The ACL Graft Has Different Cross-sectional Dimensions Compared With the Native ACL

Abstract

Background:

Impingement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts against the femoral notch and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is thought to be influenced primarily by tunnel position and graft orientation. Recent data have implied that the native ACL is ribbon-shaped.

Purpose:

To evaluate the 3-dimensional shape and cross-sectional area of the native ACL versus the ACL graft and to compare the degree of impingement against the femoral notch and PCL.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Bilateral knee magnetic resonance images were analyzed for 27 patients with unilateral bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction performed via transtibial or anteromedial portal femoral tunneling techniques. Three-dimensional models of the ACL, PCL, femur, and tibia were digitally rendered. The cross-sectional area and dimensions of the native ACL and the reconstructed graft were determined at 3 equally spaced locations and compared via Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. In addition, impingement of the ACL on the PCL and femoral notch was graded in 3 groups. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare the proportional differences of impingement of the native and reconstructed ACL on the PCL and femoral notch, respectively. All analyses were performed using 2-sided hypothesis testing, with statistical significance at P < .05.

Results:

Cross-sectional areas at all 3 points on the ACL graft were significantly greater than those of the native ACL (P < .001). The long- to short-axis ratio for the native ACL was significantly greater at each location compared with the corresponding locations along the ACL graft (P < .001), implying that the native ACL is “flatter” than is an ACL graft. There were 19 operated knees (70%) with contact or impingement between the ACL graft and the femoral notch compared with zero knees with a native ACL (P < .001). In addition, 22 operated knees (81%) showed contact or impingement between the ACL graft and the PCL, compared with 7 knees (26%) with a native ACL (P < .001). No significant differences in impingement frequency were noted between the transtibial and anteromedial tunneling techniques for ACL graft specimens (P > .05).

Conclusion:

Native ACLs have a smaller cross-sectional area, are “flatter,” and experience less incidence of impingement compared with anatomically placed BPTB ACL grafts.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)impingement cross-sectional dimensions ACL graft

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asano

Akagi

Tanaka

Tamura

Nakamura

. In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:157-166.

Astur

Santos

Aleluia

. Characterization of cruciate ligament impingement: the influence of femoral or tibial tunnel positioning at different degrees of knee flexion. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(5):913-919.

Ayerza

Muscolo

Costa-Paz

Makino

Rondon

. Comparison of sagittal obliquity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):257-261.

Bowers

Bedi

Lipman

. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(11):1511-1522.

Fujimoto

Sumen

Deie

Yasumoto

Kobayashi

Ochi

. Anterior cruciate ligament graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis using MRI plus three-dimensional reconstruction software. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(8):1125-1129.

George

Dunn

Spindler

. Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):2026-2037.

Goss

Howell

Hull

. Quadriceps load aggravates and roofplasty mitigates active impingement of anterior cruciate ligament grafts against the intercondylar roof. J Orthop Res. 1998;16(5):611-617.

Goss

Hull

Howell

. Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(2):263-268.

Howell

. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S49-S55.

10.

Howell

Clark

Farley

. A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):276-282.

11.

Howell

Taylor

. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(7):1044-1055.

12.

Iriuchishima

. ACL graft impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):NP3; author reply NP3-4.

13.

Iriuchishima

Shirakura

. Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):664-670.

14.

Iriuchishima

Tajima

Ingham

Shen

Smolinski

. Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(8):1611-1617.

15.

Iriuchishima

Tajima

Ingham

Shirakura

FH.

PCL to graft impingement pressure after anatomical or non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(5):964-969.

16.

Iwahashi

Shino

Nakata

. Direct anterior cruciate ligament insertion to the femur assessed by histology and 3-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9 suppl):S13-S20.

17.

Jagodzinski

Leis

Iselborn

Mall

Nerlich

Bosch

. Impingement pressure and tension forces of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(2):85-90.

18.

Jagodzinski

Richter

Passler

. Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(1):11-19.

19.

Kropf

Shen

van Eck

Musahl

Irrgang

. ACL-PCL and intercondylar notch impingement: magnetic resonance imaging of native and double-bundle ACL-reconstructed knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):720-725.

20.

Mochizuki

Fujishiro

Nimura

. Anatomic and histologic analysis of the mid-substance and fan-like extension fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament during knee motion, with special reference to the femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(2):336-344.

21.

Mochizuki

Muneta

Nagase

Shirasawa

Akita

Sekiya

. Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(4):356-361.

22.

Nishimori

Sumen

Sakaridani

Nakamura

. An evaluation of reconstructed ACL impingement on PCL using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(5):722-726.

23.

Pujol

Queinnec

Boisrenoult

Maqdes

Beaufils

. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament related to hamstring tendon grafts: a cadaveric study. Knee. 2013;20(6):511-514.

24.

Sasaki

Ishibashi

Tsuda

. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(8):1135-1146.

25.

Siebold

Schuhmacher

Fernandez

. Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial “C”-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3136-3142.

26.

Sonnery-Cottet

Archbold

Cucurulo

. The influence of the tibial slope and the size of the intercondylar notch on rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(11):1475-1478.

27.

Strobel

Castillo

Weiler

. Reflex extension loss after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to femoral “high noon” graft placement. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(4):408-411.

28.

Triantafyllidi

Paschos

Goussia

. The shape and the thickness of the anterior cruciate ligament along its length in relation to the posterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1963-1973.