AbouljoudMMEverhartJSSigmanBOet al. Risk of retear following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hybrid graft of autograft augmented with allograft tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(10):2927-2935.
2.
ArnoczkySP. The biology of graft incorporation. J Knee Surg. 2006;19(3):207-214.
3.
ArnoczkySPWarrenRFAshlockMA. Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using a patellar tendon allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):376-385.
4.
BottoniCRSmithELShahaJet al. Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2501-2509.
5.
BurrusMTWernerBCCrowAJet al. Increased failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft-tissue autograft-allograft hybrid grafts. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(12):2342-2351.
6.
DarnleyJELeger-St-JeanBPedrozaADet al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft tendon: a MOON cohort study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(7):2325967116662249.
7.
DiBartolaACEverhartJSKaedingCCet al. Maximum load to failure of high dose versus low dose gamma irradiation of anterior cruciate ligament allografts: a meta-analysis. Knee. 2016;23(5):755-762.
8.
EngelmanGHCarryPMHittKGPolouskyJDVidalAF. Comparison of allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft survival in an active adolescent cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2311-2318.
9.
JacksonDWGroodESGoldsteinJDet al. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(2):176-185.
10.
JacobsCABurnhamJMMakhniEet al. Allograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):892-899.
11.
KraeutlerMJKimSHBrownCCet al. Clinical outcomes following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft versus planned hybrid graft. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(9):827-833.
12.
KrishnaLTanXYWongFKLTohSJ. A 5-strand hamstring autograft achieves outcomes comparable to those of a 4-strand hamstring autograft with a graft diameter of 8 mm or more in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(3):2325967118760815.
13.
LamblinCJWatermanBRLubowitzJH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1113-1122.
LeeRJGanleyTJ. The 5-strand hamstring graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(5):e627-e631.
16.
LeoBMKrillMBarksdaleLAlvarez-PinzonAM. Failure rate and clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstring versus a hybrid graft. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2357-2363.
17.
LiHTaoHChoSet al. Difference in graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 2 years postoperatively: a comparison between autografts and allografts in young men using clinical and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1519-1526.
18.
MagnussenRALawrenceJTRWestRLTothAPTaylorDCGarrettWE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):526-531.
19.
MaletisGBChenJInacioMCSet al. Increased risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft tissue allografts compared with autografts: graft processing and time make a difference. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(8):1837-1844.
20.
MaletisGBChenJInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 21,304 patients from the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):331-336.
21.
MaletisGBInacioMCSFunahashiTT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):641-647.
22.
MariscalcoMWFlaniganDCMitchellJet al. The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):1948-1953.
23.
MuramatsuKHachiyaYIzawaH. Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1038-1044.
24.
PennockATHoBParvantaKet al. Does allograft augmentation of small-diameter hamstring autograft ACL grafts reduce the incidence of graft retear?Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):334-338.
25.
PerkinsCABuschMTChristinoMHerzogMMWillimonSC. Allograft augmentation of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts is associated with increased graft failure in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(7):1576-1582.
26.
SnaebjörnssonTHamrin SenorskiHAyeniORet al. Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register based on 2240 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2092-2097.
27.
SpraggLChenJMirzayanRLoveRMaletisG. The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1475-1481.
28.
SunKZhangJWangYet al. A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):187-194.
29.
WangHDGaoSJZhangYZ. Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hybrid graft versus a hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1508-1516.
30.
WebsterKEFellerJALeighWBRichmondAK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):641-647.
31.
WigginsAJGrandhiRKSchneiderDKet al. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1861-1876.
