Surgery for Peyronie'S Disease: Comparison of Results

Abstract

Many, varied techniques have been used over the years in the surgical treatment of Induratio Penis Plastica (IPP). From December 1994 to March 1998, 83 patients were operated for IPP and assessed with an average follow-up of 20 months (range 2–24). Results were analysed, the overall assessment taking into consideration not only the objective clinical finding by the doctor, but also the degree of satisfaction expressed by patients. The patients were given a subjective self-assessment test considering the pre and post-operative changes in the following parameters: rigidity, curvature, glandular sensitivity, length of penis and satisfaction with general result. Another doctor in the department (not the operator) clinically assessed the same parameters during follow-up. Results showed that the above parameters were more favourable in patients operated for plaque and incision of the same than in those who had undergone removal. The subjective version of almost all patients and the clinical follow-up assessment were, however, in disagreement with these results. Moreover, only 60% of patients reported that they were generally satisfied. The subjective and objective assessment by the patients and doctor respectively are not always in agreement, highlighting the fact that patient satisfaction is sometimes unrelated to the clinical evaluation of “success” of the surgical option. In IPP therapy, results for the patient would seem to be better when less aggressive surgery is carried out on the plaque as described, i.e. with minimum dissection of the anatomical structures of the penis.