The way that missionaries manage their identities has changed significantly since the days they mailed out several printed newsletters a year to a small audience “back home.” The space for this negotiation of identity has moved from private to public; and the interlocutors who access these blogs, emails, and posts are no longer homogenous. This original research study uses quantitative and qualitative methods to understand how missionaries avow the multiple layers of their identities in the digital age. I conclude that missionary updates are encoded along indexical “cultural scripts” that can be decoded idiosyncratically by various audiences.
GarciaV (2011) Young missionary recounts PNG experience. August1.
3.
HigginsC (2011) Constructing membership in the in-group: Affiliation and resistance among urban Tanzanians. In HuaZ (ed.) The Language and Intercultural Communication Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 291–306.
4.
JacksonJ (2014) Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication. New York: Routledge.
ScollonRScollonS (2011) Interpersonal politeness and power. In HuaZ (ed.) The Language and Intercultural Communication Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 64–76.
14.
Ting-ToomeyS (2005) Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries. In GudykunstW (ed.) Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 211–33.
YouyouWKosinskiMStillwellD (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences of the United States of America112(4): 1036–40.
