Abstract
Background
The Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (Escala Brasileira de Insegurança Alimentar, EBIA) is widely used to assess food insecurity (FI) in Brazil and has demonstrated strong internal and external validity. However, evidence regarding its measurement invariance across different population groups remains limited.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the invariance of the 8-item EBIA by sex, race, and education of household members, using data from the 2013 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (n = 116 543).
Methods
The sample was split into three independent subsamples, and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and the alignment method were employed to test for measurement invariance across groups. Households were classified according to the composition of residents based on each variable.
Results
Findings indicated that the EBIA exhibits configural and scalar invariance across all three groupings. Although the alignment method identified a few localized violations, over 80% of parameters were invariant, suggesting approximate invariance.
Conclusions
We conclude that EBIA demonstrates broad measurement invariance across sex, race, and education, supporting valid comparisons of FI scores among these subpopulations. These findings reinforce the psychometric robustness of EBIA as a tool for monitoring FI in diverse sociodemographic contexts.
Plain language title
Can We Trust the Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale to Compare Groups by Sex, Race, and Education? An Analysis Using National Data
Plain language summary
The Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (EBIA) is widely used to assess food insecurity among families. Though this is a very widely used measure, whether the tool enables valid comparisons between different groups of people, as defined by gender, race, and education is yet to be known. This study analyzed data from over 116 000 Brazilian families to determine whether the EBIA measures food insecurity equally well across these groups. The results showed that the scale works consistently well for men and women, different races, and people with different levels of education. Thus, the study confirms that the EBIA is a valid and reliable tool for monitoring food insecurity among different population groups in Brazil.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
