Outcomes of Surgical Repair Versus Primary Tenodesis for Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsion Injuries in Professional Athletes

Abstract

Background:

Surgical repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries is associated with prolonged periods of rehabilitation and highly variable risk of injury recurrence. Surgical tenodesis of these injuries is often reserved for recurrent injuries or revision surgery. To our knowledge, the outcomes of proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries treated with surgical repair versus primary tenodesis have not been previously reported.

Hypothesis:

Primary tenodesis of proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries is associated with reduced risk of injury recurrence as compared with surgical repair.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study included 25 patients (22 male and 3 female) who underwent surgical repair versus 30 patients (26 male and 4 female) who received primary tenodesis for proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries. Predefined outcomes were recorded at regular intervals after surgery. Mean follow-up time was 27.9 months (range, 24.0-31.7 months) from date of surgery.

Results:

All patients returned to their preinjury levels of sporting activity. Primary tenodesis was associated with earlier return to preinjury level of sporting function as compared with surgical repair (mean ± SD, 12.4 ± 1.6 vs 15.8 ± 2.2 weeks; P < .001) and reduced risk of recurrence (0% vs 16%; P < .001). At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in surgical repair versus primary tenodesis relating to patient satisfaction scores (12 very satisfied and 13 satisfied vs 16 very satisfied and 14 satisfied; P = .70), isometric quadriceps strength (95.6% ± 2.8% vs 95.2% ± 6.3%; P = .31), Tegner scores (median [interquartile range], 9 [8-9] vs 9 [8-9]; P = .54), and lower extremity functional scores (73 [72-76] vs 74 [72-75]; P = .41). High patient satisfaction, quadriceps muscle strength, and functional outcome scores were maintained and remained comparable between treatment groups at 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion:

Primary tenodesis was associated with reduced time for return to preinjury level of sporting function and decreased risk of injury recurrence when compared with surgical repair for proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries. There were no differences in patient satisfaction, functional outcome scores, and quadriceps muscle strength between the treatment groups at 1- and 2-year follow-up.