, and platelets leading to pro-inflammatory immune reactions. Accordingly, their presence in the components of atherosclerosis process is dynamic.¹⁴⁹ NETs are capable to trigger coagulation toward formation of atherosclerotic plaques.¹⁵⁰ They contribute significantly to atherogenesis as NETs facilitate the formation of a fibrin-like structure for adhesion, activation, and aggregation of platelets. Moreover, they encourage accumulation of von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen, two prothrombotic molecules, resulting in the formation of thrombosis. They are associated to arterial and venous thrombosis which were reported in both humans and animal models.¹⁴⁷

Limitations

The present study suffers from inherent limitations subjected to the review articles including the effects of authors’ personal view, and unintentional errors in data translation from original studies in terms of mispresentation or misinterpretation. Specifically, the present review discusses major players of the immune system involved in the initiation and development of atherosclerosis. However, there are still uncovered aspects or those that are not yet discovered, which need further investigations. More importantly, the principle starter of the atherosclerosis process is still not fully elucidated. Is such a factor present at all? Is it present at the lesion site or act remotely? Is this a common factor between patients with atherosclerotic plaques? Is it feasible to target this basic factor in order to stop the growing trend of morbidity and mortality?

Conclusion

Atherosclerosis has become the affliction of human kind in the modern world. There is an essential need to have an in-depth understanding about the effectors of its initiation and development. Immune system and its components make fundamental contribution to the atherosclerosis process. They play crucial roles in different stages of the plaque progression. Elucidation of the mechanisms used by these immune cells helps to apply efficient treatment, and even preventive strategies.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Iman Razeghian-Jahromi: Conceptualization, writing the original draft, review & editing. Ali Karimi Akhormeh: Writing the original draft & review. Mohammad Javad Zibaeenezhad and Mahboobeh Razmkhah: Writing the review & editing. All authors read the manuscript critically, and approved it.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [grant number: 24943].

ORCID iD

Iman Razeghian-Jahromi

References

GBD 2016 DALYs HALE Collaborators (2017). Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet (London, England) 390: 1260–1344. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32130-x.

Hansson

(2005) Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine 352: 1685–1695. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra043430.

Yuan

Hao

Ren

, et al. (2019) Tissue factor pathway inhibitor in atherosclerosis. Clinica Chimica Acta 491: 97–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.024.

Arner

(2003) The adipocyte in insulin resistance: key molecules and the impact of the thiazolidinediones. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 14: 137–145. DOI: 10.1016/s1043-2760(03)00024-9.

Yudkin

Juhan-Vague

Hawe

, et al. (2004) Low-grade inflammation may play a role in the etiology of the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: the HIFMECH study. Metabolism 53: 852–857. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.02.004.

Leitinger

(2003) Oxidized phospholipids as modulators of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Current opinion in lipidology 14: 421–430. DOI: 10.1097/00041433-200310000-00002.

Staels

Koenig

Habib

, et al. (1998) Activation of human aortic smooth-muscle cells is inhibited by PPARalpha but not by PPARgamma activators. Nature 393: 790–793. DOI: 10.1038/31701.

Nègre-Salvayre

Augé

Camaré

, et al. (2017) Dual signaling evoked by oxidized LDLs in vascular cells. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 106: 118–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.02.006.

Hansson

(2001) Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 21: 1876–1890. DOI: 10.1161/hq1201.100220.

10.

Frantz

Ertl

Bauersachs

(2007) Mechanisms of disease: Toll-like receptors in cardiovascular disease. Nature clinical practice Cardiovascular medicine 4: 444–454. DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio0938.

11.

Falck-Hansen

Kassiteridi

Monaco

(2013) Toll-like receptors in atherosclerosis. International journal of molecular sciences 14: 14008–14023. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140714008.

12.

Kobiyama

Ley

(2018) Atherosclerosis. Circulation research 123: 1118–1120. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.313816.

13.

Khoo

Miller

McLoughlin

, et al. (1988) Enhanced macrophage uptake of low density lipoprotein after self-aggregation. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas, Tex) 8: 348–358. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.8.4.348.

14.

Khoo

Miller

Pio

, et al. (1992) Monoclonal antibodies against LDL further enhance macrophage uptake of LDL aggregates. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology 12: 1258–1266. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.12.11.1258.

15.

Miller

Choi

Wiesner

, et al. (2011) Oxidation-specific epitopes are danger-associated molecular patterns recognized by pattern recognition receptors of innate immunity. Circulation research 108: 235–248. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.110.223875.

16.

Edfeldt

Swedenborg

Hansson

, et al. (2002) Expression of toll-like receptors in human atherosclerotic lesions: a possible pathway for plaque activation. Circulation 105: 1158–1161.

17.

Doherty

Fisher

Arditi

(2006) TLR signaling and trapped vascular dendritic cells in the development of atherosclerosis. Trends in immunology 27: 222–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2006.03.006.

18.

van Puijvelde

GHM

Kuiper

(2017) NKT cells in cardiovascular diseases. European journal of pharmacology 816: 47–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.052.

19.

Kovanen

Bot

(2017) Mast cells in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-Activators and actions. European journal of pharmacology 816: 37–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.013.

20.

Sunderkötter

Goebeler

Schulze-Osthoff

, et al. (1991) Macrophage-derived angiogenesis factors. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 51: 195–216. DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(91)90077-Y.

21.

Andreuzzi

Colladel

Pellicani

, et al. (2017) The angiostatic molecule Multimerin 2 is processed by MMP-9 to allow sprouting angiogenesis. Matrix Biology 64: 40–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.04.002.

22.

Bergers

Brekken

McMahon

, et al. (2000) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nature cell biology 2: 737–744. DOI: 10.1038/35036374.

23.

Gialeli

Shami

Gonçalves

(2021) Extracellular matrix: paving the way to the newest trends in atherosclerosis. Current Opinion in Lipidology 32: 277–285.

24.

Ridker

Everett

Thuren

, et al. (2017) Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 377: 1119–1131. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914.

25.

Foks

Bot

(2017) Preface: Pathology and Pharmacology of Atherosclerosis. European journal of pharmacology 816: 1–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.052.

26.

Nagenborg

Goossens

Biessen

EAL

, et al. (2017) Heterogeneity of atherosclerotic plaque macrophage origin, phenotype and functions: Implications for treatment. European journal of pharmacology 816: 14–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.10.005.

27.

Nus

Tsiantoulas

Mallat

(2017) Plan B (-cell) in atherosclerosis. European journal of pharmacology 816: 76–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.09.002.

28.

Gil-Pulido

Zernecke

(2017) Antigen-presenting dendritic cells in atherosclerosis. European journal of pharmacology 816: 25–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.016.

29.

Stary

Chandler

Dinsmore

, et al. (1995) A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 92: 1355–1374. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1355.

30.

Jonasson

Holm

Skalli

, et al. (1986) Regional accumulations of T cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas, Tex) 6: 131–138. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.6.2.131.

31.

Kovanen

Kaartinen

Paavonen

(1995) Infiltrates of activated mast cells at the site of coronary atheromatous erosion or rupture in myocardial infarction. Circulation 92: 1084–1088. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1084.

32.

Camici

Rimoldi

Gaemperli

, et al. (2012) Non-invasive anatomic and functional imaging of vascular inflammation and unstable plaque. European heart journal 33: 1309–1317. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs067.

33.

Combadière

Potteaux

Rodero

, et al. (2008) Combined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 abrogates Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo) monocytosis and almost abolishes atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Circulation 117: 1649–1657. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.745091.

34.

Matijevic

Howard

, et al. (2011) Association of blood monocyte and platelet markers with carotid artery characteristics: the atherosclerosis risk in communities carotid MRI study. Cerebrovascular Diseases 31: 552–558. DOI: 10.1159/000324389.

35.

Collin

Gössl

Matsuo

, et al. (2015) Osteogenic monocytes within the coronary circulation and their association with plaque vulnerability in patients with early atherosclerosis. International journal of cardiology 181: 57–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.156.

36.

Fadini

Albiero

Menegazzo

, et al. (2011) Widespread increase in myeloid calcifying cells contributes to ectopic vascular calcification in type 2 diabetes. Circulation research 108: 1112–1121. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.110.234088.

37.

Meeuwsen

JAL

de Vries

van Duijvenvoorde

, et al. (2019) Circulating CD14+CD16− classical monocytes do not associate with a vulnerable plaque phenotype, and do not predict secondary events in severe atherosclerotic patients. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 127: 260–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.01.002.

38.

Hamers

Dinh

Thomas

, et al. (2019) Human Monocyte Heterogeneity as Revealed by High-Dimensional Mass Cytometry. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 39: 25–36.

39.

Stoneman

Braganza

Figg

, et al. (2007) Monocyte/macrophage suppression in CD11b diphtheria toxin receptor transgenic mice differentially affects atherogenesis and established plaques. Circulation research 100: 884–893. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.0000260802.75766.00.

40.

Howard

van Lammeren

Rothwell

, et al. (2015) Symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease: correlations between plaque composition and ipsilateral stroke risk. Stroke 46: 182–189. DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007221.

41.

Gaemperli

Shalhoub

Owen

, et al. (2012) Imaging intraplaque inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography/computed tomography. European heart journal 33: 1902–1910. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr367.

42.

Hellings

Moll

De Vries

, et al. (2008) Atherosclerotic plaque composition and occurrence of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Jama 299: 547–554. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.5.547.

43.

Hellings

Peeters

Moll

, et al. (2010) Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation 121: 1941–1950. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.887497.

44.

Robbins

Chudnovskiy

Rauch

, et al. (2012) Extramedullary hematopoiesis generates Ly-6C(high) monocytes that infiltrate atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation 125: 364–374. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.111.061986.

45.

Tolani

Pagler

Murphy

, et al. (2013) Hypercholesterolemia and reduced HDL-C promote hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and monocytosis: studies in mice and FH children. Atherosclerosis 229: 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.031.

46.

Nagareddy

Murphy

Stirzaker

, et al. (2013) Hyperglycemia promotes myelopoiesis and impairs the resolution of atherosclerosis. Cell Metabolism 17: 695–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.001.

47.

Dutta

Courties

Wei

, et al. (2012) Myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature 487: 325–329. DOI: 10.1038/nature11260.

48.

Leuschner

Panizzi

Chico-Calero

, et al. (2010) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition prevents the release of monocytes from their splenic reservoir in mice with myocardial infarction. Circulation research 107: 1364–1373. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.110.227454.

49.

Mellak

Ait-Oufella

Esposito

, et al. (2015) Angiotensin II mobilizes spleen monocytes to promote the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Apoe-/-mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35: 378–388. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.114.304389.

50.

Roma-Lavisse

Tagzirt

Zawadzki

, et al. (2015) M1 and M2 macrophage proteolytic and angiogenic profile analysis in atherosclerotic patients reveals a distinctive profile in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes & vascular disease research 12: 279–289. DOI: 10.1177/1479164115582351.

51.

Shaikh

Brittenden

Lahiri

, et al. (2012) Macrophage subtypes in symptomatic carotid artery and femoral artery plaques. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 44: 491–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.08.005.

52.

Brand

Page

Rogler

, et al. (1996) Activated transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B is present in the atherosclerotic lesion. Journal of Clinical Investigation 97: 1715–1722. DOI: 10.1172/jci118598.

53.

Wolfs

Donners

de Winther

(2011) Differentiation factors and cytokines in the atherosclerotic plaque micro-environment as a trigger for macrophage polarisation. Thrombosis and haemostasis 106: 763–771. DOI: 10.1160/th11-05-0320.

54.

van Dijk

Rijs

Wezel

, et al. (2016) Systematic evaluation of the cellular innate immune response during the process of human atherosclerosis. Journal of the American Heart Association 5: e002860. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.115.002860.

55.

Fernandez

Rahman

Fernandez

, et al. (2019) Single-cell immune landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques. Nature Medicine 25: 1576–1588.

56.

Cochain

Vafadarnejad

Arampatzi

, et al. (2018) Single-Cell RNA-Seq reveals the transcriptional landscape and heterogeneity of aortic macrophages in murine atherosclerosis. Circulation Research 122: 1661–1674.

57.

Colin

Chinetti-Gbaguidi

Staels

(2014) Macrophage phenotypes in atherosclerosis. Immunological Reviews 262: 153–166.

58.

Jetten

Verbruggen

Gijbels

, et al. (2014) Anti-inflammatory M2, but not pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages promote angiogenesis in vivo. Angiogenesis 17: 109–118.

59.

Lee

Homer

Zhu

, et al. (2001) Interleukin-13 Induces Tissue Fibrosis by Selectively Stimulating and Activating Transforming Growth Factor β1. Journal of Experimental Medicine 194: 809–822.

60.

Sierra-Filardi

Vega

Sánchez-Mateos

, et al. (2010) Heme Oxygenase-1 expression in M-CSF-polarized M2 macrophages contributes to LPS-induced IL-10 release. Immunobiology 215: 788–795.

61.

Spencer

Yao-Borengasser

Unal

, et al. (2010) Adipose tissue macrophages in insulin-resistant subjects are associated with collagen VI and fibrosis and demonstrate alternative activation. The American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 299:E1016-E1027.

62.

Delavary

van der Veer

van Egmond

, et al. (2011) Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology 216: 753–762.

63.

DMJJolb

(2003). The many faces of macrophage activation 73: 209–212.

64.

Mosser

Edwards

(2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Reviews Immunology 8: 958–969.

65.

Grinberg

Hasko

, et al. (2009) Suppression of PLCβ2 by Endotoxin Plays a Role in the Adenosine A2A Receptor-Mediated Switch of Macrophages from an Inflammatory to an Angiogenic Phenotype. The American Journal of Pathology 175: 2439–2453.

66.

Ferrante

Pinhal-Enfield

Elson

, et al. (2013) The Adenosine-Dependent Angiogenic Switch of Macrophages to an M2-Like Phenotype is Independent of Interleukin-4 Receptor Alpha (IL-4Rα) Signaling. Inflammation 36: 921–931.

67.

Jinnouchi

Guo

Sakamoto

, et al. (2020) Diversity of macrophage phenotypes and responses in atherosclerosis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 77: 1919–1932.

68.

Moroni

Ammirati

Norata

, et al. (2019) The Role of Monocytes and Macrophages in Human Atherosclerosis, Plaque Neoangiogenesis, and Atherothrombosis. Mediators of inflammation 2019: 7434376. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7434376.

69.

Rekhter

Gordon

(1995) Active proliferation of different cell types, including lymphocytes, in human atherosclerotic plaques. The American journal of pathology 147: 668–677.

70.

Rosenfeld

Ross

(1990) Macrophage and smooth muscle cell proliferation in atherosclerotic lesions of WHHL and comparably hypercholesterolemic fat-fed rabbits. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas, Tex) 10: 680–687. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.10.5.680.

71.

Hamilton

Myers

Jessup

, et al. (1999) Oxidized LDL can induce macrophage survival, DNA synthesis, and enhanced proliferative response to CSF-1 and GM-CSF. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 19: 98–105. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.19.1.98.

72.

Martens

Reiner

Herrera-Velit

, et al. (1998) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is involved in the induction of macrophage growth by oxidized low density lipoprotein. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 4915–4920. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.9.4915.

73.

Guo

de Waard

Van Eck

, et al. (2005) Repopulation of apolipoprotein E knockout mice with CCR2-deficient bone marrow progenitor cells does not inhibit ongoing atherosclerotic lesion development. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 25: 1014–1019. 2005/03/19. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000163181.40896.42.

74.

Robbins

Hilgendorf

Weber

, et al. (2013) Local proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nature medicine 19: 1166–1172. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3258.

75.

Lhoták

Gabriel Gyulay

Cutz

, et al. (2016) Characterization of Proliferating Lesion-Resident Cells During All Stages of Atherosclerotic Growth. Journal of the American Heart Association 5: e003945. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.003945.

76.

Gordon

Reidy

Benditt

, et al. (1990) Cell proliferation in human coronary arteries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87: 4600–4604. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4600.

77.

Moriya

(2019) Critical roles of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Journal of cardiology 73: 22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.05.010.

78.

Kruth

Jones

Huang

, et al. (2005) Macropinocytosis is the endocytic pathway that mediates macrophage foam cell formation with native low density lipoprotein. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 2352–2360. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M407167200.

79.

Stary

Chandler

Glagov

, et al. (1994) A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 89: 2462–2478. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2462.

80.

Dai Perrard

Perrard

, et al. (2015) Foamy monocytes form early and contribute to nascent atherosclerosis in mice with hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35: 1787–1797. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.115.305609.

81.

Yamamoto

Sugiyama

Hirata

, et al. (2016) Prognostic significance of circulating leukocyte subtype counts in patients with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 255: 210–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.033.

82.

Geng

Kodama

Hansson

(1994) Differential expression of scavenger receptor isoforms during monocyte-macrophage differentiation and foam cell formation. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology 14: 798–806. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.14.5.798.

83.

Rong

Shapiro

Trogan

, et al. (2003) Transdifferentiation of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells to a macrophage-like state after cholesterol loading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 13531–13536. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1735526100.

84.

Allahverdian

Chehroudi

McManus

, et al. (2014) Contribution of intimal smooth muscle cells to cholesterol accumulation and macrophage-like cells in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 129: 1551–1559. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.005015.

85.

Feil

Fehrenbacher

Lukowski

, et al. (2014) Transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to macrophage-like cells during atherogenesis. Circulation research 115: 662–667. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.115.304634.

86.

Shankman

Gomez

Cherepanova

, et al. (2015) KLF4-dependent phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells has a key role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis. Nature medicine 21: 628–637. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3866.

87.

Vengrenyuk

Nishi

Long

, et al. (2015) Cholesterol loading reprograms the microRNA-143/145-myocardin axis to convert aortic smooth muscle cells to a dysfunctional macrophage-like phenotype. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35: 535–546. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.114.304029.

88.

Cairns

Constantinides

(1954) Mast cells in human atherosclerosis. Science (New York, NY) 120: 31–32. DOI: 10.1126/science.120.3105.31.

89.

Kovanen

(2019) Mast Cells as Potential Accelerators of Human Atherosclerosis-From Early to Late Lesions. International journal of molecular sciences 20: 4479. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20184479.

90.

Mukai

Tsai

Saito

, et al. (2018) Mast cells as sources of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Immunological reviews 282: 121–150.

91.

Itoh

Sendo

Oishi

(2005) Physiology and pathophysiology of proteinase-activated receptors (PARs): role of tryptase/PAR-2 in vascular endothelial barrier function. Journal of pharmacological sciences 97: 14–19. DOI: 10.1254/jphs.fmj04005x3.

92.

Lee-Rueckert

Kovanen

(2015) The mast cell as a pluripotent HDL-modifying effector in atherogenesis: from in vitro to in vivo significance. Current opinion in lipidology 26: 362–368. DOI: 10.1097/mol.0000000000000224.

93.

Nguyen

Maaninka

Lappalainen

, et al. (2016) Carboxyl-Terminal Cleavage of Apolipoprotein A-I by Human Mast Cell Chymase Impairs Its Anti-Inflammatory Properties. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 36: 274–284. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.115.306827.

94.

Majno

Palade

Schoefl

(1961) Studies on inflammation. II. The site of action of histamine and serotonin along the vascular tree: a topographic study. The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology 11: 607–626. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.607.

95.

Rozenberg

Sluka

Rohrer

, et al. (2010) Histamine H1 receptor promotes atherosclerotic lesion formation by increasing vascular permeability for low-density lipoproteins. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 30: 923–930. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.109.201079.

96.

Libby

Ridker

Hansson

(2009) Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54: 2129–2138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.009.

97.

Sun

Sukhova

Wolters

, et al. (2007) Mast cells promote atherosclerosis by releasing proinflammatory cytokines. Nature medicine 13: 719–724. DOI: 10.1038/nm1601.

98.

Bara

Ozier

Tunon de Lara

, et al. (2010) Pathophysiology of bronchial smooth muscle remodelling in asthma. European Respiratory Journal 36: 1174–1184. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00019810.

99.

Lätti

Leskinen

Shiota

, et al. (2003) Mast cell-mediated apoptosis of endothelial cells in vitro: a paracrine mechanism involving TNF-alpha-mediated down-regulation of bcl-2 expression. Journal of cellular physiology 195: 130–138. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10235.

100.

Mäyränpää

Heikkilä

Lindstedt

, et al. (2006) Desquamation of human coronary artery endothelium by human mast cell proteases: implications for plaque erosion. Coronary artery disease 17: 611–621. DOI: 10.1097/01.mca.0000224420.67304.4d.

101.

Ross

Glomset

Harker

(1977) Response to injury and atherogenesis. The American journal of pathology 86: 675–684.

102.

Hansson

Libby

Tabas

(2015) Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. Journal of internal medicine 278: 483–493. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12406.

103.

Bot

de Jager

Zernecke

, et al. (2007) Perivascular mast cells promote atherogenesis and induce plaque destabilization in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation 115: 2516–2525. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.660472.

104.

Leskinen

Kovanen

Lindstedt

(2003) Regulation of smooth muscle cell growth, function and death in vitro by activated mast cells–a potential mechanism for the weakening and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Biochemical pharmacology 66: 1493–1498. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00503-3.

105.

Leskinen

Lindstedt

Wang

, et al. (2003) Mast cell chymase induces smooth muscle cell apoptosis by a mechanism involving fibronectin degradation and disruption of focal adhesions. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 23: 238–243. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000051405.68811.4d.

106.

Libby

Pasterkamp

Crea

, et al. (2019) Reassessing the Mechanisms of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation research 124: 150–160. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.311098.

107.

Wezel

Lagraauw

van der Velden

, et al. (2015) Mast cells mediate neutrophil recruitment during atherosclerotic plaque progression. Atherosclerosis 241: 289–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.028.

108.

Subramanian

Tabas

(2014). Dendritic cells in atherosclerosis. In: Seminars in Immunopathology. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. pp.93–102.

109.

Yilmaz

Lochno

Traeg

, et al. (2004) Emergence of dendritic cells in rupture-prone regions of vulnerable carotid plaques. Atherosclerosis 176: 101–110.

110.

Hermansson

GKH

(2011) A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol 12: 204–212.

111.

Maganto-García

D-x

Tarrio

, et al. (2011) Foxp3+-inducible regulatory T cells suppress endothelial activation and leukocyte recruitment. The Journal of Immunology 187: 3521–3529.

112.

Robertson

A-KL

Rudling

Zhou

, et al. (2003) Disruption of TGF-β signaling in T cells accelerates atherosclerosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 112: 1342–1350.

113.

Subramanian

Thorp

Hansson

, et al. (2013) Treg-mediated suppression of atherosclerosis requires MYD88 signaling in DCs. Journal of Clinical Investigation 123: 179–188.

114.

Weber

Meiler

Döring

, et al. (2011) CCL17-expressing dendritic cells drive atherosclerosis by restraining regulatory T cell homeostasis in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 121: 2898–2910.

115.

Niessner

Sato

Chaikof

, et al. (2006) Pathogen-sensing plasmacytoid dendritic cells stimulate cytotoxic T-cell function in the atherosclerotic plaque through interferon-α. Circulation 114: 2482–2489.

116.

Goossens

Gijbels

Zernecke

, et al. (2010) Myeloid type I interferon signaling promotes atherosclerosis by stimulating macrophage recruitment to lesions. Cell Metabolism 12: 142–153.

117.

Tabas

(2010) Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews Immunology 10: 36–46.

118.

Thorp

Cui

Schrijvers

, et al. (2008) Mertk receptor mutation reduces efferocytosis efficiency and promotes apoptotic cell accumulation and plaque necrosis in atherosclerotic lesions of apoe−/− mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 28: 1421–1428.

119.

Ait-Oufella

Pouresmail

Simon

, et al. (2008) Defective mer receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in bone marrow cells promotes apoptotic cell accumulation and accelerates atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 28: 1429–1431.

120.

Yancey

Blakemore

Ding

, et al. (2010) Macrophage LRP-1 controls plaque cellularity by regulating efferocytosis and Akt activation. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 30: 787–795.

121.

Ait-Oufella

Kinugawa

Zoll

, et al. (2007) Lactadherin deficiency leads to apoptotic cell accumulation and accelerated atherosclerosis in mice. Circulation 115: 2168–2177.

122.

(2002) Role of heat shock proteins in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 22: 1547–1559. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000029720.59649.50.

123.

Stemme

Faber

Holm

, et al. (1995) T lymphocytes from human atherosclerotic plaques recognize oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92: 3893–3897. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3893.

124.

de Boer

van der Wal

Houtkamp

, et al. (2000) Unstable atherosclerotic plaques contain T-cells that respond to Chlamydia pneumoniae. Cardiovascular research 48: 402–408. DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00195-4.

125.

Szabo

Sullivan

Peng

, et al. (2003) Molecular mechanisms regulating Th1 immune responses. Annual review of immunology 21: 713–758. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.140942.

126.

Frostegård

Ulfgren

Nyberg

, et al. (1999) Cytokine expression in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques: dominance of pro-inflammatory (Th1) and macrophage-stimulating cytokines. Atherosclerosis 145: 33–43. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00011-8.

127.

Uyemura

Demer

Castle

, et al. (1996) Cross-regulatory roles of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-10 in atherosclerosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 97: 2130–2138. DOI: 10.1172/jci118650.

128.

Binder

Hartvigsen

Chang

, et al. (2004) IL-5 links adaptive and natural immunity specific for epitopes of oxidized LDL and protects from atherosclerosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 114: 427–437. DOI: 10.1172/jci20479.

129.

Shimizu

Shichiri

Libby

, et al. (2004) Th2-predominant inflammation and blockade of IFN-gamma signaling induce aneurysms in allografted aortas. Journal of Clinical Investigation 114: 300–308. DOI: 10.1172/jci19855.

130.

Konjar

Sutton

Hoves

, et al. (2010) Human and mouse perforin are processed in part through cleavage by the lysosomal cysteine proteinase cathepsin L. Immunology 131: 257–267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03299.x.

131.

Holderness

Hedges

Ramstead

, et al. (2013) Comparative biology of γδ T cell function in humans, mice, and domestic animals. Annual review of animal biosciences 1: 99–124. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103639.

132.

Kyaw

Tipping

Toh

, et al. (2017) Killer cells in atherosclerosis. European journal of pharmacology 816: 67–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.05.009.

133.

Burke

Farb

Malcom

, et al. (1997) Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. New England Journal of Medicine 336: 1276–1282. DOI: 10.1056/nejm199705013361802.

134.

Ait-Oufella

Salomon

Potteaux

, et al. (2006) Natural regulatory T cells control the development of atherosclerosis in mice. Nature medicine 12: 178–180. DOI: 10.1038/nm1343.

135.

Caligiuri

Nicoletti

Poirier

, et al. (2002) Protective immunity against atherosclerosis carried by B cells of hypercholesterolemic mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 109: 745–753. DOI: 10.1172/jci7272.

136.

Binder

Hörkkö

Dewan

, et al. (2003) Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nature medicine 9: 736–743. DOI: 10.1038/nm876.

137.

Witztum

(2002) Splenic immunity and atherosclerosis: a glimpse into a novel paradigm? Journal of Clinical Investigation 109: 721–724. DOI: 10.1172/jci15310.

138.

Major

Fazio

Linton

(2002) B-lymphocyte deficiency increases atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-null mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 22: 1892–1898. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000039169.47943.ee.

139.

Sage

Mallat

(2014) Multiple potential roles for B cells in atherosclerosis. Annals of medicine 46: 297–303. DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2014.900272.

140.

Zhang

Wang

(2015) Roles of antibody against oxygenized low density lipoprotein in atherosclerosis: recent advances. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine 8: 11922.

141.

Kovanen

Mänttäri

Palosuo

, et al. (1998) Prediction of myocardial infarction in dyslipidemic men by elevated levels of immunoglobulin classes A, E, and G, but not M. Archives of internal medicine 158: 1434–1439. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.13.1434.

142.

Houtkamp

de Boer

van der Loos

, et al. (2000) Adventitial infiltrates associated with advanced atherosclerotic plaques: structural organization suggests generation of local humoral immune responses. The Journal of pathology. The Journal of pathology 193: 263–269. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9896().

143.

Engelbertsen

Lichtman

(2017) Innate lymphoid cells in atherosclerosis. European journal of pharmacology 816: 32–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.04.030.

144.

Soehnlein

(2012) Multiple roles for neutrophils in atherosclerosis. Circulation research 110: 875–888. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.111.257535.

145.

Chistiakov

Bobryshev

Orekhov

, et al. (2015) Neutrophil's weapons in atherosclerosis. Experimental and Molecular Pathology 99: 663–671.

146.

Kougias

Chai

Lin

, et al. (2005) Defensins and cathelicidins: Neutrophil peptides with roles in inflammation, hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 9: 3–10.

147.

Moschonas

Tselepis

(2019) The pathway of neutrophil extracellular traps towards atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Atherosclerosis 288: 9–16.

148.

Mostafa

Osama

Medicine (2020) The implications of neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. Experimental Biology and Medicine 245: 1376–1384.

149.

Döring

Soehnlein

Weber

(2017) Neutrophil extracellular traps in atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. Circulation Research 120: 736–743.

150.

Yang

Zhang

(2017) Neutrophil extracellular traps and endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Frontiers in Immunology 8: 928.

Immune system and atherosclerosis: Hostile or friendly relationship

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Contribution of the immune system to atherosclerosis: From the first step to the last

Immune cells in the atherosclerotic plaque

Macrophages

Mast cells

Dendritic cells

T lymphocytes

B lymphocytes

Innate lymphoid cells (ILC)

Platelets and neutrophils

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References