In future, the function of collagen-based biomaterials as temporary scaffolds for the generation of new tissue may be emphasized. In this study the function of dermal sheep collagen (DSC) crosslinked with carbodiimide (ENDSC) as repair material for abdominal wall defects in rats was compared with that of commercial hexamethylenediisocyanate-crosslinked HDSC. The results indicate that early after implantation both ENDSC and HDSC functioned well as a matrix for cellular ingrowth. However during further implantation HDSC soon degraded resulting in herniations, while ENDSC showed a delay in the degradation time of at least 20 weeks. ENDSC thereby enabled collagen new-formation and functioned as a guidance for muscle overgrowth. These results are very promising concerning the problem of the ongoing foreign body reaction with continuing risk of implant rejection observed in clinical practice with non-degradable materials.
ChvapilM., KronenthalR.L., Van WinkleW.. Medical and surgical applications of collagen.Int Rev Conn Tissue Res.HallDA, JacksonDS, eds. London: Academic Press, UK 1973; 6: 1–61.
2.
HucA.. Collagen biomaterials: characteristics and applications.J Am Leather Chem Assoc1985; 80: 195–212.
3.
PharrissB.B.. Collagen as a biomaterial.J Am Leather Chem Assoc1980; 75: 474–85.
4.
JenkinsS.D., KlamerT.W., PartejaJ.J., CondonR.E.. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects.Surgery1983; 94: 392–8.
5.
LambJ.P., VitaleT., KaminskiD.L.. Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal wall replacement.Surgery1983; 93: 643–8.
6.
Van der LeiB., BleichrodtR.P., SimmermacherR.K.J., van SchilfgaardeR.. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of large abdominal wall defects.Br J Surg1989; 76: 803–5.
7.
SimmermacherR.K.J., BleichrodtR.P., SchakenraadJ.M.. Review: Biomaterials for abdominal wall reconstruction.Cell and Materials1992; 2, 4: 281–90.
StoneH.H., FabianT.C., TurklesonM.L., JirkiewiczM.J.. Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall.Ann Surg1981; 193: 612–8.
10.
TyrellJ., SilbermanH., ChandrasomaP., NilandJ., ShullJ.. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations.Surg Gyn & Obs1989; 168: 227–32.
11.
SmithS., GantN., RoweMl, LloydD.A.. Dura versus Goretex as an abdominal wall prosthesis in an open and closed infected model.J Ped Surg1989; 24: 519–21.
12.
Van LuynM.J.A., Van WachemP.B., Olde DaminkL., Ten HoopenH., FeijenJ., NieuwenhuisP.. Methylcellulose culture as a new cytotoxicity test system for biomaterials.J Mater Sci Mater in Med1991; 2: 142–8.
13.
Van LuynM.J.A., Van WachemP.B., Olde DaminkL., FeijenJ., NieuwenhuisP.. Enzyme-pretreatment remove cytotoxic effects of dermal sheep collagen.CimaL.G., RonE., eds. Symposium proceedings tissue inducing biomaterials.Boston: Materials Research Society, USA, 1992; 252: 167–74.
14.
Van LuynM.J.A., Van WachemP.B., Olde DaminkL., DijkstraP.J., FeijenJ., NieuwenhuisP.. Relations between in vitro cytotoxicity and crosslinking of collagen. J.Biomed Mater Res1992; 26: 8, 1091–10.
15.
Van LuynM.J.A., Van WachemP.B., Olde DaminkL., DijkstraP.J., FeijenJ., NieuwenhuisP.. Secondary cytotoxicity of (crosslinked) dermal sheep collagen during repeated exposure to human fibroblasts.Biomaterials1992; 13: 14, 1017–24.
16.
Van der LaanJ.S., van WachemP.B., SchakenraadJ.M.. Functional evaluation of degradable and non-degradable meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat.Abstract Neth J Surg1990; 42: 26.
17.
Van der LaanJ.S., LopezG.P., van WachemP.B.TFE-plasma polymerized dermal sheep collagen for the repair of abdominal wall defects.Int J Artif Organs1991; 14: 661–6.
18.
Van WachemP.B., van LuynM.J.A., KoertenH.K.In vivo degradation of processed dermal sheep collagen evaluated with transmission electron microscopy.Biomaterials1991; 12: 215–23.
19.
Van WachemP.B., van LuynM.J.A., KoertenH.K.Tissue interactions with dermal sheep collagen implants: a transmission electron microscopial evaluation.Cell and Materials1991; 1: 3, 251–63.
20.
Van WachemP.B., van LuynM.J.A., Olde DaminkL.H.H., DijkstraP.J., FeijenJ., NieuwenhuisP.. In vivo interactions with (tissue culture pretreated) dermal sheep collagen.CimaL.G., RonE., eds. Symposium Proceedings Tissue Inducing biomaterials'.Boston: Materials Research Society, USA, 1992: 252: 117–24.
21.
Van WachemP.B., van LuynM.J.A., KoertenH.K.Biocompatibility and tissue regenerating capacity of crosslinked dermal sheep collagen.J Biomed Mater Res1994; 3: 353–63.
22.
Olde DamininkL.H.H., DijkstraP.J., van LuynM.J.A., van WachemP.B., NieuwenhuisP., FeijenJ.. In vitro comparison of collagen crosslinking methods. Fourth World Biomaterials Congress, Berlin, Germany.April 24-28, 1992; 45(Abstract).
23.
Olde DaminkL.H.H., DijkstraP.J., van LuynM.J.A.Crosslinking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide, submitted to Biomaterials.
24.
Van GulikT.M.. The processing of sheepskin for use as a dermal collagen graft.Neth J Surg1987; 39: 90–4.
25.
Van GulikT.M., ChristianoR.A., BroekhuizenA.H., RaaymakersELFB, KlopperP.J.. A tanned sheep dermal collagen graft as a dressing for split-skin graft donor sites.Neth J Surg1989; 41: 65–7.
26.
GerritsP.O., van LeeuwenM.B.M.. Glycol methacrylate embedding in histo-technology; factors which influence the evolution of heat during polymerization at room temperature.J Microsc1985; 139: 303–11.
27.
LawP.K.Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of myoblast transfer therapy on Duchenne muscular dystrophy boys.Cell Transplantation1992; 1, 2/3: 235–44.
