This article discusses gender in relation to culturally derived scripts that contribute to identity confusion. This exploration is aided by the postmodernist perspectives of several authors who critique the notion of gender as a fixed aspect of identity. Gender is considered as a projection of cultural scripting, which influences the ways in which identity is expressed. Through the lens of Drego’s (1996) model of group culture (developed from Berne, 1963), the author offers suggestions for working with internalized cultural influences that are expressed in gendered behaviors and given gendered meaning. She proposes that psychotherapists consider their own gender scripting and, for the benefit of therapeutic practice, develop their own psychological androgyny.
AllenJ. R.AllenB. A. (1995). Narrative theory, redecision therapy, and postmodernism. Transactional Analysis Journal, 25, 327–334.
2.
BarnesG. (2004). Homosexuality in the first three decades of transactional analysis: A study of theory in the practice of transactional analysis psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 34, 126–155.
3.
BenjaminJ. (1988). The bonds of love. New York, NY: Pantheon.
4.
BenjaminJ. (1998). The shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BenjaminJ. (2002). Sameness and difference: An overinclusive view of gender constitution. In DimenM.GoldnerV. (Eds.), Gender in psychoanalytic space (pp. 181–206). New York, NY: Other Press.
6.
BerneE. (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York, NY: Grove Press.
7.
Birksted-BreenD. (Ed.). (1993). The gender conundrum: Contemporary psychoanalytic perspectives on femininity and masculinity. Hove, England: Routledge.
8.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
Chasseguet-SmirgelJ. (1993). Freud and female sexuality: The consideration of some blind spots in the exploration of the “dark continent.” In Birksted-BreenD. (Ed.), The gender conundrum: Contemporary psychoanalytic perspectives on femininity and masculinity (pp. 105–129). Hove, England: Routledge.
10.
ChodorowN. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
DimenM. (2003). Sexuality, intimacy, power. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
12.
DregoP. (1983). The cultural parent. Transactional Analysis Journal, 13, 224–227.
13.
DregoP. (1996). Cultural parent oppression and regeneration. Transactional Analysis Journal, 26, 58–77.
14.
DregoP. (2009). Bonding the ethnic child with the universal parent: Strategies and ethos of a transactional analysis ecocommunity activist. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39, 193–206.
15.
GoldnerV. (2002). Toward a critical relational theory of gender. In DimenM.GoldnerV. (Eds.), Gender in psychoanalytic space (pp. 63–90). New York, NY: Other Press.
LaytonL. (1997). The doer behind the deed. Gender and Psychoanalysis, 2, 131–156.
24.
LaytonL. (2002). Gendered subjects, gendered agents: Toward an integration of postmodern theory and relational analytic practice. In DimenM.GoldnerV. (Eds.), Gender in psychoanalytic space (pp. 285–311). New York, NY: Other Press.
25.
LernerH. E. (1984). Early origins of envy and devaluation of women: Implications for sex-role stereotypes. In Perri RiekerP.CarmenE. (Eds.), The gender gap in psychotherapy: Social realities and psychological processes (pp. 111–124). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
26.
NovellinoM. (1987). Redecision analysis of transference: The unconscious dimension. Transactional Analysis Journal, 17, 211–271.
27.
NovellinoM. (1990). Unconscious communication and interpretation in transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 20, 168–172.
28.
StuthridgeJ. (2017). Falling apart and getting it together: The dialectics of disintegration and integration in script change and self-development. Transactional Analysis Journal, 47, 19–31.
29.
SummertonO. (1979). Transactional analysis: A introduction to basic concepts. New Delhi, India: Manohar.
30.
TudorK. (2003). The neopsyche: The integrating adult ego state. In SillsC.HargadenH. (Eds.), Ego states(Vol. 1 of Key concepts in transactional analysis: Contemporary views) (pp. 201–231). London, England: Worth Publishing.
