The patellar tendon is often considered the “gold standard” graft for reducing the risk of graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, its use may also be associated with an increased risk of injury to the contralateral ACL.
Purpose:
To clarify the association between graft choice and the risk of revision and contralateral ACL reconstruction.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
Prospective data captured by the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and December 2018 were reviewed. All primary ACL reconstructions performed using either a hamstring tendon or patellar tendon autograft were included. Cox regression survival analysis adjusting for patient factors was performed to compare the risk of revision and contralateral ACL reconstruction between the hamstring tendon graft and the patellar tendon graft.
Results:
A total of 7155 primary ACL reconstructions were reviewed, of which 5563 (77.7%) were performed using a hamstring tendon graft and 1592 (22.3%) were performed using a patellar tendon graft. Patients with a hamstring tendon graft had a revision rate of 2.7% compared with 1.3% in patients with a patellar tendon graft (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; 95% CI, 1.55-4.06; P < .001). The patellar tendon graft was associated with an increased risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction compared with the hamstring tendon graft (adjusted HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.15-3.16; P = .012). The number needed to treat (NNT) with a patellar tendon graft to prevent 1 revision was 73.6. However, the NNT with a hamstring tendon graft to prevent 1 contralateral reconstruction was 116.3.
Conclusion:
Use of a patellar tendon graft reduced the risk of graft rupture but was associated with an increased risk of injury to the contralateral ACL. Adequate rehabilitation and informed decision making on return to activity and injury prevention measures may be important in preventing subsequent injury to the healthy knee.
AndernordDBjörnssonHPetzoldM, et al. Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(7):1574-1582.
2.
AndernordDDesaiNBjörnssonHYlanderMKarlssonJSamuelssonK. Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):121-127.
3.
BjörnssonHSamuelssonKSundemoD, et al. A randomized controlled trial with mean 16-year follow-up comparing hamstring and patellar tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(9):2304-2313.
4.
BourkeHESalmonLJWallerAPattersonVPinczewskiLA. Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(9):1985-1992.
5.
CarmichaelJRCrossMJ. Why bone-patella tendon-bone grafts should still be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):323-325.
6.
ClatworthyMGAnnearPBulowJ-UBartlettRJ. Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(3):138-145.
7.
ConnellRPatonBMilneR. Return to play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Incorporating fatigue into a return to play functional battery. Part A: Treadmill running. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5(1):e000375.
8.
DesaiNAndernordDSundemoD, et al. Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5):1542-1554.
9.
FältströmAHägglundMMagnussonHForssbladMKvistJ. Predictors for additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish National ACL Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(3):885-894.
10.
FellerJAWebsterKE. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(4):564-573.
11.
FreedmanKBSpindlerKPMatthewsCEHarrellFEKuhnJEDittusRS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1986-1995.
12.
GenuarioJWFaucettSCBoublikMSchlegelTF. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 3 anterior cruciate ligament graft types. Am J Sports Med. 2011;40(2):307-314.
13.
GifstadTFossOAEngebretsenL, et al. Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2319-2328.
14.
GobbiAFranciscoR. Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1021-1028.
15.
GoldblattJPFitzsimmonsSEBalkERichmondJC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):791-803.
16.
HerzogMMMarshallSWLundJLPateVMackCDSpangJT. Trends in incidence of ACL reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health. 2018;10(6):523-531.
17.
HewettTESamuelsenBTKrychAJWebsterKEJohnsonNR. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2459-2468
18.
HospodarMSJMillerMD. Controversies in ACL reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains the gold standard. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009;17(4):242-246.
19.
JanssenRPvan MelickNvan MourikJBReijmanMvan RhijnLW. Similar clinical outcome between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with accelerated, brace-free rehabilitation: a systematic review. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med. 2017;2:308-317.
20.
L’InsalataJCKlattBFuFHHarnerCD. Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5:234-238.
21.
LabouteEJames-BelinEPuigPLTrouvePVerhaegheE. Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:3537-3546.
22.
LaxdalGSernertNEjerhedLKarlssonJKartusJT. A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:115-125.
23.
LeysTSalmonLWallerALinklaterJPinczewskiL. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):595-605.
24.
LiSZSuWZhaoJ, et al. A meta-analysis of hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee. 2011;18:287-293.
25.
MaletisGBChenJInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):331-336.
26.
MaletisGBInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):641-647.
27.
MarxRGStumpTJJonesECWickiewiczTLWarrenRF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(2):213-218.
28.
MohtadiNChanDBarberRPaolucciEO. Reruptures, reinjuries, and revisions at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(2):96-107.
29.
MohtadiNGChanDSDaintyKNWhelanDB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005960.
NoyesFRButlerDLGroodESZernickeRFHefzyMS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:344-352.
33.
PerssonAFjeldsgaardKGjertsenJE, et al. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):285-291.
34.
PinczewskiLALymanJSalmonLJRussellVJRoeJLinklaterJ. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):564-574.
35.
PinczewskiLASalmonLJRussellVJClingelefferADeehanDJ. A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2017;30(4):523-536.
36.
Rahr-WagnerLThillemannTMPedersenABLindM. Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the Danish Registry of Knee Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):278-284.
37.
RosenbergTDFranklinJLBaldwinGNNelsonKA. Extensor mechanism function after patellar tendon graft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(5):519-526.
38.
SachsRADanielDMStoneMLGarfeinRF. Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(6):760-765.
39.
SadeghpourAEbrahimpourAAttarBAzizianZ. Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:105.
40.
SajovicMStropnikDSkazaK. Long-term comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 17-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):1800-1808.
41.
SalmonLRussellVMusgroveTPinczewskiLRefshaugeK. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):948-957.
42.
ShermanOHBanffyMB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: which graft is best?Arthroscopy. 2004;20(9):974-980.
43.
SpindlerKPKuhnJEFreedmanKBMatthewsCEDittusRSHarrellFE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring. Does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1986-1995.
44.
TayGWarrierSMarquisG. Indirect patella fractures following ACL reconstruction: a review. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(3):494-500.
45.
TaylorDCDeberardinoTMNelsonBJ, et al. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1946-1957.
46.
ThompsonSMSalmonLJWallerALinklaterJRoeJPPinczewskiLA. Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(12):3083-3094.
47.
WebsterKEFellerJAHameisterKA. Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:86-91.
48.
WebsterKEFellerJAHartnettNLeighWBRichmondAK. Comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):83-90.
49.
WestRVHarnerCD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):197-207.
50.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKStanfieldDWebsterKEMyerGD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1861-1876.
51.
WrightRWDunnWRAmendolaA, et al. Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1131-1134.
52.
XieXLiuXChenZYuYPengSLiQ. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015;22:100-110.
53.
YunesMRichmondJCEngelsEAPinczewskiLA. Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2002;17(3):248-257.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
