Objectification has been conceptualized as a form of insidious trauma, but the specific relationships among objectification experiences, self-objectification, and trauma symptoms have not yet been investigated. Participants were women with (n = 136) and without (n = 201) a history of sexual trauma. They completed a survey measuring trauma history, objectification experiences (body evaluation and unwanted sexual advances), constructs associated with self-objectification (body surveillance and body shame), and trauma symptoms. The relationships among the variables were consistent for both women with and without a history of sexual trauma. Our hypothesized path model fit equally well for both groups. Examination of the indirect effects showed that experiencing unwanted sexual advances was indirectly related to trauma symptoms through body shame for those with and without a history of sexual trauma. Additionally, for women with a history of sexual trauma, the experience of body evaluation was indirectly related to trauma symptoms through the mediating variables of body surveillance and body shame. The data indicate that the experience of sexual objectification is a type of gender-based discrimination with sequelae that can be conceptualized as insidious trauma. Clinicians may consider the impact of these everyday traumatic experiences when working with women who have clinical symptoms but no overt trauma history.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.) Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AndrewsB. (1995). Bodily shame as a mediator between abusive experiences and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 277–283. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.104.2.277
4.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi:10.1037/a0014637
5.
BandermannK. M.SzymanskiD. M. (2014). Exploring coping mediators between heterosexist oppression and posttraumatic stress symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 213–224. doi:10.1037/sgd0000044
6.
BargaiN.Ben-ShakharG.ShalevA. Y. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in battered women: The mediating role of learned helplessness. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 267–275. doi:10.1007/s10896-00709078-y
7.
BenekeT. (1982). Men on rape: What they have to say about sexual violence. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
8.
BoalsA.SchuettlerD. (2009). PTSD symptoms in response to traumatic and non-traumatic events: The role of respondent perception and A2 criterion. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 458–462. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.09.003
9.
BreslauN.ChilcoatH. D.KesslerR. C.PetersonE. L.LuciaV. C. (1999). Vulnerability to assaultive violence: Further specification of the sex difference in post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine, 29, 813–821.
10.
BriereJ. (2006). Dissociative symptoms and trauma exposure. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 78–82. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000198139.47371.54
11.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Bantam/Simon and Schuster.
12.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
13.
CapodilupoC. M.NadalK. L.CormanL.HamitS.LyonsO. B.WeinbergA. (2010). The manifestation of gender microaggressions. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 193–216). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
14.
CarrE. R.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66. doi:10.1177/0011000010378449
15.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
16.
CochranC. C.FrazierP. A.OlsonM. A. (1997). Predictors of responses to unwanted sexual attention. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 207–226. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00109.x
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CortinaL. M.KubiakS. P. (2006). Gender and posttraumatic stress: Sexual violence as an explanation for women’s increased risk. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 753–759. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.753
19.
CulbertsonK. A.VikP. W.KooimanB. J. (2001). The impact of sexual assault, sexual assault perpetrator type, and location of sexual assault on ratings of perceived safety. Violence Against Women, 7, 858–875. doi:10.1177/10778010122182794
20.
ElliottD. M.BriereJ. (1992). Sexual abuse trauma among professional women: Validating the Trauma Symptom Checklist-40 (TSC-40). Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 391–398. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90048-V
21.
Engeln-MaddoxR.MillerS. A.DoyleD. M. (2011). Tests of objectification theory in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual community samples: Mixed evidence for proposed pathways. Sex Roles, 65, 518–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-9958-8
22.
ErchullM. J.LissM.LichielloS. (2013). Extending the negative consequences of media internalization and self-objectification to dissociation and self-harm. Sex Roles, 69, 583–593. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0326-8
23.
FairchildK.RudmanL. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
24.
FeiringC.TaskaL.ChenK. (2002). Trying to understand why horrible things happen: Attribution, shame, and symptom development following sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 7, 25–39. doi:10.1177/1077559502007001003
25.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
26.
GillR. (2009). Beyond the ‘sexualization’ of culture thesis: An intersectional analysis of ‘sixpacks,’ ‘midriffs’ and ‘hot lesbians’ in advertising. Sexualities, 12, 137–160. doi:10.1177/1363460708100916
27.
GoldS. R.MarxB. P.Soler-BailloJ. M.SloanD. M. (2005). Is life stress more traumatic than traumatic stress?Anxiety Disorders, 19, 678–698. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.06.002
28.
GoldS. R.MilanL. D.MayallA.JohnsonA. E. (1994). A cross-validation study of the Trauma Symptom Checklist: The role of mediating variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 12–26. doi:10.1177/088626094009001002
29.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2012). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
30.
GriffinS. (1979). Rape, the power of consciousness. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
31.
HarmanR.LeeD. (2010). The role of shame and self-critical thinking in the development and maintenance of current threat in post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 13–24. doi:10.1002/cpp.636
32.
HarnedM. S. (2000). Harassed bodies: An examination of the relationships among women’s experiences of sexual harassment, body image, and eating disturbances. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 336–348. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00216.x
33.
HickmanS. E.MuehlenhardC. L. (1997). College women’s fears and precautionary behaviors relating to acquaintance rape and stranger rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 527–547. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00129.x
34.
KossM. P. (1990). The women’s mental health research agenda: Violence against women. American Psychologist, 45, 374–380. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.3.374
35.
KossM. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198–222. doi:10.1177/088626093008002004
36.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x
37.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
38.
La BashH.PapaA. (2014). Shame and PTSD symptoms. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6, 159–166. doi:10.1037/a0032637
39.
LissM.ErchullM. J.RamseyL. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119
40.
LongM. E.ElhaiJ. D.SchweinleA.GrayM. J.GrubaughA. L.FruehB. C. (2008). Differences in posttraumatic stress disorder diagnostic rates and symptom severity between Criterion A1 and non-criterion A1 stressors. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 1255–1263. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.01.006
41.
MacmillanR.NierobiszA.WelshS. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306–322. doi:10.1177/0022427800037003003
42.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
43.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
44.
MoradiB.HuangY. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
45.
MuehlenkampJ. J.Saris-BaglamaR. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076
46.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
47.
NadalK. L. (2010). Gender microaggressions: Implications for mental health. In PaludiM. (Ed.), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide (Vol. 2, pp. 155–175). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
48.
NadalK. L.HaynesK. (2012). The effects of sexism, gender microaggressions, and other forms of discrimination on women’s mental health and development. In Lundberg-LoveP.NadalK. L.PaludiM. A. (Eds.), Women and mental disorders: Understanding women’s unique life experiences (Vol. 1, pp. 87–101). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
49.
NealT. M. S.NagleJ. E. (2013). Measuring abuse sequelae: Validating and extending the Trauma Symptom Checklist-40. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 22, 231–247. doi:10.1080/10926771.2013.764953
50.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
51.
NorrisF. H.FosterJ. D.WeishaarD. L. (2002). The epidemiology of sex differences in PTSD across developmental, societal, and research contexts. In KimerlingR.OuimetteP.WofleJ. (Eds.), Gender and PTSD (pp. 3–42). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
52.
O’DonovanA.DevillyG. J.RapeeR. M. (2007). Antecedents to women’s fear of rape. Behaviour Change, 24, 135–145. doi:10.1375/bech.24.3.135
53.
Pimlott-KubiakS.CortinaL. M. (2003). Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 528–539. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.3.528
54.
ResickP. A. (1993). The psychological impact of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 223–255. doi:10.1177/088626093008002005
55.
ResnickH. S.AciernoR.KilpatrickD. G. (1997). Health impact of interpersonal violence 2: Medical and mental health outcomes. Behavioral Medicine, 23, 65–78. doi:10.1080/08964289709596730
56.
RootM. P. P. (1992). Reconstructing the impact of trauma on personality. In BrownL. S.BailouM. (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology: Feminist reappraisals (pp. 220–265). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
57.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M. (2008). Racial, gender, and sexual orientation microaggressions: Implications for counseling and psychotherapy. In SueD. W.SueD. (Eds.), Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (pp. 105–130). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
58.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA. M. B.NadalK. L.EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
59.
SwimJ. K.CohenL. L.HyersL. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In SwimJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 37–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?! Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1370
61.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200
62.
SzymanskiD. M.BalsamK. F. (2011). Insidious trauma: Examining the relationship between heterosexism and lesbians’ PTSD symptoms. Traumatology, 17, 4–13. doi:10.1177/1534765609358464
63.
SzymanskiD. M.HenningS. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9147-3
64.
SzymanskiD. M.MoffittL. B.CarrE. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38. doi:10.1177/0011000010378402
65.
TiggemannM.KuringJ. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/0144665031752925
66.
TolinD. F.FoaE. B. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: A quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 959–992. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.959
67.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2
68.
VidalM. E.PetrakJ. (2007). Shame and adult sexual assault: A study with a group of female survivors recruited from an East London population. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 159–171. doi:10.1080/14681990600784143
69.
VranaS.LauterbachD. (1994). Prevalence of traumatic events and post-traumatic psychological symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 289–302.
70.
WeinerK. E.ThompsonJ. K. (1997). Overt and covert sexual abuse: Relationship to body image and eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 273–284. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199711)22:3<273::AID-EAT6>3.0.CO;2-K
71.
WeisK. G. (2010). Too ashamed to report: Deconstructing the shame of sexual victimization. Feminist Criminology, 5, 286–310. doi:10.1177/1557085110376343
72.
WhealinJ. M.JacksonJ. L. (2002). Childhood unwanted sexual attention and young women’s present self-concept. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 854–871. doi:10.1177/0886260502017008004
73.
WidomC. S.DuttonM. A.CzajaS. J.DuMontK. A. (2005). Development and validation of a new instrument to assess lifetime trauma and victimization history. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 519–531. doi:10.1002/jts.20060
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
