Background: The perception of improvement by a patient has assumed a central role in functional evaluation after a variety of knee problems. One of the instruments most used in clinical research is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form because its psychometric properties are considered to be excellent. Nonetheless, this questionnaire was originally developed for use in the English language. Therefore, to use this questionnaire in the Brazilian population, it is essential to translate and validate it.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to translate the IKDC Subjective Knee Form into a Brazilian version and to test its validity and reproducibility.
Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: The translation of the original IKDC Subjective Knee Form into a Brazilian version was accomplished in accordance with the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine guidelines and was tested in 32 patients with knee pathologic conditions to develop the first Brazilian version. To test validity and reproducibility, 117 patients with several knee complaints completed the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Lysholm score. From these patients, 85 were retested within a week to achieve reproducibility. The validation was addressed by correlating the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form to the other outcome measures. The reproducibility was tested by measuring internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and agreement.
Results: The Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form was highly related to the physical component summary of the SF-36, the Lysholm score, and the WOMAC, and weakly related to the mental component summary of SF-36 (r = .79, .89, .85, and .51, respectively). The internal consistency was strong, with a Cronbach α value of .928 and .935 in the test and retest assessment, respectively. The test-retest reliability proved to be excellent, with a high value of the intraclass correlation coefficient (.988), as well as the agreement, demonstrated by the low differences between the means of the test and retest, and the short limit of agreement, observed in the Altman-Bland and survival-agreement plots.
Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence that the Brazilian IKDC Subjective Knee Form has psychometric properties similar to the original version. In addition, it was a reliable evaluation instrument for patients with knee-related problems.
AltmanDGBlandJM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307-317.
2.
BeatonDEBombardierCGuilleminFFerrazMB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
3.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
4.
CiconelliRMFerrazMBSantosWSMeinãoIQuaresmaMR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol. 1999;39:143-150.
5.
CronbachLJMeehlPE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281-302.
6.
DawsonEGCladerTJBassettLW. A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67:1153-1159.
7.
de VetHCWTerweeCBBouterLM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1137-1141.
8.
FernandesMI. Tradução e validação do questionário de qualidade de vida específico para osteoartrose WOMAC (Western Ontário McMaster Universities) para a língua portuguesa [Master’s dissertation]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina; 2003.
9.
GrecoNJAndersonAFMannBJ. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2009Dec31 [Epub ahead of print].
10.
GuilleminFBombardierCBeatonD. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417-1432.
11.
HaverkampDSiereveltINBreugemSJLohuisKBlankevoortLvan DijkCN. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1680-1684.
12.
HeftiFMullerWJakobRPStaubliHU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:226-234.
13.
IrrgangJJAndersonAFBolandAL. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-613.
14.
LertwanichPPraphruetkitTKeyurapanELamsamCKulthananT. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:1218-1225.
15.
LuizRRCostaAJLKalePLWerneckGL. Assessment of agreement of a quantitative variable: a new graphical approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(10):593-597.
16.
PaduaRBondiRCeccarelliE. Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:819-823.
17.
PeccinMSCiconelliRCohenM. Questionário específico para sintomas do joelho “Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale”: tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa. Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14:268-272.
18.
SugarbakerPHBarofskyIRosenbergSAGianolaFJ. Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials. Surgery. 1982;91:17-23.
19.
TannerSMDaintyKNMarxRGKirkleyA. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients?Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1450-1458.
